* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download can bioimaging show the connection
Survey
Document related concepts
Cell nucleus wikipedia , lookup
Tissue engineering wikipedia , lookup
Biochemical switches in the cell cycle wikipedia , lookup
Model lipid bilayer wikipedia , lookup
Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup
Cell growth wikipedia , lookup
Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup
P-type ATPase wikipedia , lookup
Cell culture wikipedia , lookup
Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup
Cell membrane wikipedia , lookup
Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Lipid flippases and vesicle budding: can bioimaging show the connection? Rosa L. López-Marqués1, Lisbeth R. Poulsen1, katarina Meffert2, Thomas Günther-Pomorski1 and Michael G. Palmgren1 1 Center for Membrane Pumps in Cells and Disease-PUMPKIN, Danish National Research Council, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, DK-1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark 2 Humboldt- University Berlin, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science I, Institute of Biology, Invalidenstrasse 42, 10115 Berlin, Germany The secretory pathway is involved in several vital cellular processes, including host-pathogen interactions, nutrient and gravity sensing, and protein sorting [1-4]. Many elements of the secretory machinery in animals and plants are still lacking or are poorly characterized [5-6]. In the past years, more and more evidence is accumulating suggesting the involvement of a subfamily of P-type ATPases in vesicle formation. P-type ATPases comprise a large family of membrane proteins with 8-12 transmembrane spans, involved in pumping different physiologically-relevant substrates across biological membranes [7]. The members of the P4 subfamily (also known as flippases) have been proposed to catalyze the energy-driven translocation of lipids necessary for establishing transbilayer lipid asymmetry [8], a feature that seems to be necessary for correct functioning of the cells [9,10]. Although direct evidence of the involvement of the P4-ATPases in flipping natural lipids is still lacking, several of these proteins have been shown to catalyze the translocation of fluorescent analogues of lipids [11,12]. Deletion of one or more P4-ATPase genes causes defects in vesicle budding in various organisms [11-13] and some members of the yeast family have been shown to interact with the vesiculation machinery [14,15]. In Arabidopsis, 12 members of the P4-ATPase family have been described, named ALA1-ALA12, for Aminophospholipid ATPase [7]. To-date only two members (ALA1 and ALA3) have been partially characterized. ALA1 is capable of transporting fluorescent analogues of phosphatidylserine (PS) when expressed in yeast and its lack is directly related to the chilling sensitivity of an ALA1 antisense Arabidopsis mutant [16]. ALA3 translocates preferentially analogues of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and an Arabidopsis knock-out mutant lacking this protein shows a severe defect in vesicle production in specialized root tip cells [12]. Currently we are characterizing another member of the ALA family, ALA2, capable of complementing yeast mutants lacking the endogenous P4-ATPases. Using transient expression in tobacco epidermal cells followed by confocal laser scanning microscopy, GFP:ALA2 was localized to highly mobile vesicular structures (1-4 µm in diameter). As many as 40 vesicles per cell could be detected. Our recent work suggests that these vesicular structures are derived from the pre-vacuolar compartment as a result of ALA2 activity. At the moment we are trying to use our tobacco expression system in combination with other techniques to prove the direct involvement of ALA2 in the formation of these vesicular structures. 1. Northcote DH, Gould J., Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1989; 43: 429-447. 2. Leucci MR, Di Sansebastiano GP, Gigante M, Dalessandro G, Piro G., Planta. 2007, 225: 1001-1017. 3. Jolliffe NA, Craddock CP, Frigerio L., Biochem Soc Trans. 2005, 33: 1016-1018. 4. Kwon C, Bednarek P, Schulze-Lefert P., Plant Physiol. 2008, 147: 1575-1583. 5. Paul MJ, Frigerio L., Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2007, 18: 471-478. 6. De Matteis MA, Di Campli A, D'Angelo G., Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007, 1771: 761-768. 7. Axelsen KB, Palmgren MG., Plant Physiol. 2001, 126: 696-706. 8. Pomorski T, Holthuis JC, Herrmann A, van Meer G., J Cell Sci. 2004, 117: 805-813. 9. O'Brien IE, Reutelingsperger CP, Holdaway KM., Cytometry. 1997, 29: 28-33. 10. Fadok VA, Voelker DR, Campbell PA, Cohen JJ, Bratton DL, Henson PM, J Immunol. 1992, 148: 2207–2216. 11. Pomorski T, Lombardi R, Riezman H, Devaux PF, van Meer G, Holthuis JC., Mol Biol Cell. 2003, 14: 1240-1254. 12. Poulsen LR, López-Marqués RL, McDowell SC, Okkeri J, Licht D, Schulz A, Pomorski T, Harper JF, Palmgren MG., Plant Cell. 2008, 20: 658-676. 13. Ruaud A-F, Nilsson L, Richard F, Larsen MK, Bessereau J-L, Tuck S, Traffick 2009, 10: 88-100. 14. Wicky S, Schwarz H, Singer-Krüger B., Mol Cell Biol. 2004, 24: 7402-7418. 15. Singer-Krüger B, Lasić B, Bürger AM, Hausser A, Pipkorn R, Wang Y., EMBO J. 2008, 27: 1423-1435. 16. Gomes E, Jakobsen MK, Axelsen KB, Geisler M, Palmgren MG., Plant Cell. 2000, 12: 2441-2454.