* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download chapter3 (new window)
Multielectrode array wikipedia , lookup
Convolutional neural network wikipedia , lookup
Neural oscillation wikipedia , lookup
Biological neuron model wikipedia , lookup
Types of artificial neural networks wikipedia , lookup
Binding problem wikipedia , lookup
Neuroesthetics wikipedia , lookup
Neuroanatomy wikipedia , lookup
Perception of infrasound wikipedia , lookup
Metastability in the brain wikipedia , lookup
Neural engineering wikipedia , lookup
Caridoid escape reaction wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Central pattern generator wikipedia , lookup
Premovement neuronal activity wikipedia , lookup
Pre-Bötzinger complex wikipedia , lookup
Endocannabinoid system wikipedia , lookup
Synaptic gating wikipedia , lookup
Molecular neuroscience wikipedia , lookup
Nervous system network models wikipedia , lookup
Development of the nervous system wikipedia , lookup
Psychophysics wikipedia , lookup
Optogenetics wikipedia , lookup
Clinical neurochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Neural correlates of consciousness wikipedia , lookup
Neural coding wikipedia , lookup
Time perception wikipedia , lookup
Channelrhodopsin wikipedia , lookup
Efficient coding hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Neuropsychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup
Chapter 3: Neural Processing and Perception Neural Processing and Perception • Neural processing is the interaction of signals in many neurons. Figure 3-1 p54 Lateral Inhibition and Perception • Experiments with eye of Limulus – Ommatidia allow recordings from a single receptor. – Light shown into a single receptor leads to rapid firing rate of nerve fiber. – Adding light into neighboring receptors leads to reduced firing rate of initial nerve fiber. Figure 3-2 p54 Figure 3-3 p55 Lateral Inhibition and Lightness Perception • Three lightness perception phenomena explained by lateral inhibition – The Hermann Grid: Seeing spots at an intersection – Mach Bands: Seeing borders more sharply – Simultaneous Contrast: Seeing areas of different brightness due to adjacent areas Hermann Grid • People see an illusion of gray images in intersections of white areas. • Signals from bipolar cells cause effect – Receptors responding to white corridors send inhibiting signals to receptor at the intersection – The lateral inhibition causes a reduced response which leads to the perception of gray. Figure 3-4 p55 Figure 3-5 p55 Figure 3-6 p56 Figure 3-7 p56 Figure 3-8 p56 Mach Bands • People see an illusion of enhanced lightness and darkness at borders of light and dark areas. – Actual physical intensities indicate that this is not in the stimulus itself. – Receptors responding to low intensity (dark) area have smallest output. – Receptors responding to high intensity (light) area have largest output. Figure 3-9 p57 Figure 3-10 p57 Mach Bands - continued – All receptors are receiving lateral inhibition from neighbors – In low and high intensity areas amount of inhibition is equal for all receptors – Receptors on the border receive differential inhibition Mach Bands - continued – On the low intensity side, there is additional inhibition resulting in an enhanced dark band. – On the high intensity side, there is less inhibition resulting in an enhanced light band. – The resulting perception gives a boost for detecting contours of objects. Figure 3-9 p57 Figure 3-12 p58 Figure 3-13 p58 Lateral Inhibition and Simultaneous Contrast • People see an illusion of changed brightness or color due to effect of adjacent area – An area that is of the same physical intensity appears: • lighter when surrounded by a dark area. • darker when surrounded by a light area. Lateral Inhibition and Simultaneous Contrast - continued – Receptors stimulated by bright surrounding area send a large amount of inhibition to cells in center. – Resulting perception is of a darker area than when this stimulus is viewed alone. – Receptors stimulated by dark surrounding area send a small amount of inhibition to cells in center. – Resulting perception is of a lighter area than when this stimulus viewed alone. Figure 3-14 p58 Figure 3-15 p59 A Display That Can’t Be Explained by Lateral Inhibition • White’s Illusion – People see light and dark rectangles even though lateral inhibition would result in the opposite effect. Explanation of White’s Illusion • Belongingness – An area’s appearance is affected by where we perceive it belongs. – Effect probably occurs in cortex rather than retina. – Exact physiological mechanism is unknown. Figure 3-16 p59 Figure 3-17 p59 Figure 3-18 p60 Processing From Retina to Visual Cortex and Beyond • Area of receptors that affects firing rate of a given neuron in the circuit • Receptive fields are determined by monitoring single cell responses. • Research