* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Evolution 1/e - SUNY Plattsburgh
Genealogical DNA test wikipedia , lookup
Nucleic acid double helix wikipedia , lookup
Zinc finger nuclease wikipedia , lookup
Genomic library wikipedia , lookup
Molecular cloning wikipedia , lookup
Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup
DNA supercoil wikipedia , lookup
DNA damage theory of aging wikipedia , lookup
Dominance (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Genetic code wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup
Saethre–Chotzen syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Nucleic acid analogue wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of neurodegenerative diseases wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup
Extrachromosomal DNA wikipedia , lookup
Cancer epigenetics wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup
Cell-free fetal DNA wikipedia , lookup
Cre-Lox recombination wikipedia , lookup
Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup
Population genetics wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
Genome editing wikipedia , lookup
Deoxyribozyme wikipedia , lookup
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
Microsatellite wikipedia , lookup
No-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) Genome Editing wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Helitron (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Frameshift mutation wikipedia , lookup
Read chapter 6 Darwin unfortunately never understood what genes were or how information passed between generations. Even though Darwin didn’t know it, Gregor Mendel was figuring out the laws of inheritance while Darwin was developing his theory of evolution. Mendel carried out classic research on inheritance by crossing pure-breeding strains of peas. The results of his crosses revealed two basic laws of inheritance. Law of segregation – each individual has two gene copies at each locus and these are segregated (split up) during the formation of gametes so only one copy goes into each gamete. Mendel also showed by carrying out crosses in which he tracked multiple traits simultaneously that different traits were inherited independently. Mendel’s Law of independent assortment – alleles at different loci are inherited independently i.e. what allele is passed down at one locus has no influence on what allele is passed down at another. What Mendel’s work showed was that copies of discrete particles (what we today call genes) are passed from one generation to the next. Inheritance is thus particulate and is not a process of blending (e.g. as occurs when paints are mixed) An early criticism of Darwin’s work was that any new favorable mutation would be so diluted by the effects of blending inheritance that it could never become common. How then could evolution occur? With particulate inheritance that problem disappears. Genes do not blend together and so a favorable variant can increase over time as a result of selection. DNA made up of sequence of nucleotides. Each nucleotide includes a sugar, phosphate and one of four possible nitrogenous bases (adenine and guanine [both purines], and thymine and cytosine [both pyrimidines]). The opposite strands of the DNA molecule are complementary because the strands are held together by bonds between the opposing bases and adenine bonds only with thymine and cytosine only with guanine. Thus, knowing the sequence on one strand enables one to construct the sequence on the other strand. Sequence of bases in DNA codes for protein structure as each three base sequence codes for one amino acid in the protein chain. [To refresh yourself on basic DNA structure and protein synthesis see any Introductory Biology textbook] In the processes of transcription and translation a section of DNA (a gene) is first transcribed into to an RNA copy, which then has all the all the non-coding portions (the introns) removed, and is then translated into a protein. One gene codes for one protein. Different versions of a gene are called alleles. The combination of genes an individual has at a locus (a genes physical location on a chromosome) is referred to as its genotype. [genotype may also refer to all the alleles an individual has at all its loci] An individual who has two different alleles at its loci is a heterozygote. An individual with two copies of the same allele is referred to as a homozygote. If the heterozygote is phenotypically identical to one of the homozygotes we say the allele in that homozygote is dominant and the other allele is recessive. If the heterozygote is phenotypically intermediate between the two homozygotes we say the alleles are codominant. A grid called a punnett square can be used to figure out what genotypes will be produced as a result of a cross between individuals. Each side of the punnett square lists the possible gametes an individual can produce and the squares in the grid show the genotypes different combinations of gametes will produce. A major source of genetic variability comes from the production of new combinations of genes as a result of sexual reproduction. The process of crossing-over in which pieces of chromosomes are exchanged between chromosomes produces new and unique chromosomes. Recombination remixes existing variation, but where does variation ultimately come from? Mutations – changes in the DNA sequence of an organism are the ultimate source of all variation When DNA is synthesized an enzyme called DNA polymerase reads one strand of