* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Supplementary Information (docx 4776K)
Clinical neurochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Real-time polymerase chain reaction wikipedia , lookup
Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides wikipedia , lookup
Evolution of metal ions in biological systems wikipedia , lookup
Gel electrophoresis wikipedia , lookup
Bisulfite sequencing wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Expression vector wikipedia , lookup
Magnesium transporter wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Paracrine signalling wikipedia , lookup
Ancestral sequence reconstruction wikipedia , lookup
Bimolecular fluorescence complementation wikipedia , lookup
Protein structure prediction wikipedia , lookup
Interactome wikipedia , lookup
G protein–coupled receptor wikipedia , lookup
Community fingerprinting wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of proteins wikipedia , lookup
Protein purification wikipedia , lookup
Metalloprotein wikipedia , lookup
Protein–protein interaction wikipedia , lookup
Western blot wikipedia , lookup
Microbe-microbe interactions trigger Mn(II)-oxidizing gene expression Jinsong Liang1,2,★, Yaohui Bai1,★, Yujie Men3, Jiuhui Qu1 1 Key Laboratory of Drinking Water Science and Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; 3 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA ★ These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence: JH Qu, Key Laboratory of Drinking Water Science and Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 18 Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100085, China. Tel: 86 10 62849160. Fax: 86 10 62849160. E-mail: [email protected]. The authors declare no conflict of interest. This Supplementary Information includes: Supplementary Methods S1 to S3 Supplementary Figures S1 to S6 Supplementary Tables S1 to S4 1 / 15 Supplementary Methods Method S1 Strain identification by 16S rDNA sequencing Total genomic DNA of the two strains was extracted using TIANamp Bacteria DNA Kit (TIANGEN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The 16S rDNA fragments were amplified by PCR with the primer set, 27F and 1492R (Weisburg et al., 1991). The PCR amplification protocol was as follows: one cycle at 95°C for 3 min, and 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min, and one cycle at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products were purified and then sequenced by Sanger sequencing. The output sequences from bi-directional sequencing of each fragment were trimmed and assembled into contigs (> 1300 bp) with DNAMAN (version 6.0) and then analyzed using BLAST alignment. The closest genus was assigned to each of the 16S rDNA sequences. Method S2 Spectroscopic Mn(III) trapping experiments Mn(III) was also monitored during Mn(II) oxidation by the co-culture of strain Arthrobacter and strain Sphingopyxis. Ligand-binding complex P2O74- (PP) was selected to complex Mn(III) by forming stable Mn(III)-PP complex, which has max absorbance at 258 nm (ε = 6,750 M-1). The co-culture was first cultured in the absence of Mn(II) for 24 h, and then 200 μM Mn(II) was added to the medium, which was quickly transferred to five flasks, and PP was sterilely added to each flask to achieve the final concentrations of 0, 100, 500, 2000, and 10000 μM respectively. Samples of 2 / 15 1 mL were taken per hour, and filtered through a 0.45 μm pore size filter (JINTENG) before spectroscopic determination (full wavelength scan). After spectroscopic determination, the samples were reduced in cuvette by adding 10 μL 10% (w/v) reducing agent NH2OH·HCl and then subjected to the second spectroscopic determination. Method S3 Protein identification with nanoLC-MS/MS The gel band of interest was excised from the gel, reduced with 25 mM of DTT