* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Gene Order Polymorphism in Yeast
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Human genome wikipedia , lookup
Neocentromere wikipedia , lookup
X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup
Nucleic acid double helix wikipedia , lookup
United Kingdom National DNA Database wikipedia , lookup
Molecular cloning wikipedia , lookup
Cancer epigenetics wikipedia , lookup
Metagenomics wikipedia , lookup
Cre-Lox recombination wikipedia , lookup
SNP genotyping wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Deoxyribozyme wikipedia , lookup
Molecular Inversion Probe wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
DNA supercoil wikipedia , lookup
Extrachromosomal DNA wikipedia , lookup
Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup
No-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) Genome Editing wikipedia , lookup
Genome editing wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Epigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Microsatellite wikipedia , lookup
Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup
Cell-free fetal DNA wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
Bisulfite sequencing wikipedia , lookup
Genomic library wikipedia , lookup
Comparative genomic hybridization wikipedia , lookup
Copy-number variation wikipedia , lookup
Gene Order Polymorphism in Yeast Dina Faddah Vision Lab Meeting- February 18, 2005 Background • Differences in the order of genes on chromosomes among individuals within a population may influence expression at those affected loci • We do not know how frequently such variations in gene order occur among individuals in a population • We do not know the degree to which such differences in chromosomal location affect gene expression at those transposed loci Outline I. Detecting Transposition-Using DNA Microarrays and SpotProb II. Characterization of a Candidate Transposed Region using PCR assays III. Joe & Eric looking at the expression data and utilizing genome mismatch scanning to predict the genomic locations of transposed segments in Y101 Detecting Transpositions • Using Comparative Genomic Hybridization on a Microarray (CGHM) to detect genomic segments that have transposed between two stains of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) • S288C- sequenced reference strain • S90- thought to be very similar to S288C • Y101- known to lack 4 open reading frames (ORFs) which are present in S288C • Transposed: Equal copy number, but at non-syntenic positions Segregation of a Transposed Segment ABC DEF Parents Tetrads AC x DBEF 5 6 ABC DBEF ABC DBEF ABC DEF ABC DEF ABC DEF ABC DBEF ABC DEF AC DBEF AC DEF AC DBEF AC DEF AC DBEF AC DEF AC DBEF AC DEF AC DEF AC DBEF 1 2 3 ABC DEF ABC DEF ABC DBEF ABC DBEF ABC DBEF AC DEF AC DBEF 4 1 1 1 1 2 0 Duplication 1 1 1 1 2 0 Deletion 2 2 2 2 0 4 Parental 1/6 1/6 2/3 Methods 1. Genomic DNA is extracted from each parent (S90 and Y101) and from the four spores in a tetrad (7, 21, 27, 36) 2. The reference DNA is labeled with one fluorescent dye, Cy3, and the sample DNA is labeled with another fluorescent dye, Cy5 3. The reference is mixed with the sample and then hybridized onto an array Cy5 Cy3 S288C S90 1 Arrays Y101 7A 2 3 4 5 6 7B 7C 7D DNA Microarrays • 14,097 spots on the array cover the entire yeast genome, including intergenic regions Normal (1 copy) 1:1 Ratio of Cy3 and Cy5 Deleted (0 copies) Low ratio of Cy3:Cy5 Duplicated (2 copies) High ratio of Cy3:Cy5 We have ratio values for each ORF and intergenic in each of the four spores for each tetrad (21 & 27) Now what? Questions? Analysis of ratios • The normalized hybridization log ratios are used in analysis 1200 1000 frequency • The spot intensities were normalized for each sample separately by transforming the logarithm of the ratio to a standard normal distribution (subtracting the mean and dividing by the std dev) 800 600 400 200 • Examined each spot in each spore of each tetrad • Threshold -2.9-- 2.0 log(ratio) 3.7 3.1 2.4 1.8 1.2 0.6 -0.1 -0.7 -1.3 -1.9 -2.6 -3.2 -3.8 -4.4 • By inspection of the tails of the distribution , specific upper and lower threshold were chosen common to all samples -5.1 0 SpotProb • – – – Each spot was classified as being: Below the lower threshold (Deletion) Within the thresholds Surpassing upper threshold (Duplication) SpotProb searches for spots with the following criteria: I. Within the thresholds in the parent samples II. In a given tetrad, it is duplicated in one spore, deleted in one spore, and present in equal copy number in the other two spores III. Or, in a given tetrad, there is a duplication or a deletion in one spore, but not both 84 spots were identified as candidate transpositions (I & II) and (I & III) 3 spots fit criteria (I & III) TOTAL: 57 candidate transposed segments Map of Candidate Transpositions Refresh • We’ve identified 57 putative transposed segments between S90 and Y101 using DNA microarrays and SpotProb. • Lets look closer at the region on Chromosome 15 in which the three spots show a 1:1:2 pattern • Questions? PCR Assays • Each open reading frame (ORF) and intergenic within the area of interest was amplified in the two parents (S90 and Y101) and all four spores in a tetrad • Analysis of the PCR band pattern among the parental strains and two tetrads allowed us to characterize segments within, outside, or on the boundaries of the transposed region Expected PCR Band Patterns S288C Y101 S90 21A 21B 21C 21D 27A 27B 27C 27D Within Rearrangement + + + + + + Outside Rearrangement + + + + + + + + + + + Endpoints, or primer mismatch + - - + - - + + + - + + - - + + Within Rearrangement -Spots termed as ‘Within Rearrangement’ are also termed ‘transpositions’ - Remember, for a transposed segment, within a tetrad, 1 spore will be missing the segment, 1 spore will have two copies of the segment, and 2 spores will each have a single segment S288C Y101 S90 21A 21B 21C 21D 27A 27B 27C 27D Within Rearrangement + + + - + + + - + + + Duplicated Deleted Spore S90 Copy Y101 Copy Duplicated S90 Copy Deleted Spore Y101 Copy Endpoints, or primer mismatch S288C Y101 S90 21A 21B 21C 21D 27A 27B 27C 27D Endpoints, or primer mismatch + - + - - + + - + + - Duplicated Deleted Spore Pre-Transposed location in Y101 Transposed location in Y101 S90 Copy Y101 Copy Duplicated S90 Copy Deleted Spore Y101 Copy Characterization of Chromosome 15 Region * * •Contains 5 genes •Spans ~15kB of genomic DNA Refresh • We have identified 57 putative transposed segments using DNA microarrays and SpotProb • We have used PCR assays to delineate the extent of the Chromosome 15 region Current Work • Hybridization of additional tetrads (21, 36, 7) to allow for better predictions of where these transposed segments are located in Y101 • 2/3 of the tetrads should show the 1:1:2 pattern for a transposed segment • We are using these transpositions as markers to map Y101 Future Work • • Contour-clamped homogeneous electric field (CHEF) analysis will be used to determine the exact chromosomal location of the transposed segment in Y101 We would also like to examine a. How transposition of the five genes affects their gene expression b. What the frequency of this rearrangement is among a larger sample of natural yeast strains c. Whether there are any clues as to the transposition mechanism in the sequences in and around the transposed segment Conclusion • Developing a new procedure to systematically identify transpositions • Using CGHM in a novel way. Now we are no longer limited to preselected or adjacent regions • We can make a genome-wide map of transposed segments • Hopefully, our procedure will be applied to more complex eukaryotic genomes in the future