Download View poster

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup

Mutagen wikipedia , lookup

DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup

Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup

Gel electrophoresis of nucleic acids wikipedia , lookup

DNA damage theory of aging wikipedia , lookup

Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

United Kingdom National DNA Database wikipedia , lookup

Nucleosome wikipedia , lookup

DNA sequencing wikipedia , lookup

Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Cancer epigenetics wikipedia , lookup

Molecular cloning wikipedia , lookup

Mutation wikipedia , lookup

Nucleic acid analogue wikipedia , lookup

X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup

Nucleic acid double helix wikipedia , lookup

Primary transcript wikipedia , lookup

Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Tag SNP wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

Whole genome sequencing wikipedia , lookup

NEDD9 wikipedia , lookup

Gene wikipedia , lookup

Cre-Lox recombination wikipedia , lookup

Segmental Duplication on the Human Y Chromosome wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Deoxyribozyme wikipedia , lookup

Metagenomics wikipedia , lookup

DNA supercoil wikipedia , lookup

Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

No-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) Genome Editing wikipedia , lookup

Genealogical DNA test wikipedia , lookup

Extrachromosomal DNA wikipedia , lookup

Frameshift mutation wikipedia , lookup

Human genome wikipedia , lookup

Microsatellite wikipedia , lookup

Epigenomics wikipedia , lookup

Comparative genomic hybridization wikipedia , lookup

Bisulfite sequencing wikipedia , lookup

Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Point mutation wikipedia , lookup

Genome editing wikipedia , lookup

Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Cell-free fetal DNA wikipedia , lookup

Copy-number variation wikipedia , lookup

Genomic library wikipedia , lookup

Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Helitron (biology) wikipedia , lookup

