* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Ledbetter Presentation 8/15/05
DNA profiling wikipedia , lookup
Cancer epigenetics wikipedia , lookup
Metagenomics wikipedia , lookup
Whole genome sequencing wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup
Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Y chromosome wikipedia , lookup
DNA damage theory of aging wikipedia , lookup
Nucleic acid analogue wikipedia , lookup
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
United Kingdom National DNA Database wikipedia , lookup
Bisulfite sequencing wikipedia , lookup
Gel electrophoresis of nucleic acids wikipedia , lookup
SNP genotyping wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Human genome wikipedia , lookup
Nucleic acid double helix wikipedia , lookup
No-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) Genome Editing wikipedia , lookup
Molecular Inversion Probe wikipedia , lookup
Epigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Genealogical DNA test wikipedia , lookup
X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup
Deoxyribozyme wikipedia , lookup
Cre-Lox recombination wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Cell-free fetal DNA wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Molecular cloning wikipedia , lookup
Extrachromosomal DNA wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
DNA supercoil wikipedia , lookup
Helitron (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Genome editing wikipedia , lookup
Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
Neocentromere wikipedia , lookup
Segmental Duplication on the Human Y Chromosome wikipedia , lookup
Star Wars: Episode II – Attack of the Clones wikipedia , lookup
DiGeorge syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Genomic microarrays: Applications to gene discovery and molecular karyotype August, 2005 David H. Ledbetter, Ph.D. Department of Human Genetics Emory University [email protected] Human Telomere Structure centromere (T2AG3)n 3 -20 kb Unique DNA Subtelomeric Region 100 - 300 kb Martin and Ledbetter Telomere Abnl. Frequency in MR Biesecker, Am. J. Med. Genet. 107:263-266, 2002 Reviewed 14 studies, 1,718 patients with MR 6% overall abnormal results (range 2-29%) 50% of abnormalities inherited from balanced translocation parent Conclusion: G-banding alone is insufficient to identify clinically significant segmental aneusomy. Additional molecular cytogenetic technologies are needed. Subtelomere Analysis on 12,000 Cases Britt Ravnan, James Tepperberg, Christa Martin Genzyme, LabCorp and U. Chicago >12,000 cases examined 3.2 % abnormals identified 0.4% polymorphisms, benign variants 2.8% clinically significant Molecular Ruler 1 Mb contig 1 clone/500 kb to 5 Mb (T2AG3)n Subtelomeric Region Telomere probe Unique DNA 17p: Genotype/Phenotype Normal Miller-Dieker ABR 1 Mb tel – 68F18 CRK I&II 14-3-3 1.5 Mb 250 kb RPA1 2.0 Mb 1029F21 HIC1 2.5 Mb 500 kb LIS1 2.8 Mb ILS 17p Cardoso et al. (2003) Am J Hum Genet,72:918-930 Lese Martin et al. (2002) J Med Genet 39(10):734-740 Limitations of Telomere FISH Does not assay whole genome Labor Need intensive for a whole genome approach to submicroscopic deletions/duplications which is amenable to automation Array CGH Patient DNA Genomic Clones Gain Loss Resolution = clone size ~ 100 kb Control DNA Pinkel et al., Nat Genet (1998), 20(2):207-11 CGH array format GenoSensor™ Array 300 (N = 287) Telomere array (N = 165) – Each telomere – Five X and two Y chromosome clones – “Molecular ruler” on 1p, 16p, 17p, and 22q. TEL CEN 1Mb Array Examples Y X Patient DNA (male) Control DNA (female) Gain = green Loss = red Normal = gray X X X Y X Normal • Each clone is spotted multiple times for reproducibility • Clones from the same chromosomal region are placed apart from each other Array Examples Y X Patient DNA (male) Control DNA (female) X X X Y X Normal Gain = green Loss = red Trisomy 21 Ratio Display: female, 16p+; 17p- X Y MR - Blinded Study Results FISH # Detected by array 1p deletion 1 yes 6q deletion 1 yes 9q deletion 1 yes 16p duplication 3 yes (3) 17p deletion 2 yes (2) 22q deletion 5 yes (5) Derivative chrom. 