* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download View Full PDF - Biochemical Society Transactions
Subventricular zone wikipedia , lookup
Molecular neuroscience wikipedia , lookup
Brain morphometry wikipedia , lookup
Neurogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Activity-dependent plasticity wikipedia , lookup
Limbic system wikipedia , lookup
Premovement neuronal activity wikipedia , lookup
Holonomic brain theory wikipedia , lookup
Brain Rules wikipedia , lookup
Development of the nervous system wikipedia , lookup
History of neuroimaging wikipedia , lookup
Cognitive neuroscience wikipedia , lookup
Selfish brain theory wikipedia , lookup
Aging brain wikipedia , lookup
Biochemistry of Alzheimer's disease wikipedia , lookup
Nervous system network models wikipedia , lookup
Neuroplasticity wikipedia , lookup
Neuropsychology wikipedia , lookup
Haemodynamic response wikipedia , lookup
Feature detection (nervous system) wikipedia , lookup
Synaptic gating wikipedia , lookup
Metastability in the brain wikipedia , lookup
Clinical neurochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Optogenetics wikipedia , lookup
Circumventricular organs wikipedia , lookup
Neuroanatomy wikipedia , lookup
Biochemical Society Transactions (200 I ) Volume 29, part 6 Uncoupling protein 2 in the brain: distribution and function D. Richard', S. Clavel, Q. Huang. D. Sanchis and D. Ricquier Centre de recherche de I'h6pital Laval et Centre de recherche sur le metabolisme energetique de I'Univenite Laval, Faculte de medecine, Univenite Laval, Quebec, Canada G I K 7P4 Abstract determine the exact function of UCP2, it nonetheless suggests that UCP2 can fulfil more general functions than U C P l and UCP3. T h e role of UCP2 has yet to be fully delineated, even though two recent studies carried out in UCP2-- mice have suggested that this protein could be involved in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [2], as well as in the control of insulin secretion [3]. In contrast with what was first anticipated, UCP2 does not seem to be a major effector of thermoregulatory processes, but the possibility that this protein can be involved in obesity remains factual [4]. Another characteristic feature of UCP2 is that it is expressed in the brain [l], where the distribution of UCP2 mRNA is wide, but specific to certain areas [S]. T h e focus of this mini-review is to discuss the potential functions of UCPZ in the brain in the light of its distribution, uncoupling activity and role in the control of ROS production. Uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2) mRNA is expressed in a panoply of tissues, including the brain, where it is widely distributed. In the mouse brain, it is expressed in the hypothalamus (suprachiasmatic, paraventricular, dorsomedial, ventromedial and arcuate nuclei), the thalamus (submedius nucleus) and the brain-stem (dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve). In the rat brain, it is also expressed in the hippocampus. T h e presence of UCP2 mRNA in neurons expressing corticotropin-releasing factor and arginine-vasopressin suggests a role for UCP2 in the control of neuroendocrine and behavioural functions. We have recently demonstrated that UCP2-deficient mice can resist the lethal effect of toxoplasmosis through an enhanced production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) from the macrophages. This finding provides evidence that UCPZ can be part of a mechanism preventing ROS production. UCP2 could therefore be involved in protecting the brain against oxidative stress. T h e involvement of UCP2 in neuroprotection is also consistent with the recent observation that kainic acid, which promotes Ca2+uptake in the glutamate-activated neurons in the hippocampal CAI field, can induce the UCPZ gene in the activated CAI cells. T h e role of UCP2 in neuroprotection warrants further investigation. Uncoupling proteins Mainly on the basis of studies addressing the function of U C P l [6], UCPs have been described as