* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Memory_Ch7_all - Arizona State University
Embodied cognitive science wikipedia , lookup
Synaptic gating wikipedia , lookup
Activity-dependent plasticity wikipedia , lookup
Brain Rules wikipedia , lookup
Limbic system wikipedia , lookup
Socioeconomic status and memory wikipedia , lookup
Adaptive memory wikipedia , lookup
Autobiographical memory wikipedia , lookup
Music-related memory wikipedia , lookup
Atkinson–Shiffrin memory model wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics in learning and memory wikipedia , lookup
Collective memory wikipedia , lookup
State-dependent memory wikipedia , lookup
Childhood memory wikipedia , lookup
Source amnesia wikipedia , lookup
Holonomic brain theory wikipedia , lookup
Eyewitness memory (child testimony) wikipedia , lookup
Misattribution of memory wikipedia , lookup
Memory and Cognition PSY 324 Topic: Long-term Memory- Encoding and Retrieval Dr. Ellen Campana Arizona State University Storage of Memories Information is used in one type of memory system (STM / WM) but in order for it to stick around for longer than a few seconds it needs to be transferred into Long-term Memory Transferring information TO LTM is called encoding or storage Vocabulary note: Coding refers to the form in which information is represented Encoding refers to the process used to get information into LTM Transferring information OUT OF LTM in order to use it in STM/WM is called retrieval Rehearsal We saw last chapter that in certain cases simply repeating information can cause it to be stored Simply repeating information is called maintenance rehearsal because it is most useful for keeping the information in STM/WM Maintenance rehearsal is actually NOT an effective way to transfer information to LTM A more effective way to encode information is through elaborative rehearsal – making connections between the new item and memories you already have What affect showed this in the last class??? Does this sound familiar? What concept is like this in STM? Levels of Processing Theory explains these differences Levels of Processing Theory (Craik & Lockhart, 1972) Basic idea: memory depends on the specific process used to get information into LTM Shallow processing: little attention to meaning, based on surface characteristics Deep processing: considering meaning and/or relating items to other information in LTM Count the vowels Think about how useful it would be on a desert island Try the demo on page 198 (takes too long for class) Confirmed in many different studies of memory for words, but two levels turned out to be too simple Levels of Processing Craik & Tulving (1975) introduced more levels Shallow: A question about the physical features Deeper: A question about rhyming Is the word printed in capital letters? [bird] Does the word rhyme with train? [pain] Deepest: A fill-in-the-blanks question Does the word fit in the sentence “he saw a ___ on the street”? [car] Levels of Processing % of words recalled after delay Fill-in- Rhyme theblanks Capital Letters Levels of Processing Are you convinced? People were, at first. But then a bunch of new tasks were tried and a people discovered a circularity in the argument What makes a level “deep”? It leads to better memory. And why care about “depth”? It can predict memory. Dissatisfaction with the Levels of Processing Theory coincided with introduction of a new theory about the encoding of long-term memory: Transfer-Appropriate Processing Transfer-Appropriate Processing Basic idea: memory is best when the task at encoding matches the task at retrieval Morris and Coworkers (1977) independently varied the tasks at encoding and retrieval Encoding tasks: meaning-task (fill-in-the-blanks) and rhyming-task Retreival tasks: standard recognition task and rhymed recognition task (does it rhyme with a word you heard?) Transfer-Appropriate Processing Matching Standard Recognition Test Rhymed Recognition Test % correct Fill-intheblanks Rhyme Other factors that aid encoding NOTE: All of these are about encoding, but caused by increasing retrieval cues Forming connections with other information More vivid /detailed => better memory Visually imagining pairs of words => better memory Bower & Wizenz (1970) Self-reference effect Rogers and Coworkers (1979) Other factors that aid encoding Generating information The generation effect (Slameka and Graf, 1978) Read (king-crown) vs fill-ins (king-cr_____) Memory for words that were filled in is better Organizing information Bower and colleagues –similar groupings Bransford and Johnson – balloon picture study Encoding Specificity Basic idea: Context of learning (location, etc.) can act as a retrieval cue It’s actually good for you that we’re using scan-tron! Diver Study (who?) Group of divers ½ learned a list on land ½ learned a list under water ½ tested on land ½ tested under water State-Dependent Learning Basic idea: Your own internal state can act as a retrieval cue Emotions, sleep-deprivation state, chemicals How Long-term Memories are Stored (biologically-speaking) Storage at the Synapse Remember Chapter 2, discussion of faces? Storage at the Synapse Representation of each face is a memory How did these particular memories come to be represented by these particular neurons firing in this pattern? Key is in the synapses between neurons Neurotransmitters cause structural changes Structural changes modify the firing rate of neurons Hebbian Learning, Long-term Potentiation “Neurons that fire together, wire together” Structure of a Neuron Storage at the Synapse Storage at the Synapse Process of Long-term Potentiation A and B are connected such that A’s axon synapses with B’s dendrite Both A and B may be connected to many other neurons When A and B fire at the same time, neurotransmitters cause structural changes Effect is that over time the same stimulus will produce faster firing rates by B Hebb came up with this in 1948, but neurological evidence came much later Important because it is used in connectionist models Fragility of New Memories Much evidence that new memories are fragile Concussions – memory for events just prior is lost Electroconvulsive Therapy – again, memory for events just prior is lost (at least temporarily) Another dimension of amnesia Retrograde amnesia – loss of declarative memory for events prior to a trauma Graded amnesia – loss worse for more recent memories Anterograde amnesia – inability to form new memories Graded Amnesia H.M. in your book (had hippocampus removed) Had both retrograde and anterograde amnesia His retrograde amnesia was graded Could remember events before 10-15yrs before operation More recent memories, more damage FUTURE PAST Old memories have graded damage Operation New memories are never even formed Graded Amnesia Why talk about graded amnesia right now? Demonstrates that recent memories are more fragile Hippocampus involved in recent (not old) memories Some process must make memories less fragile That’s because H.M. had no hippocampus Consolidation is the process that makes memories less fragile over time Synaptic consolidation Systems consolidation Process of Consolidation Synaptic consolidation First type to be studied Rapid, happens over the time span of minutes Long-term Potentiation is an example Systems consolidation Large-scale reorganization of circuits of neurons Gradual, happens over days, weeks, months, years Standard model of consolidation Retrieval depends on hippocampus during consolidation Afterwards, hippocampus no longer involved Standard Model of Consolidation Early on, memory is distributed across the brain, no connections between active cortical areas Hippocampus coordinates activity across the cortical area during memory reactivation Sights, sounds, smells, etc. Links form between active cortical areas Gradually the hippocampus is no longer involved in retrieval Standard Model of Consolidation Standard Model of Consolidation Much of consolidation (including reactivation) happens during sleep / relaxed wakefulness Can also happen during rehearsal Especially elaborative rehearsal Results in situation where only cortical activity is necessary for remote memories Remote memories are memories for events that occurred long ago Consolidation Controversy That’s the nice clean model… but there is controversy about the claim that the hippocampus completely drops out of retrieval Evidence for no hippocampal involvement Brain imaging – Medial Temporal Lobe (which contains the hippocampus) is not active for remote memories Used semantic, not episodic, memories Evidence for hippocampal involvement Brain imaging studies looking at episodic memories Test Reminders Studying for Tests Elaborate and Generate – why? Organize – why? Associate – why? Take breaks – why? Distributed vs. Massed Practice Effect Match Learning and Testing Conditions ….or at least move around a lot The End