SNP genotyping wikipedia , lookup

Genomics wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Molecular Inversion Probe wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Customizable exon-centric target enrichment
strategy for copy number and SNP analysis
Arjun Vadapalli *, Kyeong Soo Jeong*, Ashutosh Ashutosh , Devendra Joshi , Eric Lin, Carlos Pabon, Gilbert Amparo, Jayati Ghosh, Douglas Roberts
Agilent Technologies, Diagnostics and Genomics Group, Santa Clara, California 95051 *Equally contributed
Abstract
SNP/INDEL detection in DMD
Schema of DMD gene
Structural variations in the genome can be determined from NGS data with either whole
genome sequencing (WGS) or targeted enrichment using exome or gene panels. Copy
number variation (CNV) of genomic segments is a large category of structural variation
and has been implicated in many Mendelian diseases and complex traits. The impact of
CNVs on gene expression is not limited to only the coding regions of genes localized
within the CNV but also their flanking regions, an effect that could even extend over the
entire length of the chromosome. Genomic coverage of coding regions and their
upstream and downstream regions can vary between different platforms that are
currently being used to study CNVs. DNA sequencing technologies which allow human
genomes to be re-sequenced rapidly and inexpensively, are being used increasingly to
detect a comprehensive list of variants relative to the reference genome. Combining
DNA sequencing with the ability to selectively capture DNA targets provides additional
cost benefits and lower amounts of DNA input per experiment. WGS has the potential to
provide a single platform solution for detecting copy number variations (CNVs).
However, it is prohibitively expensive in identifying mutations such as single nucleotide
polymorphisms (SNPs), and insertions and deletions (INDELs) that require high
sequencing read depths.
OneSeq is an NGS target enrichment solution providing simultaneous detection of
genome-wide CNVs and copy neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH) in addition to SNPs
and INDELs at desired loci. Herein we describe custom OneSeq, enabling higher
resolution, exon-centric CN determination in any genes of interest. To this end, we have
created a library of high resolution target enrichment probes targeting exon-proximal
regions. When deployed in conjunction with existing exonic probes, they improve
detection of biologically relevant CNVs in and near exons, while simultaneously
detecting exonic SNPs and INDELs. The targeted CN regions can be customized to
address only a subset of genes, thus maximizing sequencing efficiency.
To demonstrate the performance of the custom OneSeq assay, publicly available
genomic DNA reference materials for DMD genetic testing are studied for known
deletions, duplications and point mutations.
NA04978
(Exon 41;
C>T)
Figure 1. Composition of DMD reference material panel. Schema of the
promoter (P) and 79 exons of the DMD gene are indicated by numbered
black rectangles. The locations of deletions or duplications of DMD exons in
each cell line are indicated by horizontal bars. Duplications are indicated
above the exon map, and deletions are shown below. The exonic locations of
point mutations are indicated by vertical lines. Coriell numbers (GMXXXXX)
are shown for each cell line, and DNA from female donors is indicated with
an asterisk.
Exon-level detection in DMD
NA05263
(Exon 54;
delC)
NA04619
(Exon 59;
C>T)
One copy gain in exon 27 and 28 (DMD encodes dystrophin)
SureSelect Target Enrichment Workflow
Figure 4. Detection of known SNP/INDEL in DMD. Coriell DNA samples
were analyzed with custom OneSeq design. All known SNP/INDEL were
independently confirmed by microarray in Kalman L. et al.
Control
NA23127
Exon 29
Exon 28
Exon 27
Exon 26
Gain (12.9kb)
3
Exon-level detection in 18q deletion
Log2Ratio
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
NA11957
Figure 2. Detection of exon 27 and 28 in DMD. 832 probe groups were
designed to detect exon-level copy number changes. The standard
OneSeq protocol was used with Coriell DNA (NA23127) and Agilent male
reference DNA. Sequencing read depths are shown in Integrative
Genomics Viewer (top panel). The vertical axis in the bottom panel
shows their log ratios. SureCall detects 12.9kb of one copy gain (blue
box) across exon 27 and 28.
NA50160
NA50118
NA21886
NA50180
Single exon gain (Exon 17; NA23159)
Exon 16
OneSeq Custom Design/Analysis
3
2
Log2Ratio
Gain (22.6kb)
3
Log2Ratio
2
OneSeq probes for exon-level aberration detection in custom regions
Custom mutation tiling
1
0
-3
Exon 16
Exon 17
Figure 5. Whole chromosome view for 18q deletion. 23,928 probe
groups were designed to include all exons, exon-proximal regions,
and chromosome wide backbone in chromosome 18. In NA50118,
the boundary of DNA loss is located between exon 15 and 16 in
TCF4 which is linked to Pitt-Hopkins Syndrome.
Log2Ratio
2
1
0
-1
-2
OneSeq data analysis
Loss (137kb) Exon 44
Exon 45
Exon 43
Conclusions
Single exon deletion (Exon 45; NA05115)
log2(Number of Reads in sample / Number of Reads in Reference)
-1
-2
3
-3
0
-2
Single exon deletion (Exon 44; NA04315)
Empirically validated All Exon SureSelect probes
1
-1
-3
Custom OneSeq Design for the present study
1) DMD in chromosome X for exon-level copy number & SNP/INDEL detection
2) Whole chromosome 18 for exon-level copy number detection in 18q deletion
Exon 15
3
Log2Ratio
2
• Agilent’s Custom OneSeq provides a comprehensive, flexible, and costeffective means to identify exon-level copy number changes as well as
SNP/INDEL in one assay.
1
Loss (143kb)
0
-1
-2
-3
Exon 46
Exon 45
Exon 44
Figure 3. Single exon detection in DMD. OneSeq was performed
with DNA aberrations in one exon. Baits located in exons, exonproximal regions, and regional backbone allow for precise
detection of aberration boundaries. Each panel shows DNA
aberration in one exon and proximal introns.
• Empirically validated probes for exons, exon-proximal regions and
genome-wide backbone produce robust performance to detect any
combination of CNV, SNP and INDEL.
Reference
Kalman L. et al., Quality Assurance for Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophy
Genetic Testing, The journal of Melecular Diagnostics, 2011, Vol. 13, No. 2
Peippo M. and Ignatius J., Pitt-Hopkins Syndrome, Mol Syndromol, 2012, 2:171-180
For Research Use Only. Not for Use in Diagnostic Procedures.