example for vision – Stimulus is presented to retina and response of cell is measured by an electrode. Figure 3-19 p60 Figure 3-20 p61 Figure 3-21 p61 Center-Surround Antagonism • Output of center-surround receptive fields changes depending on area stimulated: – Highest response when only the excitatory area is stimulated – Lowest response when only the inhibitory area is stimulated – Intermediate responses when both areas are stimulated Figure 3-22 p62 Figure 3-23 p62 Hubel and Wiesel’s Rational for Studying Receptive Fields • Signals from the retina travel through the optic nerve to the – Lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) – Primary visual receiving area in the occipital lobe (the striate cortex or area V1) – And then through two pathways to the temporal lobe and the parietal lobe – Finally arriving at the frontal lobe Figure 3-24 p63 Figure 3-25 p63 Hubel and Wiesel’s Rational for Studying Receptive Fields - continued • LGN cells have center-surround receptive fields. • Major function of LGN is to regulate neural information from the retina to the visual cortex. – Signals are received from the retina, the cortex, the brain stem, and the thalamus. – Signals are organized by eye, receptor type, and type of environmental information. Hubel and Wiesel’s Rational for Studying Receptive Fields - continued • Excitatory and inhibitory effects are found in receptive fields. • Center and surround areas of receptive fields result in: – Excitatory-center-inhibitory surround – Inhibitory-center-excitatory surround Figure 3-26 p64 Receptive Fields of Neurons in the Visual Cortex • Neurons that fire to specific features of a stimulus • Pathway away from retina shows neurons that fire to more complex stimuli • Cells that are feature detectors: – Simple cortical cell – Orientation tuning curve – Complex cortical cell – End-stopped cortical cell Figure 3-27 p65 Figure 3-28 p65 Figure 3-29 p66 Table 3-1 p66 Selective Adaptation • Neurons tuned to specific stimuli fatigue when exposure is long. • Fatigue or adaptation to stimulus causes – Neural firing rate to decrease – Neuron to fire less when stimulus immediately presented again • Selective means that only those neurons that respond to the specific stimulus adapt. Figure 3-30 p67 Selective Adaptation - continued • Measure sensitivity to range of one stimulus characteristic • Adapt to that characteristic by extended exposure • Re-measure the sensitivity to range of the stimulus characteristic Figure 3-31 p67 Selective Adaptation - continued • Gratings are used as stimuli – Made of alternating light and dark bars – Angle relative to vertical can be changed to test for sensitivity to orientation – Difference in intensity can be changed to test for sensitivity to contrast Figure 3-32 p67 Selective Adaptation - continued • Measure contrast threshold by decreasing intensity of grating until person can just see it. • Calculate the contrast sensitivity by taking 1/threshold. • If threshold is low, person has high contrast sensitivity. Figure 3-33 p68 Selective Rearing • Animals are reared in environments that contain only certain types of stimuli – Neurons that respond to these stimuli will become more predominate due to neural plasticity. – Blakemore and Cooper (1970) showed this by rearing kittens in tubes with either horizontal for vertical lines. – Both behavioral and neural responses showed the development of neurons for the environmental stimuli. Figure 3-34 p69 Higher Level Neurons • Inferotemporal (IT) cortex • Prosopagnosia • Fusiform face area Figure 3-35 p69 Figure 3-36 p70 The Sensory Code • Sensory code - representation of perceived objects through neural firing – Specificity coding - specific neurons responding to specific stimuli • Leads to the “grandmother cell” hypothesis • Recent research shows cells in the hippocampus that respond to concepts such as Halle Berry. The Sensory Code continued – Problems with specificity coding: • Too many different stimuli to assign specific neurons • Most neurons respond to a number of different stimuli. • Distributed coding - pattern of firing across many neurons codes specific objects – Large number of stimuli can be coded by a few neurons. Figure 3-37 p70 Sensory Code The Sensory Code continued • How many neurons are needed for an object in distributed coding? – Sparse coding - only a relatively small number of neurons are necessary • This theory can be viewed as a midpoint between specificity and distributed coding. Figure 3-38 p71 Figure 3-39 p71 Figure 3-40 p72 The Mind-body Problem • How do physiological processes become transformed into perceptual experience? – Easy problem of consciousness • Neural correlate of consciousness (NCC) - how physiological responses correlate with experience – Hard problem of consciousness • How do physiological responses cause experience? Figure 3-41 p73