Download The Functional Organization of the Barrel Cortex

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Human brain wikipedia, lookup

Clinical neurochemistry wikipedia, lookup

Aging brain wikipedia, lookup

Caridoid escape reaction wikipedia, lookup

Neuropsychopharmacology wikipedia, lookup

Emotional lateralization wikipedia, lookup

Affective neuroscience wikipedia, lookup

Neuroesthetics wikipedia, lookup

Neural coding wikipedia, lookup

Central pattern generator wikipedia, lookup

Allochiria wikipedia, lookup

Nervous system network models wikipedia, lookup

Rheobase wikipedia, lookup

Environmental enrichment wikipedia, lookup

Neurocomputational speech processing wikipedia, lookup

Connectome wikipedia, lookup

Binding problem wikipedia, lookup

Executive functions wikipedia, lookup

Cognitive neuroscience of music wikipedia, lookup

Premovement neuronal activity wikipedia, lookup

Embodied cognitive science wikipedia, lookup

Cortical cooling wikipedia, lookup

Nonsynaptic plasticity wikipedia, lookup

Orbitofrontal cortex wikipedia, lookup

Neuroeconomics wikipedia, lookup

Eyeblink conditioning wikipedia, lookup

Perception wikipedia, lookup

Activity-dependent plasticity wikipedia, lookup

Neural correlates of consciousness wikipedia, lookup

Sensory substitution wikipedia, lookup

Synaptic gating wikipedia, lookup

Time perception wikipedia, lookup

Evoked potential wikipedia, lookup

Neuroplasticity wikipedia, lookup

Stimulus (physiology) wikipedia, lookup

Inferior temporal gyrus wikipedia, lookup

Cerebral cortex wikipedia, lookup

Feature detection (nervous system) wikipedia, lookup

Transcript
The Functional Organization of the
Barrel Cortex
Alfred Li
Cassie Qiu
Outline
● How is Barrel Cortex important for mouse (and us!)
● From whisker to cortex: functional anatomy.
● How barrels are mapped.
● Connection within barrel cortex.
Why Barrel Cortex?
• Barrel Cortex: Primary Somatosensory Cortex (S1).
• Somatotopic map
• sensory information actively acquired
• Important Because:
• Mouse and Rat nocturnal: lack of vision
• Solution: Tactile information by whiskers:
spatial information, object position and texture
• Understanding of active perception, experience-dependent
plasticity and learning
Active Exploration
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gLKtw8gDZU
• Whisking is an attractive model for studying sensory processing and
sensorimotor integration.
Barrel Cortex
Somatosensory very important to rodents, larger portion of the
brain.
From Whisker to Cortex
Cortex (barrels)
Inhibit (by motor
cortex)
Thalamus (barreloids)
Zona Incerta
inhibit
Brain Stem (barrelettes)
Sensory Neuron
From Whisker to Cortex
Somatotopic map throughout
Brainstem and thalamus reliable coding, cortex has large variability,
Single whisker receptive field in ganglion contrast with broad receptive field in
Cortex.
Suggesting interaction with other cortical activity, and suggest that neo cortex
generate association, context dependent.
Role of different pathways
• Lemniscal pathway: Major signal pathway
Strongly modulated by touch and phase of whisking
• Paralemniscal pathway:
weakly modulated by touch and phase of whisking
problem: POM inhibited by ZI, disinhibit when
whisking, possibly encode touch, still unclear.
Barrel
• Barrel = Cortical column responding to stimulus to one whisker.
• Primarily due to projection to layer 4.
• Identical layout as Whiskers:
Barrel Map
• Determined genetically
• Can be visualized with histology.
How Barrels are mapped
• Electrophysiology
• Single electrode, Electrode array
Intrinsic Optical Imaging
• A type of BOLD (blood oxygenation dependent signal)
• Differential Absorbance of Oxy and Deoxyhemoglobin at higher than 600nm (highest contrast
there)
• Measure back scattering of red light from tissue.
• Fast initial rise of deoxyhemoglobin, follows by slow
not very localized drop of deoxy, rise of
oxyhemoglobin. IOI measure latter.
Averaged intrinsic optical response to
whisker stimuli
Mapping of Barrel
Across intact skull.
Left to Right: Green light imaging of blood vessel,
Intrinsic imaging of response to one whisker stimulus, insert Dil crystal (dye) to response site.
DAPI (stain for nucleus) and Dil fluorescence picture, after sectioning.
Match between optical mapping and anatomical barrel map.
Voltage Sensitive Dye Mapping
• High temporal resolution.
Graphics: Response to a single deflection of
C2 whisker.
• Subthreshold Potential.
• Only reflect activity at surface.
Difference in Spatial extent: Subthreshold vs. Suprathreshold measurement.
Low frequency vs. High frequency stimulus (known to evoke more
localized response)
Mapping Techniques
• Provide functional evidence for somatotopic sensory processing
precisely aligned to the anatomical barrel map
• dynamic pattern for object localization
• Texture
• different whiskers exhibit different resonant frequencies
