* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Raes - Joossens
Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Metabolic network modelling wikipedia , lookup
Gene desert wikipedia , lookup
Fetal origins hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup
Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup
Human genome wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup
Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup
Ridge (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Helitron (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of neurodegenerative diseases wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup
Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
Conflicts of interest: none ILSI/ILSI North America Annual Meeting 24 January 2012, Phoenix, Arizona Studying the human microbiome using high‐throughput meta‐omics data Marie Joossens for Jeroen Raes VIB – VUB Belgium jeroen.raes@vib‐vub.be Last 7y: developing approaches to study microbial population variation and its functional impact from meta‐omics data Raes et al., Genome Biology 2007 Foerstner et al. EMBO reports 2005 Von Mering et al., Science 2007 Harrington et al., PNAS 2007 Raes et al., Curr Opin Microbiol 2007 Gianoulis*, Raes* PNAS 2008 Raes et al., MSB 2011 Data handling is tough, interpretation is difficult: many technical and biological factors influence the end result Raes and Bork, Nat Rev Microbiol, 2008 MareNostrum supercomputer Barcelona Comparative metagenomics as a tool to compare microbial communities as a whole What’s the functional difference between sample A and B? What’s the phylogenetic difference between sample A and B? Comparing total gene pool of diverse environments Same environments (human intestine), different hosts e.g. patient vs. reference Same host, different timepoints MetaHIT – European partners in the international human microbiome consortium Metagenomics of the human intestinal tract • Creation of a reference gut gene and genome pool • Determining metagenomic variation within the European population, investigation of determining factors • Studying microbiome variation in disease (Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Obesity) • Functional follow‐up studies of disease – related genes and species MetaHIT partners CBS‐DTU, Denmark EMBL, Germany (now +VIB/VUB) HUVH, Spain IEO, Italy INRA, France SDU, Denmark WU, The Netherlands Sanger centre, UK Genoscope, France Bejing Genome Centre, China Danone research Novo Nordisk, Denmark UCB Pharma, Spain 124 individuals 3.3 mio genes Ultra‐deep Illumina sequencing (BGI, Shenzen) allows almost complete coverage 580 Gbases (~200 human genomes!) First ultra‐short read metagenome +unknown genes (grand total: ~19.000 gene families) +known genes with unknown functions Known functions Qin, Li, Raes et al. Nature 2010 Substantial overlap in gut microbiota composition between individuals • 1/3rd of species present in almost all individuals • 1500 species total • 160 species/ individual Gut gene core (minimal metagenome ‐ present in all individuals) +‐ 6000 gene families ‐ housekeeping genes for general bacterial survival, but also specific functionalities rare in currently sequenced genomes (+unknowns!) Qin, Li, Raes et al. Nature 2010 What determines the microbiota composition? Comparing nationalities shows very little influence of ethnicity Quantitative species composition comparison based on phylomarkers (40 universal single copy genes) Blue: danish Red: french Orange: italian Yellow: japanese Each individuals’ gut microbiota can be classified in a limited number of cross‐national ‘enterotypes’ 85 Illumina danish metagenomes 33 international sanger metagenomes 155 US 16S rRNA pyrosequencing Arumugam*, Raes* et al. Nature 2011 Enterotypes are stable constellations of co‐occurring species, with 3 main drivers “ecosystem optima” What do they mean? ‐No correlation to measured host properties (age, sex, BMI, nationality) ‐Functional composition (e.g. vitamin production pathways, metabolism) ‐Many unknowns or unclear trends, maybe factors we haven’t taken into account yet? Confirmation: Morotomi et al Biol Pharm Bull 2011 Clustering based on functional content Long term dietary patterns? Short term dietary intervention ‐> no effect Wu et al Science 2011 Rare biomarkers correlate with host properties, proof of principle for future disease studies Method pool see Gianoulis*, Raes* et al. PNAS 2009 & Raes et al Mol Sys Biol 2010; Arumugam*, Raes* et al. Nature 2011 Gut‐specific pathway modules: a powerful tool for gut meta‐omics data annotation, interpretation and metabolic modeling •Advantage 1: Interpretation improvement “Butyrate metabolism is down and H2S production + mucus degradation is up” vs. long lists of genes, species and orthologous groups •Advantage 2: Sensitivity & Specificity increase •Less multiple testing issues •Pathways as they occur in gut, not as they are in KEGG “You see what you need to see” Extending “cellular level”‐systems biology to whole ecosystems (“eco‐systems biology”) metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, meta‐metabolomics Computational integration will be main challenge Raes and Bork, Nat Rev Microbiol 2008 Metagenomics and ‐transcriptomics indicate that small intestine microbiota is tuned for fast carbohydrate uptake Zoetendal*, Raes* et al., ISME 2012 Eco‐systems biology of the human intestinal microbiota in Crohn’s disease NIH HMP concordant/discordant twin study Janet Jansson (Berkeley), Claire Fraser (U.Maryland), Robert Hettich (Oak Ridge National Lab) Metaproteomics Metagenomics Ecosystem network reconstruction and its variation in disease Meta‐metabolomics 454‐tag phylotyping Wrap up: Gut microbiota for personalized medicine •Microbiota is characterizable using meta‐omics combined with dedicated computational tools •Microbiota is linked to disease, interpretation through specific metabolic models •Specific diagnostic & prognostic markers for disease are possible •Enterotype‐based diagnosis (“bad” enterotypes?) •Enterotype‐specific drug treatment (different metabolism of chemical compounds) Your genome matters ‐ your microbiome even more! Functional diversity of the human gut microbiome Plateau is not reached yet – new cohorts add more (unknown) gene families +unknown genes +known genes with unknown functions known functions Spanish + Danish cohort, 124 individuals Data from Qin, Li, Raes et al Nature 2010 Same, + 73 individuals from Chinese (diabetes) cohort (collab w. Junjie Qin, Wang Jun, BGI) Acknowledgments Raes lab @ VIB, Brussels The MetaHIT consortium Falk Hildebrand EMBL Dusko Ehrlich Youssef Darzi Peer Bork Wang Jun/Junjie Qin (BGI) Gwen Falony Mani Arumugam Joel Dore (INRA) Gipsi Lima‐Mendez …and many others …and many others Karoline Faust Shujiro Okuda Ugent HMP Anh Nguyen Peter Vandenabeele Curtis Huttenhower (Harvard) Roberto Garcia Wim Declerq Dirk Gevers (Broad) Sara Vieira‐Silva Jacques Izard (Forsyth) Samuel Chaffron Universiteit Wageningen Marie Joossens Erwin Zoetendal Michiel Kleerebezem Berkeley/U. Maryland/Oak Ridge Willem De Vos Janet Jansson Claire Fraser‐Ligget Robert Hettich Thanks for your attention Positions available: [email protected]