* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download High-Efficiency DNA Separation by Capillary Electrophoresis in a
Epigenetic clock wikipedia , lookup
DNA paternity testing wikipedia , lookup
Zinc finger nuclease wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Mitochondrial DNA wikipedia , lookup
Holliday junction wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
DNA barcoding wikipedia , lookup
DNA sequencing wikipedia , lookup
No-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) Genome Editing wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Primary transcript wikipedia , lookup
Comparative genomic hybridization wikipedia , lookup
Cancer epigenetics wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
DNA polymerase wikipedia , lookup
DNA profiling wikipedia , lookup
Genomic library wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
SNP genotyping wikipedia , lookup
Bisulfite sequencing wikipedia , lookup
DNA damage theory of aging wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup
Microsatellite wikipedia , lookup
Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup
Nucleic acid analogue wikipedia , lookup
Genealogical DNA test wikipedia , lookup
Epigenomics wikipedia , lookup
United Kingdom National DNA Database wikipedia , lookup
Cell-free fetal DNA wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Cre-Lox recombination wikipedia , lookup
Molecular cloning wikipedia , lookup
Extrachromosomal DNA wikipedia , lookup
DNA supercoil wikipedia , lookup
Helitron (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Nucleic acid double helix wikipedia , lookup
Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 2385-2389 High-Efficiency DNA Separation by Capillary Electrophoresis in a Polymer Solution with Ultralow Viscosity Futian Han,†,‡ Bryan H. Huynh,† Yinfa Ma,*,† and Bingcheng Lin‡ Truman State University, 100 East Normal Street, Kirksville, Missouri 63501, and Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 457 Zhongshan Road, Dalian 116023, P.R. China The viscosities of some polymer solutions for DNA separation in capillary electrophoresis are generally very high, which makes them hard to pump into the capillaries. We have developed a novel sieving buffer, based on lowmolecular-weight hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, to separate DNA fragments. The viscosity of this sieving matrix was at least 1 order of magnitude lower than that of traditional buffers with similar sieving effect. The influence of additives such as urea and mannitol was investigated. It was found that the double-stranded DNA (ds DNA) fragments began to denature in 3.5 M urea, and 7 M urea can denature the ds DNA completely. The presence of mannitol will decrease the overlap threshold of the polymer solution (the concentration at which the polymer molecules begin to entangle with each other), which makes it possible to separate DNA fragments in a polymer solution of relatively low concentration. The influence of the electrical field was also investigated, and it was found that the mobility of DNA fragments up to 2000 bp in length did not change greatly with different electric fields. This phenomenon implies that the DNA fragments at this range do not change their conformation with the increase of electric field as was previously believed. The possible mechanism for the separation of DNA fragments is also discussed. The charge densities of DNA fragments are independent of molecular size. Therefore, the mobilities of DNA fragments of different length are almost constant, which makes it impossible to separate DNA fragments in free zone capillary electrophoresis. Although some investigators have explored using free-solution electrophoresis to separate molecule-tagged DNA fragments,1 molecular sieving must be applied to DNA separation by capillary electrophoresis in most cases. Originally, a capillary electrophoresis system with various gels (capillary gel electrophoresis, CGE) was used for the separation of biopolymers such as oligonucleotides, nucleic acids, and proteins. However, an easy-to-operate and reproducible CGE system is difficult to obtain and the cross* Corresponding author: (phone) 660-785-4084; (fax) 660-785-4045; (e-mail) [email protected]. † Truman State University. ‡ Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics. (1) Heller, C.; Slater, G. W.; Mayer, P.; Dovichi N.; Pinto, D.; Viovy, J.; Drouin, G. J. Chromatogr., A 1998, 806, 113-121. 