* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download GFP is the way to glow: bioimaging of the plant endomembrane
Survey
Document related concepts
SNARE (protein) wikipedia , lookup
Cell nucleus wikipedia , lookup
G protein–coupled receptor wikipedia , lookup
Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup
Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup
Cytoplasmic streaming wikipedia , lookup
Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup
Protein phosphorylation wikipedia , lookup
Protein moonlighting wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of proteins wikipedia , lookup
Cell membrane wikipedia , lookup
Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup
Magnesium transporter wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Proteolysis wikipedia , lookup
Western blot wikipedia , lookup
List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Journal of Microscopy, Vol. 214, Pt 2 May 2004, pp. 138–158 Received 22 October 2003; accepted 22 December 2003 INVITED REVIEW Blackwell Publishing, Ltd. GFP is the way to glow: bioimaging of the plant endomembrane system F. B R A N D I Z Z I *, S . L . I R O N S , J. J O H A N S E N , A . K O T Z E R & U. N E U M A N N Research School of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane, Oxford OX3 0BP, U.K. *Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada Summary It is less than a decade that the green fluorescent protein (GFP) and its spectral variants have changed the approach to studying the dynamics of the plant secretory pathway. GFP technology has in fact shed new light on secretory events by allowing bioimaging in vivo right to the heart of a plant cell. This review highlights exciting discoveries and the most recent developments in the understanding of morphology and dynamics of the plant secretory pathway achieved with the application of fluorescent proteins. Received 22 October 2003; accepted 22 December 2003 1. The plant secretory pathway The endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the Golgi apparatus, the vacuole and the plasma membrane constitute the major components of the plant secretory system (Fig. 1). In general, the ER appears as the central factory dedicated to the synthesis of proteins, lipids and glycans. ER proteins that are not retained in the lumen of the ER or in the ER membrane are processed and folded prior to their transport to the Golgi apparatus (reviewed in Vitale & Denecke, 1999). In the Golgi, proteins are further processed (reviewed in Dupree & Sherrier, 1998) and then, if not resident in the Golgi, are sorted either to the storage (for example in pea cotyledons via dense vesicles; Hohl et al., 1996) or to the lytic vacuole via prevacuolar compartments (PVCs; Matsuoka & Neuhaus, 1999; Vitale & Raikhel, 1999) or multivesicular bodies (MVBs; Robinson et al., 1998). Alternatively, proteins can be secreted at the plasma membrane via vesicular transport (reviewed in Satiat-Jeunemaitre & Hawes, 1993; Battey et al., 1999). Recycling of membranes via an endocytic pathway contributes to the maintenance of the overall lipid and protein distribution between plasma membrane and secretory organelles (reviewed in Hawes et al., 1995; in Battey et al., 1999; Crooks Correspondence to: Dr Federica Brandizzi. Fax: +1 306 966 4461; e-mail: [email protected] et al., 1999). This would result in a movement of vesicles from the plasma membrane to the partially coated reticulum (PCR), and from this to either the Golgi or the MVBs and then to the vacuole (Fowke et al., 1991; see also Hawes et al., 1999). Our understanding of the dynamics of the secretory pathway in plant cells is often impaired by the difficulty of working with such cells. The dynamics of the secretory pathway have been exponentially clarified in recent years, thanks to new tools becoming available, such as green fluorescent protein (GFP) technology, that allow the study of dynamic cellular processes in vivo. GFP is a self-assembling fluorescent protein with a molecular mass of approximately 27 kDa. It emits green fluorescence upon excitation with UV or blue light. As specific secretory proteins or signals can be fused to GFP, usually without altering their targeting, it is a useful alternative to conventional dyes previously used to investigate endomembrane compartments in vivo. Moreover, GFP itself is not able to cross most membranes, with the exception of the nuclear membrane through the nuclear pores (Grebenok et al., 1997). These are some of the most valuable features of GFP and its spectral derivatives, especially considering that many of the vital dyes available for studies in animal cells cannot be used for investigating the biology of plant cells. In this respect, GFP has played a central role in uncovering dynamic endomembrane events in vivo (for a review see also Brandizzi et al., 2002b). 1.1. Introduction of GFP into the plant endomembrane studies GFP was first identified in the jellyfish Aequoria victoria (Shimomura et al., 1962) and purified and crystallized later by Morise et al. (1974). About 20 years later, Prasher et al. (1992) cloned the gfp gene. In 1994, it was first demonstrated that the expression of the gene in heterologous organisms generates fluorescence upon UV or blue light excitation (Chalfie et al., 1994; Inouye & Tsuji, 1994). In plants, the first reports of successful expression of unmodified wild-type gfp using cytoplasmic RNA viruses such © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society G F P I S T H E WAY TO G L OW 139 closer to the plant consensus and removal of the cryptic plant intron (Haseloff et al., 1997) allowed a wider exploitation of GFP as a fluorescent reporter for plant cell bioimaging. 2. Plant endomembranes highlighted by GFP The introduction of GFP into the plant secretory pathway mirrors a natural pathway of a secretory protein. GFP has in fact first illuminated the ER and nuclear envelope (Boevink et al., 1996) and then it has made its way to organelles downstream of the secretory pathway. In this section we highlight the way that GFP has revealed the secretory pathway and we focus on recent discoveries linked to GFP targeting and expression in different secretory organelles. 2.1. The nuclear envelope Fig. 1. Major organelles of the plant endomembrane system. (a) Schematic diagram of the endomembrane organelles of the plant secretory pathway. Material exiting the ER can be transported to the protein storage vacuole (1) or passed to the Golgi. At the Golgi, the main transport pathways are believed to lead to three different destinations: the protein storage vacuole (PSV) via so-called dense vesicles (2), the plasma membrane (PM)/apoplast via secretory vesicles (3) or the lytic vacuole via clathrin-coated vesicles (4). On route to the lytic vacuole or the PM, material passes through the prevacuolar compartment (PVC), which may also be the sorting station for material entering from the PM via endocytosis (5). (b) Transmission electron micrograph of Arabidopsis suspension cultured cells prepared by high-pressure freezing and freeze substitution, showing different organelles of the plant secretory pathway. CW, cell wall (apoplast); ER, endoplasmic reticulum; G, Golgi apparatus; LV, lytic vacuole; NE, nuclear envelope; PM, plasma membrane; T, tonoplast. Scale bar = 500 nm. as potato virus X and tobacco mosaic virus date back to 1995 (Baulcombe et al., 1995; Heinlein et al., 1995). Owing to the presence of a cryptic intron recognizable by plant mRNA splicing machinery, GFP technology had a difficult birth in plant cell studies. Alteration of the codon usage to be © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 214, 138–158 The dynamics of the plant nuclear envelope (NE) are relatively uncharacterized in comparison with many other membranes of the plant endomembrane system. This is mostly due to a lack of in vivo markers specific for the plant NE (Meier, 2001; Irons et al., 2003). In the search for an NE-specific marker that works in plants, the N-terminal domain of the human lamin B receptor (LBR; Ellenberg et al., 1997) was fused to GFP5 (Haseloff et al., 1997). Stable expression of the LBR-GFP5 fusion protein in tobacco plants and BY-2 suspension cells gives specific labelling of the NE (Irons et al., 2003; Fig. 2a,b). Immobile fluorescent punctate structures were observed in interphase (Fig. 2a) and dividing cells (arrowhead, Fig. 2c green image) and are likely to be membrane stacks arising as a result of protein over-expression. Similar membrane stacks have been observed in yeast cells expressing LBR (Smith & Blobel, 1994). During mitosis, the LBR-GFP5 fluorescence locates to tubular membrane structures, co-localizing with a lumenal ER marker constructed with the yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) (Irons et al., 2003; Fig. 2c), showing that the protein moves to the ER membranes during division as in animal cells. The continuity of the NE and ER ensures that a secretory protein, which labels the ER, labels the NE as well. This is illustrated by GFP targeted to the ER [signal peptide–GFP (sp-GFP); Boevink et al., 1996], and of fluorescent proteins targeted to and retained in the ER (e.g. sp-GFP-KDEL, Boevink et al., 1996; sp-YFP-HDEL, calnexin-GFP, Irons et al., 2003). In the case of soluble proteins, this is due to the continuity of the NE and ER lumen. For membrane proteins, the nuclear pores allow lateral diffusion of small proteins, with labelling of the inner NE as well as the outer NE and ER. It is therefore interesting that in interphase the fluorescence of LBR-GFP5 localizes exclusively to the NE, suggesting that specific retention signals retain the protein in the NE. A GFP fusion of the plant protein, matrix attachment region binding filament-like protein (MFP1) associated factor 1 (MAF1; Gindullis et al., 1999) has been located to the NE area in plant cells and shows association with the nuclear matrix and 140 F. B R A N D I Z Z I E T A L . © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 214, 138–158 G F P I S T H E WAY TO G L OW nuclear periphery as well as structures further from the NE. A GFP fusion of RanGAP, a protein mediating nuclear import via activation of Ran GTPases, labels speckle-like structures at the NE and the cytoplasm (Pay et al., 2002). Early papers using an MFP1-GFP fusion showed labelling at the nuclear periphery and through the cytoplasm (Gindullis & Meier, 1999). The structures observed at the nuclear periphery in tobacco suspension cells expressing MFP1-GFP have recently been shown to be nucleoids of proplastids close to the NE ( Jeong et al., 2003). This finding illustrates the need for high-resolution microscopy beyond the light microscopy level for determination of protein location. A plant protein that exclusively labels the NE remains elusive. 2.2. ER morphology and dynamics The first published GFP fusion labelling of the plant ER was achieved using the potato virus X expression system (Boevink et al., 1996). In tobacco leaf cells GFP was targeted to the lumen of the ER by fusing the coding sequence of the signal peptide of the potato storage protein, patatin, to the N-terminus of wild-type GFP. Substitution of the patatin signal peptide with the sporamin signal peptide (PVX.sp-GFP) resulted in brighter fluorescence, presumably reflecting a higher level of translocation of GFP into the ER (Boevink et al., 1999). It is known that soluble proteins remain in the ER due to a C-terminal tetrapeptide (K/HDEL) retrieval signal encoded in their primary amino acid sequence (Denecke et al., 1992). Proteins escaping the ER and carrying the K/HDEL signal are retrieved by a receptor that recognizes the signal (Semenza et al., 1990; Lee et al., 1993). The construct PVX.sp-GFP without a K/HDEL retrieval signal was secreted and accumulated in the apoplast in older infections. When the KDEL tetrapeptide was spliced to the carboxyl terminus of GFP, GFP was retained in the ER (Boevink et al., 1996, 1999). With this marker, ER appears as a relatively immobile but locally remodelling polygonal tubular network with variously shaped cisternae at the cell cortex, with other more mobile tubules streaming through the cytoplasm. 