Download Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD)

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup

Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup

Protein moonlighting wikipedia , lookup

Copy-number variation wikipedia , lookup

Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Saethre–Chotzen syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Metabolic network modelling wikipedia , lookup

Population genetics wikipedia , lookup

Epistasis wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of diabetes Type 2 wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup

Genetic drift wikipedia , lookup

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis wikipedia , lookup

Genome editing wikipedia , lookup

Gene desert wikipedia , lookup

Gene wikipedia , lookup

Point mutation wikipedia , lookup

Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

NEDD9 wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup

Gene nomenclature wikipedia , lookup

Helitron (biology) wikipedia , lookup

Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

Hardy–Weinberg principle wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Dominance (genetics) wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
General background text Pharmacogenetics –
Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD)
Last updated: 9 June 2015
Definitions in pharmacogenetics
The genotype is the hereditary information about a specific characteristic of an individual. This information is
located in the genes, in the DNA that consists of nucleotides. The piece of the DNA that carries information for
one specific hereditary characteristic is called a gene. The DNA is divided into chromosomes, which usually
occur in pairs. A person generally has two copies (alleles) of a gene, one on each of the chromosomes of a
chromosome pair.
The phenotype indicates what the final manifestation (phenotypic state) of a certain genotype is. This can
involve the functionality of a protein (for example the enzyme or the receptor), but also the physical
manifestation of a disease. The phenotype is a result of the genotype that a person possesses, the degree of
expression of the gene in question and the combination with environmental factors such as co-medication, diet
and disease conditions.
Variations can exist in a population within the DNA that encodes a protein. Variations can result in alleles that
encode for proteins with no or reduced activity. The simplest form of variations are “single-nucleotide
polymorphisms” (SNPs), in which a certain part of a gene differs by only one nucleotide. If a gene variation
occurs in at least 1% of the population, then this is referred to as a genetic polymorphism. Wild-type is the
name given to the most common active allele. There can be a number of different polymorphisms for a certain
allele.
Names of genes are given in italics. In some cases the abbreviation of the name of the gene can differ from the
name of the gene product. This is the case for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, where the gene is abbreviated
to DPYD and the enzyme to DPD.
Altered metabolic capacity and clinical consequences
Fluorouracil is mainly (> 80%) converted by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) to the inactive metabolite
dihydrofluorouracil. DPD is mainly present in the liver, but also in most other tissues. Lower metabolic activity of
DPD leads to increased intracellular concentrations of fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate, the active metabolite
of fluorouracil and its prodrug capecitabine. This leads to an increased risk of side effects such as neutropenia,
thrombopenia and hand-foot syndrome.
Variations in the gene that encodes the DPD enzyme can result in reduced or absent enzyme activity.
The population can be divided into five phenotypes, based on the metabolic capacity of DPD that is present:
- Gene activity score 0: absent metabolic capacity (two inactive alleles)
- Gene activity score 0.5: very strongly reduced metabolic capacity (one inactive and one reduced-activity
allele)
- Gene activity score 1: strongly reduced metabolic capacity (one fully active and one inactive allele or two
reduced-activity alleles)
- Gene activity score 1.5: reduced metabolic capacity (one fully active and one reduced-activity allele)
- Gene activity score 2: “normal” metabolic capacity (extensive metaboliser (EM), two fully active alleles)
There is also significant variation in metabolic capacity within the groups with gene activity score 0.5-2.
As the genotype only determines part of the metabolic capacity, the guidelines for dose adjustment based on
