* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Chapter 11: Sex differences in spatial intelligence
Affective neuroscience wikipedia , lookup
Cognitive neuroscience of music wikipedia , lookup
Nervous system network models wikipedia , lookup
Biochemistry of Alzheimer's disease wikipedia , lookup
Holonomic brain theory wikipedia , lookup
Selfish brain theory wikipedia , lookup
Artificial general intelligence wikipedia , lookup
Activity-dependent plasticity wikipedia , lookup
Optogenetics wikipedia , lookup
Brain morphometry wikipedia , lookup
Limbic system wikipedia , lookup
Functional magnetic resonance imaging wikipedia , lookup
Aging brain wikipedia , lookup
Haemodynamic response wikipedia , lookup
Brain Rules wikipedia , lookup
Neuroinformatics wikipedia , lookup
Neuroplasticity wikipedia , lookup
Neurolinguistics wikipedia , lookup
Neuropsychology wikipedia , lookup
Neuroanatomy wikipedia , lookup
History of neuroimaging wikipedia , lookup
Embodied language processing wikipedia , lookup
Neuropsychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup
Embodied cognitive science wikipedia , lookup
Neuroeconomics wikipedia , lookup
Metastability in the brain wikipedia , lookup
Expert system wikipedia , lookup
Emotion perception wikipedia , lookup
Neurophilosophy wikipedia , lookup
Cognitive neuroscience wikipedia , lookup
Neuroesthetics wikipedia , lookup
Time perception wikipedia , lookup
Chapter 6 Update - March 2005 On butterflies and moths: exploring the role of the fusiform gyrus in … face perception Various lines of research support the notion that we have a specialised brain region for processing faces. Neurons in monkeys appear to be selectively responsive to faces, patients with prosopagnosia are unable to recognise familiar faces (but can recognise other objects and can identify features of faces such as their age and sex) and neuroimaging evidence suggests that one part of the brain is more significantly activated than others when people view faces. This part is the fusiform gyrus, also called fusiform face area (FFA). This view may be too simplistic. For example, it has been argued that the FFA, rather than being specialised for recognising faces specifically, is responsible for distinguishing between members of a homogeneous class of objects (not just faces). An extension to this argument suggests that the FFA is active when it distinguishes between members of object classes that we are expert in identifying. Because we are very familiar with faces, and expert at recognising them, the FFA is, therefore, active when we view faces. This argument also suggests, however, that expert identifiers should activate the FFA when they view objects they are expert in recognising (and not just faces). To test these various hypotheses, Rhodes et al (2004) set up two experiments in which people were either trained or were not trained to recognise Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies). Brain activation was monitored using fMRI while participants viewed faces and Lepidoptera. In the second experiment, experts in identifying moths and butterflies passively watched examples of the species while brain activity was recorded. If the FFA is active during expert discrimination, then it should be just as active during face perception and Lepidoptera perception in experts. The authors found no support for this hypothesis. In the first experiment, the FFA was more significantly activated when people watched faces than Lepidoptera, regardless of whether people had been trained to recognise examples of the species. In the second experiment, activation was greater in the FFA when the butterfly experts watched faces than Lepidoptera. There was no overlap in the areas activated by faces and moths and butterflies. The results suggest that the FFA contains neurons that allow ‘individuation’ of (i.e., discrimination between) faces. Rhodes, G., Byatt, G., Michie, P.T. & Puce, A. (2004). Is the fusiform face area specialised for faces, individuation, or expert individuation? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 2, 189-203.