10.1021/ac990160x CCC: $18.00 Published on Web 05/13/1999 © 1999 American Chemical Society linked gel-filled capillaries do not have a long lifetime. In recent years, entangled polymer solutions, such as poly(ethylene oxide),2 poly(ethylene glycol), poly(vinyl alcohol),3 glucomannan,4 uncross-linked polyacrylamide,5 and cellulose and its derivatives,6,7,8 were more and more frequently employed as media to achieve molecular sieving of DNA fragments. Several models, such as the Ogston model,9 the reptation model,10 and the biased reptation model,11 were employed to explain the behavior of DNA fragments in these kinds of sieving matrixes. But there still does not exist a complete understanding of electrophoretic migration of DNA fragments in polymer solutions. Therefore, it is hard to predict the resolution of the migration and to design a sieving system that satisfies one’s separation requirements. Generally, polymer solutions with a wide range of concentrations were used for DNA separation. The sieving ability varies greatly according to the polymer concentration and chemical components. For sieving matrixes prepared from cellulose and its derivatives, concentrated solutions are generally required in order to get satisfactory separation of smaller DNA fragments (<1000 bp) because of the smaller mesh size of these solutions. The viscosities of such solutions are high, and sometimes it is difficult to fill the capillary with buffer for the commercially available instruments, which generally do not have the ability to provide sufficient pressure. In addition, a viscous solution may stick to the electrode and contaminate the sample during the injection. Great care must be taken when these kinds of buffers are used. On the basis of a theory of entangled polymer solutions, one can easily predict that shorter polymers can form a sieving net in the solution giving it a relatively low viscosity and a smaller mesh size.12 But the shorter polymers were not often used. One reason is that the sieving (2) Zhang, N.; Yeung, E. S. J. Chromatogr., A 1997, 768, 135-141. (3) Dolnik, V.; Novotny, M. V. J. Microcolumn Sep. 1992, 4, 515-519. (4) Izumi, T.; Yamaguchi, M.; Yoneda, K.; Isobe, T.; Okuyama T.; Shinoda, T. J. Chromatogr., A 1993, 652, 41-46. (5) Ruiz-Martinez, M. C.; Salas-Solano, O.; Carrilho, E.; Kotler, L.; Karger, B. L. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 1516-1527. (6) MacCrehan, W. A.; Rasmussen, H. T.; Northrop, D. M. J. Liq. Chromatogr. 1992, 15 (6, 7), 1063-1080. (7) Kim, Y.; Morris, M. D. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 1168-1174. (8) Barron, A. E.; Soane, D. S.; Blanch H. W. J. Chromatogr., A 1993, 652, 3-16. (9) Ogston, A. G. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1958, 54, 1754-1757. (10) Slater, G. W.; Rousseau, J.; Noolandi, J.; Turmel, C.; Lalande, M. Bioploymers 1988, 27, 509-524. (11) Slater, G. W.; Noolandi J. Bioploymers 1989, 28, 1781-1791. (12) Grossman, P. D.; Soane, D. S. Biopolymers 1991, 31, 1221-1228. Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 71, No. 13, July 1, 1999 2385 ability of these shorter polymers is not competitive enough.13 We have not seen any reports regarding the use of cellulose derivatives with very low molecular weight (as low as 10 000) as sieving buffers. In this paper, we have developed a sieving matrix for DNA separation. The matrix is based on low-molecular-weight hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) and has a remarkably low viscosity. The influence of urea and mannitol on the separation of DNA fragments was investigated, and the effect of electric field on separation was also evaluated. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION Chemicals and Reagents. The HPMC with low molecular weight (HPMC-5, the viscosity of which in 2% aqueous solution is 5 cP and the molecular weight is ∼10 000) is from Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI). Other HPMCs (HPMC-50, HPMC-100, and HPMC-4000, the viscosities of which in 2% aqueous solutions at 25 °C are 50, 100, and 4000 cP, respectively, and the molecular weights are about 11 500, 12 000, and 86 000, respectively) are from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane, mannitol, boric acid, urea, ethylendiaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt (EDTA), and the PBR322/HaeIII DNA standard were also purchased from Sigma. The DNA marker contains 22 fragments, 8, 11, 18, 21, 51, 57, 64, 80, 89, 104, 123, 124, 184, 192, 213, 234, 367, 434, 458, 504, 540, and 587 bp long, respectively. A DNA lowrange marker was obtained from Life Technologies Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD), which contains six DNA fragments ranging from 100 to 2000 bp. The samples were diluted with deionized water to a concentration of ∼40 µg/mL and kept at -20 °C until use. Deionized water (resistance g18 MΩ) was prepared with a Milli-Q System (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Capillary Electrophoresis Separation. All the experiments were carried out on the Beckman P/ACE 5500 capillary electrophoresis system (Fullerton, CA). The fused-silica capillary (37 cm in length with 30 cm from inlet to detection window, 50 µm i.d.) was purchased from PolyMicro Technologies, Inc. (Phoenix, AZ). The capillary was precoated with polyacrylamide as described elsewhere14 to prevent adsorption and to eliminate electroosmotic flow. The background electrolyte (BGE) was 0.1 M Tris-0.1 M boric acid-2 mM EDTA with or without urea. Solutions with concentrations of urea ranging from 1 to 10 M were investigated in this study. A 0-12% (w/v) mannitol additive was added to the buffer to investigate the influence of mannitol and evaluate the optimum concentration of mannitol for the best sieving effect. The sieving solutions were prepared by adding the polymers to the BGE and stirring the mixture until all the polymer was dissolved