4 yes (4) ALL 17 IMBALANCES WERE IDENTIFIED USING CGH-ARRAYS Case 1: 8p deletion 8p tel Ratio = 0.51 8p tel Ratio = 0.52 Phenotype: MR, hypopigmentation Case 2: 1ptel deletion with size of 4 Mb Multiple 1ptel clones from telomere to 4 Mb Phenotype: MR, obesity Telomere Molecular Rulers aCGH results Size estimation 22q tel deletion 130 kb 17p tel deletion 1.9 Mb 16p tel duplication, 17p deletion 3.5 Mb for 16p, ~2.7 Mb for 17p 1p tel deletion 4 Mb 16p tel duplication 4 Mb 22q tel deletion 4 Mb 1p tel deletion 6.5 Mb 16p tel duplication 10 Mb 22q11 duplication 22q Ratio: 1.4 V300 ARRAY Patient DNA (male), Control DNA (female) Gain = green, Loss = red 01.1727 22q11 duplication 01.1727 Microduplications Identified by Array 4qtel duplication: MR, seizures, cerebellar atrophy Phenotypically normal mother has same duplication. 10qtel duplication: Microcephaly, spasticity Phenotypically normal father has same duplication. 10qtel duplication (2 clones): Microcephaly, autism (parents pending) 22q11 duplication: bilateral colobomas, DD, seizures, left ptosis (Cat Eye) MR Blinded Study Conclusions Demonstrates the sensitivity and accuracy of CGH-arrays since we detected 100% of all imbalances (n=17) identified by FISH; Identified 4 small duplications not detectable by metaphase FISH, at least one clinically significant. Potential for a more sensitive and cost-effective test for telomere and genome-wide screening since the assay is automatable. Pericentromeric “Rulers” Development of Centromere Molecular Rulers for identification and “calibration” of supernumerary marker chromosomes – Most proximal unique genomic clone to each pericentromeric “junkyard” – 1 Mb contig plus 1 clone every 500 kb to 5 Mb away from pericentromeric region – Validated as unique FISH signal, map position and order Pericentromeric region α-satellite Subtelomeric repeats Unique DNA (TTAGGG) n Chromosome 13 Phenotype – Chromosome 10 Marker Routine prenatal for AMA At 1 year of age patient exhibited slightly delayed expressive language skills At At 19 months, oral motor dyspraxia noted 2 years expressive language delays resolving Chromosome 10p Chromosome 10p Chromosome 10q Chromosome 10q Results # Cases Chromosome # 1 10 Result p-;q+ 2 13 or 21 q- 6 14 or 22 q- 1 16 p+;q- Array Formats LOW RESOLUTION Targets only clinically relevant loci and clones are not spaced evenly across genome – Commercial » Vysis/Abbott, Spectral Genomics,… – Home Brew » Baylor, Signature Genomics,… 400 clones Array Formats HIGH RESOLUTION Range from 1-3 Mb spacing to complete genome tiling path consisting of >32,000 clones! – Commercial » Spectral Genomics,… – Home Brew 12 mm 2,500 clones; 1.4 Mb » UCSF, British Columbia Genome Center,… Array image from UCSF website Array Formats – High Resolution coverage 32,855 BACs ~79 kb resolution Developed by: BC Cancer Agency Genome Sciences Center Krzywinski et al., Nucleic Acids Res (2004) 32(12):3651-60. aCGH-15 Pilot Study- Clone Selection Homebrew clones Tiling Path Clones Chose the two re-array plates that had the highest number of clones in the 15q11-15q13 region. (Plates 2B1 and 3A1) 3A1 was a partially filled plate of 43 clones 135 tiling path clones total 36 clones at significant loci on chr. 15 » Breakpoints » genes » segmental duplications 7 Sex Chrm. Clones Total clones: 178 Average coverage on chr15: 1 clone ~ 470 kb Average coverage in q11-q13: 1 clone ~150 kb aCGH-15 Pilot Study Class II deletion Class I deletion aCGH-15 Pilot Study aCGH-15 Patient 1 Pervasive Developmental Delay Phenotype suggestive of PW As normal as normal can be? Sebat et al. Iaftrate et al. Technique ROMA* - 20 indiv. Array CGH - 55 indiv. Resolution ~1 probe / 35 kb (105 kb detection size) ~150 kb every 1 Mb (50 kb detection size) 76 255 Avg. - 465 kb median - 222 kb 150 kb – 2 Mb 11 12.4 # of Loci Length Avg. diff. b/t any 2 indiv. *ROMA = Representational Oligonucleotide Microarray Analysis) • Only 11 loci in common (within 1 Mb) • In both studies, half were observed in >1 indiv. Acknowledgements Emory University Christa Lese Martin, Ph.D. Vysis/Abbott: Kim Wilber Walter King Teresa Ruffalo Andrew Wong, Ph.D. Lorraine May, M.S. David Johnson, B.S. Devan Pressley, B.S. Courtney Works, B.S. Grant Support: March of Dimes NIH Vysis/Abbott, Inc.