and alkylated with 55 mM iodoacetamide. In gel digestion was then carried out with sequencing grade modified trypsin in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate at 37°C overnight. The peptides were extracted twice with 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid in 50% (v/v) acetonitrile aqueous solution for 30 min. Extracts were then centrifuged in a speedvac to reduce the volume. For nanoLC-MS/MS analysis, the digestion products were separated by a 65 min gradient elution at a flow rate of 0.250 µL/min with an EASY-nLCII™ integrated nano-HPLC system (Proxeon, Denmark), directly interfaced with a Thermo LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer. The analytical column was a home-made fused silica capillary column (75 µm ID, 150 mm length; Upchurch, Oak Harbor, WA) packed with C-18 resin (300 Å, 5 µm, Varian, Lexington, MA). Mobile phase A was Milli-Q water with 0.1% (v/v) formic acid, and mobile phase B was 99.9% acetonitrile with 0.1% (v/v) formic acid. The LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer was operated in the data-dependent acquisition mode using Xcalibur 2.0.7 software and 3 / 15 there was a single full-scan mass spectrum in the orbitrap (400-1800 m/z, 30,000 resolution) followed by 20 data-dependent MS/MS scans in the ion trap at 35% normalized collision energy (CID). The MS/MS spectra from each LC-MS/MS run were searched against the selected database using an in-house Proteome Discoverer searching algorithm. The search criteria were as follows: full tryptic specificity was required; one missed cleavage was allowed; carbamidomethylation was set as the fixed modification; the oxidation (M) was set as the variable modification; precursor ion mass tolerances were set at 10 ppm for all MS acquired in an orbitrap mass analyzer; and the fragment ion mass tolerance was set at 0.8 Da for all MS2 spectra acquired in the linear ion trap. 4 / 15 Supplementary Figures Figure S1 Optical density at 600 nm (OD600) in monocultures of Arthrobacter and Sphingopyxis. 5 / 15 Figure S2 Mn(III) production in the co-culture of strain Arthrobacter and strain Sphingopyxis. The max absorbance wavelength of Mn(III)-PP (P2O74-) complex is 258 nm. The dotted curves represent absorbance values of samples (1 mL) after adding 10 μL 10% (w/v) reducing agent NH2OH·HCl. 6 / 15 Figure S3 Scanning electron microscope of strains Arthrobacter and Sphingopyxis in monoculture and co-culture. a, Arthrobacter (A); b, Sphingopyxis (S); c, co-culture, 1 h before Mn(II) oxidation initiation; d, co-culture, 1 h after Mn(II) oxidation initiation. e, 14 out of 64 (22%) Arthrobacter cells were coated with Mn oxides. Bars, 1 μm. 7 / 15 Figure S4 Alignment of conserved copper-binding regions of the Mn(II)-oxidizing protein (BoxA) in strain Arthrobacter sp. QXT-31 and other Mn(II)-oxidizing-related multicopper oxidases in other strains. The potential copper-binding sites are indicated as T1, T2, and T3 for three binding types, i. e., type 1, type 2, and type 3. The accession numbers of CotA, CueO, MofA, MoxA and MnxG are AFL56752, NP_414665, CAA81037, CAJ19378, and WP_006837219, respectively. 8 / 15 Figure S5 Phylogenetic analysis illustrating the similarity of BoxA to its closest relatives (search against the NCBI protein database) and the known Mn(II)-oxidizing protein sequences. The tree was generated by the maximum likelihood method in software MEGA 6 (Tamura et al., 2013). The numbers (only those greater than 70% are indicated) on the branch nodes demonstrate the percentage of bootstrap support for the clades based on 1000 bootstrap resampling. Enzymes CotA, MofA, CueO, MoxA and MnxG have been reported as Mn(II)-oxidizing proteins. 