* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Structural analysis of both products of a reciprocal translocation
Transposable element wikipedia , lookup
Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup
DNA polymerase wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
DNA profiling wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
DNA barcoding wikipedia , lookup
Cancer epigenetics wikipedia , lookup
Comparative genomic hybridization wikipedia , lookup
Holliday junction wikipedia , lookup
DNA damage theory of aging wikipedia , lookup
United Kingdom National DNA Database wikipedia , lookup
Zinc finger nuclease wikipedia , lookup
Genealogical DNA test wikipedia , lookup
Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup
Gel electrophoresis of nucleic acids wikipedia , lookup
Human genome wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Bisulfite sequencing wikipedia , lookup
Primary transcript wikipedia , lookup
DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup
Cell-free fetal DNA wikipedia , lookup
Epigenomics wikipedia , lookup
DNA supercoil wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Nucleic acid double helix wikipedia , lookup
Metagenomics wikipedia , lookup
Homologous recombination wikipedia , lookup
Extrachromosomal DNA wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Molecular cloning wikipedia , lookup
SNP genotyping wikipedia , lookup
No-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) Genome Editing wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Deoxyribozyme wikipedia , lookup
Nucleic acid analogue wikipedia , lookup
Microsatellite wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Molecular Inversion Probe wikipedia , lookup
Genomic library wikipedia , lookup
Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
Genome editing wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
volume 13 Number 6 1985 Nucleic Acids Research Structural analysis of both products of a reciprocal translocation between c-myc and inununoglobulin lod in Burkitt lympboma Christopher Moulding, Aaron Rapoport, Paula Goldman, Jim Battey, Gilbert M.Lenoir1 and Philip Leder Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, 45 Shattuclc Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA, and 'International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150 Cours Albert-Thomas, 69372 Lyon, France Received 27 December 1984; Accepted 5 February 1985 ABSTRACT The balanced transiocations that occur between the c-myc and Iranunoglobulin l o c i In B u r k i t t lymphoraa provide an unusual opportunity to analyze both products of a reciprocal recombination. Accordingly, we have determined t h e ' s t r u c t u r e of the two reciprocal products of a translocation t h a t j o i n s the 5' portion of the c-myc gene on chromosome 8 to the Immunologulin (i switch recombination signal on chromosome 14. By determining the nucleot i d e sequences at the translocation crossover points of both product chromosomes, we precisely locate these points with respect to nearby genes. This determination allows us to conclude that translocation Involves nonhomologous recombination, Is highly conservative of c-myc sequences ( d e l e t ing only 16 bp at the crossover p o i n t ) , but deletes over 2 Kb of Immunoglobulin sequences from the \i switch s i g n a l . The p constant and c-rayc genes are joined head-to-head about 3 Kb apart, while the IgH enhancer and an aberrantly rearranged D/J region are linked to sequences 51 of c-rayc on the reciprocal product. INTRODUCTION The occurrence of reciprocal translocations between the c-myc gene and the Imraunoglobulin loci In Burkitt lymphoma provides a rare opportunity to analyze both the substrates and the products of a reciprocal recombination that occurs In a human cell (1-3). Such analyses are Important because they r e f l e c t the mechanisms by which these translocations occur and allow us to explore the structural and functional