* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download attpost
Self-affirmation wikipedia , lookup
Developmental psychology wikipedia , lookup
Attribute hierarchy method wikipedia , lookup
Behavior analysis of child development wikipedia , lookup
Neuroeconomics wikipedia , lookup
Operant conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Attribution (psychology) wikipedia , lookup
Behavioral modernity wikipedia , lookup
Psychological behaviorism wikipedia , lookup
Learning theory (education) wikipedia , lookup
Educational psychology wikipedia , lookup
Cognitive load wikipedia , lookup
Music psychology wikipedia , lookup
Behaviorism wikipedia , lookup
Theory of planned behavior wikipedia , lookup
Social psychology wikipedia , lookup
Neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development wikipedia , lookup
Cognitive flexibility wikipedia , lookup
Insufficient justification wikipedia , lookup
Dual process theory wikipedia , lookup
Theory of reasoned action wikipedia , lookup
Cognitive psychology wikipedia , lookup
Cognitive science wikipedia , lookup
Cognitive development wikipedia , lookup
Social cognitive theory wikipedia , lookup
Attitude (psychology) wikipedia , lookup
Social Psychology Attitudes and Attitude Change Attitudes  Enduring orientations with cognitive, affective, and behavioral components.  Cognitive  Affective  Behavioral  A favorable or unfavorable evaluative reaction toward something or someone, exhibited in one’s beliefs, feelings or intended behavior Attitude Development External Stimuli  The Target  Intervening Processes  The Response  Intervening Process: Learning Attitudes as Habits – Carl Hovland (1953)  Processes   Association  Reinforcement  Imitation Association  Message Learning  Weak relationships  Motivation  Transfer of Affect  Associations between two objects Reinforcement Rewarded for attitudes that fit with values of group, society, culture  May initially change behavior   Then accept the underlying value Reinforcement: Incentive Theory Adopt attitude that maximizes gains  Consider importance and value  Cognitive response theory   Respond to proposition with thoughts = attitude  Expectancy value theory  Consider likelihood & value Imitation Model our behaviors (and related attitudes) after others  Aronson & O’Leary   Water  conservation Cialdini  Littering Intervening Process: Cognitive Consistency  Gestalt influence: Seek coherence  Attitudes must be interpreted in context  Balance theory (Heider, 1958)  Cognitive dissonance (Festinger, 1957) Balance Theory Key P = Person (self) O = Other X = Attitude Object (issue, person, etc.) Unit or Sentiment Relations + sign = Link/Like - sign = No Link/Dislike P + or - + or - + or - Triads can be: Balanced = signs multiply to positive (+) Unbalanced = signs multiply to negative (-) O X Cognitive Dissonance (Leon Festinger)  Cognitions can have 3 relations  Irrelevant  Consonant  Dissonant Dissonance Dissonance = A feeling of discomfort that is caused by holding 2 or more inconsistent cognitions  Dissonance = # and importance  How do you get rid of it?  How do you restore a sense of consistency?  Change your behavior  To be consistent  To compensate  Change your cognitions  Add consonant cognitions (mis-remember things, rationalize your behavior)  Alter importance of cognitions Cognitive Dissonance Theory: Study Example (Festinger & Carlsmith, 1959): Insufficient Justification Participants are asked to engage in a very boring task  After that, they either:   Were told the study was over  Were paid $1 to lie to another participant about the task  Were paid $20 to lie to another participant about the task  Then, participants’ (real) attitudes about the task were measured Applications Therapy  Cults   Festinger  – “When Prophecy Fails” Daily situations Self Perception Theory      Bem (1972) Rational cognitive process Behaviorist Infer attitudes for others Zanna & Cooper (1974) Consistency: Reactions to Discrepancy  Modes of resolution  Derogating the source  Distorting the message  Blanket Rejection Elaboration Likelihood Model (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986)  Two routes  Central  Based on thoughtful consideration of facts  Peripheral Based on thoughtless affective evaluations  Leads to acceptance of weak messages   Route depends on motivation & opportunity Controlling Cognitive Responses  Counterarguing  Active processing  Implicit or explicit  Verbal or nonverbal  Depends on quantity and quality ELM: Communicator  Credibility  Expert  Trustworthy   Reciprocity Reference ELM: Communication Discrepancy  Motive arousal   Anger  Fear ELM: Target  Ego involvement  Commitment  Issue involvement  Response involvement  Defense – McGuire  Supportive  Inoculation ELM: Situation Forewarning of position  Forewarning of intent  Distraction  Cults Changed norms  Gradual  Powerful leader  Unquestioned authority  Applications War  Token economies  Presentations  Office politics 
 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                            