the genotype are no more than a tool that can be used to achieve the desired intracellular concentration of the
active metabolite. Pharmacokinetic dose adjustment (guided by steady-state plasma concentrations or AUC)
may be useful for fluorouracil to optimise the dose. This is not currently used for capecitabine, as it is only
converted to fluorouracil in tissue.
Genotyping
The process of genotyping is used to determine the genotype. It indicates which alleles of the gene for DPD are
present in the tested individual. Each allele has a name that consists of a star (*) and a number, an example of
a possible DPD genotype is DPYD*1/*2A. Standard nomenclature is not available for all discovered alleles. This
is why some alleles are still referred to by nucleotide numbers followed by nucleotide changes (or by amino acid
1
number preceded by symbol of the amino acid in the wild-type protein followed by the symbol of the amino acid
in the variant).
Many variations exist for DPD; more than 30 different allele variations have been identified and described in the
literature. The incidences of all variants are low and whether DPD activity is affected is not fully known for each
variant; a reliable genotyping test for DPD is not available. A number of these alleles are listed in Table 1,
including their functionality. Genotyping usually screens for only the most common variant alleles. This may
result in less common variants being missed and incorrectly being designated the wild-type.
If two different gene variations are found during genotyping of one patient, it is possible that both gene
variations are on the same allele. This means that this patient has one wild-type allele and one reduced-activity
allele and not two reduced-activity alleles. The total gene activity score is different in these two cases.
Table 1. DPYD alleles and metabolic capacity
Metabolic
Reduced
capacity
fluorouracil
clearance and
toxicity in studies
Fully functional
(wild-type;
gene activity
score 1)
Reduced
functionality #
(gene activity
score 0.5)
Association with
toxicity in a study,
but no association in
other studies or no
other studies known
Toxicity in cases
496A>G
IVS10-15T>C
*6 = 2194G>A
1896C>T
*3 = 1897delC
*7 = 295-298delTCAT
*8 = 703C>T
*9B = 85T>C +
2657G>A
*10 = 2983G>T
*11 = 1003G>T
*12 = 62G>A
1156G>T
1651G>A
1845G>T
*13 = 1679T>G##
*1
2846A>T
1236G>A
Toxicity in cases,
but no association
in studies and/or no
reduced clearance
or activity@
*4 = 1601G>A
*5 = 1627A>G
*9A = 85T>C
fully
*2A = IVS14+1G>A
dysfunctional
(inactive
or
null
allele;
gene activity
score 0)
@ Toxicity in cases does not mean that an allele has reduced functionality. Toxicity may also occur in patients
with genotype *1/*1, i.e. in patients with other fully functional alleles. The fact that there was no association
with increased risk of toxicity in studies and/or reduced clearance by or activity of DPD means that these
alleles are fully functional.
# The nature of the change in protein sequence in these variants suggests that the protein may still be partially
functional (only 1 amino acid changed).
## There is limited evidence from studies of this variant that measured DPD activity, that the amino acid
substitution (Ile560Ser) leads to an inactive enzyme.
Translation from genotype to phenotype
When an individual’s genotype has been determined and one wants to know what the metabolic capacity for
DPD is, then the genotype needs to be “translated” to the phenotype. The relationship between genotype and
phenotype is given in table 2.
Table 2. Relationship between genotype and phenotype
Genotype (given as functionality of both alleles)
Fully functional/fully functional
Phenotype
Gene activity score 2
2
Fully functional/reduced functionality
Fully functional/inactive
Reduced functionality/reduced functionality
Reduced functionality/inactive
Inactive/inactive
Gene activity score 1.5
Gene activity score 1
Gene activity score 1
Gene activity score 0.5
Gene activity score 0
Phenotyping
The process of phenotyping is used to determine the phenotype, which means: measuring or estimating the
activity of the DPD enzyme. This uses the 2-13C-uracil breath test [Mattison, 2004] or analysis of plasma
uracil/dihydrouracil ratios [Ciccolini, 2006; Zhou, 2007]. The first test measures 13CO2 formation following
breakdown of 2-13C-uracil mediated by DPD and other enzymes in the pyrimidine catabolic route. The second
test measures conversion of the endogenous uracil substrate. The activity of the DPD enzyme can also be
determined by analysing conversion of a single dose of uracil [van Staveren, 2013].
Other possible phenotyping methods are analysing DPD enzyme activity in peripheral mononuclear blood cells