141 A similar ER pattern has been identified in studies using GFP spliced to ER native proteins and targeting motifs. These include the soluble proteins such as sp-GFP-HDEL (Fig. 2d,f ) and colour variants (sp-YFP-HDEL; Irons et al., 2003), domains of calreticulin (Brandizzi et al., 2003), BiP (Lee et al., 2002) and the membrane protein calnexin (Irons et al., 2003), the dilysine motif GFP-tm-KKXX (Benghezal et al., 2000), and a calmodulin-regulated Ca2+-ATPase (ACA2p; Hong et al., 1999). ER structures highlighted by GFP are similar to those seen with ER probes such as DiOC6 and hexyl rhodamine B, confirming that GFP is correctly targeted to the ER (Quader, 1990). sp-GFP-HDEL stably expressed in Arabidopsis highlights a characteristic cortical tubular network in leaf cells (Matsushima et al., 2002, 2003). In root cells, the ER showed mobile ‘ER bodies’ as well as a fluorescent tubular network (Hawes et al., 2001). The ER bodies are 0.5 µm wide and 5– 10 µm in length and are brightly fluorescent. Their presence has also been demonstrated in wild-type plants by immunofluorescence, hence demonstrating that their presence is not likely to be an artefact of a GFP fusion expression. A form of β-glucosidase with an ER retention signal appears to be the main constituent of the ER bodies (Matsushima et al., 2003). The formation of ER bodies in leaves was observed upon wounding (Matsushima et al., 2003), suggesting that ER bodies may have a role in wounding response. For instance, β-glucosidases may hydrolyse β-linked oligosaccharides (e.g. cellobiose) involved in plant defence, hormone activation and cell wall breakdown. The movement of ER bodies within the ER lumen raises questions about how proteins move within the ER. This opens a new area of plant endomembrane study in which fluorescent protein technology will be a key tool. As well as providing a wealth of information on the dynamics of the endomembrane system in ‘normal’ living plant cells, fluorescent probes can visualize morphological changes occurring in plant membranes during a pathogen attack. For example, the effect of tobacco mosaic virus infection on the ER morphology was followed with an ER-targeted GFP (Reichel & Beachy, 1998; Gillespie et al., 2002) and Takemoto et al. (2003) have Fig. 2. Organelles of the early endomembrane system highlighted by fluorescent fusion proteins. (a) Confocal laser scanning (CLS) micrograph of an interphase tobacco BY-2 cell expressing LBR-GFP5 (Irons et al., 2003). The fusion protein locates to the nuclear envelope. (b) Low-magnification CLS micrograph of tobacco epidermal leaf cells stably expressing LBR-GFP5. Nuclear envelopes are highlighted by the fusion protein (green image, arrowheads); nuclear contents are labelled with ethidium bromide (merged image, arrows). (c) CLS micrograph of BY-2 cells stably expressing LBR-GFP5 (green image) and a soluble ER-marker, spYFP-HDEL (red image; Irons et al., 2003), at different stages of division. The upper two cells are at the end of mitosis, with the NE and phragmoplast fully formed. The lower cell is in anaphase, with the membranes of the mitotic apparatus forming tubular structures (green image, arrows) as the chromosomes move towards the cell poles. Apart from the punctate structures, the GFP and YFP fusion proteins label the same structures in the dividing cell (merged image), suggesting that the LBR-GFP5 protein locates to the ER during mitosis. (d) CLS micrograph of a tobacco leaf protoplast transiently expressing sp-GFP-HDEL (Brandizzi et al., 2003). The cortical ER highlighted by this construct appears as a loose network of tubules. (e) CLS micrograph of Golgi stacks in a BY-2 cell labelled with GFP-tagged mannosidase I (GmMan1-GFP; Nebenführ et al., 1999). The image was created by merging 15 deconvolved images that were taken 0.5 µm apart at the centre of a BY-2 cell near the top of the nucleus. Micrograph courtesy of A. Nebenführ. (f ) CLS micrograph of the cortical cytoplasm of a leaf epidermal cell transiently expressing both spGFP-HDEL (green image; Batoko et al., 2000) and the Golgi marker ST-YFP (red image; Brandizzi et al., 2002a). Golgi stacks are in close proximity to the tubules of the ER network (merged image). N, nucleus. Scale bars: a,d–f = 10 µm; b,c = 20 µm. © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 214, 138–158 142 F. B R A N D I Z Z I E T A L . investigated the effect of oomycete pathogen attack in Arabidopsis on ER and Golgi membranes as well as microtubules and microfilaments labelled with fluorescent proteins. 2.3. Golgi imaging in vivo Studies on the dynamics of the plant Golgi are relatively young in comparison with their mammalian counterparts, due to the absence of genuine plant Golgi enzymes to be fused to GFP and used as in vivo markers. The first report on the visualization of the Golgi apparatus in living plant cells with GFP dates back to 1998 (Boevink et al., 1998), whereas the mammalian counterpart dates back to 2 years earlier (Cole et al., 1996). The Golgi apparatus in living plant cells has been first visualized with two different fluorescent constructs (Boevink et al., 1998). GFP was fused (1) to the putative Arabidopsis K/HDEL receptor, ERD2, homologous to a yeast and mammalian protein that recycles soluble proteins with a K/HDEL tetrapeptide back to the ER, and (2) to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of a rat sialyl-transferase, a mammalian Golgi glycosylation enzyme (ST-GFP). Both GFP-chimeras were found to localize to fluorescent punctuate mobile structures, revealed to be Golgi stacks by immunogold electron microscopy with a GFPantibody (Boevink et al., 1998). As native sialyl-transferases have not been reported in plants, the targeting of the ST-GFP to the plant Golgi suggests a common mechanism in plants and mammals for targeting and retention of transferases in Golgi membranes. Subsequently, identification of novel probes has produced more reports on the dynamics of the Golgi apparatus. For example, Nebenführ et al. (1999) reported on Golgi targeting in BY-2 cells of a soybean α-1,2 mannosidase I, the first enzyme involved in the N-linked oligosaccharide pathway, fused to GFP (Fig. 2e). The N-terminal TMD, including the flanking amino acids from a plant N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase I, has also been fused to GFP and was found to be targeted to the Golgi in Nicotiana benthamiana plants with a tobacco mosaic virus-mediated expression (Essl et al., 1999). The same group reported later on Golgi targeting by an Arabidopsis β1,2-xylosyltransferase, a glycosyltransferase that is unique to plants and some invertebrates (Dirnberger et al., 2002). An N-glycan GFP-tagged xylosyltransferase has been found associated with Golgi stacks of BY-2 cells preferentially located in medial cisternae (Follet-Gueye et al., 2003). Dupree’s group reported on the expression of a GONST1-YFP fusion that localizes to small punctate structures in onion cells, interpreted as being the Golgi apparatus (Baldwin et al., 2001). The organization of the plant Golgi apparatus, at light microscope resolution, appears rather different from the mammalian Golgi. The plant Golgi is scattered in the cell as small stacks in the cortical cytoplasm and within trans-vacuolar strands of cytoplasm (Boevink et al., 1998; Wee et al., 1998; Essl et al., 1999; Nebenführ et al., 1999). In leaves, individual stacks of the Golgi apparatus appear closely associated with the cortical ER network (Boevink et al., 1998; Saint-Jore et al., 2002; Fig. 2f ). This is particularly evident when imaging the ERD2-GFP fusion. In mammalian cells, the homologue of the ERD2 protein has been identified on the intermediate compartment between the ER and the Golgi and on the Golgi itself (Griffiths et al., 1994). In plant cells, the location of the receptor was, until recently, unknown. Confocal microscopy of ERD2-GFP in Nicotiana leaves showed the chimeric protein to be located to Golgi bodies and the ER network. This close association of ER and Golgi has led to the hypothesis, suggested by a few reports based on electron microscopy, that the two organelles may have connections and function as a secretory unit ( Juniper et al., 1982; Harris & Oparka, 1983; Brandizzi et al., 2002c). However, the nature and persistence of these connections have yet to be established. Movement of the Golgi over the ER is actin-dependent. Rhodamine–phalloidin staining of tobacco leaf epidermal cells expressing ERD2-GFP has revealed a close juxtaposition of the ER and the Golgi to the actin cytoskeleton (Boevink et al., 1998). More recently, the dynamic association of the Golgi with actin has been shown in tobacco epidermal cells expressing fluorescent constructs for Golgi and actin cytoskeleton, the latter being highlighted with an actin-binding region of a mouse talin fused to YFP (Brandizzi et al., 2002c). Depolymerization of the actin network with drugs results in an inhibition of Golgi movement and clustering of the fluorescent bodies on small islands of lamellar ER within the cortical tubular network (Boevink et al., 1998; Brandizzi et al., 2002c). The dynamics of the plant Golgi over the ER network opens up questions on the modality of ER-to-Golgi protein and membrane transport and on the distribution of ER export sites. It was postulated that ER-to-Golgi protein transport might be linked to the discontinuity of Golgi movement (Nebenführ et al., 1999). As Golgi stacks move, arrest and regain movement after time intervals, cargo collection would occur during Golgi arrest, possibly after transient detachment from actin (‘stop-and-go model’). Alternatively, the Golgi movement in plant cells would allow the Golgi continually to collect vesicles budding from the ER (‘vacuum cleaner model’; Boevink et al., 1998). These models, which are as yet unsupported by any experimental evidence, do not exclude the possibility that the ER and Golgi may behave as one dynamic system, either through direct membrane continuities or through continuous vesicle or tubule formation/fusion reactions (Brandizzi et al., 2002b; reviewed in Neumann et al., 2003). In this view, ER-to-Golgi transport may occur during Golgi movement. 2.4. Imaging the vacuole with GFP The plant vacuole is a multifunctional organelle, which is essential for growth and development. Unlike yeast vacuoles © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 214, 138–158 G F P I S T H E WAY TO G L OW or mammalian lysosomes, the plant vacuole often serves as both storage and lytic compartment. In addition, the plant vacuole acts as a pool for metabolic intermediates such as organic acids and is involved in the regulation of turgor pressure, detoxification of the cytosol and the maintenance of cytosolic pH. Both lytic and storage vacuoles may coexist in the same cell (Paris et al., 1997). Lytic and protein storage vacuoles can be distinguished by the presence of different specific aquaporins, termed tonoplast intrinsic proteins (TIPs). The location of several TIPs has been established through immunocytochemistry. α-TIP has been mainly assigned to protein storage vacuoles ( Johnson et al., 1989). γ-TIP has been found in lytic or degradative vacuoles (Paris et al., 1996; Reisen et al., 2003), whereas δ-TIP has been found in pigment-containing vacuoles ( Jauh et al., 1998). The discovery of GFP and the formation of TIP-GFP fusion proteins has allowed in vivo study of vacuolar functions and dynamics. In a random GFP::cDNA fusion screen, a δ-TIP fused to GFP was demonstrated to be a vacuolar membrane protein in Arabidopsis hypocotyl epidermal cells (Cutler et al., 2000). The identity of this vacuolar membrane is at present unknown. Reisen et al. (2003) recently reported on another aquaporin isolated from cauliflower, BobTIP26-1, that has previously been demonstrated to be an active aquaporin in Xenopus leavis oocytes. BobTIP26-1 is a protein located in the tonoplast (Barrieu et al., 1998) and is a specific marker for acidic, lytic vacuoles. Reisen et al. (2003) fused the GFP sequence downstream of the BobTIP26-1 coding region and observed a complex tonoplast labelling in Nicotiana tabacum cv. Wisconsin 38 suspension cells. Fluorescent patches were detected on the tonoplast, which might suggest that the aquaporins are not evenly distributed within the vacuolar membrane. In tobacco leaf epidermal cells, BobTIP26-1-GFP evenly labels the tonoplast (Fig. 3a). When BobTIP26-1-GFP was transiently expressed in protoplasts isolated from tobacco suspension cultures, the fusion protein was not detected on the tonoplast, but in a fluorescent network resembling the ER. Reisen et al. (2003) suggest that this might be due to BobTIP26-1-GFP en route to the vacuolar membrane. A study using γ-TIP-GFP to investigate the dynamics of the vacuole reported that the tonoplast protein was targeted to the vacuolar membranes in young Arabidopsis cotyledon cells (Saito et al., 2002). In addition, it was found that the marker protein also labelled some spherical structures (bulbs) that were often observed within the lumen of vacuoles. These bulbs were connected with the vacuolar membrane and were moving around within or along the outline of the membrane. In addition, larger bulbs were also shown to become elongated and form tube-like structures. The intensity of the fluorescence emitted from the γ-TIP-GFP-labelled bulbs was reported to be several-fold higher than the adjacent vacuolar membrane. This could be explained by the observation using transmission electron microscopy that the bulbs consist of a double © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 214, 138–158 143 Fig. 3. Fluorescent protein fusions highlights vacuole and plasma membrane. (a) Low-magnification CLS micrograph of tobacco leaf epidermal cells transiently expressing a GFP fusion to the tonoplast intrinsic protein BobTIP26-1 (Reisen et al., 2003). The fusion protein locates to the tonoplast of central lytic vacuole, thereby visualizing the transvacuolar strands (arrowheads). The insert shows cytoplasmic strands leading to the centre of a cell where the nucleus is located in a cytoplasmic pocket in the middle of the vacuole. BobTIP26-1-GFP construct courtesy of N. Leborgne-Castel. (b) CLS micrograph of a tobacco leaf epidermal cell transiently expressing NtAQP1-YFP (A. Kotzer and C. Hawes, unpublished data). This YFP fusion to the plasma membrane intrinsic protein NtAQP1 exclusively labels the plasma membrane, thereby outlining the cell shape. Note that in comparison with (a), no cytoplasmic strands are highlighted. NtAQP1 construct (Siefritz et al., 