and the solution became homogeneous. The solutions were not filtered or degassed before use. The capillary was rinsed first with water and then with buffer before injection. The rinsing time varies from a range of 3 to 20 min for each buffer according to its viscosity. The outside wall of the capillary at the inlet end and the electrode were cleaned to prevent the sample from being contaminated by viscous buffers. The sample was introduced into the capillary by electromigration at 10 kV for 5 s. The electrophoresis was carried out under negative polarity at 25 °C. An ultraviolet detector was used with the filter setting at 254 nm, and the data were collected and (13) Barron, A. E.; Blanch H. W.; Soane D. S. Electrophoresis 1994, 15 (5), 597615. (14) Han, F.; Xue, J.; Lin, B. Talanta 1998, 46, 735-742. 2386 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 71, No. 13, July 1, 1999 Figure 1. Electropherogram of the PBR322/HaeIII in different sieving matrixes. Conditions: capillary, 37 cm × 50 µm i.d. with 30 cm effective length; injection, 10 kV for 10 s; running voltage, 6 kV from negative to positive; detection, UV at 254 nm; sieving buffers, (A) 4% HPMC-5, (B) 2.0% HPMC-50, (C) 1.8% HPMC-100, and (D) 1.2% HPMC-4000. The sieving buffers were prepared in 0.1 M Tris0.1 M boric acid-2 mM EDTA solution. processed by the Beckman PACE Station software. The viscosity of each buffer was measured with an Ostwald viscometer at a constant temperature of 25 °C. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Four HPMCs with different molecular sizes, HPMC-5, HPMC50, HPMC-100 and HPMC-4000, were investigated to compare the sieving abilities of those polymers. The PBR322/HaeIII DNA marker was employed as a sample to test the sieving matrixes. It was found that the larger fragments can be easily separated with relatively low polymer concentration while the smaller fragments can only be separated with high polymer concentration. For HPMC-50, HPMC-100, and HPMC-4000, the baseline separation of the PBR322 marker can be achieved (except for the 123/124 pair, which migrate together) only when the concentrations reached as high as 2.0, 1.8, and 1.2%, respectively. The concentrations of the four smallest DNA fragments were not high enough for successful detection. It was found that, for HPMC-5, there was no satisfactory separation even when the concentration reached as high as 4% (Figure 1A). In another independent study, it was found that mannitol can enhance the separation ability of cellulosebased polymer solutions because mannitol and boric acid may form a chain bridge between HPMC molecules through the tetraborate structure.14 Experiments with HPMC-5 also show dramatically enhanced resolution when mannitol is present. With the addition of mannitol, even 2% HPMC-5 gave good resolution of the DNA standards (Figure 2). The influence of the mannitol concentration was investigated, and it was found that 6% (w/v) mannitol was the optimum concentration for the 2% HPMC-5 solution. It was also found that more mannitol was needed for the more concentrated HPMC-5 solutions because 12% mannitol would result in an optimized separation in the 4% HPMC-5 buffer Figure 4. Plot of [Vn)0/VDNA - 1] as a function of HPMC-5 concentration. Figure 2. Electropherogram of the PBR322/HaeIII in 2.0% HPMC-5 + 6% mannitol. Peak identification: (1) 51, (2) 57, (3) 64, (4) 80, (5) 89, (6) 109, (7) 123/124, (8) 184, (9) 192, (10) 213, (11) 234, (12) 267, (13) 434, (14) 458, (15) 504, (16) 540, and (17) 587 bp. Other conditions are the same as in Figure 1. ment coupling mechanism” to explain the migration behavior of DNA fragments in ultradilute polymer solution.13 On the basis of the DNA/polymer interaction theory, Hubert and co-authors also developed a theoretical model to interpret the separation of DNA fragments in very dilute (HEC) hydroxyethylcellulose solutions.15 The prediction from their theory was in good agreement with the experimental data from Barron’s work. According to Hubert’s theory, a DNA fragment drags along polymer molecules it encounters during migration. Taking account of several factors that influence migration, asymptotic relative velocity (VDNA/Vn)0) can be described as ( ( VDNA L ) 1/ 1 + γC 1 + β Vn)0 MDNAb Figure 3. Viscosity as a function of the concentration of HPMC-5 with and without urea and mannitol additives. (data not shown). According to a theory of the role of an entangled polymer solution, only when the concentration of the solution is higher than the overlap threshold concentration can a network be formed in the solution.12 The threshold concentration of HPMC-5 (both with and without 6% mannitol) can be determined by measuring the viscosities of the polymer solutions with different concentrations and plotting the viscosity as a function of the polymer concentration (Figure 3). From Figure 3 we can see that the threshold for the HPMC-5 itself is ∼3.5%, and mannitol can decrease the threshold of this polymer to 2.5%, thus making it possible for to separate DNA fragments in a relatively low concentration. It was found that good separation can be achieved at concentrations under the threshold concentration. Considerable