or measuring uracil concentration in plasma or urine [Ploylearmsaeng, 2006].
All existing phenotyping methods have limited applicability for either accuracy or sensitivity reasons or because
of the feasibility of screening large numbers of patients (costs and time commitment).
Ethnic variation in prevalence of phenotypes and allele frequency
In the Caucasian population, approximately 3-5% have partial DPD deficiency and 0.1-0.2% have complete
DPD deficiency. Approximately 8% of the African American population have partial DPD deficiency.
The frequency of occurrence of the various DPD alleles and the different phenotypes appears to vary
significantly between nations and ethnic groups. The *2A allele is the most common cause of DPD deficiency in
the population in the Netherlands.
Allele frequencies and phenotypes per population are given in table 3.
Table 3. Ethnic variation in prevalence of phenotypes and allele frequency
Prevalence of phenotype Allele frequency (%)
(%)
Ethnicity
Country
PM#
IM#
EM#
*2A
2846
A>T
Caucasian
0.1-0.2 3-5
95-97
0-1.4
1
Asian
The
Netherlands
South West
Asia
East Asia
0.6-0.9
0.7
1236
G>A
0.3
2.5
0-0.75
0-2.7
0
African8
0
American
#: PM (poor metaboliser), IM (intermediate metaboliser) and EM (extensive metaboliser) in the table above
mean the following:
PM: 0 fully functional alleles (gene activity score 0-1)
IM: 1 fully functional allele (gene activity score 1-1.5)
EM: 2 fully functional alleles (gene activity score 2)
Literature
- Mattison LK et al. Rapid identification of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency by using a novel 213C-uracil breath test. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:2652–8.
- Ciccolini J et al. A rapid and inexpensive method for anticipating severe toxicity to fluorouracil and
fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Ther Drug Monit 2006;28: 678–85.
- Ploylearmsaeng SA et al. How may anticancer chemotherapy with fluorouracil be individualised? Clin
Pharmacokinet. 2006;45(6):567-92.
- Zhou ZW et al. The dihydrouracil/uracil ratios in plasma and toxicities of 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant
chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients. Chemotherapy 2007;53:127–131.
3
-
-
-
van Staveren MC et al. Evaluation of predictive tests for screening for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase
deficiency. Pharmacogenomics J 2013;13:389-95.
Tuchman M et al. Familial pyrimidinemia and pyrimidinuria associated with severe fluorouracil toxicity. N
Engl J Med 1985;313:245–9.
Mattison LK et al. Increased prevalence of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency in AfricanAmericans compared with Caucasians. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:5491–5.
Van Kuilenburg ABP et al. Lethal outcome of patient with complete dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD)
deficiency after administration of 5-fluorouracil: frequency of the common IVS14 + 1G > A mutation causing
DPD deficiency. Clin Cancer Res 2001;7:1149–53.
Sulzyc-Bielicka V et al. 5-Fluorouracil toxicity-attributable IVS14 + 1G > A mutation of the dihydropyrimidine
dehydrogenase gene in Polish colorectal cancer patients. Pharmacol Rep 2008;60:238-42.
Morel A et al. Clinical relevance of different dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene single nucleotide
polymorphisms on 5-fluorouracil tolerance. Mol Cancer Ther 2006;5:2895-904.
Seck K et al. Analysis of the DPYD gene implicated in 5-fluorouracil catabolism in a cohort of Caucasian
individuals. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Aug 15;11(16):5886-92.
Yamaguchi K et al. Germline mutation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenese gene among a Japanese
population in relation to toxicity to 5-fluorouracil. Jpn J Cancer Res 2001;92:337-42.
Deenen MJ et al. Standard-dose tegafur combined with uracil is not safe treatment after severe toxicity from
5-fluorouracil or capecitabine. Ann Intern Med 2010;153:767-8.
Rosmarin D et al. A candidate gene study of capecitabine-related toxicity in colorectal cancer identifies new
toxicity variants at DPYD and a putative role for ENOSF1 rather than TYMS. Gut 2014 Mar 19 [Epub ahead
of print].
Deenen MJ et al. Relationship between single nucleotide polymorphisms and haplotypes in DPYD and
toxicity and efficacy of capecitabine in advanced colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:3455-68.
Kristensen MH et al. Variants in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase
and thymidylate synthase genes predict early toxicity of 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer patients. J Int
Med Res 2010;38:870-83.
4