2001) courtesy of F. Siefritz. (c,d) Projection of CLS optical sections through the roots of Arabidopsis cv. Wassylevskaja plantlets (Flückiger et al., 2003), at an early stage of root hair formation, stably expressing two different vacuolar GFP markers. (c) GFP-Chi (Di Sansebastiano et al., 1998, 2001), a marker of the protein storage vacuole, accumulates in small compartments. (d) Aleu-GFP (Di Sansebastiano et al., 2001), a marker of the lytic vacuole, accumulates in the large central vacuole. Micrographs courtesy of G. P. Di Sansebastiano. N, nucleus. Scale bars: a–d = 25 µm; insert in a = 10 µm. 144 F. B R A N D I Z Z I E T A L . membrane. In the same study, another vacuolar membrane protein, AtRab75c, was fused to GFP and expressed in Arabidopsis. The construct gave good vacuolar localization but, interestingly, did not label any structures in the lumen of the vacuole as seen for the γ-TIP-GFP (Saito et al., 2002). However, although not fluorescent, bulbs are present in cotyledon epidermal cells in GFP-AtRab75c-transformed Arabidopsis as confirmed by electron microscopy. γ-TIP is an integral membrane protein with six TMDs and probably forms a dimer or tetramer like other aquaporins, whereas Rab75c belongs to the Rab GTPase family and is attached to the membrane via a C-terminal prenylation. Saito et al. (2002) proposed that the difference in membrane attachment might be the reason for their segregation into different structures. Alternatively, an unknown mechanism might exclude GFP-AtRab75c from the bulb region (Saito et al., 2002). Uemura et al. (2002) used a vacuolar syntaxin-related molecule, AtVam3/SYP22, fused to GFP, to study the vacuolar dynamics in Arabidopsis. This protein has previously been demonstrated by immunoelectron microscopy to locate to the vacuolar membrane (Sato et al., 1997). The GFP construct revealed complicated vacuolar architectures in various cell types with internal membranous structures inside the central vacuole in root epidermal cells. This was also observed in mesophyll cell protoplasts. By three-dimensional modelling and reconstruction from confocal images, the internal membrane structures were organized as sheets and cylindrical structures. These structures were also highly dynamic and were constantly remodelled. Interestingly, the fluorescence intensity of this GFP construct, GFP-Vam3, on the cylindrical structures was twice as strong as the outer-vacuolar membrane (Saito et al., 2002). Uemura et al. (2002) concluded that this intravacuolar membrane has a double membrane structure. The streaming motion could be blocked with an actindepolymerizing agent, cytochalasin D, whereas microtubuledisrupting drugs had no effect on the movement of the sheet-like structures. These data suggest that the dynamic movement of the internal vacuolar membrane is actin-dependent, but independent of microtubules. Uemura et al. (2002) concluded that these sheet-like structures are possible transvacuolar strands involved in cytoplasmic streaming. They postulated two models for the formation of intravacuolar structures. In the ‘autophagic’ model, a small vacuole is engulfed by a large vacuole, and remains enclosed in the vacuolar lumen. The second model suggests that the vacuolar membrane could be invaginated into the vacuolar lumen to form sheet-like structures, which then become rounded. A potassium channel protein (AtKCO1) fused to GFP locates to the vacuolar membrane in transgenic tobacco BY-2 cells (Czempinski et al., 2002). Confocal images showed that the signal of the AtKCO1-GFP was present as a single fluorescent line surrounding the large central vacuole. In addition, individual cells contained multiple small vacuoles labelled by GFP fluorescence. In addition, in some cells containing a single large vacuole, a network of connecting strands most similar to transvacuolar strands exhibited GFP fluorescence. Likewise, an iron-regulated ABC transporter, IDI7, from barley roots fused to GFP localized to the vacuolar membrane when transiently expressed in suspension-cultured tobacco cells (Yamaguchi et al., 2002). IDI7 is believed to be a tonoplast ABC transporter and is thought to be involved in the export of certain substrates from the cytosol to the vacuoles. Finally, Thomine et al. (2003) expressed a metal transporter of the NRAMP family, AtNRAMP3, as a GFP fusion in onion cells and in Arabidopsis protoplasts located to the vacuolar membrane. The existence of more than one type of vacuole in some cells implies that, in these cases, different mechanisms for tonoplast protein sorting coexist. It has been established for several vacuolar membrane proteins that both the TMD and the cytosolic tail are important for sorting to the tonoplast (Jiang & Rogers, 1998). A C-terminal portion of α-TIP composed of the sixth and last TMDs and the 17-amino-acid cytosolic tail contains sufficient information for sorting to the tonoplast (Hofte & Chrispeels, 1992). Unlike the increasing amount of data collected using GFP as a tag for soluble vacuolar proteins, little has been done to investigate the actual transport pathway of vacuolar membrane proteins using GFP. Mitsuhashi et al. (2000) designed αTIP-GFP and γ-TIP-GFP constructs and both were localized to a vacuolar membrane in BY-2 cells. Mitsuhashi et al. (2000) concluded that both TIP-GFP fusions are targeted to the same vacuole in BY-2 cells. This is in contrast to what Okita & Rogers (1996) and Paris et al. (1996) reported, in which the two TIPs localize to different vacuoles in the same cell in barley roots and in maturing pea cotyledons. It will be interesting to reinforce these findings on the dynamics of coexisting vacuoles with experiments based on co-expression of different TIP chimeras with available GFP spectral variants. In the experiments of Mitsuhashi et al. (2000), GFP fluorescence was also observed in the ER network, suggesting that both α-TIP-GFP and γ-TIP-GFP are transported through the ER and then to the vacuolar membranes. 2.5. Plasma membrane illuminated by GFP The plasma membrane (PM) encloses the cell and is the prime barrier between the cytosol and the extracellular environment. The PM is a dynamic, fluid structure constantly changing in composition and organization. Fusions of various plasma membrane proteins to GFP have been used to label the PM, but to date GFP has shed little light on the underlying mechanics and dynamics of the PM. GFP fusion proteins targeted to the PM have been constructed including artificial markers BP22-GFP and TM23GFP (Brandizzi et al., 2002a). BP22-GFP was designed by adding three hydrophobic residues (LAL) to the TMD of the pea vacuolar sorting receptor BP80 (Paris et al., 1997). This addition resulted in fluorescence accumulation on the plasma © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 214, 138–158 G F P I S T H E WAY TO G L OW membrane and in small punctate structures (Brandizzi et al., 2002a). Like BP22-GFP, TM23-GFP, a fusion of the TMD of a human lysosomal protein (LAMP1) to GFP, was targeted to the PM (Brandizzi et al., 2002a). In addition, the location of several endogenous/native plasma membrane proteins has been demonstrated by the use of GFP. PM proteins fused to GFP include the Rac-type small GTPase ZeRAC2 (Nakanomyo et al., 2002), the tobacco PM aquaporin NtAQP1 (Siefritz et al., 2001; A. Kotzer and C. Hawes, unpublished observations; Fig. 3b), the ammonium transporter LjAMT2;1 (Simon-Rosin et al., 2003) and the acylCoA binding protein ACBP1 (Li & Chye, 2003). 2.6. GFP and the apoplast A GFP construct with the ER signal peptide but lacking the retrieval signal (sp-GFP) has proven to be a useful marker for following secretion in vivo (Boevink et al., 1999). Tobacco leaves infected with this construct show very little fluorescence in the ER, probably due to continuous secretion. Treating the same leaves with cold shock or brefeldin A (BFA) caused an inhibition of the GFP secretion, resulting in the build-up of fluorescence in the ER (Boevink et al., 1999). These results were similar to those reported for mammalian cell systems (Presley et al., 1997). As will be discussed in detail below, transport of a secreted form of GFP to the apoplast can also be inhibited by co-expression of dominant-negative mutants of proteins regulating secretion. 145 3. GFP sheds light on protein retention and targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum Mechanisms by which the cell exports secretory proteins but retains resident ER proteins are the subject of intense investigation. Brandizzi et al. (2002a) investigated the influence of the TMD length on the destination of membrane proteins along the secretory pathway. The length of the TMD has been found to be important for protein progression along the secretory pathway. In this respect, a GFP fusion to a TMD stretch of 17 amino acids (aa) has been located to the NE and ER in tobacco. Extension of this stretch by three further aa resulted in the location to the Golgi, and a further elongation of the TMD by another three aa resulted in the GFP fusion incorporation into the PM. This study highlights an analogous influence of the TMD length on the destination of membrane proteins in plants as found in yeast (Munro, 1995). Irons et al. (2003) reported a TMD and cytosolic tail GFP fusion of an Arabidopsis calnexin, which contains a dilysine motif. The chimera locates to the NE and ER and it is highly mobile in these membranes as revealed by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) technique (Fig. 4a). This construct may be retained in the ER by virtue of specific signals present in the cytosolic tail of calnexin. Benghezal et al. (2000) have shown that the C-terminal dilysine motif confers ER localization to type I membrane proteins in plants. Cf-9 (a resistance gene, conferring resistance against the fungal pathogen Cladosporium fulvum) is a type I membrane protein that Fig. 4. Protein movement into organelles of the endomembrane system as shown by FRAP. (a) Photobleaching of a nuclear envelope (arrow) of a Nicotiana tabacum leaf epidermal cell transformed with a calnexin-GFP construct (Irons et al., 2003). The images are prebleach (0.0 s), bleach event (7.4 s), partial recovery (13.3 s) and full recovery (34.9 s). The frame indicates the area of photobleaching. (b) Photobleaching of a Golgi body in an N. tabacum leaf epidermal cell expressing ERD2-GFP and treated with cytochalasin D as described in Brandizzi et al. (2002c). The images are prebleach (0.0 s), bleach event (7.1 s), partial recovery (141.5 s) and full recovery (300.8 s). The frame indicates the area of photobleaching. Note that the recovery of fluorescence in the nuclear envelope is much faster than the in the Golgi apparatus. Scale bars: a = 10 µm; b = 5 µm. © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 214, 138–158 146 F. B R A N D I Z Z I E T A L . has a large extracytosolic leucine repeat domain, a single TMD and a cytosolic tail carrying a C-terminal dilysine KKXX motif. To study the ER retrieval mechanism motif of Cf-9, fusions of GFP to the TMD and cytosolic tail of Cf-9, creating GFP-KKXX, were generated (Benghezal et al., 2000). The location of GFPKKXX in the ER was verified by the co-localization of BiP and GFP using double immunofluorescent labelling. Amino acid substitution of KKXX to NNKK caused the secretion of most of the fusion protein from the ER, proteolytic release of GFP from its membrane anchor and loss of fluorescent properties. The extent to which the GFP-NNKK fusion was retained in the ER differed between different systems. In epidermal cells, the GFP-NNKK still showed an ER pattern but the intensity of fluorescence was much weaker than GFP-KKXX-expressing cells. In BY-2 cells, this was not the case as the GFP-NNKK showed no ER fluorescence. Soluble reticuloplasmins are targeted to the ER by virtue of a signal peptide. Signal peptides, like those of sporamin, chitinase and patatin, were proven sufficient for targeting GFP to the ER lumen (Boevink et al., 1996; Batoko et al., 2000; Brandizzi et al., 2003). The ER retention of soluble reticuloplasmins in plants depends on the carboxyl-terminal signal K/HDEL (Denecke et al., 1992). As mentioned above, ER-targeted GFP fused to K/ HDEL is retained in the ER (Boevink et al., 1996; Brandizzi et al., 2003). However, when overexpressed, ER-targeted GFP-HDEL (sp-GFP-HDEL) may reach the vacuole (Brandizzi et al., 2003). This is consistent with the retrieval mechanism of reticuloplasmins being under the control of a saturable pathway. A transmembrane receptor ERD2 has been identified in Arabidopsis (Lee et al., 1993) and is likely to function in the same way as the yeast and mammalian homologues in recognizing the ER retention motif and to trigger retrograde transport of soluble ER-resident proteins that have escaped. The localization of ERD2GFP on the Golgi and ER reflects the fact that the receptor is likely to shuttle between the two organelles. However, the activity of the ERD2-GFP fusion has not yet been tested in plants. Malfolded secretory proteins are retained in the ER until they reach a final low-energy state conformation. How retention is accomplished is still a matter of debate. It is tempting to suggest that retention may be operated by lumenal chaperones or alternatively that malfolding may prevent proteins from being recognized by the ER-export machinery. If proteins do not reach a proper conformation, they are generally degraded. In plants, little is known about the mechanisms and proteolytic systems that mediate protein quality control in the secretory system. It is known that malfolded lumenal proteins can be targeted to the vacuole via a Golgi-mediated pathway (Pueyo et al., 1995; Coleman et al., 1996). Other malfolded proteins are degraded via a BFA and heat-shock-independent pathway in an unidentified cellular compartment (Pedrazzini et al., 1997). The existence of a protein retrograde transport and degradation pathway in plant cells has been suggested by the analysis of the location of the ricin catalytic A subunit in tobacco protoplasts (Frigerio et al., 1998). Brandizzi et al. (2003) have identified a GFP fusion that is detected in the cytosol and the nucleoplasm of tobacco cells in spite of the presence of an N-terminal secretory signal peptide. In contrast to secreted GFP, the fusion protein is retained in the cells where it is degraded slowly, at a higher rate than the ER retained GFP-HDEL. The fusion protein could not be stabilized by inhibitors of transport or the cytosolic proteasome. Brandizzi et al. (2003) suggested that the fusion protein is disposed of from the ER via a retrograde translocation back to the cytosol. Moreover, accumulation in the nucleoplasm was shown to be microtubule-dependent, unlike the well-documented diffusion into the nucleoplasm of cytosolically expressed GFP. The apparent active transport of the GFP fusion into the nucleoplasm may indicate a yet undiscovered feature of the ER-associated protein degradation pathway and may explain the insensitivity of degradation to proteasome inhibitors (Brandizzi et al., 2003). 