mitochondrial inner membrane proteins capable of dissipating the proton electrochemical gradient (ApH') that builds up across the inner mitochondrial membrane and drives the A T P synthase pathway (Figure 1) [6]. This uncoupling process is susceptible to decreases in A T P synthesis and generation of significant amounts of heat, as is the case of BAT, which serves as an efficient thermogenic effector in small mammals [7]. UCPs have also been demonstrated to be involved in ROS production [2], which seems to be facilitated in totally coupled mitochondria [8,9]. In fact, the increase in ApH+, which occurs when a mitochondrion is in respiration state 4 (that is, when A T P levels are high and the availability of A D P is low), would slow down the electron flow through the respiratory chain. This would facilitate the transfer of electrons from ubisemiquinone radicals to 0, and subsequently promote the formation of superoxide radicals (02.-). T h e total coupling of mitochondria could also enhance the Introduction Uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2) is a member of the mitochondrial carrier superfamily with a predicted homology of sequence of 59", with UCPl [l]. In contrast with the other UCPs, such as UCP1, which is uniquely expressed in brown adipose tissue (BAT), or UCP3, which is found in B A T and muscle, UCPZ is expressed in a large number of tissues. Although this specificity does not Key words: mitochondrion, neuroendocnnology. neuroprotection. rat Abbreviations used: UCP2. uncoupling protein 2 : ROS. reactive oxygen species: BAT. brown adipose tissue: CRF. corticotropinreleasing factor: AVP. arginine-vasopressin. 'To whom correspondence should be addressed (e-mail denis.richard(u8phs.ulaval.ca). 0 200 I Biochemical Society 812 Mitochondria1Uncoupling Proteins Schematic showing the bioenergetical function of UCPZ The potential function of uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2). similar t o the other UCPs, is t o dissipate the proton electrochemical gradient (ApH') that builds up across the inner mitochondrial membrane and drives the ATP-synthase pathway. This uncoupling process is susceptible to the reducing of ATP synthesis and the prevention of the transfer of electrons from ubisemiquinone radicals t o 0, and, subsequently,the formation of reactive oxygen species, such as superoxide radicals (02'-). mitoehoodrial outer membrane %ll mitochondrial inner membrpm mitochondrial matrix 1 mRNA is found in large amounts in the hypothalamus, the limbic system and in the brainstem. In the rat, as well as in the mouse [S], the hypothalamic expression of UCP2 is abundant in the suprachiasmatic, paraventricular, dorsomedial, ventromedial nucleus and arcuate nuclei. In both species, the expression of UCP2 is marked in the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve. In the mouse, UCP2 mRNA is abundantly expressed in the cerebellum, but hardly so in the hippocampus. T h e cerebellar expression is not seen in the rat, which, however, exhibits a strong expression of UCP2 in the hippocampus (Figure 2). T h e reasons for differences between strains in the expression of UCP2 are still obscure. There is now evidence that expression is largely neuronal [5,20]. T h e chemical identity of the neurons expressing UCP2 mRNA has yet to be fully determined. Nonetheless, it is clear that neurons expressing corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) in the parvocellular division of the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus and arginine- production of ROS by generating more NADPH through the activation of nicotinamide-nucleotide transhydrogenase [lo]. In the presence of a functional NADPH oxidase system, oxidation of NADPH could produce 02'-, even in cells other than phagocytes [ 111. U p until now, no less than three mammalian UCPs, referred to as U C P I , UCP2 and UCP3, have been cloned and identified as members of the U C P subfamily [12-141. Other UCPs, cloned in plants [15] and birds [16], are also part of this family. Furthermore, two other mitochondrial proteins with uncoupling activities have recently been discovered, and designated UCP4 [17] and BMCPl [18,19]. Brain distribution of UCPZ mRNA One striking feature of the UCP2 gene is that it is expressed to a significant level in the brain [S]. Studies conducted in the mouse, as well as in the rat (Figure 2), have demonstrated that UCP2 813 0 200 I Biochemical Society Biochemical Society Transactions (200 I ) Volume 29. part 6 r * -:; +" ,fp$&fm@ r.r--..