consequences of juxtaposing genes normally located on different chromosomes. Several reciprocal translocations have been analyzed 1n mouse piasmacytomas where recombination generally Involves the Immunoglobulin a switch signal (1,4-10), a sequence thought to be Involved In specific recombinational events that occur during maturation of B lymphocytes and formation of antibody genes. In human Burk i t t c e l l s , these translocations generally—but not always—Involve a d i f ferent recombination signal, the (i switch, a sequence that occurs near the region encoding the Immunoglobulin v heavy chain (1,11-13). A less coranon class of translocation Involves the c-myc gene and the X © IRLPres* Limited, Oxford, England. 2141 Nucleic Acids Research l i g h t chain locus (14). One example has been exmained In p a r t i c u l a r d e t a i l and has been found to Involve that j o i n s a region near the \ a highly conservative recombination constant region genes to a point thousand bases downstream (3') from the c-myc gene (15). event several In t h i s case no switch region signal Is found on either segment Involved 1n the translocation. Because the basis of these recombination events 1s s t i l l not clear, we have examined both reciprocal products of a translocatlon that has occurred between the c-myc gene and the 1mmunoglobul1n \i switch region in the B u r k i t t lymphoma BL22. In contrast to the example cited above, the recip- rocal exchange 1s r e l a t i v e l y conservative of c-myc sequences, but not of \L switch region 1n which a 2 Kb segment 1s l o s t translocatlon. from the products of the Furthermore, the translocatlon has not associated the IgH enhancer (16-18) w i t h the c-nyc gene, rather the enhancer Is found on the product reciprocal to the n constant-c-myc linkage. The segment carrying the rearranged c-rayc gene renains t r a n s c r i p t i o n a l l y a c t i v e , though deregulated (19.20). MATERIALS AND METHODS B u r k i t t Lywphoma Cell Line, BL22 The B u r k i t t lyraphoma cell l i n e BL22 was established from a pleural effusion of a 19 year old Congolese female (14). The malignant c e l l s were characterized by the presence of the EBV genome, a t(8;14) and a II,K phenotype. Genomic DNA Preparation and Southern B l o t t i n g DMA samples from normal human peripheral white blood c e l l s and the B u r k i t t lyraphoma c e l l l i n e BL22 were prepared as described previously (21). AHquots of genomic DNA were digested with appropriate r e s t r i c t i o n enzymes (New England Biolabs), electrophoresed, blotted to n i t r o c e l l u l o s e , and hybridized to nick-translated DHA r e s t r i c t i o n fragment probes. tivity of probes was t y p i c a l l y 100-300 cpra/pg. Specific ac- Hybridized f i l t e r s were washed at 52°C 1n 15 niM NaCl, 1.5 mM sodium c i t r a t e and 0.11 NaDodS04. Genomic Cloning The human germline c-myc genomic clone and the c-myc containing recorabinant clone frora BL22 were obtained as described previously (19). ciprocal The r e - recombined (17 Kb EcoRl) fragment was obtained by screening ap- proximately 2 x 10 recombinant phage \ CH4A (22) clones containing size p u r i f i e d 17 Kb EcoRl r e s t r i c t i o n fragments frora BL22 genomic DNA. The hyb r i d i z a t i o n probe was a 1 Kb C l a - H i n d l l l 2142 fragment (5 1 break; F i g . 1) frora Nucleic Acids Research the germline c-myc clone. The gennline innunoglobuHn heavy chain clone 1s described elsewhere ( 2 3 ) . DMA Sequencing DNA sequencing was performed using the H13 "dideoxy" chain termination method (24) essentially as described In the Bethesda Research Laboratories sequencing manual (1981). RESULTS I d e n t i f i c a t i o n and Cloning of c-myc Reciprocal Translocation Fragments The two products of the reciprocal translocation that occurred 1n the Burkitt l i n e BL22 were detected by making use of mapping data which I n d i cated that the translocation breakpoint occurred about 1 Kb 5' to the