separation can even be achieved in the 1.5% HPMC-5 solution with 6% mannitol. In this case, neither the Ogston model nor the reptation model will be suitable for explaining the mechanism of separation. Barron and co-authors developed a so-called “transient entangle- )) -1 (1) where VDNA is the mean velocity of DNA in a polymer solution, Vn)0 is the DNA velocity in a solution without polymer, C is the polymer concentration, L is the contour length of the polymer, MDNA is the DNA fragment length in base pairs, b is the contour length of one DNA base pair, and β and γ are constants related to the polymer and buffer. Since we were unable to find the L value of HPMC-5, we were not able to use the fully functional form of eq 1. But since L, MDNA, b, β, and γ are all constants, a plot of [Vn)0/VDNA - 1] as a function of polymer concentration will still result in a straight line. We tested our data for the 2000bp fragment using this method (Figure 4), and it was found that our data were in good agreement with this theory. It was worth noting that the concentration of our polymer solution was not very low. From Figure 4, we can see that a good linear relationship was obtained within a wide range of polymer solutions (0-4%). This result indicated that Hubert’s theory may not only be applied to interpret the DNA migration in ultradilute polymer solution but also be applied to interpret the sieving mechanism of DNA fragments in a low-molecular-weight polymer solution. DNA conformation may have great influence on the mobility of the DNA fragments in nongel sieving electrophoresis. Therefore, denaturant may be necessary in the buffers to eliminate the conformation influence in some occasions.16 Urea is often employed as a denaturant in biological laboratories, and in this study, (15) Hubert, S. J.; Slater, G. W.; Viovy J. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 1006-1009. (16) Han, F,; Lin, B.; Xu, Q.; Shen, Y.; Wu, G. Chromatographia 1999, 49, 179184. Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 71, No. 13, July 1, 1999 2387 Figure 5. Urea influence on the migration of DNA fragments. Table 1. Comparison of Viscosity and Efficiency of the Buffers Based on HPMCs with Different Molecular Sizes 2% HPMC-5 + 7 M urea 2% 1.8% 1.2% + 6% mannitol HPMC-50 HPMC-100 HPMC-4000 viscosity (cP) efficiency (plates/m) 5.7 1 800 000 30.8 600 000 46.0 840 000 335.3 530 000 urea also served to denature the double-stranded (ds) DNA fragments. The influence of urea was investigated by adding different amounts of urea to the mannitol-modified 2% HPMC-5 sieving buffer and plotting the migration time as a function of urea concentration (Figure 5). Figure 5 shows some unique sigmoidal curves for the DNA fragments ranging from 51 to 587 bp. Since single-stranded DNA (ss DNA) has lower mobility than ds DNA, the mobility of a ds DNA fragment will decrease when part of the double-stranded molecule denatures to single strand. From Figure 5, one can easily see that ds DNA began to denature when the urea concentration reached ∼3.5 M and continued to denature with the increase in urea concentration. When the urea concentration reaches ∼7 M, the ds DNAs are completely denatured and higher urea concentration will not lead to a large increase in migration time; therefore, 7 M urea is necessary to completely eliminate the influence of conformation. One of the main advantages of this sieving medium is the low viscosity, which makes it very easy and convenient to use. The viscosities of the buffers with different molecular sizes were measured with an Ostwald viscometer under the same conditions, The results are listed in Table 1. It was found that the viscosities of the sieving buffers containing larger HPMC molecules were much higher than that of the HPMC-5 solution. Therefore it took a much longer time (e.g., 20 min) for the instrument to fill the capillary with a very viscous buffer. Furthermore, the viscous buffers are more likely to stick on the electrode and/or the capillary and may contaminate the sample if there is no cleaning procedure before injection. On the contrary, the mannitol-modified HPMC-5 buffer has a viscosity equivalent to water, thus making it very easy to operate. Table 1 also shows the efficiency of the different sieving buffers in terms of plate numbers. We can see that the mannitol-modified low-viscosity buffer also give the highest efficiency up to 1 800 000 plates/m, which makes it an 2388 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 71, No. 13, July 1, 1999 Figure 6. Electrical field influence on the migration of DNA fragments (51, 234, 587, and 2000 bp). Sieving buffer: 2%HPMC-5 + 7 M urea + 6% mannitol. Inset: migration time vs electric field for the 2000-bp fragment in the undenatured 2% HPMC-50 buffer. ideal sieving matrix for DNA analysis.The influence of electric field was also investigated in this study. On the basis of the biased reptation model, the coil of the chainlike molecules tends to be elongated under high fields.12 This conclusion does not agree with what we observed in our experiments. Figure 6 shows the variation of the migration time of the 51-, 234-, 587-, and 2000-bp fragments with