Download Response to Nelson-Sathi et al. (Nature 517, 77-80

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Protein moonlighting wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics in learning and memory wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup

Epistasis wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of neurodegenerative diseases wikipedia , lookup

Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup

Point mutation wikipedia , lookup

Fetal origins hypothesis wikipedia , lookup

NEDD9 wikipedia , lookup

Genomics wikipedia , lookup

Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup

Copy-number variation wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Gene wikipedia , lookup

Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of diabetes Type 2 wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup

Saethre–Chotzen syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup

The Selfish Gene wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup

Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup

Gene desert wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

Gene nomenclature wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Helitron (biology) wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Response to Nelson-Sathi et al. (Nature 517, 77-80)
Origins of major archaeal clades do not correspond to gene
acquisitions from bacteria
Mathieu Groussin1 , Bastien Boussau2,3,4 , Gergely J. Szöllősi5 , Laura Eme6 , Manolo Gouy2,3,4 ,
Céline Brochier-Armanet2,3,4 , Vincent Daubin2,3,4
1
– Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA,
USA
2
3
4
– Université Lyon 1, 69622 Villeurbanne, France
– CNRS, UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, 69622 Villeurbanne, France
5
6
– Université de Lyon, 69361 Lyon, France
– ELTE-MTA “Lendület” Biophysics Research Group, Pázmány, Budapest, Hungary
– Centre for Comparative Genomics and Evolutionary Bioinformatics, Department of Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
1
b)
5
+ +
+
+
+ + + + + +
+ +
2
4
6
8
10
10
+
8
2
1
2
+
3
4
+
5
6
+
7
2
4
+
+
6
+
+
+
8
Maximum Likelihood
expectations (Total = 25)
25
10
15
20
+
+
+
+ +
4
+ +
+
6
+ + + +
8
10
+ + +
12
14
10
200
Nelson-Sathi et al.
estimates (Total = 1047)
+
+ + +++++
+
++++++ ++++ + +
5
Number of genomes in which the family is found
Maximum Likelihood
expectations (Total = 215)
100
150
+
50
Number of gene families inferred at the root
+
+
10
Haloarchaea
0
150
100
Maximum Likelihood
expectations (Total = 15)
50
0
Number of gene families inferred at the root
+
8
Nelson-Sathi et al.
estimates (Total = 100)
f)
Nelson-Sathi et al.
estimates (Total = 338)
+
6
+
Number of genomes in which the family is found
Methanosarcinales
+
+
Methanococcales
2
8
Number of genomes in which the family is found
e)
+
5
0
Number of gene families inferred at the root
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
+
+
0
Number of gene families inferred at the root
Maximum Likelihood
expectations (Total = 23)
+
+
+
4
d)
Nelson-Sathi et al.
estimates (Total = 128)
+
+
Number of genomes in which the family is found
Methanobacteriales
+
+
+
+
12
Number of genomes in which the family is found
c)
Maximum Likelihood
expectations (Total = 4)
6
10
Maximum Likelihood
expectations (Total = 5)
Nelson-Sathi et al.
estimates (Total = 40)
4
+
Desulfurococcales
2
Number of gene families inferred at the root
15
Nelson-Sathi et al.
estimates (Total = 59)
0
Thermoproteales
0
Number of gene families inferred at the root
a)
10
15
+
20
Number of genomes in which the family is found
Figure 1: Family size and gene gains for the “import” set at the origin of archaeal phyla.
The 6 phyla for which Nelson-Sathi et al. (2015) [NS] claim a strong signal for HGTs from bacteria at
their origins are shown. NS estimates are represented in purple. Maximum Likelihood expectations of
gains at the origin for the same datasets are represented by red crosses. Expectations of gains were
calculated from branch-specific rates of gene gain and loss estimated from the 25,762 gene families of
NS, but we report only the results for the 2,264 genes from the “import” set of NS. Most of the families
inferred to be gained at the origin of each phylum by NS are distributed over 2 or 3 archaeal genomes
only. ML estimates show that only a small fraction of gene families were actually acquired at the origin
of each phylum.
2
1000
800
Parsimony estimates
200
400
600
Maximum Likelihood estimates
les
ea
ca
Th
er
mo
p
oc
oc
ur
ulf
De
s
ro
t
les
s
ale
lob
les
lfo
ca
Su
oc
mo
c
Th
er
ac
ter
ial
es
les
ca
ob
an
th
Me
th
an
oc
oc
les
ata
sm
Me
Th
er
mo
og
ae
ch
Ar
pla
lob
ale
s
es
ial
ob
icr
om
an
th
Me
Me
th
an
oc
ell
ale
s
ale
a
ar
cin
ae
os
rc
h
Me
th
an
loa
Ha
s
0
Number of gene gains at the origin of archaeal phyla
Nelson-Sathi et al. estimates
Figure 2: Consistency of gene family ancestral gain estimations on the “import” gene set.
Along the archaeal reference tree provided by Nelson-Sathi et al. (2015) [NS], both Parsimony (green)
and Maximum Likelihood (blue) inferences of ancestral gains were computed with Count (Csurs and
Miklos, 2006; Csurs, 2010), and compared with the estimates of NS. Wagner parsimony with a large
range of gain/loss costs combinations were tested, yielding similar estimations. Here are represented
the results with a gain cost of 2 and 4, from left to right respectively. In ML, ancestral branch-specific
gain expectations were computed from rates of gene gain and loss estimated either from the 2,264, 3,315
or 25,762 gene family sets defined by NS, from left to right respectively. All analyses are consistent and
strongly contradict the scenario of massive gene acquisitions among these 2,264 families at the origin
of archaeal phyla, claimed by NS
3
References
Csurs M. 2010. Count: evolutionary analysis of phylogenetic profiles with parsimony and likelihood.
Bioinformatics 26:1910–1912.
Csurs M and Miklos I. 2006. A probabilistic model for gene content evolution with duplication, loss,
and horizontal transfer. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual International Conference on Research in
Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB) Vol. 3909 of Springer Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics,
Heidelberg:206–220.
Nelson-Sathi S, Sousa FL, Roettger M, Lozada-Chvez N, Thiergart T, Janssen A, Bryant D, Landan
G, Schnheit P, Siebers B, McInerney JO, and Martin WF. 2015. Origins of major archaeal clades
correspond to gene acquisitions from bacteria. Nature 517:77–80.
4