c-myc promoter ( 1 9 ) . A probe was made from a normal c-myc fragment located Im- mediately 5 1 to the BL22 recombination s i t e (5 1 break, F1g. 1 ) . When this probe 1s hybridized to EcoRl-digested BL22 and control DNA's, I t detects an unrearranged 12.5 Kb c-myc DNA EcoRI fragment 1n the control sample and two fragments In BL22 genomic DNA. One of the BL22 fragments corresponds to the unrearranged 12.5 Kb EcoRI fragment; the other, EcoRI r e s t r i c t i o n fragment. to a rearranged 17 Kb When a segment of the c-myc gene I t s e l f Is used as a probe (F1g. 1 ) , the unrearranged c-myc gene Is again detected 1n both DNA samples, but a rearranged fragment 9 Kb 1n length, the other product of the reciprocal translocation, Is detected In the tumor c e l l s . The 17 Kb EcoRI fragment represents one of the two reciprocally ranged fragments generated by the BL22 translocation. rear- The 9 Kb EcoRI c-rayc-containing fragment represents the other (F1g. 1) and has I t s Iraraunoglobulin recombination site In the middle of the p. switch signal, extending Into sequences 3 1 to this region ( 1 6 ) . The reciprocal of this fragment would therefore be expected to contain sequences 5' to \i switch. Including the heavy chain J region cluster. A J region probe also detects a co-mi- grating, rearranged 17 Kb EcoRI fragment In BL22 genomic DNA, as expected I f this fragment represents the reciprocal fragment (data not shown). This 17 Kb fragment was cloned Into a phage \ vector from s i z e - p u r i f i e d , EcoRI cleaved BL22 genomic DNA using the 5' break fragment ( F i g . 1) as a probe. Comparative r e s t r i c t i o n mapping and b l o t hybridization experiments showed that this fragment contains Immunoglobulin heavy chain sequences extending from J5 to the 5' border of the u switch. In a d d i t i o n , this reciprocal fragment contains v i r t u a l l y a l l c-myc sequences 5' to the previously determined site of translocation ( F i g . 1 ) . The 17 Kb reciprocal fragment also 2143 Nucleic Acids Research A 17Kb 12.5Kb—, DNA Control BL22 I Probe: c-myc Recombinont (9 Kb) BL22 I L__ MYC 5' Break 14 L .fr Reciprocal (17 Kb) IgH Control 1 H C 14 X H 14 F1g. 1 . Structure of germline and recorabinant DNA segments around the c-rayc-IgH translocation s i t e s . A) Genoraic DNA from normal human polymorphonuclear c e l l s (control) and the B u r k i t t lymphona cell l i n e BL22 was d i gested with EcoRl, b l o t t e d , and hybridized with either a 5' break or c-myc probe. The map positions of these two probes on the gerraline c-myc f r a g ment are designated below In p a r t B. Both probes Identify an unrearranged 12.5 Kb EcoRl fragment 1n control and BL22 DNA. The myc probe detects an additional 9.0 Kb EcoRl fragment 1n BL22 which Is the c-myc recorabinant. The 5 1 breakpoint probe hybridizes to the 17 Kb reciprocal recorabined fragment 1n BL22. B) The structure of the human germline c-myc locus and the germline IgH locus are compared to the c-rayc containing recorabinant and reciprocal recotnbined fragment. All c-myc derived DNA (chromosome 8) Is represented as a stippled bar and Inmunoglobulin heavy chain DNA (chromosome 14) Is shown as an open bar. A thin l i n e designates rearranged DNA of uncertain origin flanking J5 on the reciprocal recombined fragment. Translated exons are f i l l e d boxes above the bars; untranslated exons are unshaded boxes. The 16 bp deleted from germline c-myc and the 2 Kb deleted from IgH by r e - 2144 14 Nucleic Acids Research combination are Indicated by t r i a n g l e s . A hatched box Indicates Iromunoglobulin rau switch sequences. The directions of transcription of c-myc and IgH genes are shown by arrows. The structure of the gerraline IgH locus 1s as described by Ravetch e t a i . ( 2 3 ) . Abbreviations used: Cn = (i constant region, E « Iraraunoglobulin enhancer element, Sji = |i switch sequences, J H » heavy chain J segment cluster. Restriction s i t e s : R - EcoRl, H =• H i n d l l l , C = C l a l , X - Xbal, B - BamHl. contains approximately 8 Kb of DMA adjacent to J5 that 1s not homologous to either c-myc or IgH Iramunoglobulin J sequences ( F i g . 