Structure Within Barrel: Orientation Map (In rat)
• Layer 2,3 measured with tetrode (clustered four electrodes) recordings.
• Deflect toward a nearby whisker = stronger response near the barrel for that
whisker.
The future: Calcium Imaging
Influx of Ca2+ during action potential.
Fluorescent Protein response to [Ca2+].
• Single Cell Activity
• Sectioning (Certain Layer)
• Mediocre Temporal resolution (slow removal
of Ca2+)
Connections within Cortical Column
Histology and in-vitro studies shows
that L4 excitatory neuron have axon
laterally confined to single barrel.
B. Red square is simulation point
Right most: GABA inhibition
blocked, signal spread.
C. Uncaging = release.
Connection in Barrel Cortex
• L2/3 neuron extend well beyond boundaries of barrel column.
(spreading of VSD signal)
• L2/3 neuron also have axon to L5, which receive input from L4 and
thalamus etc. Integration and Computation.
• Signal spread more when GABA inhibited: real cortex can be more
excitable.
• Other Connection: Cortex-Cortex (from S2, M1) Paralemniscal,
extralemniscal pathway.
The Functional Organization of the
Barrel Cortex (PART II)
Alfred Li
Cassie Qiu
Development and Plasticity of the Barrel
Cortex Patterning
• somatotopic patterning of the barrel cortex appears to be
determined by genetic programs
• position and dimension of the barrel field - FGF8
• ectopic posterior expression of FGF8 induces formation of a secondary
barrel field
Development and Plasticity
• Refinement of the map might be guided by activity-dependent
mechanisms
• barrels less defined or absent in NMDA receptor KO mice
• development is within a few days of birth (early critical period)
• lesion of whisker follicles - no formation of corresponding barrels
Development and Plasticity
• Next critical period relates to NMDA receptor-dependent plasticity
• LTP cannot be induced after P8
• increase in axon and dendrite complexity
Development and Plasticity
• whisker deflection localized to individual cortical columns
• reduced synaptic connectivity
• barrel cortex neurons receive information relating to their principle
whiskers early in development
Experience-Dependent Map Plasticity in
Mature Rodents
• depression of evoked responses to deflection of the trimmed
whiskers
• presynaptic reduction in neurotransmitter release probability
• consistent with a Hebbian spike-timing-dependent plasticity
• increasing response to remaining whiskers
• using intrinsic optical imaging (caged vs. novel environment)
Experience-Dependent Map Plasticity
(A)
Single-whisker experience induced a
profound and reversible expansion of
the spared whisker representation.
(B)
reversible contraction of the spared
whisker representation
State-Dependent Whisker Perception
• Spontaneous cortical response
• Whole-cell recording of layer 2/ 3
(membrane potential changes)
• quiet wakefulness - slow largeamplitude
• active whisking - variance smaller,
depolarize
• VSD shows spontaneous slow
oscillation, spread like wave.
State-Dependent Whisker Perception
• processing of sensory stimuli
• Deflection of C2 whisker
• quiet wakefulness - strong cortical
sensory response, wild spread
• active whisking - weak response,
more localized.
• Difference not due to sensory organ
(follicle): trigeminal ganglion
stimulation.
Actively Acquired Sensory Information
• Recordings from the first-order sensory neurons in the trigeminal
ganglion of awake rodents
• in the absence of whisker movement - no spontaneous action potential
firing in the trigeminal ganglion.
• ‘‘whisking in air,’’- a low level of spiking activity in the sensory neurons.
• phase-locked signals could form the basis of a map of positional information
• many action potentials in the sensory neurons were evoked when the
whiskers contacted objects Whisker-related trigeminal ganglion neurons
are therefore sensitive object detectors
Actively Acquired Sensory Information
Actively Acquired Sensory Information
• single-whisker active touch responses can also propagate across the
barrel map
• Contrast with artificial whisker stimulation, which is weak.
Actively Acquired Sensory Information
• Real whisker-object contacts, but not remotely applied passive
stimuli, might be specifically amplified by a rapid low-level
sensorimotor loop
Sensory Information Processing during Learned
Behaviors
● Two behavior task using whisker
○ detection of edge locations: reach other side for
reward
○ discrimination of textures (finger level performance)
● Studies:
○ edge location detection only need one whisker,
require S1.
○ Single whisker can also detect object position
○ two separate psychophysical channels when
responding to single whisker stimuli.
■ small A high f, and small f high A.
■ rapidly adapting & slowly adapting trigeminal
Sensory Information Processing during Learned
Behaviors
• different action-potential
activities in different
cortical layers.
• top-down input.