* :*'t:: The expression of UCPZ mRNA in the rat brain The film autoradiograms represent coronal rat brain sections that were hybridized with an antisense riboprobecomplementaryto the rat UCP2 mRNA. RegionsexpressingUCPZ mRNA are emphasized. ' 10'. dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve: AP, area postrrma: ARH. arcuate hypothalamic nucleus: BLA. basolateral amygdaloid nucleus: CAI, Ammon's horn I field of the hippocampus: CA3.Ammon's horn 3 field of the hippocampus: DMH. dormmedial hypothalamic nucleus: LV, lateral ventncle: PVN. paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus: SCH. suprachiasmatic nucleus: SON, supraoptic nucleus; VMH. ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus. 1 DMH vasopressin in the magnocellular division of the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei (Figure 3) expressed UCPZ mRNA. The UCPZ gene is not constitutively expressed in astrocytes and nonactivated microglial cells. 0 200 I Biochemical Society Brain distribution and function of UCp2 in the brain T h e brain distribution, as well as the cellular localization, of UCP2 mRNA in the brain supports 814 Mitochondria1Uncoupling Proteins Neurons expressing CRF in the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus (PVN) and arginine-vasopressin in the supraoptic nucleus (SON) express UCP2 mRNA. CRH and AVP neurons were first immunostainedand hybridized with an antisense riboprobe complementary to the rat UCPZ mRNA. Doubly labelled cells are indicated by arrows. Magnification, x 20 (left panels) and x I00 (right panels). 3V, third ventricle. this mutant has an increased ability to secrete insulin [3], which suggests that UCPZ might play some role in energy metabolism. T h e expression of UCP2 mRNA in C R F and AVP cells raises the possibility that UCP2 is involved in neuroendocrine functions. C R F is expressed abundantly in the parvocellular division of the paraventricular nucleus, from which C R F neurons project to the median eminence to control the activity of the pituitary-adrenal axis. It is noteworthy that C R F neurons other than those from the paraventricular nucleus do not express UCP2 mRNA (D. Richard, unpublished results), indicating that UCP2 could play a role in neuroendocrine neurons specifically. UCP2 is also expressed in AVP neurons, whose role in the control the hydric balance has been credited for years. A role for UCP2 in neuroendocrine secretions appears feasible in the light of the recent demonstration of the involvement of UCP2 in insulin secretion [3]. Because it has the ability to control A T P levels, UCP2 has been assumed to influence /?-cell glucose sensing. By controlling a role for UCP2 in energy balance regulation, neuroendocrine and autonomic functions. In the hypothalamus, UCP2 mRNA is found in at least four structures, playing a very important role in the control of food intake and energy expenditure. UCP2 mRNA is indeed expressed in the paraventricular, dorsomedial, ventromedial and arcuate nuclei [21]. In the arcuate nuclei, UCP2 mRNA has been found in neurons containing neuropeptide Y and agouti-related protein (A. Dunn-Meynel, B. Levin and D. Richard, unpublished results), which are undeniably two of the most important neuropeptides involved in the regulation of energy balance in laboratory rodents [22]. T h e putative role of UCP2 in the control of food intake and thermogenesis needs, however, to be ascertained. Factors such as obesity, leptin treatment and food deprivation do not apparently alter