4. GFP highlights protein movement towards cell compartments 4.1. GFP shows that ER-to-Golgi transport does not require cytoskeleton GFP is an important tool for investigating ER-to-Golgi protein transport in vivo. Saint-Jore et al. (2002) used BFA to establish the involvement of the cytoskeleton in the transport to and from the Golgi. In mammalian cells, BFA induces redistribution of Golgi membrane proteins to the ER (Lippincott-Schwartz et al., 1990; Robineau et al., 2000). After treatment with BFA, fluorescent Golgi markers expressed in tobacco epidermal leaf cells and in BY-2 cells are redistributed to the ER (Boevink et al., 1998; Ritzenthaler et al., 2002; Saint-Jore et al., 2002). The BFA effect is reversible upon drug washout (Satiat-Jeunemaitre & Hawes, 1993; Satiat-Jeunemaitre et al., 1996; Saint-Jore et al., 2002). Saint-Jore et al. (2002) proved that in the absence of an intact actin and microtubule cytoskeleton, the BFA effect and recovery were still taking place, indicating that movement of proteins to and from the Golgi is cytoskeleton-independent. These data were confirmed by Brandizzi et al. (2002c), who used FRAP (Fig. 4b) experiments to investigate the requirements of an intact cytoskeleton for fluorescence recovery into Golgi. FRAP experiments were performed on leaf tissues expressing either ERD2-GFP or ST-GFP, and treated with cytoskeleton inhibitors. When the FRAP protocol was applied to cells treated with actin depolymerizing agents, in order to stop Golgi movement, the recovery of fluorescence in bleached Golgi stacks occurred within 5 min of the bleaching event (Fig. 4b). This shows that actin is not required for ER-to-Golgi trafficking even though it is required for Golgi movement. As Golgi still moved in the absence of microtubules, the concomitant use of an actin depolymerizing agent was required to perform FRAP on immobile Golgi. Again, Golgi bodies re-gained fluorescence within 5 min after the bleaching, indicating that © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 214, 138–158 G F P I S T H E WAY TO G L OW neither actin filaments nor microtubules are necessary for ER-to-Golgi protein transport. These results highlight a major difference between the plant and mammalian Golgi, as it appears that in plants, the cytoskeleton is not essential for protein transport to the Golgi. Moreover, although the Golgi marker ERD2-GFP was found distributed uniformly over the Golgi and ST-GFP towards the trans-most cisternae (Boevink et al., 1998), no substantial differences in the recovery times upon photobleaching were recorded. In addition, the recovery time of these two proteins was similar to the recovery time of a glycosylated form of ST-GFP (Batoko et al., 2000). 4.1.1. Out of the Golgi: transport to the vacuole. A considerable effort has been made over the last few years to identify and characterize differentiated and specialized vacuoles in higher plants. Recently, GFP has become a popular tool to unravel the mechanisms of transport of soluble and membrane proteins to the different vacuoles and to investigate the dynamics of the plant vacuolar system. However, the acidic nature of certain types of vacuoles has made it difficult to explore the accumulation of certain soluble markers, such as aleurain-GFP, for the rapid degradation/quenching of GFP (Di Sansebastiano et al., 1998). The low pH may be a determinant feature of vacuoles with a primarily lytic function, and storage vacuoles need not be acidic. Recently, using Arabidopsis cv. Columbia seedlings, it has been shown that light-dependent hydrolytic enzymes influence the stability of GFP and account for the reduction of GFP fluorescence in lytic vacuoles (Tamura et al., 2003). However, Di Sansebastiano et al. (2004) have not shown a similar light-dependent effect on fluorescence levels of GFP in lytic vacuoles when using another cultivar (Arabidopsis cv. Wassylevskaja), suggesting that different ecotypes within the same species may account for differences in the visibility of GFP in the vacuolar system (Di Sansebastiano et al., 2004). Soluble proteins reach the vacuole via information stored in their C-terminus, N-terminus or in an internal fragment of their propeptides. In the absence of such signalling peptides, vacuolar proteins are secreted. Cleavable vacuolar sorting signals include the N-terminal propeptide (NTPP) present in sweet potato sporamin and the C-terminal propeptide (CTPP) present in barley lectin (reviewed in Matsuoka & Neuhaus, 1999; Vitale & Raikhel, 1999). The N-terminal NTPP signals contain an NPIR consensus amino acid motif that is necessary for targeting sporamin to the vacuole (Matsuoka et al., 1995). A consensus sequence has not yet been identified in the C-terminus, but rather a common structural motif seems to serve as a sorting signal in the CTPPs (reviewed in Matsuoka & Neuhaus, 1999). CTPP- and NTPP-dependent pathways are likely to be distinct. Soluble proteins destined for the lytic vacuoles, such as barley aleurain, are transported through the Golgi complex. From the Golgi apparatus, the proteins are transported to a prevacuolar compartment (PVC) in clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs; Paris et al., 1996; Vitale & Raikhel, 1999). A type I trans© 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 214, 138–158 147 membrane glycoprotein, BP80, probably acts as a receptor for protein delivery to the lytic vacuole (Matsuoka et al., 1997; Paris et al., 1997). Lumenal vacuolar proteins might reach the protein storage vacuole in three different ways. The first route is through autophagy of ER-released storage protein aggregates (Levanony et al., 1992). In the second route, precursor-accumulating (PAC) vesicles may be released from the ER and mediate transport of storage proteins directly to the storage vacuole as reported in pumpkin and castor bean seeds (Hara-Nishimura et al., 1998). The third route includes transport via the Golgi complex where storage vacuole proteins are sorted in dense vesicles from other proteins in the secretory pathway as demonstrated for barley lectin (Hohl et al., 1996). Each transport pathway implies a first sorting event in the ER where some proteins are transported to the Golgi complex whereas others would aggregate and be released in the cytosol or be packed into PAC vesicles for transport to the storage vacuole. Di Sansebastiano et al. (2001) described protein trafficking to two different types of vacuoles in protoplasts by the fusion of GFP to two vacuolar sorting determinants (VSD). One GFP, mGFP5, was targeted to a pH-neutral vacuole by the C-terminal vacuolar sorting signal (VSS) of tobacco chitinase A (see also Fig. 3c). The construct was demonstrated to accumulate in an organelle different from the organelle accumulating the stain neutral red, which on proteonation is trapped within acidic compartments. It was concluded that the fusion to the Cterminus VSS of chitinase A is sufficient to send a secreted GFP to the storage vacuole. A construct made by fusing the NTPP of barley aleurain to mGFP5 was localized to compartments smaller than 2 µm and no fluorescence was detectable in the main lytic vacuole. The authors suggested that the lack of fluorescence in the main lytic vacuole might be due to the rapid degradation of GFP in acidic environments and that the observed fluorescent smaller compartments might be intermediates in the transport pathway of aleurain (see also Fig. 3d). Fusion of the pro-peptide of aleurain to a brighter and more stable form of GFP, mGFP6, targeted the construct to the small intermediate compartments in addition to the central vacuole. Neutral red was demonstrated to accumulate in the same compartment as mGFP6-aleurain, indicating a lytic vacuolar location for aleurain. This also clearly indicates the sensitivity of mGFP5 to an acidic environment. Recently, Flückiger et al. (2003) made stable Arabidopsis transformants with soluble vacuolar GFP constructs. It was evident that the distribution of the fluorescence of GFP-Chi and GFP-Aleu was different in elongated root cells. The GFPChi was located in the ER, small vacuoles and occasionally in the large central vacuole, whereas GFP-Aleu accumulated in the large lytic vacuole (Fig. 3c,d). In addition, the organization of the vacuolar system was investigated in different tissues of Arabidopsis cv. Wassylevskaja plantlets. In contrast to the location of GFP-Chi in elongated root cells, GFP-Chi was found in root apex cells to accumulate in the ER and in different 148 F. B R A N D I Z Z I E T A L . smaller vacuolar compartments. These results highlight the differences in protein targeting due to tissue specificity and cellular differentiation (Flückiger et al., 2003). The location of another soluble vacuolar protein, 2S albumin, a major storage protein, was investigated using GFP (Mitsuhashi et al., 2000). A construct, consisting of a signal peptide (sp) fused to GFP followed by the C-terminal 18-aa peptide (2SC), sp-GFP-2SC, was found to be able to bind to PV72, a putative sorting receptor for the storage vacuole. Fluorescence was observed in a large compartment as well as in the ER network and in the nuclear envelope. The large compartment was also stainable with BCECF, which is fluorescent in vegetative vacuoles in BY-2 cells. Some small particles were also labelled by sp-GFP-2SC. Mitsuhashi et al. (2000) postulated that because these particles show a similar size as the Golgi complex, the C-terminal peptide of 2S albumin functions as a targeting signal for vacuoles via the Golgi complex. Mitsuhashi et al. (2000) also designed a GFP fusion of sp-GFP and the C-terminal region of pumpkin PV72 that included the TMD and the cytosolic tail. This construct located to small particles in 3-day-old BY-2 cells. The authors concluded that these particles were consistent with fluorescent Golgi complexes and that the C-terminal part of PV72 is responsible for the presence of the receptor in the Golgi complex. An observation on these experiments is that no co-localization with a Golgi marker was performed, and that these ‘small particles’ might also correspond to PAC vesicles that Hara-Nishimura et al. (1998) previously demonstrated PV72 to locate to. In 10-day-old callus cells, the fluorescence of sp-GFP-PV72 was observed within the vacuoles and the construct was demonstrated to be proteolytically cleaved by immunoblot analysis. Mitsuhashi et al. (2000) suggest that like pea BP-80, the vacuolar sorting receptor for the lytic vacuole, PV72, might cycle between the Golgi complex and a prevacuolar compartment of the storage vacuole. 