1 and see below). Sixteen Basepairs are Deleted from Germline c-myc at the Site of Translocation. DNA sequences a t the translocation crossover point from both the c-myc containing recorabinant (9.0 Kb Rl) and the reciprocal recombinant fragment (17 Kb) were compared to their unrearranged counterparts In the gerraline c-myc region (12.5 Kb Rl) ( F i g . 2 ) . With the exception of a 16 nucleotlde segment of DNA derived from the gerraline c-myc locus, a l l sequences are found In either gerraline c-rayc the c-myc containing recombinant or I t s re- ciprocal (F1g. 2 ) . About Two Kilobases of n Switch DNA are Deleted from the Translocated Heavy Chain Locus. The c-myc containing recorabinant In BL22 contains about 1 Kb of switch sequence adjacent to I t s c-myc recombination s i t e ( 1 6 ) . germline \i switch region extends over 3 Kb ( 2 3 ) . u The e n t i r e Restriction mapping and genoraic blotting experiments comparing the germline IgH locus with the r e ciprocal recorabined fragment showed that the reciprocal no switch sequences (data not shown). fragment contained This result Indicates that at l e a s t 2 Kb of IgH |i switch sequences are deleted at the translocation s i t e . DNA sequence comparison of the translocation site In the reciprocal fragment and the germline IgH locus precisely locates the recombination s i t e 50 bp 5' to the n switch region ( F i g . 1 and 2 ) , as predicted from mapping and blotting experiments. The possibility that this 2 Kb deletion occurred as a consequence of the cloning procedure, could be ruled out by comparing fragment length of cloned and genomic DNA. the restriction BL22 genomic DNA and the r e - ciprocal clone were digested with H i n d i I I , blotted and probed with the 5' break probe (Figs. 1 and 3A). This probe detects a 2 Kb H i n d l i l fragment In the cloned DNA which co-migrates with I t s 2 Kb rearranged H i n d l i l count e r p a r t In BL22 genomic DNA ( F i g . 3A). This 2 Kb H i n d l i l fragment spans the translocatlon crossover point In which the switch deletion has occurred 2145 Nucleic Acids Research ucaa C-KTC i ii i i i ii in i GO>WICUXTlCtCCCmaCCTCCClT11IUU.U,lll^lCCTTTCllllll MI minimum ii minium i mum n minmiimmimmimnimnnnn] TTTI T c-myc Recombinant •••• Reciprocal B U IfB iimimiinninnnnniiminiimiminnii J, J 2 J 3 J 4 J B J 6 IgM • III 1 J Reciprocal , 1 i , i i mi i S^ J i C^ X//////////////)i B 6 i 1 1• 1 t—1 -1 • F1g. 2 . Hucleotide sequences a t the translocation s i t e . A) The DNA sequences a t the transiocat.1 on s i t e of the two reciprocal fragments are compared to their germiine c-nyc counterparts. The regions sequenced are designated by bars above the three structural representations. The 16 nucleotides deleted from germline c-myc a t the recombination site are boxed. B) The nucleotlde sequence of the non c-myc containing fragment ( r e ciprocal) compared to IgH sequences bordering the n switch. The region sequenced 1s designated by bars 0—>) above structural representations of these DNA segments. (Fig. 1 ) , since the fragments are of Identical length, the deletion has occurred In the Burkitt c e l l . Similar comparisons of the c-myc recombinant clone and BL22 genomic r e s t r i c t i o n fragments confirmed that no major deletions occurred during cloning o f this genomic fragment (data not shown). The J Cluster on the Reciprocal Fragment has Undergone an Aberrant Immunogiobulin J-Type Recombination Event. Restriction mapping and Southern b l o t comparison between a germline IgH clone (23) and the cloned reciprocal fragment from BL22 showed an abrupt break In homology between these two cloned DMAs within the J cluster (F1g. 1 ) . In order to define precisely the location of this break 1n homology, DMA sequence from the reciprocal J region was determined and compared to that previously determined genaline for the IgH nucleotlde sequence ( 2 3 ) . The two sequences are homologous through the 3' end of the J c l u s t e r , 2146 Nucleic Acids Research but sharply diverge three nucieotides Into the J5 segment (see F i g . 