the expression of UCP2 in the brain (D. Richard, unpublished results). In addition, the UCP2-- mouse does not appear to exhibit major changes in terms of energy balance regulation [2]. However, it has been demonstrated recently that 815 0 200 I Biochemical Society Biochemical Society Transactions (200 I ) Volume 29. part 6 A T P levels, UCP2 could also modulate the activity of the C R F and AVP neurons; the use of inhibitors of A T P synthesis has been reported to lower significantly the rates of basal and potassiuminduced C R F release in a hypothalamic superfusion system [23]. One of the brain nuclei that express the most UCP2 is the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve, suggesting a role for UCPZ in the activity of the parasympathetic nervous system. In addition, the UCP2 transcript is found in the nucleus of the solitary tract and the area postrema. These two nuclei, together with the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve, form the dorsal vagal complex, a role for which in the integrated visceral functions appears irrefutable [24]. glutamate, a cellular Ca2+overload is capable of initiating either necrotic or apoptotic pathways leading to cell death. UCP2, by lowering the mitochondrial ApH’, could limit the Ca2+-buffering capacity of the mitochondrion in order to protect cells against the detrimental effect of an overload of Ca”. That UCPZ can be involved in protecting cells overloaded by Ca2+is consistent with the recently observed increase in UCP2 expression in the CA (Ammon’s horn)-1 field of the hippocampus in mice subjected to an acute intraperitoneal injection of kainic acid (S. Clavel and D. Richard, unpublished work). T h e CA1 field, which does not constitutively express UCP2 mRNA in the mouse, undergoes a strong activation following treatment with kainic acid [26]. UCPZ and neuroprotection Conclusion Given the apparent importance of UCP2 in the control of ROS production [2,9], it seems reasonable to hypothesize that UCP2 is part of a system limiting the neurodegerative processes associated with oxidative stress. Even though the deficiency in UCP2 mRNA has been reported to have beneficial effect in the resistance to infection by promoting macrophagic microbiocidal activity [2], the fact remains that ROS production, when it is sustained, has detrimental effects on cells. T h e marked expression of UCP2 in macrophages during infection probably occurs as a means to protect surrounding cells against ROS. Not many studies to date have addressed the role of UCPZ in neurodegenerative processes attibutable to oxidative stress, but it seems clear that brain injuries cause the infiltration of phagocytic cells abundantly expressing UCP2 (S. Clavel and D. Richard, unpublished work). In the case of brain injuries, microglial cells are also observed to express UCPZ mRNA (S. Clavel, D. Arsenijevic and D. Richard, unpublished work). As yet, it is unclear as to whether UCP2 protects neurons that constitutively express it. In addition to protecting neurons by preventing the production of ROS, UCP2 could also contribute to neuroprotection via at least one supplementary mechanism, which is still speculative. T h e fact that UCP2 can reduce the mitochondrial ApH+ suggests that this protein could participate in the Ca”-buffering capacity of the mitochondria, which seems in large part mediated by the mitochondrial ApH’ [25]. There is now a consensus that mitochondria play a vital role in buffering the cytosolic calcium overload in stimulated neurons. In mammalian neurons exposed to 0 2001 Biochemical Society UCP2 is a unique UCP. It is expressed in an impressive array of tissues, including the brain, where the distribution of its mRNA is widespread, although specific to certain nuclei. T h e brain distribution and localization of UCP2 mRNA in C R F and AVP neurons suggest a role for UCP2 in energy balance regulation, as well as in neuroendocrine and autonomic functions. A role of UCP2 in the neuroendocrine functions is supported by the recent