DNA molecule and constructs a complementary strand. If DNA polymerase makes a mistake and it is not repaired, a mutation has occurred. A mistake that changes one base on a DNA molecule is called a point mutation. Two forms: › Transition: one pyrimidine (T or C) substituted for the other pyrimidine or one purine substituted for the other purine (A or G). › Transversion: purine substituted for pyrimidine or vice versa Not all mutations cause a change in amino acid coded for. These are called silent mutations. Mutations that do cause a change in amino acid are called replacement mutations. Another type of mutation occurs when bases are inserted or deleted from the DNA molecule. This causes a change in how the whole DNA strand is read (a frame shift mutation) and produces a nonfunctional protein. Duplication results from unequal crossing over when chromosomes align incorrectly during meiosis. Result is a chromosome with an extra section of DNA that contains duplicated genes. Extra sections of DNA are duplicates and can accumulate mutations without being selected against because the other copies of the gene produce normal proteins. Gene may completely change over time so gene duplication creates new possibilities for gene function. Hemoglobin (the oxygen-carrying molecule in red corpuscles) consists of an iron-binding heme group and four surrounding protein chains (two coded for by genes in the Alpha cluster and two in the Beta cluster). Ancestral globin gene duplicated and diverged into alpha and beta ancestral genes about 450-500 mya. Later transposed to different chromosomes and followed by further subsequent duplications and mutations. From Campbell and Reese Biology 7th ed. Lengths and positions of exons and introns in the globin genes are very similar. Very unlikely such similarities could be due to chance. Exons (blue), introns (white), number in box is number of nucleotides. 4.9 Different genes in alpha and beta families are expressed at different times in development. For example, in very young human fetus, zeta (from alpha cluster) and epsilon (from beta cluster) chains are present initially then replaced. Similarly G-gamma and Agamma chains present in older fetuses are replaced by beta chains after birth. 4.8 Gestation (weeks) Post-birth(weeks) Fetal hemoglobin has a higher affinity for oxygen than adult hemoglobin. Enhances oxygen transfer from mother to offspring. It is important to realize that mutations arise randomly and are not biased towards making the organism better adapted. In fact, most mutations are deleterious. The random nature of mutations was demonstrated by an elegant experiment by Luria and Delbruck in 1943. At the time it was unclear if mutations occurred at random or if the environment somehow induced mutations when there was a need for them. Luria and Delbruck worked on the bacterium Escherischia coli and a bacteriophage virus that killed E. coli. When E. coli on petri dishes was exposed to the virus most E. coli were infected and killed but a few resistant bacteria survived and produced colonies. L+D wanted to distinguish between two competing hypotheses. 1. Random mutation: before being exposed to phage some bacteria would have randomly developed mutations. These would survive and produce colonies. 2. Acquired hereditary resistance. At time of exposure to phage all bacteria would be vulnerable. However, exposure to the phage would induce resistance in some small percentage of bacteria that would produce resistant colonies. L+D experiment L+D grew phage sensitive bacteria to high densities in a broth and spread them on a plate covered with phage. They then counted the number of colonies that grew after 24-48 hours. Using just this count data they could distinguish between the two hypotheses. How were they able to use the count data to distinguish between the two hypotheses? Logic depends on the timing of when mutations would have happened. If the presence of phage induced mutations in the bacteria then mutations would not occur until after the bacteria were exposed to the phage. Because there were lots of bacteria in each culture and a nontrivial number should develop resistance by the law of large numbers we would expect a similar number of colonies to develop on each plate. In contrast under the random mutation model beneficial mutations could have arisen at any time before phage exposure. Thus we would expect in some cases for the mutation to have arisen well before exposure to phage and for the bacteria to have produced lots of descendents with the mutation. In other cases the mutation may have arisen more recently and so few descendents with the mutation would be present. Therefore, under the random mutation scenario we would expect there to be a lot of variation from plate to plate in the number of resistant colonies seen. L+D repeated their experiment many times and counted the resistant colonies they found. When they analyzed their data they found that the variance was much larger than the mean which supported the random mutation hypothesis and allowed them to reject the induced mutation hypothesis. Very little data is available of the proportions of mutations that are beneficial versus deleterious. However a recent study on a virus in which specific point mutations were artificially induced have shown that most are deleterious, about 40% neutral and only 2-3% beneficial. Even though most mutations are neutral or deletrious the few beneficial mutations when combined with natural selection are what lead to evolution taking place.