4). These results are consistent with a recombination event a t J5. VDJ joining 1s mediated by characteristic recombination signal sequences that flank germiine human Immunoglobuiin D segments on their 5 1 and 3' sides ( 2 3 , 2 5 ) . The consensus recombination signal sequence usually found on the 5' side of gerraline D segments 1s GGTTTTTGT—12 bp—CACTGTG ( 2 3 , 2 5 ) . I f the DJ-type recombination event had joined a germline 0 to J5, the 5 1 D recombination signal sequence should be found 10-30 nucleotides 51 to the J5 sequence In the reciprocal recotnbined fragment. No such signal sequence 1s found within several hundred nucleotides of the J5 segment ( F i g . 4 ) . It Is clear that a normal germline D segment has not participated 1n a DJ recombination at J5 1n the reciprocal, unless a V-D joining has also taken place. I f the recombination at J5 In the reciprocal Is a VDJ j o i n i n g , a l l recombination signal sequences associated with the joined D segment would be deleted. Instead, DNA sequence encoding a highly conserved ami no a d d se- quence In the framework three region (amino a d d s 90-92) found In a l l known human heavy chain variable regions should be observed within 30-50 bases 5' to J5 (see Fig. 4) ( 2 6 ) . No such ami no acid sequence could be translated In any frame from DNA sequences within several hundred bases 5' to J5, r u l ing out a functional or aberrant V-region joining 1n the BL22 reciprocal recombined fragment ( F i g . 4 ) . The DNA Fragment Joined to J5 on the Reciprocal Recombinant is Homologous to a Family of D-Bear1ng Fragments In order to better understand the nature of the sequences rearranged 5' to J5, a probe was prepared from this region and hybridized to P v u I I cleaved genomic DNA from a normal Individual and BL22. The probe hybri- dizes to at least four fragments In normal genomic DNA (F1g. 3 8 ) . Genomic DNA from BL22 shares one of these homologous fragments, and also contains two homologous fragments of d i f f e r i n g sizes. The smallest homologous f r a g ment In BL22 genomic DNA comigrates with a 748 bp PvuII-PvuII fragment containing the J5 breakpoint from the reciprocal PvuII fragment Is J5 break probe) (Fig. 3 ) . rearranged clone (748 bp In separate experiments (not shown) we find that this segment strongly crosshybridizes to a family of cloned DNA fragments known to encode multiple human D segments (U. Sieben11st, personal communication). The Nature of the Re combinational Event Comparison of the germline and translocated DNA segments from a Bur- 2147 Nucleic Acids Research o c o o 20 — 10 — B CM CVJ c _J CD o o 1 BB m• 10 5 2 I 0.5 I — Enzyme: Hind IE Probe: 5' Break Pvu H J5 Break 5' Break c-myc 5' Break J5 Break Reciprocal F1g. 3. Genomic representation of the reciprocally translocated junction fragment and the aberrantly rearranged J5 segment. A) Ten pg of genomic DKA from normal human polymorphonuclear cells (control) and the Burk i t t lynphoma cell Une BL22 are digested with HindiII and compared to 20 picograras DMA digested with the reciprocal rearranged clone 1n a genomic blot hybridization. The probe (5' break) hybridizes to an approximately 15 Kb unrearranged genomic fragment in control and BL22 genomic DNA. A 2 Kb H i n d l l l fragment Is rearranged by translocation In BL22 and hybridizes to the probe. The b l o t shows that the same 2 Kb H i n d l l l fragment Is In the reciprocal clone and coraigrates with I t s genomic counterpart In BL22 DNA. B) Ten ug of genoraic DNA from control and Burkitt lymphoma BL22 are digested with PvuII and compared to 20 picograms of PvuII-cut DNA from the reciprocal clone by Southern blot analysis. The probe u t i l i z e d 1n the hybridization (J5 break) Is a 