demonstration that UCP2 can be a regulator of ATP-dependent hormonal secretions [3]. Recent studies [2,9] have suggested that UCP2 can negatively control ROS production, raising the possibility that brain UCP2 can protect neurons against oxidative stresses. A role for UCP2 in neuroprotection is supported further by the recent observation that kainic acid, which promotes Ca2+ uptake in the glutamate-activated neurons in the hippocampus, can induce UCP2 expression in the activated CAI cells. T h e protective role of UCPs against excitotoxicity lends itself to an interesting avenue of research in the light of the mitochondrial ApH+-dependent Ca’+-buffering capacity of the mitochondrion [25]. References I 2 3 816 Fleury. C.. Neverova. M., Collins, S.. Raimbauk. S.. Champigny. O., Levi-Meyrueis. C.. Bouillaud, F., Seldin. M. F.. SurWit. R S.. Ricquier, D. and Warden, C. H. ( I 997) Nat. Genet. IS. 269-272 Arsenijevic. D.. Onuma, H., Pecqueur, C.. Raimbault. S., Manning, B. S..Miroux. B., Couplan. E., AlvesGuem. M. C.. Goubem. M.. Surwit. R et al. (2000) Nat. Genet. 26, 435439 Zhang. C. Y., Ba?. G.. Perret. P.. Krauss, S.. Peroni, 0.. Grujic, D.. Hagen. T., Vidal-Puig, A. 1.. Boss, 0..Kim, Y. B. et al. (2001) Cell 105. 745-755 Mitochondria1Uncoupling Proteins 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I1 I2 13 14 15 16 Raimbault. S.. Dndi. S.. Denjean. F.. Lachuer. 1.. Couplan. E.. Bouillaud. F.. Bordas, A.. Duchamp. C..Taouis. M. and Ricquier, D. (200 I) Biochem. J. 353, 44 1-444 17 Mao. W. G.. Yu. X. X.. Zhong. A,. Li. W. L.. Brush. J.. Shewood. S. W., Adams. S.H. and Pan, G. H. (1999) FEBS Lett 443, 326-330 18 Sanchis. D.. Fleury, C.. Chomiki, N..Goubern, M.. Huang, Q.. Neverova. M.. Gregoire. F.. Easlick 1.. Raimbautt. S.. Levi-Meyrueis. C. et al. ( 1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 3461 1-34615 19 Bouillaud, F.. Couplan, E.. Pecqueur. C. and Ricquier, D. (200 I) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1504, 107- I I 9 20 Hot-vath, T. L.. Warden, C. H.. Hajos. M., Lombardi. A,. Goglia F. and Diano, S. ( 1999) J. Neurosci. 19, I 04 I 7- I 0427 21 Elmquist. J. Ic, Elias. C. F. and Saper, C. B. ( I 999) Neuron 22.22 1-232 22 Schwartz. M. W., Woods, S. C.. Porte. Jr,D.. Seeley, R J. and Baskin. D. G. (2000) Nature (London) 404,66 1-67 I 23 Turkelson. C. M. ( 1988) Life Sci. 43, I 199- I205 24 Powley. T. L., Berthoud, H. R. Fox, E. A. and Laughton, W. (I992) in Neumanatomy and Physiology of Abdominal Vagal Afferents (Ritter, S.. Ritter, R C. and Bames, C. D.. eds). pp. 55-79, CRC. Boca Raton 25 Duchen. M. R (2000) J. Physiol. 529, 57-68 26 Ben-An, Y. and Cossart. R (2000) Trends Neurosci. 23, 58S587 Esterbauer, H., Schneitler, C.. Oberkofler, H.. Ebenbichler, C.. Paulweber. B.. Sandhofer. F.. Ladumer. G.. Hell, E., Strosberg. A. D.. Patsch. J. R et al. (2001) Nat. Genet. 28, 178- I83 Richard. D.. Rivest. R, Huang. Q. L.. Bouillaud. F.. Sanchis. D.. Champigny. 0.and Ricquier, D. ( I 998) J. Comp. Neuml. 397,549-560 Nicholls, D. G. and Locke. R M. ( 1984) Physiol. Rev. 64. 1-64 Foster, D. 0. ( I 984) Can. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 62, 6 I 8-622 Skulachev, V. P. ( 1997) Biosci. Rep. 17, 347-366 Negre-Salvayre.A.. Hirtz. C.. Camra, G.. Cazenave. R. Troly. M., Salvayre, R, Penicaud, L. and Casteilla, L. (1997) FASEB J. I I, 809-8 I5 Hanukoglu. I. and Rapoport. R ( 1995) Endocr. Res. 2 I, 231-241 Steinbeck M. 1.. Appel. Jr.W. H.. Verhoeven. A. J. and Karnovsky, M. J. ( 1994) J. Cell Biol. 126, 765-772 Boss. O., Hagen. T. and Lowell, B. B. (2000) Diabetes 49, 143- I56 Ricquier, D. and Bouillaud. F. ( 1998) Med./Sci. 14, 889-897 Ricquier, D.. Fleury. C.. Larose. M.. Sanchis. D.. Pecqueur, C.. Raimbautt. S.. Gelly, C., Vacher, D., Cassard-Doulcier, A. M.. Levi-Meyrueis, C. et al. (1999) J. Intern. Med. 245, 637-642 Laloi. M.. Klein. M.. Riesmeier. J. W.. Muller-Rober, 6.. Fleury. C.. Bouillaud. F. and Ricquier. D. ( 1997) Nature (London) 389. I 35- I 36 Received I 3 July 200 I 817 0 200 I Biochemical Society