Download Supplementary Figure 1: Gene/Protein restrictions selection. First

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup

Biochemistry wikipedia , lookup

Thylakoid wikipedia , lookup

LSm wikipedia , lookup

Proteasome wikipedia , lookup

Endomembrane system wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression wikipedia , lookup

G protein–coupled receptor wikipedia , lookup

Acetylation wikipedia , lookup

Magnesium transporter wikipedia , lookup

Silencer (genetics) wikipedia , lookup

Paracrine signalling wikipedia , lookup

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup

Biochemical cascade wikipedia , lookup

Gene regulatory network wikipedia , lookup

Interactome wikipedia , lookup

List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Protein adsorption wikipedia , lookup

Protein wikipedia , lookup

Protein moonlighting wikipedia , lookup

Two-hybrid screening wikipedia , lookup

Western blot wikipedia , lookup

SR protein wikipedia , lookup

Proteomics wikipedia , lookup

Protein mass spectrometry wikipedia , lookup

Protein–protein interaction wikipedia , lookup

QPNC-PAGE wikipedia , lookup

Intrinsically disordered proteins wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
1
Supplementary Figure 1: Gene/Protein restrictions selection. First, those proteins in
2
the microarray data that fulfilled and passed the filters after translating the pig proteome
3
were used to further analysis. Then, the proteins are tagged accordingly to their state,
4
activated or inhibited, in healthy conditions. Using this information as baseline, we
5
restrict the models to account only for those proteins that vary from these values on the
6
follow-up. Red circles refer to human data obtained. Blue circles refer to pig data
7
obtained. Grated circles depict contradictory or non-homologous information. Green
8
arrows depict an example of activated proteins. Red arrows depict an example of inhibit
9
proteins. Black crosses represent the process of discarding those proteins that does not
10
differ from baseline conditions, which have not been used for further analysis.
11
Supplementary Figure 2: Biological Effectors Database (BED) representation. BED
12
is a database property of Anaxomics Biotech SL. It includes several conditions (in our
13
case we focused on MI and HF), the motives that cause them and the effector
14
proteins/genes related to those conditions.
15
Supplementary Figure 3: Artificial neuronal networks (ANN) depiction. The
16
learning methodology used consisted in a mixture of neural networks as a model,
17
trained with a gradient descent algorithm to approximate the values of the given truth-
18
table. Known input (Blue circles) refers to any element that affects gene/protein
19
expression level or activity in the network. Every link has been previously described in
20
the literature. TPMS technology collect these stimulus, relates them with the known
21
output (in this case adverse cardiac remodeling; red circle) and traces back the pathway
22
most likely to be responsible for the observed outcome (Green circles refers to our pool
23
of proteins/genes).
1
1
Supplementary Figure 4: TPMS technology illustration. TPMS Technology takes
2
into account all known stimulus (inputs) that may affect our group of proteins (136
3
proteins in this case) under the pathology of study. Then, allows us to trace back the
4
molecular pathway most likely to cause the known response (output) (in this case
5
adverse cardiac remodeling). Colored nodes on the left circle represent different
6
proteins on basal condition that are affected by different stimulus. Colored nodes on the
7
right circle represent the same proteins responding to the stimulus; hence the change of
8
color on some examples. MoA= Mechanism of Action; AEs= drugs Adverse Effects.
9
Supplementary Figure 5: Valsartan’s effects on cardiac remodeling. Highlights
10
extracted from the MoA (Figure 2) that explain which proteins affected by Valsartan are
11
ultimately involved in reducing adverse cardiac remodeling via specific motives (e.g.
12
Hypertrophy), according to the mathematical models.
13
Supplementary Figure 6: Representation of the mechanistic roles of an alternative
14
synergistic pathway. The model indicates a second potential synergistic pathway for
15
Sacubitril/Valsartan’s effects on cardiac remodeling. Red lines indicate inhibition, green
16
lines indicate activation, and dashed blue lines indicate an indirect relationship. Grey
17
dotted-line circles encompass the proteins affected either by Sacubitril or Valsartan.
18
Supplementary Figure 7: Sacubitril’s effects on cardiac remodeling. Highlights
19
extracted from the MoA (Figure 2) that explain which proteins affected by Sacubitril are
20
ultimately involved in reducing adverse cardiac remodeling via specific motives (e.g.
21
Hypertrophy), according to the mathematical models.
2