748 bp PvuII fragment which spans the J5 rearrangement site from the reciprocal rearranged clone. This probe hybridizes to a fatally of at least four genoraic fragments 1n normal DNA. All but one of these fragments 1s deleted or rearranged 1n BL22 genomic DNA. One of the 2148 Nucleic Acids Research rearranged fragments In BL22 genomic DNA comigrates with the 748 bp PvuII fragment 1n the cloned DNA that spans the J5 rearrangement s i t e , clearly demonstrating that the rearrangement found In cloned BL22 DNA 1s not a cloning a r t i f a c t . A schematic diagram of the reciprocal rearranged fragment and germline c-myc DNA 1s shown below the autoradiogram. The position of the two probes used (5' Break and J5 Break) Is shown in the two clones. Stippled bars denote c-myc derived sequences and open bars indicate IgH derived sequences. The BL22 translocation site 1s designated by a triangle on gennline c-myc. The three exon structure of the c-myc gene and the direction of I t s transcription Is Indicated. The J segments and enhancer region (E) are shown on the reciprocal. k1tt lymphoma (BL22) Indicates that this translocation event is highly conservative with respect to c-myc sequences 1n the Immediate v i c i n i t y of the translocation breakpoint. This result 1s similar to the 8;22 variant translocation 1n the Burkitt lyraphoma BL37, where no nucleotfdes are lost from c-myc sequences during recombination (8). Analysis of an analogous mouse plasmacytoroa (Bl-8 \i) c-rayc translocation revealed loss of only 7 bp of c-myc sequences—also highly conservative (9). Approximately two kilobases of ti switch sequences are lost from the translocation site In this Burkitt lymphoma. I t Is Impossible to know whether this DNA was deleted before, during or after translocation, or whether the sequences were lost from either the c-myc containing recotnbinant or Its reciprocal recombined fragment. This represents a larger deletion than has been previously observed at c-myc trans locations, and may r e f l e c t the recombinational I n s t a b i l i t y of this highly repeated sequence. In addition, i t Is Important to note that the changes occurring In the Immediate v i c i n i t y of the translocation breakpoint are not the only a l t e r ations detected In the structure of the c-tnyc gene. Detailed sequence analysis of the untranslated leader exon of BL22 c-rayc gene, a region about 1.5 Kb from the crossover point described here, contains a number of point mutations and small Insertions and deletions (20). The structural basis of the recombination event Is not obvious from Inspection of various sequences surrounding the translocational recombination site (4-10,13,15). Clearly there 1s no region of evident homoiogy 1n the sequences presented here. Furthermore, from a variant translocation Involving the X l i g h t chain locus, 1t is clear that switch region sequences are not a necessary component of the recombination site (15). What Is then responsible for this recurrent non-homologous recombination event? I t Is s t i l l possible that some subtle feature of the primary structure of the DNA surrounding the various sites of translocation w i l l be found (e.g. note the 2149 Nucleic Acids Research A I I II ii i II I M : in I : HI II II I in I I II I I in l I C T Q » P T 3 T C T P L T C « P 3 i F F T T I 1 3 P 3 L 0 3 r i • > > T I P I 3 L U > F I « L G L P < L T P P L I I l P 1 3 l t P C K C T C P G L C G C S I I V G S O C S P B B ^ S E P Q P P E P P I I Mil I II I III II II II I I I I I I I I II rir.rTr»^ I I C I P a t Q P P 3 I I P Q 3 3 a i I C i r > T t P 3 B G G T I E G D 1 A H K P 3 P H P G G P I A Q G 1 G A D S E Q P I V T Y G T T I E f l P P T 3 P l P I Q E l P [ L l i P G Q I L I I 3 P E S I V V Q P V G 0 G T L T T T 3 3~] idUCTOGTTGGii lli:i:ill iTGTTOGTTCCAl V > D G l G C - u r D 3 V G I ) G T I . > T T 3 3 G E 3 3 P P P L > T I I G T T l l G « G 9 T P G t l t P V 3 P 3 P Q T 3 P a B P L 3 t 3 T L C I I I G T L T I P L G P G I P G B