5. GFP technology helps to locate regulatory small GTPases and to shed light on their function In eukaryotic cells, the model that transport vesicles mediate protein transport between the various compartments of the endomembrane system is generally accepted. The formation, transport and fusion with a target membrane of these vesicular shuttles are orchestrated by a plethora of proteins. Among these regulatory proteins, Ras-related small GTPases play an important role (Vernoud et al., 2003). Whereas Arf and Sar GTPases are predominantly involved in the formation of vesicles and cargo packaging (Chavrier & Goud, 1999), Rab proteins are mainly thought to act as key regulators of the fusion of vesicles with their appropriate target membrane (Zerial & McBride, 2001). GFP technology has increased our understanding of the function of small GTPases in trafficking events between compartments of the plant endomembrane system (Figs 5–8). Fig. 5. Effect of wild-type and mutant forms of Sar1p on the transport of Golgi and vacuolar fluorescent markers. (a–c) CLS micrographs of Arabidopsis protoplasts expressing ERD2-GFP, a Golgi/ER marker, alone (a) and alongside AtSar1 (b) or AtSar1 H74L (5c). When expressed alone (a) or with wild-type AtSar1 (b), GFP fluorescence is mainly in the form of punctate structures corresponding to individual Golgi stacks, whereas co-expression of AtSar1 H74L leads to fluorescence accumulation of AtErd2-GFP in an ER-like pattern (c). (d–f ) CLS micrographs of Arabidopsis protoplasts expressing a GFP fusion to the vacuolar soluble protein sporamin alone (d) and alongside AtSar1 (e) or AtSar1 H74L (f). When expressed alone (d) or with wild-type AtSar1 (e), sporamin-GFP locates to the lumen of the central vacuole and to additional punctate structures, whereas when co-expressed with AtSar1 H74L, sporamin-GFP fluorescence accumulates in the ER (f ). Scale bars = 10 µm. (a) to (f ) are from Takeuchi et al. (2000) (figs 3a,c,e, 7a,c,e). Copyright Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, U.K., and reprinted with permission. Two major GFP-based approaches have been adopted. The first consists of expressing GFP fusions of small GTPases in order to identify their subcellular distribution, which can be indicative of the organelles involved in the transport step(s) regulated by that particular gene product (Ueda et al., 2001; Cheung et al., 2002; Inaba et al., 2002; Bolte et al., 2004). The second approach is based on different GFP markers either of one specific endomembrane organelle or of a whole transport pathway (Andreeva et al., 2000; Batoko et al., 2000; Saint-Jore et al., 2002; Sohn et al., 2003). In co-expression experiments, the influence of small GTPases on the intracellular distribution/transport of a given GFP marker can then be studied with the confocal laser scanning microscope. In this type of study, defined point mutations predicted to disrupt GTP binding and hydrolysis activity of small GTPases (resulting in constitutively active or inactive mutant forms) are often introduced in their coding sequence. The influence of the wild-type and the different mutant forms on the intracellular distribution/transport of GFP markers can then be compared. Finally, in a combination of both approaches, dual colour imaging experiments are performed in which fluorescent protein-tagged small GTPases (i.e. GFP) are co-expressed with fluorescent markers based on a spectral derivative [i.e. YFP, and the cyan fluorescent protein © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 214, 138–158 G F P I S T H E WAY TO G L OW Fig. 6. Effect of wild-type and mutant forms of Arf1 and Arf3 on the transport of Golgi and plasma membrane GFP markers. GFP fluorescence in green, chlorophyll autofluorescence in red. (a–c) CLS micrographs of Arabidopsis protoplasts transiently expressing the Golgi marker ST-GFP alongside Arf1 (a) or Arf1[T31N] (b) or Arf3[T31N] (c). When expressed with wild-type Arf1 (a) or Arf3[T31N] (c), GFP fluorescence is in the form of punctate structures corresponding to individual Golgi stacks, whereas co-expression of Arf1[T31N] leads to a diffuse GFP pattern (b). (d–g) CLS micrographs of Arabidopsis protoplasts transiently expressing the plasma membrane marker H+-ATPase-GFP alone (d) and alongside Arf1 (e) or Arf1[T31N] (f,g). When expressed alone (d) or with wild-type Arf1 (e), H+-ATPase-GFP is exclusively located at the plasma membrane (arrows). Co-expression with Arf1[T31N] leads to fluorescence accumulation of the plasma membrane marker in punctate structures and aggregates (f,g, arrowheads). CH, chloroplasts. Scale bars: d–e = 20 µm. (a)–(c) are from Lee et al. (2002) (fig. 2A,a,b,c). (d) to (g) are from Lee et al. (2002) (fig. 6A,a,b,c-3,c-2). Copyright the American Society of Plant Biologists and reprinted with permission. (CFP)]. This last method offers the possibility to correlate unequivocally, in a cell population, the phenotype of individual cells to the effect of GTPases. 5.1. Regulatory proteins of ER-Golgi/Golgi-ER transport steps 5.1.1. Sar1p. In mammalian and yeast cells, protein transport from the ER to the Golgi is mediated by COPII-vesicles. Cargo © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 214, 138–158 149 packaging and vesicle formation at this level requires initial binding to the ER membrane of the Sar1p GTPase (reviewed by Barlowe, 2002). Two tobacco and Arabidopsis Sar1p homologues were shown to be able to complement the lethal yeast ∆sar1 mutant (Takeuchi et al., 1998). Co-expression of one of two mutant forms of the tobacco Sar1p impaired in guanine nucleotide interactions (T34N and H74L) with either a secreted soluble or a Golgi membrane GFP marker led to an accumulation of fluorescence in the ER of Nicotiana clevelandii leaf epidermal cells (Andreeva et al., 2000). Fluorescence also accumulated in the ER, though to a lesser extent, when the GFP markers were co-expressed with a third mutant form of tobacco Sar1p (N129I) and with an entire wild-type ORF in anti-sense orientation (Andreeva et al., 2000). Similar results were obtained by Takeuchi et al. (2000), in which one of two Golgi GFP markers and a wild-type or mutant form (H74L) of Arabidopsis Sar1p (AtSar1) were encoded in the same T-DNA. The Golgi markers relocated from the Golgi to the ER in tobacco BY-2 cells as well as in Arabidopsis suspension protoplasts when simultaneously expressed with AtSar1 H74L (Takeuchi et al., 2000; Fig. 5a–c). In addition, AtSar1 H74L, in contrast to the wild-type protein, had a drastic effect on the intracellular distribution of a soluble GFP marker targeted to the lytic vacuole (sporamin-GFP). In Arabidopsis suspension protoplasts, fluorescence distribution of sporamin-GFP changed from a predominantly vacuolar location to an ER-like network pattern (Takeuchi et al., 2000; Fig. 5d–f ). A biochemical approach confirmed that Sar1p is necessary for transport of proteins to the Golgi in tobacco leaf protoplasts (Phillipson et al., 2001). 5.1.2. Arf1, Arf3. Arf1 GTPases are involved in vesicle budding steps by recruiting COPI coatomer components as well as clathrin coats. In mammalian cells, COPI vesicles mediate retrograde protein transport between the Golgi cisternae and from ER-Golgi-intermediate compartments back to the ER; their involvement in anterograde protein transport is still debated (Spang, 2002). In plant cells, Arf1 has been located to the Golgi by immunocytochemical means both by light microscopy in BY-2 cells (Ritzenthaler et al., 2002) and in maize root tip cells (Couchy et al., 2003), as well as by electron microscopy in maize and Arabidopsis root tip cells (Pimpl et al., 2000). In a GFP-based study, Arabidopsis Arf1-GFP (AtArf1-GFP) was shown to accumulate in BFA-sensitive, Golgi-reminiscent punctate fluorescent structures in both Arabidopsis protoplasts and BY-2 cells (Takeuchi et al., 2002). The effect of different forms of AtArf1 on various fluorescent markers (three Golgi markers, one vacuolar marker) was evaluated principally in tobacco BY-2 cells using an approach similar to the one described above for Sar1p in which the marker protein and the untagged small GTPase are expressed from the same T-DNA (Takeuchi et al., 2000). Expression of the GTP-locked AtArf1 Q71L or the GDP-locked AtArf1 T31N resulted in the relocation of ERD2-GFP fluorescence from the Golgi to the ER, whereas two other fluorescent Golgi markers were not affected or at 150 F. B R A N D I Z Z I E T A L . least did not relocate to the ER. In addition, the transport of sporamin-GFP to the lytic vacuole was inhibited with the marker accumulating in the ER when AtArf1 Q71L was present. The authors suggested that Arf1 is primarily required for retrograde Golgi-to-ER trafficking and that disruption of Arf1 activity leads indirectly to perturbation of ER-to-Golgi trafficking (Takeuchi et al., 2002). Functional differences between the two Arabidopsis isoforms Arf1 and Arf3 were described by Lee et al. (2002) in experiments performed in Arabidopsis leaf protoplasts in which either the wild-type or GDP-binding dominant-negative mutants of Arf1 and Arf3 (Arf1[T31N] and Arf3[T31N]) were co-transfected alongside one or two cellular markers tagged by either GFP or the red fluorescent protein (RFP). In the presence of Arf1[T31N] but not of Arf1, Arf3 and Arf3[T31N], the Golgi marker ST-GFP relocated to the ER, which was found to display profound morphological changes (Fig. 6a–c). Arf1[T31N] and Arf3[T31N] also had a different effect on the trafficking of H+-ATPase-GFP. Although the presence of Arf1 and Arf3 wild-type as well as of Arf3[T31N] did not affect the targeting of H+-ATPase:GFP to the plasma membrane (Fig. 6d,e), H+ATPase:GFP fluorescence was in the form of punctate stains or aggregates and not at the plasma membrane or in the ER when co-expressed with Arf1[T31N] (Fig. 6f,g). Interestingly, BFA caused a similar change in distribution of H+-ATPase:GFP, suggesting that Arf1 may act via a BFA-sensitive factor as in yeast and mammalian cells (Lee et al., 2002). These reports clearly show that Arf1 mutants do not always lead to a relocation into the ER of markers of different cellular compartments (Golgi, vacuole, plasma membrane) although all of these markers are transported from the ER to the Golgi (AtArf1 Q71L even had different effects on markers of the same organelle, the Golgi). This indicates that inhibition of transport by Arf1 mutants cannot be easily explained either by a general blockage of anterograde ER-to-Golgi transport or by a blockage of retrograde Golgi-to-ER transport. In this respect it is interesting to note that biochemical data indicate that Arf1 might not only influence transport steps of soluble cargo to the plasma membrane but also have an influence on the BP80-mediated transport of soluble cargo to the vacuole (Pimpl et al., 2003). 5.1.3. Rab1 and Rab2 homologues. Whereas Sar1p and Arf1 linked to vesicle formation and recruitment of vesicle coat proteins, other small GTPases act predominantly at the level of vesicle fusion with the target membrane. One example for a small GTPase apparently involved at this particular transport level of anterograde ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking is Rab1, controlling tethering and fusion events at the Golgi level (Lupashin & Waters, 1997; Moyer et al., 2001). Batoko et al. (2000) used both biochemical and GFP techniques to investigate the function of an Arabidopsis Rab1 (AtRab1) homologue in tobacco. Co-expression of the dominant inhibitory mutant AtRab1b(N121I) alongside a secreted form of GFP (secGFP) resulted in GFP fluorescence accumulating in tobacco leaf epidermal cells in an ER-reminiscent dynamic reticulate pattern, whereas the fluorescence pattern of secGFP was unaltered when co-expressed with wild-type AtRab1b (Fig. 7a–e). AtRab1b(N121I), when co-expressed alongside the Golgi marker ST-GFP, was shown to have no effect on the BFAinduced redistribution of the Golgi marker back into the ER (Saint-Jore et al., 2002). However, recovery of Golgi fluorescence upon BFA removal was seriously reduced in the presence of AtRab1b(N121I) (Fig. 7f,g) whereas the BFA recovery phenotype could be rescued when the wild-type protein was co-expressed alongside AtRab1b(N121I). These data strongly suggest that AtRab1b regulates anterograde rather than retrograde transport between the ER and the Golgi. However, although providing strong evidence for the involvement of Rab1 in ER-to-Golgi trafficking events in plant cells, neither of the two studies (Batoko et al., 2000; Saint-Jore et al., 2002) could distinguish between a blockage of protein export out of the ER and blockage of protein import into the Golgi. Tobacco Rab2 (NtRab2), a homologue of the mammalian Rab2 GTPase, has recently been investigated in tobacco pollen tubes as well as in leaf epidermal cells (Cheung et al., 2002). A GFP fusion of NtRab2 in pollen tubes was shown to locate Fig. 7. Effect of wild-type and mutant forms of plant Rab1 and Rab2 proteins on ER-to-Golgi transport as illustrated by the use of various GFP markers. (a – c) Low-magnification CLS micrographs of tobacco leaf epidermal cells transformed with a secreted GFP marker, secGFP, alone (a) and alongside AtRab1b (b) or AtRab1b(N121I) (c). Epidermal cells of tobacco leaf areas infiltrated with secGFP alone (a) or secGFP and AtRab1b (b) show little or no intracellular fluorescence. Intracellular secGFP fluorescence is clearly visible when leaf areas are co-transformed with AtRab1b(N121I) (c). (d,e) High-magnification CLS micrographs showing that, when co-expressed with AtRab1b(N121I), the pattern of intracellular secGFP fluorescence (d) resembles the fluorescence pattern caused by expression of GFP-HDEL, a soluble ER marker (e). (f,g) CLS micrographs of tobacco leaf epidermal cells expressing the Golgi marker STGFP and after 8 h recovery in water from BFA treatment in the absence (f ) or in the presence of AtRab1b(N121I) (g). In comparison with the control cell (f), BFA recovery is inhibited by the presence of AtRab1b(N121I), as indicated by the ER-like pattern of ST-GFP fluorescence (g). (h–j) Fluorescence micrographs of tobacco pollen tubes expressing the Golgi-marker ERD2-GFP alongside wild-type and mutant forms of NtRab2. When co-expressed with wildtype NtRab2, ERD2-GFP locates to Golgi stacks (h), whereas co-expression with NtRab2(S20N) (i) or NtRab2(N119I) ( j) reduces the Golgi location of ERD2-GFP. Micrograph (i) courtesy of A. Cheung. (k,l) Fluorescence micrographs of tobacco