variation of the electrical field in the urea- and mannitol-modified 2% HPMC-5 buffer. The curve indicates that the migration times of the fragments are inversely proportional to the electric field. When we draw the plot of reciprocal migration time as a function of electric field, we obtain some linear relationships (R > 0.9990). The relationship can be described by 1/t ) K1E + K2 (2) where t is the migration time of the DNA fragments, K1 is a constant related to the size of a DNA fragment, K2 is another constant related to the system (temperature, capillary inner diameter, sieving buffer, etc.), and E is the electric field. The mobility of a DNA fragment is defined by µ ) L/(tE) (3) where µ is the mobility and L is the effective length of the capillary. From eqs 2 and 3, we can get µ ) K1L + K2L/E ) µ0 + K2L/E (4) where µ0 was defined as the optimized mobility of a DNA fragment in this buffer, which is the maximum mobility that a DNA fragment can reach because K2 is a negative value of all cases. µ0 can be determined experimentally by plotting the reciprocal migration time as a function of electric field and multiplying the slope by the effective length of the capillary. Differentiation of the above leads to dµ/dE ) -K2L/E2 (5) Equation 5 indicates that the mobility variation with the change of electric field is inversely proportional to the square of the electric field. From the experimental data, we can see that dµ/ dE is a very tiny (almost zero) value, which means that the influence of the electric field on mobility is so slight that it can be neglected. As a matter of fact, the second term of eq 4 is at least 2 orders of magnitude less than the first term of eq 4 in all of this study. The above description states that the mobility of the DNA fragments does not change greatly under different electric fields ranging from 80 to 480 V/cm. We also tested a larger fragment from the low-range DNA sample and our calculations show that the mobilities of the DNA fragments up to 2000 bp in length also do not change greatly while the electric field changes. We even obtained the same results from the 2% HPMC-50 undenatured buffer (inset of Figure 6). Therefore, this phenomenon is not the result of using the denaturing buffer, which can eliminate the influence of the secondary or higher order structure of the DNA fragments. This result is not consistent with the biased reptation model,11 which suggests that the DNA molecule may change its conformation when the electrical field increases, because the change in the conformation will lead to great change in the mobility. On the basis of this phenomenon, we suggest that the electric field does not influence the resolution of the DNA fragments as much as what is thought. Figure 7 shows the resolution of the 80/89,184/192, and 540/587 fragment pairs under different electric fields. Resolution was calculated using a traditional chromatographic method,17 and the result shows that there is no significant change in the resolution of 80/89, 184/192, and 540/587 fragment pairs when the electric fields changed from 80 to 320 V/cm. The resolution of these fragment pairs decreased slightly when the electric fields changed from 320 to 480 V/cm, probably due to band-broadening resulted from the Joule heating effect. Therefore, a higher electric field should be used to get faster separation until Joule heating becomes obvious. CONCLUSION The mannitol-modified low-molecular-size HPMC buffer has very low viscosity, which makes it easy for capillary filling, flushing, and refilling. This is a great advantage over those buffers (17) Snyder, L. R.; Kirkland, J. J. Introducation to Modern Liquid Chromatography; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1979; Chapter 2. Figure 7. Resolutions of the 80/89, 184/192, and184/192 fragment pairs under different electrical fields. The line was drawn through the data to guide the eye. with high viscosities. Mannitol can enhance the separation by interacting with HPMC molecules and decreasing the threshold of the polymer solution. Satisfactory resolution of DNA fragments can be achieved in the solution with a concentration even lower than the overlap threshold concentration. A theory used to interpret the DNA separation mechanism in a ultradilute polymer solution is found to fit the data presented in this paper for the low-molecular-weight solution. A concentration of 7 M urea is necessary for the complete denaturing of the ds DNA fragments. The electric field does not have much influence on the mobility of the DNA fragments, which implies that the DNA fragments up to 2000 bp do not change their conformation with a change of electric field. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors thank Dr. Kenneth Martin and Dr. Kenneth Fountain of Truman State University for their help on the manuscript. This work was supported by an Internal Faculty Research Grant from Truman State University awarded to Y.M.. We also appreciate the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China. Received for review February 10, 1999. Accepted April 6, 1999. AC990160X Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 71, No. 13, July 1, 1999 2389