I 1 . L I ' T L T T P 3 L 3 P L IgH Reciprocal IOO bp Consensus 5'D Signal: 6GTTTTTGT —I2bp—CACTGTG Invariant IgHV . Amlno Acids 9 0 - 9 2 FF YYC F1g. 4 . Hudeotide sequence comparison of gerraiine IgH J region and the reciprocal recorabined fragment a t the J recombination s i t e . The two sequences are compared and show evidence for a J-type rearrangement three nucleotides from the 5' end of J5 1n the reciprocal. The boundaries of J5 are Indicated, and the J5 translation shown above I t s germline sequence. The DNA sequence from the reciprocal around the J5 rearrangement site 1s translated In three forward frames below the sequence. Asterisks designate stop codons. Neither a consensus 5' D signal nor the Invariant IgH V amlno adds 90-92 are found within several hundred nucleotides of the J5 rearrangement s i t e In the reciprocal sequence. The consensus 5' D signal sequence (GGTTTTTGT— 12 bp— CACTGTG) and Invariant araino a d d s 90-92 (YYC) are shown a t the bottom of the f i g u r e . Phenylalanine (F) can occasionally substitute for tyrosine (Y) at amlno a d d s 90 and 9 1 , but the cysteine (C) at amlno a d d 92 1s absolutely I n v a r i a n t . Schematic diagrams of the two DNA segments (germline IgH and reciprocal) are shown below the sequence. Bars designate the regions In wrrich sequences are compared In the figure. CCAAACCC found near the breakpoint In the c-myc gene ( F i g . 2A) and also found 1n this form or as I t s complement near the recombination point 1n several Burkitt translocations (14,15) and mouse myelomas ( 7 , 9 , 1 0 ) ) . 2150 On the Nucleic Acids Research other hand, since no general and consistent sequence has yet emerged, I t Is more useful to think of the ImmunoglobulIn locus as one that physiologica l l y must undergo recombination In pre-B cells and, therefore, usually exists 1n a chromosomal configuration suitable for recombination. Making this assumption contributes l i t t l e to our understanding of why the c-myc locus should serve as a partner In this process unless we assume I t 1s not the only fragment drawn Into the Imraunoglobulin locus by translocation, but one of the few that leads to the dramatic transforming events that result In Its detection. The Translocated IgH Enhancer Transcription enhancer sequences In immunoglobuHn genes have been shown to markedly Increase transcription In B-cells from IgH V region and other promoter sequences joined 1n close proximity to these enhancer elements (16,17). The human homologue to the known mouse IgH enhancer sequence (18) has been located between the J cluster and the \L switch region by DNA sequence analysis (F1g. 1). This sequence resides not with the translocated c-rayc gene, but with I t s reciprocal In this Burkitt lyraphoma. This c1s-act1ng sequence therefore cannot be responsible for altering c-myc gene expression In this lymphoma or, 1n fact, In any other c-rayc translocation occurring In this orientation at an Imraunoglobulin switch region. The translocation event has moved this enhancer near DNA sequences normally l o cated > 1 Kb 5' to c-myc. These 5' sequences are not normally transcribed 1n B lymphoblastoid c e l l s . RNA blot experiments using probes from the region 5' to c-rayc show no novel transcripts In BL22 (A.R., unpublished observations). I t thus appears that this enhancer does not activate new transcripts within five kilobases of the DNA fragment normally flanking the 5' portion of the c-rayc gene. Furthermore, the fact that no transcripts are found corresponding to the IgH portion of the reciprocal fragment reflects the fact that the Ig V region and I t s promoter sequence has not yet been joined to this region. