Download Alternative conceptions about genetics

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Twin study wikipedia , lookup

Human genome wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics in learning and memory wikipedia , lookup

DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup

Primary transcript wikipedia , lookup

Transposable element wikipedia , lookup

Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of neurodegenerative diseases wikipedia , lookup

Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup

Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup

Point mutation wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup

Essential gene wikipedia , lookup

Cancer epigenetics wikipedia , lookup

NEDD9 wikipedia , lookup

Extrachromosomal DNA wikipedia , lookup

Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup

Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup

Genome editing wikipedia , lookup

Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup

Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup

Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup

Ridge (biology) wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup

Gene wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
genetics
Context > Uniquely me > Teaching and Learning Approaches > Alternative conceptions about
genetics
TEACHER RESOURCE: Alternative conceptions about genetics
These are some common student misunderstandings about genetics based on education
research.
Keep them in mind while teaching – and address them as they come up.
Genes and DNA are separate things
Many students think of genes and DNA as separate things – specifically, that genes are what
make you look like your family and DNA is for identification. The focus on DNA in crime solving
in the media contributes to this view. A gene is actually a segment of a DNA molecule.
Genes are only found in certain cells
Students may hold the view that genes are only found in certain cells, commonly in the blood,
brain or reproductive system. It is important for them to understand that, except for mature
red blood cells, all human cells contain DNA and therefore genes.
Different cells contain different genes
Students often think that different cells contain different DNA, for example, the DNA in their
skin cells is different to the DNA in their heart cells. In fact, every cell in your body (other than
gametes) contains the same DNA and consequently the same genes. However, not every gene
is expressed in every cell. For example, the genes that code for muscle proteins such as actin
and myosin are only expressed in muscle cells and not in the other cells in your body, even
though the genes are present in those other cells.
We are all unique because we have different genes
Students may think we are all unique because we each have different genes. However, all
humans have almost exactly the same genes, in the same order, along our chromosomes. Our
uniqueness is a result of the different combinations of alleles that we inherit from our parents.
This variance in alleles results in a unique combination of traits. (Note: Alleles are alternative
forms of the same gene that occupy the same location on a chromosome).
Genes code directly for our traits
Students commonly think of genes as direct instructions for particular traits. In fact, genes
code for proteins that make up our cells, tissues and organs, ultimately leading to our unique
phenotype.
Single genes code for particular traits
The examples we use when teaching about genetics may lead to the view that particular traits
are always coded for by a single gene. While there are a few traits that are determined by a
single gene (for example, dimples and cleft chin), most traits are complex and are the result of
the interactions between several genes.
We only have genes for the traits that are displayed
Students might think that we only have genes for the traits we display. In fact, at any given
locus there are 2 alleles (alternative forms of the same gene). Different alleles of a gene
generally serve the same function (for example, they code for a protein that affects eye
colour) but may produce different phenotypes (for example, blue eyes or brown eyes)
depending on which set of 2 alleles you have and whether 1 allele is dominant.
© 2007–2011 The University of Waikato
www.sciencelearn.org.nz
1
genetics
Context > Uniquely me > Teaching and Learning Approaches > Alternative conceptions about
genetics
Inheritance involves an averaging of the genes from both parents
Some students view genetic inheritance as an averaging of the genes from both parents. For
example, 1 short parent and 1 tall parent will result in a child of average height. However, our
characteristics (such as height) are commonly controlled by a number of genes. A child’s
genotype is a unique combination of genes from both parents and is not merely a blending of
the two. In addition, dominance means that a child may display characteristics of only 1
parent.
References and further reading






Venville, G. and Donovan, J. (2007) Developing year 2 students’ theory of biology with
concepts of the gene and DNA. International Journal of Science Education, 29(9), 1111–
1131.
Donovan, J. and Venville, G. (2005) A concrete model for teaching about genes and DNA to
young students. Teaching Science, 51(4), 29–31.
Venville, G., Gribble, S. and Donovan, J. (2005) An exploration of young children’s
understandings of genetics concepts from ontological and epistemological perspectives.
Science Education, 89(4), 614–633.
Venville, G. and Donovan, J. (2005) Searching for clarity to teach the complexity of the
gene concept. Teaching Science, 51(3), 20–24.
Lewis, J., Leach, J. and Wood-Robinson, C. (2000) All in the genes? Young people’s
understanding of the nature of genes. Journal of Biological Education, 34(2), 74–79.
State of Victoria Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. (2009)
Science Continuum: Doing science authentically. Retrieved 18 April 2011 from
www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/teachingresources/science/scicontinuum/default
.htm
© 2007–2011 The University of Waikato
www.sciencelearn.org.nz
2