* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download A7: Decoding genome encoded host-pathogen
Survey
Document related concepts
Endomembrane system wikipedia , lookup
Protein phosphorylation wikipedia , lookup
SNARE (protein) wikipedia , lookup
Histone acetylation and deacetylation wikipedia , lookup
G protein–coupled receptor wikipedia , lookup
Protein moonlighting wikipedia , lookup
P-type ATPase wikipedia , lookup
Magnesium transporter wikipedia , lookup
Type three secretion system wikipedia , lookup
List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup
Bacterial microcompartment wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Intrinsically disordered proteins wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
A7: Decoding genome encoded host-pathogen protein interactions and response networks involved in c-di-GMP signalling Akash Ranjan, Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics (CDFD) State of the art: The discovery of c-di-GMP as a universal secondary messenger is a breakthrough in bacterial physiology: high concentrations activate sessility, adhesion, biofilm and cell cycle progression; low concentrations stimulate single cell dispersal, motility and upregulation of virulence genes (1-3). GGDEF domain proteins synthesize ci-di-GMP, EAL or HD-GYP domain containing proteins degrade it. These domain containing proteins are abundant and often modular in a diverse set of bacteria, i.e. containing additional domains such as PilZ, REC, PAS etc. (4). The modular nature enables participation in various biological processes, their diverse distribution in various species probably helps in niche adaptation. Our analysis will unravel their functional relations and organizational principles. Previous work: We have identified GGDEF, EAL, HD and PilZ domain containing 16179 proteins in 779 completely sequenced bacterial genomes. We found that these domains cooccur with 124 other domains, which suggests their contribution in many biological processes. We also mapped their sequential order along 16179 proteins often termed domain architecture or organization. A directed graph was constructed by linking domains located adjacent to each other from N- to C- terminal order, analyzing the c-di-GMP associated functional patterns (5), now an automated process. We are in the process of proposing a new protein-protein interaction prediction method using five genomic context methods and gene expression profiling in various conditions (6, 7). With this template we will extend the domain work to identify their interacting partners (8). Working hypothesis and work plan: Preliminary analysis of the GGDEF, EAL, HD-GYP and PilZ domain containing proteins suggested that the abundance of these domains is for functional diversity. We hypothesize a correlation of the variable number of these domains in various species and their specific phenotype/habitat, their co-occurrence with functionally diverse domains may be responsible for sensing environmental cues, causing appropriate physiological adaptations. Can we identify the common domain usage pattern and probable response they generate? What are the effectors to which c-di-GMP can bind? Through available microarray data and protein-protein interaction networks we can identify the functional modules to which different GGDEF and EAL domain containing proteins belong. Comparison of domains present in pathogenic vs. non-pathogenic organisms can provide the pathogenesis related c-di-GMP signalling modules, leading to the identification of proteins exclusively present in pathogenic organisms. The second aspect will be to identify the probable interacting partners of these proteins based on integrated analysis protein-protein interaction networks and microarray datasets, providing us with probable pathways affected by c-di-GMP signalling. Proposed thesis topics: (1) Reconstruction of a genome-wide protein-protein functional linkage map of E. coli: A computational approach to study cellular physiology associated with c-di-GMP signalling; (2) Functional characterization of molecular interactions involved in c-diGMP signalling. Interlinkage: Our bioinformatics analysis will be experimentally confirmed by. R. Hengge (A2). We will send a student from our lab to the lab of R. Hengge, and receive a student from the Berlin. We will also assist L.H. Wieler and C. Ewers (A1) with bioinformatics analyses. References: (1) Hengge R (2009) Principles of c-di-GMP signalling in bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:263-73 (2) Jenal U, J Malone (2006) Mechanisms of cyclic-di-GMP signaling in bacteria. Annu Rev Genet 40: 385-407 (3) Pesavento C et al. (2008) Inverse regulatory coordination of motility and curli-mediated adhesion in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev 22:2434-46 (4) Romling U, M Gomelsky, MY Galperin (2005) C-di-GMP: the dawning of a novel bacterial signalling system. Mol Microbiol 57:629-39 (5) Kummerfeld SK, SA Teichmann (2009) Protein domain organisation: adding order. BMC Bioinformatics 10: 39 (6) Harrington ED, LJ Jensen, P Bork (2008) Predicting biological networks from genomic data. FEBS Lett 582:1251-8 (7) von Mering C, et al. (2002) Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 417:399-403. (8) Pujana MA, et al.(2007) Network modelling links breast cancer susceptibility and centrosome dysfunction. Nat Genet 39:1338-49.