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would l i k e to thank U. S i e b e n l i s t f o r numerous h e l p f u l and h i s generous g i f t o f T c e l l genooic DNAs. discussions We are g r a t e f u l t o R. Taub f o r her generous g i f t o f B c e l l genomic DNAs and BL22 RNA and we would a l s o l i k e t o thank L. Hennighausen f o r h i s h e l p f u l comments. We g r a t e f u l l y a c knowledge the support o f grants from the American Business Cancer Research Foundation and E . I . DuPont deNenours and Co. f o r p o r t i o n s o f t h i s work. 2151 Nucleic Acids Research J.B. was supported In p a r t by a postdoctoral f e l l o w s h i p from the American Cancer S o c i e t y . REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 2152 Taub R., K i r s c h , I . , Morton, C , L e n o i r , G . , Swan, D . , T r o n i c k , S . , Aaronson, S. and Leder, P. (1982) Proc. H a t l . Acad. S c 1 . U.S.A. 7 9 , 7837-7841. D a l l a - F a v e r a , R., Bregni, M . , E r i k s o n , J . , P a t t e r s o n , D . , G a l l o , R. and Croce, C. (1983) Science 2 1 9 , 9 6 3 - 9 6 7 . Hatnlyn, P. and R a b b i t t s , T . (1983) Nature 3 0 4 , 135-139. Shen-Ong, G . , K e a t h , E . , P 1 c c o l 1 , S. and C o l e , H. (1982) Cell 3 1 , 443-452. Adams, J . , Gerondakis, S . , Webb, E . , M i t c h e l l , J . , Bernard, 0 . and Cory, S. (1982) P r o c . N a t l . Acad. S c 1 . U.S.A. 7 9 , 6966-670. Crews, S . , B a r t h , R., Hood, L . , Prehn, J . and Calame, K. (1982) Science 2 1 8 , 1319-1321. Mar"cu, K., H a r r i s , L . , Stanton, L . , E r i k s o n , J . , Watt, R., and Croce, C. (1983) Proc. N a t l . Acad. S c 1 . U.S.A. 8 0 , 5 1 9 - 5 2 3 . Cory, S . , Gerondakis, S. and Adams, J . (1983) EMBO 2 , 697-703. Neuberger, M. and Calabe, F. (1983) Nature 3 0 5 , 240-243. Gerondakis, S . , Cory, S., and Adaras, J . M . (1984) C e l l 3 6 , 9 3 7 - 9 8 2 . Bernard, 0 . , Cory, S . , Geronadakis, S . , Webb E . , and Adaras, O.K. (1983) EMBO J . 2 , 2375-2383. D a l l a - F a v e r a , R.. M a r t 1 n o t t 1 , S . , G a l l o , R . C . , E r i k s o n , J . and Croce, C M . (1983) Science 219, 9 6 3 - 9 6 7 . Gelmann, E . P . , P s a l U d o p o u l o s , M . C . , Papas, T . S . , and D a l l a - F a v e r a , R. (1983) Nature 3 0 6 , 799-802. L e n o i r , G . , Preud'homme, J . , Bernheim, A. and Berger, R. (1982) Nature 298, 474-476. H o l U s , G . , M i t c h e l l , K.. B a t t e y , J . , P o t t e r , H . , Taub, R., L e n o i r , G . , and Leder, P. (1984) Nature 307, 7 5 2 - 7 5 5 . B a n e r j i , J . , Olson, L . , and S c h a f f n e r , W. (1983) C e l l 3 3 , 7 2 9 - 7 4 0 . G i l l i e s , S . , M o r r i s o n , S . , 0 1 , V . , and Tonegawa, S. ( 1 9 8 3 ) . Cell 3 3 , 717-728. Hayday, A . C . , G i l l i e s , S . D . , S a i t o , H . , Wood, C , W1man, K., Hayward, W.S. and Tonegawa, S. (1984) Nature 3 0 7 , 3 3 4 - 3 4 0 . B a t t e y , J . , Moulding, C , Taub, R., Murphy, W., S t e w a r t , T . , P o t t e r , H . , L e n o i r . G. and Leder, P. (1983) C e l l 3 4 , 7 7 9 - 7 8 7 . Taub, R., Moulding, C , B a t t e y , J . , Murphy, W., V a s i c e k , T . , L e n o i r , G. and Leder, P. (1984) C e l l 3 6 . 3 3 9 - 3 4 8 . H i e t e r , P . , H o l U s . G . , Korsmeyer, S . , Waldmann, T . and Leder, P. (1981) Nature 2 9 4 , 536-540. B l a t t n e r , F . , W i l l i a m s , B . , B l e c h l , A . , Denniston-Thorapson, K., Faber, H . , F u r l o n g , L . , Grunwald, D . , K e e f e r , D . , Moore, D . , Schumra, J . , Sheldon, E . , and Smithies, 0 . (1977) Science 1 9 6 , 161-169. Ravetch, J . , S i e b e n l i s t , U . , Korsmeyer, S . , Waldmann, T . and Leder, P. (1981) C e l l 2 7 , 5 8 3 - 5 9 1 . Sanger, F . , N i c k l e n , S. and Coulson, A. (1977) Proc. N a t l . Acad. S c i . U.S.A. 7 4 , 5463-5467. S i e b e n l i s t , U . , Ravetch, J . , Korsraeyer, S . , Waldmann, T . and Leder, P. (1981) Nature 2 9 4 , 631-635. Kabat, E. ( 1 9 8 3 ) . From Sequences of P r o t e i n s of Innunological I n t e r e s t , pp. 1 0 5 - 1 1 1 . U . S . Dept. o f Health and Huaan S e r v i c e s , P u b l i c Health S e r v i c e , National I n s t i t u t e of H e a l t h . S t e w a r t , T . , B a t t e y , J . , and Leder, P . , manuscript 1n p r e p a r a t i o n .