9 / 15 a b Figure S6 Abundance estimation of transcripts related to (a) type VI secretion apparatus (T6SS) and type IV secretion apparatus (T4SS), and (b) phage infection. (a) Transcripts encoding a T6SS apparatus, a T4SS apparatus and an effector (related to virulence) in Sphingopyxis. (b) Transcripts encoding a phase shock protein and a peptidoglycan glycosyltransferase in Arthrobacter. Data are means ± average deviation for two biological replicates, except for 0 h (single sample with no replicate). 10 / 15 Supplementary Tables Table S1 Primers used in PCR and genomic walking. 11 / 15 Table S2 Top ten candidate proteins for proteins in the ~300-500 kDa protein band based on the analysis using nanoLC-MS/MS. Accession Description Score Coverage # Proteins # Unique Peptides MW [kDa] calc. pI WP_056084337 bilirubin oxidase [Arthrobacter sp. Leaf137] 272.35 8.69 9 1 74.0 7.05 WP_056628334 bilirubin oxidase [Arthrobacter sp. Soil736] 131.82 9.88 9 3 71.9 8.48 WP_003805885 bilirubin oxidase [Arthrobacter globiformis] 105.12 13.69 9 2 73.0 7.64 WP_058810643 MULTISPECIES: serine hydrolase [Sphingopyxis] 54.19 20.63 2 7 41.2 8.34 WP_056343216 hypothetical protein [Sphingopyxis sp. Root1497] 48.06 0.87 1 2 383.8 4.06 WP_058806415 MULTISPECIES: TonB-dependent receptor 37.53 10.45 1 4 68.9 5.39 [Sphingopyxis] WP_026544903 bilirubin oxidase [Arthrobacter sp. 35/47] 31.13 4.33 2 1 59.4 7.59 WP_054730799 molybdopterin dehydrogenase [Sphingopyxis 28.11 11.39 11 1 33.0 9.52 20.62 12.03 11 1 33.2 9.72 17.43 3.94 2 1 39.0 7.55 macrogoltabida] WP_058806746 MULTISPECIES: molybdopterin dehydrogenase [Sphingopyxis] WP_056347851 12 / 15 hypothetical protein [Sphingopyxis sp. Root1497] Table S3 Top ten candidate proteins for proteins in the ~70 kDa protein band based on the analysis using nanoLC-MS/MS. Accession Description Score Coverage # Proteins # Unique MW [kDa] calc. pI Peptides WP_058809156 hypothetical protein, partial [Sphingopyxis sp. HXXIV] 332.16 36.38 8 13 47.7 4.67 WP_058809698 MULTISPECIES: TonB-dependent receptor [Sphingopyxis] 257.90 19.97 8 15 83.3 5.01 WP_056342572 TonB-dependent receptor [Sphingopyxis sp. Root1497] 107.85 18.00 10 6 84.5 4.92 WP_058809157 MULTISPECIES: TonB-dependent receptor [Sphingopyxis] 84.98 11.45 7 9 98.9 4.69 WP_058456813 MULTISPECIES: TonB-dependent receptor [Sphingopyxis] 74.60 11.32 8 1 84.3 4.77 WP_058807574 MULTISPECIES: hypothetical protein [Sphingopyxis] 63.69 17.77 128 12 81.1 4.94 WP_058807958 MULTISPECIES: hypothetical protein [Sphingopyxis] 60.44 12.08 4 10 108.2 4.89 WP_056084337 bilirubin oxidase [Arthrobacter sp. Leaf137] 34.16 6.63 11 3 74.0 7.05 WP_058810555 MULTISPECIES: ABC transporter ATP-binding protein 30.28 7.43 4 4 88.2 5.16 25.33 5.64 13 4 90.4 4.83 [Sphingopyxis] WP_056371367 13 / 15 MULTISPECIES: TonB-dependent receptor [Sphingopyxis] Table S4 Statistics of RNA-Seq data. Sample name Clean reads Clean bases 0h 1.5h_1 1.5h_2 3h_1 3h_2 4h_1 4h_2 7h_1 7h_2 Paired-end 11,862,668 11,739,303 11,533,380 11,548,897 11,649,526 11,779,250 11,859,254 11,768,023 11,712,894 26,192,356 581,270,732 575,225,847 565,135,620 565,895,953 570,826,774 577,183,250 581,103,446 576,633,127 573,931,806 2,357,312,040 14 / 15 Read length (bp) 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 90 Insert size (bp) Q20(%) GC(%) Number of reads aligned to the assembled transcripts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 97.14 97.60 96.92 96.91 96.79 96.93 97.16 97.10 97.25 96.87 62.59 64.04 64.11 64.02 64.07 63.78 63.70 63.97 61.86 59.86 10900897 10698448 10347700 10547625 10467886 10725710 10954806 10867634 10780192 - Number of reads aligned to boxA sequence 166 829 1682 37843 36578 6916 8994 6268 5118 - References Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. (2013). MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725-2729. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. (1991). 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 173: 697–703. 15 / 15