pollen tubes expressing the plasma membrane marker Aha1GFP alongside wild-type NtRab2 (k) or NtRab2(S20N) (l). When co-expressed with NtRab2, Aha-GFP labels the plasma membrane (k), whereas co-expression with NtRab2(S20N) leads to intracellular accumulation of Aha1-GFP. Scale bars: a–c,f,g = 25 µm; d–e,k = 10 µm; h,j,l = 20 µm. (a) to (e) are from Batoko et al. (2000) (fig. 4A,B). (h), ( j) and (l) from Cheung et al. (2002) (figs 4C,4E, 5D,E). Copyright the American Society of Plant Biologists and reprinted with permission. (f) to (g) are from Saint-Jore et al. (2002) (fig. 8g,h). Copyright Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, U.K., and reprinted with permission. © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 214, 138–158 G F P I S T H E WAY TO G L OW © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 214, 138–158 151 152 F. B R A N D I Z Z I E T A L . Fig. 8. Location of wild-type and mutant forms of Rab proteins involved in post-Golgi transport. (a) CLS micrograph of tobacco BY-2 cells simultaneously expressing GFP-Pra2 (green image) and RFP-Pra3 (red image) (Inaba et al., 2002). The merged image shows that the two closely related Ypt3/Rab11 homologues locate to different organelles of the endomembrane system. Micrograph courtesy of Y. Nagano. (b) CLS micrograph of Arabidopsis protoplasts expressing Ara6-GFP, a homologue to mammalian Rab5, and labelled with the putative endocytic marker FM4-64. Mobile punctate structures and spherical organelles labelled with GFP (green image, arrowheads) were also labelled with FM4-64 (red image, arrowheads), as shown by the merged image (arrowheads). (c) CLS micrograph of Arabidopsis protoplasts expressing Ara6Q93L-GFP and labelled with the putative endocytic marker FM4-64. Ara6Q93L-GFP predominantly locates to the tonoplast and to spherical structures larger than those labelled by wild-type Ara6-GFP (green image; compare with b). These spherical structures were also labelled by FM4-64 (red and merged images). N, nucleus. Scale bars: b–c = 10 µm. (b) and (c) are reprinted, with permission, from Ueda et al. (2001) (figs 6D,E,F and 7M). to BFA-sensitive punctate structures, identified as individual Golgi stacks by immunogold TEM with polyclonal anti-GFP serum. GFP fusions of two dominant-negative inhibitory mutants, GFP-NtRab2(S20N) and GFP-NtRab2(N119I), located to the pollen tube cytosol. Untagged versions of the two mutant proteins inhibited the transport of Golgi-resident, plasma membrane, and secreted GFP marker proteins to their usual destination in pollen tubes (Fig. 7h–l). For instance, the ERD2-GFP was shown to change from a predominantly Golgi location to the ER when co-expressed with the dominant-negative inhibitory mutants of NtRab2 (Fig. 7h–j). NtRab2(S20N) and NtRab2(N119I) also had an inhibitory effect on pollen tube growth. Thus, Cheung et al. (2002) proposed a role for NtRab2 in ER-to-Golgi traffic. Interestingly, in contrast to pollen tubes, the GFP fusion of the wild-type NtRab2 did not target Golgi stacks in tobacco leaf protoplasts © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 214, 138–158 G F P I S T H E WAY TO G L OW and epidermal cells. However, a GFP fusion of an Arabidopsis Rab2 homologue, AtRab2a (now called AtRabB1b), successfully targeted the fusion to Golgi stacks in tobacco leaf epidermal cells (Neumann et al., 2003). This may suggest a role of AtRab2a in a traffic event between the Golgi and a downstream compartment (U. Neumann, I. Moore, C. Hawes and H. Batoko, unpublished observations). 5.2. Regulatory proteins of post-Golgi transport steps 5.2.1. Rab11 (and Rab25) homologues. GFP-based studies on plant homologues of the mammalian Rab11 subclass suggest that closely related Rab proteins locate to different compartments and might fulfil different functions (Inaba et al., 2002; Fig. 8a). GFP fusions of Pra2 and Pra3, two Pisum sativum Rab11/Ypt3 homologues, have been located to punctate structures in stably transformed tobacco BY-2 cells. Whereas GFP-Pra3 fluorescence was not affected by BFA treatment, the punctate fluorescent GFP-Pra2 structures relocated to ERreminiscent membranes after BFA treatment, suggesting that GFP-Pra2 is targeted to Golgi stacks. However, GFP-Pra2 also labelled BFA-insensitive structures thought to be endosomallike compartments. Co-localization experiments of GFP-Pra3 with a fusion between AtVTI11 – a marker of the ‘trans-Golgi network’ (TGN) and the PVC – and RFP resulted in partial overlap of the two fluorochromes, suggesting that GFP-Pra3 locates to the TGN and/or the PVC. 5.2.2. Rab5 homologues. GFP-based technology has also highlighted functional diversification among plant homologues of mammalian Rab5 GTPases (Ueda et al., 2001; Sohn et al., 2003; Bolte et al., 2004). The location of GFP-tagged versions of two Rab5 homologues, Ara6 and Ara7, was investigated in Arabidopsis protoplasts (Ueda et al., 2001). Ara6 is a member of a novel, plant-unique type of Rab GTPases that lacks the C-terminal region, essential for attachment to membranes and subcellular localization. Instead, these unique Rabs are modified at the N-terminus for N-myristoylation and palmitoylation (Ueda et al., 2001). Ara6-GFP was shown to label both punctate and spherical structures (in addition to some PM and ER labelling in some cells), whereas GFP-Ara7, the conventional Rab5 homologue, was predominantly detected on punctate structures and less often on spherical organelles. Dual-colour imaging showed that Ara6-GFP- or GFP-Ara7positive structures were also labelled with the styryl dye FM4-64, a putative marker of the endocytic pathway (Fig. 8b). GFP fusions of the GTPase-deficient mutants, Ara6Q93L-GFP and GFP-Ara7Q69L, both located to aggregates of large spherical structures (FM4-64 positive; Fig. 8c), to the tonoplast and small punctate structures. Whereas Ara6Q93L-GFP was occasionally detected on the PM, GFP-Ara7Q69L never was. Ueda et al. (2001) conclude that both Ara6 and Ara7 locate to endosomal-like organelles and regulate membrane fusion in the early endocytic pathway. However, based on the slightly different location of their © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 214, 138–158 153 GTPase-deficient mutants as well as on differences in expression pattern and in the amino acid sequence of the effector domain, Ara6 and Ara7 might regulate fusion of different endosomal populations in Arabidopsis protoplasts (Ueda et al., 2001). Another member of the plant-specific Rab GTPases lacking C-terminal isoprenylation has also been isolated from a salinitytolerant plant, Mesembryanthemum crystallinum (Bolte et al., 2000). Termed m-Rabmc, it is closely related to the Arabidopsis homologue Ara6 and correspondingly undergoes N-myristoylation (Bolte et al., 2004). In contrast to results shown by Ueda and co-workers on Ara6, m-Rabmc appears to be involved in the vacuolar trafficking pathway (Bolte et al., 2004). m-Rabmc has been co-located with markers for the prevacuolar compartment of the lytic vacuole (BP80, Pep12). These localization studies were carried out by immunolabelling or by a combination of expression of m-Rabmc-CFP constructs and immunolabelling. Both approaches resulted in a co-localization of m-Rabmc on more than 80% of prevacuole. It has also been shown that mRabmc co-located partially on the Golgi apparatus. Importantly, it has been demonstrated that m-Rabmc was implicated in the transport of the soluble marker protein aleurain-GFP, which is targeted to the acidic vacuole (Bolte et al., 2004). A similar role in trafficking of soluble cargo from the PVC to the central vacuole was also suggested for the third Arabidopsis isoform closely related to mammalian Rab5, Rha1 (Sohn et al., 2003). In Arabidopsis protoplasts, the dominant-negative inhibitory mutant Rha1[S24N] (either tagged with the small epitope haemagglutinin, HA, or fused to RFP) was shown to inhibit transport of GFP fused to the soluble vacuolar markers sporamin (spo-GFP) and Arabidopsis aleurain-like protein (AALP-GFP) to the central vacuole, presumably at the level of PVCs. Interestingly, RFP-Ara7[S24N] but not Ara6[S47N]HA caused the same altered distribution of spo-GFP. Biochemical methods confirmed that vacuolar trafficking of spo-GFP and AALP-GFP is inhibited, but also revealed that spo-GFP and AALP-GFP are secreted into the culture medium under the influence of HA-Rha1[S24N] and RFP-Rha1[S24N], respectively (Sohn et al., 2003). Thus, questions regarding the location and function of the plant Rab5 homologues have yet to be conclusively answered. Concluding remarks Within a short time, fluorescent proteins have become invaluable tools for in vivo investigations of the plant secretory pathway dynamics and regulation. However, as with any powerful technique, GFP technology has to be used wisely to avoid artefacts and data misinterpretations. For example, the nature of expression systems, whether by virus, agrobacterium or other transformation methods, may involve protein overexpression. As such, it is important to bear in mind the possible effect that protein over-expression may have on the plant endomembrane system. Therefore, the value of controls on transformation levels and ensuring that the labelling with 154 F. B R A N D I Z Z I E T A L . Fig. 9. Comparison of the location of two different Golgi markers in tobacco BY-2 cells with the CLSM (a,c) and the TEM (d). Although both GFP fusion proteins, ST-GFP (Batoko et al., 2000; Saint-Jore et al., 2002) and GFP-XylT36 (Follet-Gueye et al., 2003) locate to punctate structures when seen with the CLSM (a,b, respectively), their location within the Golgi stack, as seen by immunogold labelling using polyclonal anti-GFP antibodies, is different. Whereas ST-GFP locates towards the trans-half of the Golgi stack (b), GFP-XylT36 is restricted to medial cisternae (d). Scale bars: a = 50 µm; b = 20 µm; c,d = 100 nm. (c) and (d) are reproduced, with permission, from Follet-Gueye et al. (2003) (fig. 6A,B). GFP fusions is due to correct targeting should not be underestimated. Over-expression of protein may lead to ‘over-spill’ to other cellular compartments including the Golgi, vacuole and tonoplast, or even distension of the ER tubules as seen in cells over-expressing non-GFP-labelled protein (Crofts et al., 1999). In addition, GFP tagging of proteins may result in loss of a specific function or, worse, acquisition of new function. Another possible limit of GFP technology could arise from the production of such artefacts in reporter systems involving malfolding of proteins and malfunction. Furthermore, as for any other fluorescent probe, the sensitivity of GFP and its spectral variants to pH and proteolysis should be considered when investigating different organelles. One example is the vacuole, where GFP may accumulate but its fluorescence may be easily quenched by the acidic pH and specific experimental procedures may need to be adopted in order to visualize GFP fluorescence (Tamura et al., 2003). Finally, yet importantly, the expression and fluorescence of a GFP reporter may vary among different reporter systems (Di Sansebastiano et al., 2004). It should also be noted that organelles highlighted by GFP that may have similar appearance to others described in the literature (e.g. a dot or a ring) might not necessarily be the same. Therefore, attempts to establish the subcellular location of novel protein markers fused to GFP should always be accompanied by co-localization studies with other fluorescent markers that label specific compartments. Alternatively, immunogold with GFP antiserum applied to TEM should be used to investigate the nature of the GFP labelling at high resolution (see Fig. 9). As for any other light-microscopy-based technique, GFP technology also has its limits with regard to suborganelle © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 214, 138–158 G F P I S T H E WAY TO G L OW resolution. Figure 9 illustrates that two GFP fusion proteins locating to the Golgi bodies in tobacco BY-2 cells show a different location within the stack with the aid of electron microscopy. Modifications of GFP resulting in variations in both emission and excitation wavelengths (Haseloff et al., 1999), coupled with the development of other fluorescent proteins such as the recently described red fluorescent protein (DsRed, Matz et al., 1999), will permit two- or even three-colour detection of organelles in vivo (reviewed in Brandizzi et al., 2002b). The advent of new photoactivatable proteins, such as the photoactivatable GFP (Patterson & Lippincott-Schwartz, 2002) and the kindling RFP (Chudakov et al., 2003), coupled with improvements in imaging and analysis techniques, will offer an impressive armoury for the investigation and understanding of the dynamic nature of living plant cells. Acknowledgements We thank all those who have kindly provided micrographs: H. Batoko, A. Cheung, G. P. Di Sansebastiano, M. L. Follet-Gueye, I. Hwang, Y. Nagano, A. Nakano, A. Nebenführ, C. Saint-Jore, M. Takeuchi and T. Ueda. We also thank F. Siefritz and N. Leborgne-Castel for the generous gift of the NtAQP1 cDNA and of the BobTIP26-1::GFP construct, respectively. We acknowledge the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council for supporting the work undertaken in our laboratory. Finally, we would like to thank Chris Hawes for having been a very good friend and an excellent tutor during our residency at Oxford Brookes. References Andreeva, A.V., Zheng, H., Saint-Jore, C.M., Kutuzov, M.A., Evans, D.E. & Hawes, C.R. (2000) Organization of transport from endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi in higher plants. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 28, 505–512. Baldwin, T.C., Handford, M.G., Yuseff, M.I., Orellana, A. & Dupree, P. (2001) Identification and characterization of GONST1, a Golgi-localized GDP-mannose transporter in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 13, 2283–2295. Barlowe, C. (2002) COPII-dependent transport from the endoplasmic reticulum. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14, 417– 422. Barrieu, F., Thomas, D., Marty-Mazars, D., Charbonnier, M. & Marty, F. (1998) Tonoplast intrinsic proteins from cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis): immunological analysis, cDNA cloning and evidence for expression in meristematic tissues. Planta, 204, 335–344. Batoko, H., Zheng, H.Q., Hawes, C. & Moore, I. (2000) A Rab1 GTPase is required for transport between the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus and for normal Golgi movement in plants. Plant Cell, 12, 2201–2217. Battey, N., James, N., Greenland, A. & Brownlee, C. (1999) Exocytosis and endocytosis. Plant Cell, 11, 643–659. Baulcombe, D.C., Chapman, S. & Santa Cruz, S. (1995) Jellyfish green fluorescent protein as a reporter for virus infections. Plant J. 7, 1045– 1053. Benghezal, M., Wastenays, G.O. & Jones, D.A. (2000) The C-terminal dilysine motif confers endoplasmic reticulum localization to type I membrane proteins in plants. Plant Cell, 12, 1179–1201. © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 214, 138–158 155 Boevink, P., Martin, B., Oparka, K., Cruz, S. & Hawes, C. (1999) Transport of virally expressed green flourescent protein through the secretory pathway in tobacco leaves is inhibited by cold shock and brefeldin A. Planta, 208, 392 – 400. Boevink, P., Oparka, K., Santa Cruz, S., Martin, B., Batteridge, A. & Hawes, C. (1998) Stacks on tracks: the plant Golgi apparatus traffics on an active actin/ER network. Plant J. 15, 441– 447. Boevink, P., Santa Cruz, S., Hawes, C., Harris, N. & Oparka, K.J. (1996) Virus-mediated delivery of the green fluorescent protein to the endoplasmic reticulum of plant cells. Plant J. 10, 935–941. Bolte, S., Brown, S. & Satiat-Jeurnemaitre, B. (2004) The N-myristolylated Rab-GTPase m-Rabmc is involved in post-Golgi trafficking events to the lytic vacuole in plant cells. J. Cell Sci. 117, 943 –954. Bolte, S., Schiene, K. & Dietz, K.J. (2000) Characterization of a small GTPbinding protein of the Rab 5 family in Mesembryanthemum crystallinum with increased level of expression during early salt stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 923–936. Brandizzi, F., Frangne, N., Marc-Martin, S., Hawes, C., Neuhaus, J.M. & Paris, N. (2002a) The destination for single-pass membrane proteins is influenced markedly by the length of the hydrophobic domain. Plant Cell, 14, 1077–1092. Brandizzi, F., Fricker, M. & Hawes, C. (2002b) A greener world: the revolution in plant bioimaging. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 520 –530. Brandizzi, F., Hanton, S., Pinto da Silva, L., Boevink, P., Evans, D., Oparka, K., Denecke, J. & Hawes, C. (2003) ER quality control can lead to retrograde transport from the ER lumen to the cytosol and the nucleoplasm in plants. Plant J. 34, 269–281. Brandizzi, F., Snapp, E.L., Roberts, A.G., Lippincott-Schwartz, J. & Hawes, C. (2002c) Membrane protein transport between the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi in tobacco leaves is energy dependent but cytoskeleton independent: evidence from selective photobleaching. Plant Cell, 14, 1293–1309. Chalfie, M., Tu, Y., Euskirchen, G., Ward, W.W. & Prasher, D.C. (1994) Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science, 263, 802–805. Chavrier, P. & Goud, B. (1999) The role of ARF and Rab GTPases in membrane transport. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 466–475. Cheung, A.Y., Chen, C.Y.H., Glaven, R.H., de Graaf, B.H.J., Vidali, L., Hepler, P.K. & Wu, H.M. (2002) Rab2 GTPase regulates vesicle trafficking between the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi bodies and is important to pollen tube growth. Plant Cell, 14, 945–962. Chudakov, D.M., Belousov, V.V., Zaraisky, A.G., Novoselov, V.V., Staroverov, D.B., Zorov, D.B., Lukyanov, S. & Lukyanov, K.A. (2003) Kindling fluorescent proteins for precise in vivo photolabeling. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 191–194. Cole, N.B., Smith, C.L., Sciaky, N., Terasaki, M., Edidin, M. & LippincottSchwartz, J. (1996) Diffusional mobility of Golgi proteins in membranes of living cells. Science, 273, 797–801. Coleman, C.E., Herman, E.M., Takasaki, K. & Larkins, B.A. (1996) The maize γ-zein sequesters α-zein and stabilises its accumulation in protein bodies of transgenic tobacco endosperm. Plant Cell, 8, 2335–2345. Couchy, I., Bolte, S., Crosnier, M.T., Brown, S. & Satiat-Jeunemaitre, B. (2003) Identification and localization of a beta-COP-like protein involved in the morphodynamics of the plant Golgi apparatus. J. Exp. Bot. 54, 2053–2063. Crofts, A.J., Leborgne-Castel, N., Hillmer, S., Robinson, D., Phillipson, B., Carlsson, L.E., Ashford, D.A. & Denecke, J. (1999) Saturation of the endoplasmic reticulum retention machinery reveals anterograde bulk flow. Plant Cell, 11, 2233–2247. 156 F. B R A N D I Z Z I E T A L . Crooks, K., Coleman, J. & Hawes, C. (1999) The turnover of cell surface proteins of carrot protoplasts. Planta, 208, 46 –58. Cutler, S.R., Ehrhardt, D.W., Griffitts, J.S. & Somerville, C.R. (2000) Random GFP: cDNA fusions enable visualization of subcellular structures in cells of Arabidopsis at a high frequency. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 28, 3718–3723. Czempinski, K., Frachisse, J.M., Maurel, C., Barbier-Brygoo, H. & MuellerRoeber, B. (2002) Vacuolar membrane localization of the Arabidopsis ‘two-pore’ K+ channel KCO1. Plant J. 29, 809–820. Denecke, J., De Rycke, R. & Botterman, J. (1992) Plant and mammalian sorting signals for protein retention in the endoplasmic reticulum contain a conserved epitope. EMBO J. 11, 2345–2355. Di Sansebastiano, G.P., Paris, N., Marc-Martin, S. & Neuhaus, J.M. (1998) Specific accumulation of GFP in a non-acidic vacuolar compartment via a C-terminal propeptide-mediated sorting pathway. Plant J. 15, 449–457. Di Sansebastiano, G.P., Paris, N., Marc-Martin, S. & Neuhaus, J.M. (2001) Regeneration of a lytic central vacuole and of neutral peripheral vacuoles can be visualized by green fluorescent proteins targeted to either type of vacuoles. Plant Physiol. 126, 78–86. Di Sansebastiano, G.P., Renna, L., Piro, G. & Dalessandro, G. (2004) Stubborn GFPs in Nicotiana tabacum vacuoles. Plant Biosystems, in press. Dirnberger, D., Bencur, P., Mach, L. & Steinkellner, H. (2002) The Golgi localization of Arabidopsis thaliana beta 1,2-xylosyltransferase in plant cells is dependent on its cytoplasmic and transmembrane sequences. Plant Mol. Biol. 50, 273–281. Dupree, P. & Sherrier, D.J. (1998) The plant Golgi apparatus. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1404, 259–270. Ellenberg, J., Siggia, E.D., Moreira, J.E., Smith, C.L., Presley, J.F., Worman, H.J. & Lippincott-Schwartz, J. (1997) Nuclear membrane dynamics and reassembly in living cells: targeting of an inner nuclear membrane protein in interphase and mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 138, 1193–1206. Essl, D., Dirnberger, D., Gomord, V., Strasser, R., Faye, L., Glössl, J. & Steinkellner, H. (1999) The N-terminal 77 amino acids from tobacco N-acetylglucosoaminyltransferase I are sufficient to retain a reporter protein in the Golgi apparatus of Nicotiana benthamiana cells. FEBS Lett. 453, 169–173. Flückiger, R., De Caroli, M., Piro, G., Dalessandro, G., Neuhaus, J.M. & Di Sansebastiano, G.P. (2003) Vacuolar system distribution in Arabidopsis tissues, visualized using GFP fusion proteins. J. Exp. Bot. 54, 1577–1584. Follet-Gueye, M.L., Pagny, S., Faye, L., Gomord, V. & Driouich, A. (2003) An improved chemical fixation method suitable for immunogold localization of green fluorescent protein in the Golgi apparatus of tobacco bright yellow (BY-2) cells. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 51, 931–940. Fowke, L.C., Tanchak, M.A. & Galway, M.E. (1991) Ultrastructural cytology of the endocytotic pathway in plants. Endocytosis, Exocytosis and Vesicle Traffic in Plants (ed. by C. R. Hawes, J. O. D. Coleman and D. E. Evans), pp. 15–40. Society for Exp. Biol., Seminar Series 45. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. Frigerio, L., de Virgilio, M., Prada, A., Faoro, F. & Vitale, A. (1998) Sorting of phaseolin to the vacuole is saturable and requires a short C-terminal peptide. Plant Cell, 10, 1031–1042. Gillespie, T., Boevink, P., Haupt, S., Roberts, A.G., Toth, R., Valentine, T., Chapman, S. & Oparka, K.J. (2002) Functional analysis of a DNAshuffled movement protein reveals that microtubules are dispensable for the cell-to-cell movement of tobacco mosaic virus. Plant Cell, 14, 1207–1222. Gindullis, F. & Meier, I. (1999) Matrix attachment region binding protein MFP1 is localized in discrete domains at the nuclear envelope. Plant Cell, 11, 1117–1128. Gindullis, F., Peffer, N.J. & Meier, I. (1999) MAF1, a novel plant protein interacting with matrix attachment region binding protein MFP1, is located at the nuclear envelope. Plant Cell, 11, 1755–1767. Grebenok, R.J., Pierson, E., Lambert, G.M., Gong, F.C., Afonso, C.L., Haldeman-Cahill, R., Carrington, J.C. & Galbraith, D.W. (1997) Greenfluorescent protein fusions for efficient characterization of nuclear targeting. Plant J. 11, 573–586. Griffiths, G., Ericsson, M., Krijnse-Locker, J., Nilsson, T., Goud, B., Soling, H.D., Tang, B.L., Wong, S.H. & Hong, W. (1994) Localization of the Lys, Asp, Glu, Leu tetrapeptide receptor to the Golgi complex and the intermediate compartment in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 127, 1557–1574. Hara-Nishimura, I.I., Shimada, T., Hatano, K., Takeuchi, Y. & Nishimura, M. (1998) Transport of storage proteins to protein storage vacuoles is mediated by large precursor-accumulating vesicles. Plant Cell, 10, 825–836. Harris, N. & Oparka, K. (1983) Connections between dictyosomes, ER and GERL in cotyledons of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). Protoplasma, 114, 93–102. Haseloff, J., Dormand, E.L. & Brand, A.H. (1999) Live imaging with green fluorescent protein. Meth. Mol. Biol. 122, 241–259. Haseloff, J., Siemering, K.R., Prasher, D.C. & Hodge, S. (1997) Removal of a cryptic intron and subcellular localization of green fluorescent protein are required to mark transgenic Arabidopsis plants brightly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 2122–2127. Hawes, C.R., Brandizzi, F. & Andreeva, A.V. (1999) Endomembranes and vesicle trafficking. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2, 454 – 461. Hawes, C., Crooks, K., Coleman, J. & Satiat-Jeunemaitre, B. (1995) Endocytosis in plants: fact of artefact? Plant Cell Environ. 18, 1–7. Hawes, C., Saint-Jore, C., Martin, B. & Zheng, H.Q. (2001) ER confirmed as the mystery organelles in Arabidopsis plants expressing GFP! Trends Plant Sci. 6, 245–246. Heinlein, M., Epel, B.L., Padgett, H.S. & Beachy, R.N. (1995) Interaction of tobamovirus movement proteins with the plant cytoskeleton. Science, 270, 1983–1985. Hofte, H. & Chrispeels, M.J. (1992) Protein sorting to the vacuolar membrane. Plant Cell, 4, 995–1004. Hohl, I., Robinson, D.G., Chrispeels, M.J. & Hinz, G. (1996) Transport of storage proteins to the vacuole is mediated by vesicles without a clathrin coat. J. Cell Sci. 109, 2539–2550. Hong, B., Ichida, A., Wang, Y., Gens, J.S., Pickard, B.G. & Harper, J.F. (1999) Identification of a calmodulin-regulated Ca2+-ATPase in the endoplasmic reticulum. Plant Physiol. 119, 1165–1176. Inaba, T., Nagano, Y., Nagasaki, T. & Sasaki, Y. (2002) Distinct localization of two closely related Ypt3/Rab11 proteins on the trafficking pathway in higher plants. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 9183–9188. Inouye, S. & Tsuji, F.I. (1994) Aequorea green fluorescent protein – expression of the gene and fluorescence characteristics of the recombinant protein. FEBS, 341, 277–280. Irons, S.L., Evans, D.E. & Brandizzi, F. (2003) The first 238 amino acids of the human lamin B receptor are targeted to the nuclear envelope in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 54, 943–950. Jauh, G.Y., Fischer, A.M., Grimes, H.D., Ryan, C.A. Jr & Rogers, J.C. (1998) δ-Tonoplast intrinsic protein defines unique plant vacuole functions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 27, 12995–12999. Jeong, S.Y., Rose, A. & Meier, I. (2003) MFP1 is a thylakoid-associated, nucleoid-binding protein with a coiled-coil structure. Nucl. Acids Res. 31, 5175–5185. © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 214, 138–158 G F P I S T H E WAY TO G L OW Jiang, L. & Rogers, J.C. (1998) Integral membrane protein sorting to vacuoles in plant cells: evidence for two pathways. J. Cell Biol. 30, 1183–1199. Johnson, K.D., Herman, E.M. & Chrispeels, M.J. (1989) An abundant, highly conserved tonoplast protein in seeds. Plant Physiol. 91, 1006– 1013. Juniper, B.E., Hawes, C.R. & Horne, J.C. (1982) The relationships between the dictyosomes and the forms of endoplasmic reticulum in plant cells with different export programmes. Bot. Gaz. 143, 135–145. Lee, H.I., Gal, S., Newman, T.C. & Raikhel, N.V. (1993) The Arabidopsis endoplasmic reticulum retention receptor functions in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 11433–11437. Lee, M.H., Min, M.K., Lee, Y.J., Jin, J.B., Shin, D.H., Kim, D.H., Lee, K.H. & Hwang, I. (2002) ADP-ribosylation factor 1 of Arabidopsis plays a critical role in intracellular trafficking and maintenance of endoplasmic reticulum morphology in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 129, 1507–1520. Levanony, H., Rubin, R., Altschuler, Y. & Galili, G. (1992) Evidence for a novel route of wheat storage proteins to vacuoles. J. Cell Biol. 119, 1117–1128. Li, H.Y. & Chye, M.L. (2003) Membrane localization of Arabidopsis acylCoA binding protein ACBP2. Plant Mol Biol. 51, 483–492. Lippincott-Schwartz, J., Donaldson, J.G., Schweizer, A., Berger, E.G., Hauri, H.P., Yuan, L.C. & Klausner, R.D. (1990) Microtubule-dependent retrograde transport of proteins into the ER in the presence of brefeldin A suggests an ER recycling pathway. Cell, 60, 821–836. Lupashin, V.V. & Waters, M.G. (1997) t-SNARE activation through transient interaction with a rab-like guanosine triphosphatase. Science, 276, 1255–1258. Matsuoka, K., Bassham, D.C., Raikhel, N.V. & Nakamura, K. (1995) Different sensitivity to wortmannin of two vacuolar sorting signals indicates the presence of distinct sorting machineries in tobacco cells. J. Cell Biol. 130, 1307–1318. Matsuoka, K., Higuchi, T., Maeshima, M. & Nakamura, K. (1997) A vacuolar-type H+-ATPase in a nonvacuolar organelle is required for the sorting of soluble vacuolar protein precursors in tobacco cells. Plant Cell, 9, 533–546. Matsuoka, K. & Neuhaus, J.M. (1999) Cis-elements of protein transport to the plant vacuoles. J. Exp. Bot. 50, 165–174. Matsushima, R., Hayashi, Y., Kondo, M., Shimada, T., Nishimura, M. & Hara-Nishimura, I. (2002) An endoplasmic reticulum-derived structure that is induced under stress conditions in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 130, 1807–1814. Matsushima, Y., Kondo, M., Nishimura, M. & Hara-Nishimura, I. (2003) A novel ER-derived compartment, the ER body, selectively accumulates β-glucosidase with an ER-retention signal in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 33, 493–502. Matz, M.V., Fradkov, A.F., Labas, Y.A., Savitsky, A.P., Zaraisky, A.G., Markelov, M.L. & Lukyanov, S.A. (1999) Fluorescent proteins from nonbioluminescent Anthozoa species. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 969–973. Meier, I. (2001) The plant nuclear envelope. CMLS, 58, 1774–1780. Mitsuhashi, N., Shimada, T., Mano, S., Nishimura, M. & Hara-Nishimura, I. (2000) Characterization of organelles in the vacuolar-sorting pathway by visualization with GFP in tobacco BY-2 cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 41, 993–1001. Mitsuhashi, N., Shimada, T., Mano, S., Nishimura, M. & Hara-Nishimura, I. (2000) Characterization of organelles in the vacuolar-sorting pathway by visualization with GFP in tobacco BY-2 cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 41, 993–1001. © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 214, 138–158 157 Morise, H., Shimomura, O., Johnson, F.H. & Winant, J. (1974) Intermolecular energy transfer in the bioluminescent system of Aequorea. Biochemistry, 13, 2656–2662. Moyer, B.D., Allan, B.B. & Balch, W.E. (2001) Rab1 interaction with a GM130 effector complex regulates COPII vesicle cis-Golgi tethering. Traffic, 2, 268–276. Munro, S. (1995) A comparison of the transmembrane domains of Golgi and plasma membrane proteins. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 23, 527–530. Nakanomyo, I., Kost, B., Chau, N.H. & Fukuda, H. (2002) Preferential and asymmetrical accumulation of a Rac small GTPase mRNA in differentiating xylem cells of Zinnia elegans. Plant Cell Physiol. 43, 1484–1492. Nebenführ, A., Gallagher, L.A., Dunahay, T.G., Frohlick, J.A., Mazurkiewicz, A.M., Meehl, J.B. & Staehelin, L.A. (1999) Stop-and-go movements of plant Golgi stacks are mediated by the acto-myosin system. Plant Physiol. 121, 1127–1142. Neumann, U., Brandizzi, F. & Hawes, C. (2003) Protein transport in plant cells: in and out of the Golgi. Ann. Bot. 92, 167–180. Okita, T.W. & Rogers, J.C. (1996) Compartmentation of proteins in the endomembrane system of plant cells. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47, 327–350. Paris, N., Rogers, S.W., Jiang, L., Kirsch, T., Beevers, L., Phillips, T.E. & Rogers, J.C. (1997) Molecular cloning and further characterization of a probable plant vacuolar sorting receptor. Plant Physiol. 115, 29–39. Paris, N., Stanley, C.M., Jones, R.L. & Rogers, J.C. (1996) Plant cells contain two functionally distinct vacuolar compartments. Cell, 17, 563–572. Patterson, G.H. & Lippincott-Schwartz, J. (2002) A photoactivatable GFP for selective photolabeling of proteins and cells. Science, 297, 1873–1877. Pay, A., Resch, K., Frohnmeyer, H., Fejes, E., Nagy, F. & Nick, P. (2002) Plant RanGAPs are localised at the nuclear envelope in interphase and associated with microtubules in mitotic cells. Plant J. 30, 699–709. Pedrazzini, E., Giobinazzo, G., Bielli, A., deVirgilio, M., Frigerio, L., Pesca, M., Faoro, F., Bollini, R., Ceriotte, A. & Vitale, A. (1997) Protein quality control along the route to the plant vacuole. Plant Cell, 9, 1869–1880. Phillipson, B.A., Pimpl, P., daSilva, L.L., Crofts, A.J., Taylor, J.P., Movafeghi, A., Robinson, D.G. & Denecke, J. (2001) Secretory bulk flow of soluble proteins is efficient and COPII dependent. Plant Cell, 13, 2005–2020. Pimpl, P., Hanton, S.L., Taylor, J.P., Pinto-daSilva, L.L. & Denecke, J. (2003) The GTPase ARF1p controls the sequence-specific vacuolar sorting route to the lytic vacuole. Plant Cell, 15, 1242–1256. Pimpl, P., Movafeghi, A., Coughlan, S., Denecke, J., Hillmer, S. & Robinson, D.G. (2000) In situ localization and in vitro induction of plant COPIcoated vesicles. Plant Cell, 12, 2219–2235. Prasher, D.C., Eckenrode, V.K., Ward, W.W., Prendergast, F.G. & Cormier, M.J. (1992) Primary structure of the Aequorea victoria greenfluorescent protein. Gene, 111, 229–233. Presley, J.F., Cole, N.B., Schroer, T.A., Hirschberg, K., Zaal, K.J. & Lippincott-Schwartz, J. (1997) ER-to-Golgi transport visualized in living cells. Nature, 389, 81–85. Pueyo, J.J., Chrispeels, M.J. & Herman, E.M. (1995) Degradation of transport-competent destabilized phaseolin with a signal for retention in the endoplasmic reticulum occurs in the vacuole. Planta, 196, 586–596. Quader, H. (1990) Formation and disintegration of cisternae of the endoplasmic reticulum visualized in live cells by conventional fluorescence and confocal laser scanning microscopy: evidence for the involvement of calcium and the cytoskeleton. Protoplasma, 155, 166–175. 158 F. B R A N D I Z Z I E T A L . Reichel, C. & Beachy, R.N. (1998) Tobacco mosaic virus infection induces severe morphological changes of the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 11169–11174. Reisen, D., Leborgne-Castel, N., Özalp, C., Chaumont, F. & Marty, F. (2003) Expression of a cauliflower tonoplast aquaporin tagged with GFP in tobacco suspension cells correlates with an increase in cell size. Plant Mol. Biol. 52, 387– 400. Ritzenthaler, C., Nebenführ, A., Movafeghi, A., Stussi-Garaud, C., Behnia, L., Pimpl, P., Staehelin, L.A. & Robinson, D.G. (2002) Reevaluation of the effects of Brefeldin A on plant cells using tobacco Bright Yellow 2 cells expressing Golgi-targeted green fluorescent protein and COPI antisera. Plant Cell, 14, 237–261. Robineau, S., Chabre, M. & Antonny, B. (2000) Binding site of brefeldin A at the interface between the small G protein ADP-ribosylation factor 1 (ARF1) and the nucleotide-exchange factor Sec7 domain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 9913–9918. Robinson, D.G., Hinz, G. & Holstein, S.E. (1998) The molecular characterization of transport vesicles. Plant Mol. Biol. 38, 49–76. Saint-Jore, C.M., Evins, J., Batoko, H., Brandizzi, F., Moore, I. & Hawes, C. (2002) Redistribution of membrane proteins between the Golgi apparatus and endoplasmic reticulum in plants is reversible and not dependent on cytoskeletal networks. Plant J. 29, 661–678. Saito, C., Ueda, T., Abe, H., Wada, Y., Kuroiwa, T., Hisada, A., Furuya, M. & Nakano, A. (2002) A complex and mobile structure forms a distinct subregion within the continuous vacuolar membrane in young cotyledons of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 29, 245–255. Satiat-Jeunemaitre, B., Cole, L., Bourett, T., Howard, R. & Hawes, C. (1996) Brefeldin A effects in plant and fungal cells: something new about vesicle trafficking? J. Microsc. 181, 162–177. Satiat-Jeunemaitre, B. & Hawes, C. (1993) The distribution of secretory products in plant-cells is affected by Brefeldin A. Cell Biol. Int. 17, 183–193. Sato, M.H., Nakamura, N., Ohsumi, Y., Kouchi, H., Kondo, M., HaraNishimura, I., Nishimura, M. & Wada, Y. (1997) The AtVAM3 encodes a syntaxin-related molecule implicated in the vacuolar assembly in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem. 26, 24530–24535. Semenza, J.C., Hardwick, K.G., Dean, N. & Pelham, H.R. (1990) ERD2, a yeast gene required for the receptor-mediated retrieval of luminal ER proteins from the secretory pathway. Cell, 29, 1349–1357. Shimomura, O., Johnson, F.H. & Saiga, Y. (1962) Extraction, purification and properties of aequorin, a bioluminescent protein from the luminous hydromedusan Aequorea. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 59, 223– 239. Siefritz, F., Biela, A., Eckert, M., Otto, B., Uehlein, N. & Kaldenhoff, R. (2001) The tobacco plasma membrane aquaporin NtAQP1. J. Exp. Bot. 52, 1953–1957. Simon-Rosin, U., Wood, C., Udvardi & M.K. (2003) Molecular and cellular characterization of LjAMT2: 1, an ammonium transporter from the model legume Lotus japonicus. Plant Mol. Biol. 51, 99–108. Smith, S. & Blobel, G. (1994) Colocalization of vertebrate lamin B and lamin B receptor (LBR) in nuclear envelopes and in LBR-induced membrane stacks of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 10124–10128. Sohn, E.J., Kim, E.S., Zhao, M., Kim, S.J., Kim, H., Kim, Y.W., Lee, Y.J., Hillmer, S., Sohn, U., Jiang, L. & Hwang, I. (2003) Rha1, an Arabidopsis Rab5 homolog, plays a critical role in the vacuolar trafficking of soluble cargo proteins. Plant Cell, 15, 1057–1070. Spang, A. (2002) ARF1 regulatory factors and COPI vesicle formation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14, 423– 427. Takemoto, D., Jones, D.A. & Hardham, A.R. (2003) GFP-tagging of cell components reveals the dynamics of subcellular re-organization in response to infection of Arabidopsis by oomycete pathogens. Plant J. 33, 775–792. Takeuchi, M., Tada, M., Saito, C., Yashiroda, H. & Nakano, A. (1998) Isolation of a tobacco cDNA encoding Sar1 GTPase and analysis of its dominant-negative mutations in vesicular traffic using a yeast complementation system. Plant Cell Physiol. 39, 590 –599. Takeuchi, M., Ueda, T., Sato, K., Abe, H., Nagata, T. & Nakano, A. (2000) A dominant negative mutant of Sar1 GTPase inhibits protein transport from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi apparatuis in tobacco and Arabidopsis cultured cells. Plant J. 23, 517–525. Takeuchi, M., Ueda, T., Yahara, N. & Nakano, A. (2002) Arf1 GTPase plays roles in the protein traffic between the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus in tobacco and Arabidopsis cultured cells. Plant J. 31, 499–515. Tamura, K., Shimada, T., Ono, E., Tanaka, Y., Nagatani, A., Higashi, S.I., Watanabe, M., Nishimura, M. & Hara-Nishimura, I. (2003) Why green fluorescent fusion proteins have not been observed in the vacuoles of higher plants. Plant J. 35, 545–555. Thomine, S., Lelievre, F., Debarbieux, E., Schroeder, J.I. & Barbier-Brygoo, H. (2003) AtNRAMP3, a multispecific vacuolar metal transporter involved in plant responses to iron deficiency. Plant J. 34, 685–695. Ueda, T., Yamaguchi, M., Uchimiya, H. & Nakano, A. (2001) Ara6, a plant-unique novel type Rab GTPase, functions in the endocytic pathway of Arabidopsis thaliana. EMBO J. 20, 4730 – 4741. Uemura, T., Yoshimura, S.H., Takeyasu, K. & Sato, M.H. (2002) Vacuolar membrane dynamics revealed by GFP-AtVam3 fusion protein. Genes Cells, 7, 743–753. Vernoud, V., Horton, A.C., Yang, Z. & Nielsen, E. (2003) Analysis of the small GTPase gene superfamily of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 131, 1191–1208. Vitale, A. & Denecke, J. (1999) The endoplasmic reticulum – Gateway of the secretory pathway. Plant Cell, 11, 615–628. Vitale, A. & Raikhel, N.V. (1999) What do proteins need to reach different vacuoles? Trends Plant Sci. 4, 149–155. Wee, E.G., Sherrier, D.J., Prime, T.A. & Dupree, P. (1998) Targeting of active sialyltransferase to the plant Golgi apparatus. Plant Cell, 10, 1759–1768. Yamaguchi, H., Nishizawa, N.K., Nakanishi, H. & Mori, S. (2002) IDI7, a new iron-regulated ABC transporter from barley roots, localizes to the tonoplast. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 727–735. Zerial, M. & McBride, H. (2001) Rab proteins as membrane organizers. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 107–117. © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society, Journal of Microscopy, 214, 138–158