* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download L - Oxford Academic
Synaptic gating wikipedia , lookup
Neuroregeneration wikipedia , lookup
Nonsynaptic plasticity wikipedia , lookup
Molecular neuroscience wikipedia , lookup
Node of Ranvier wikipedia , lookup
Proprioception wikipedia , lookup
Stimulus (physiology) wikipedia , lookup
Evoked potential wikipedia , lookup
Axon guidance wikipedia , lookup
Perception of infrasound wikipedia , lookup
Electromyography wikipedia , lookup
Caridoid escape reaction wikipedia , lookup
End-plate potential wikipedia , lookup
Neuromuscular junction wikipedia , lookup
A M . ZOOLOGIST, 7:527-551 (1967). Crustacean Neuromuscular Mechanisms HAROLD L. ATWOOD Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Canada SYNOPSIS. Properties of crustacean muscle fibers and neuromuscular synapses are discussed, with particular reference to the problems of fast and slow contraction, synaptic diversity, and peripheral inhibition. Electrical and mechanical responses of crustacean muscle fibers are variable, and govern to a large extent the muscle's performance. Fast and slow contractions are often mediated by distinct "phasic" and "tonic" muscle fibers, as in abdominal muscles, in which such fibers are segregated into two parallel sets of muscles. In leg muscles the fibers are often heterogeneous in properties and innervation. In doubly-motor-innervated muscles of crabs the axons producing fast and slow contractions preferentially innervate rapidly and slowly contracting fibers, respectively. Crustacean neuromuscular synapses vary greatly in electrical behavior and in ultrastructural characteristics. Some motor axons possess both facilitating and nonfacilitating synapses. The proportion of the different types of synapse associated with a motor axon probably determines in large measure the properties of the postsynaptic potentials evoked by that axon. Pre-synaptic and post-synaptic inhibition both occur, sometimes in the same muscle. The latter type is more common. Pre-synaptic inhibition is thought to be mediated by the action of an inhibitory transmitter-substance on receptors of the motor nerve terminals. Crustacean muscles differ from those of the higher vertebrates in the sparseness of their efferent innervation, which may consist of as little as two axons for muscles such as the opener of the crayfish claw. A common feature is the presence of at least one inhibitory axon, activity of which can weaken or abolish the contractions evoked by the motor axons. Muscles receiving more than one motor axon often generate a fast or a slow contraction depending upon which axon is stimulated; thus the different axons have been termed "fast" or "slow". The innervation patterns of decapod leg muscles are known from the work of Wiersma, van Harreveld, and collaborators (see review by Wiersma, 1961). Two of the known patterns, the brachyuran and the astacuran, are shown in Figure 1. Although the motor innervation is the same in these two and in other Reptantia as well, there are differences in the inhibitory innervation. For instance, in the brachyurans the opener and stretcher muscles receive double inhibitory innervation, whereas in the crayfish there is only a single inhibitory axon supplying each muscle. Numerous questions were raised by the early work on the innervation and physiology of the crustacean leg muscles (Wiersma, 1961). Attention will be focused here mainly on three of these: 1) What mechanisms are responsible for fast and slow contraction? 2) Why do synapses of different axons show differences in electrical behavior? 3) What mechanisms are responsible for peripheral inhibition? Recent work has produced tentative answers to the above questions, but has left others unsolved, as will be indicated later. The present account will be confined to the Decapoda Reptantia, which have been the most thoroughly investigated of the crustaceans. No attempt will be made to present an exhaustive review; rather, a point of view which has arisen from certain recent observations will be developed. Some of the work reported here was supported by a grant (A-2352) from the National Research Council of Ganada. Crustacean muscle fibers FAST AND SLOW CONTRACTION (527) The contractions of any muscle are 528 HAROLD L. ATWOOD B B F A 1 L i * B FIG. 1. Efferent innervation of brachyuran (A) and uslacuran (B) leg muscles. Solid lines represent motor axons, and dotted lines, inhibitory axons. The muscles are : O, opener; C, closer; R, bender; S, stietcher; F, flexor of carpopodite; A, accessory flexor; E, extensor of carpopodite. (After Wiersma, 1961.) dependent on the properties of the responding muscle fibers. This is readily apparent in such material as the muscles of the frog, in which twitch and tonus fibers have been shown to be responsible for fast and slow contractions, respectively (Kuffler and Vaughan Williams, 1953a, b) . Until recently, relatively little attention was given to the contractile and morphological characteristics of crustacean muscle fibers. In attempts to explain crustacean fast and slow contractions, most workers concentrated on the properties of the different axons, including differences in their electrical and chemical effects (e.g., Hoyle and Wiersma, 1958 u-c). However, there were early indications from the work of Jasper and Pezard (1934) and Alexandrowicz (1951, 1952) that crustacean muscle fibers are not uniform in their morphological and contractile properties. Only recently have these findings been more fully developed and elaborated. It is worth emphasizing here the importance of the diversity of muscle fibers which occurs in crustacean material. The diversity extends to fine structure, contractile behavior, and electrical responsiveness. In different fibers, responses to depolarization range from all-or-nothing spikes in some crab leg fibers and in crayfish abdominal muscle fibers (Atwood, 1965«, b; Atwood, et al., 1965; Abbott and Parnas, 1965), through the large or small graded responses of the majority of crustacean fibers (Fatt and Katz, 1953a; Atwood, et al., 1965), to delayed rectification and absence of graded responsiveness (Atwood, 1963fl, b; Atwood, et al., 1965). In certain leg muscles of crabs, the entire range of electrical responsiveness may be encountered. In Figure 2, representative responses to depolarization of fibers in the closer of Chionecetes tanneri are shown. In other muscles, the range may be more restricted. The fibers of the deep abdomi- 529 CRUSTACEAN XF.UROMUSCUI.AR MFXHANISMS TABLE 1. Characteristics of muscle fibers in the Ca rein us closer muscle (Alter Atwood, 19636) Fiber type (Fig. 21) Motor innervation A Mainly fast axon B Mainly slow axon C Both Cast and slow axons Membrane responsheness Large graded active membrane responses Little or no graded responsiveness: delayed rectification Variable small graded responses nal muscles of the crayfish and rock lobster show responses ranging from all-or-nothing spikes to large graded responses, whereas the fibers of the superficial abdominal muscles show small graded responses or none (Kennedy and Takeda, 1965c/, b; Parnas and Atwood, 1966). L FIG. 2. Membrane responses of three fil>ers in the closer muscle of Chionecetes with intracellular stimulation. Current is monitored in the lower traces. The three libers show spikes (A), graded response (15), and delayed rectification (C). Calibration: voltage, 20 mV; cm lent, 2 ^A (A), 1 ^A (15, C): time, 100 msec (A). 200 msec (15), 400 msec (C, top), 1 sec (C, bottom). After Atwood (19656). In crab leg muscles, the fibers which generate large graded responses or spikes show certain differences in their cable characteristics from those which lack such responses (Table 1; Atwood, 1963o, b). These differences are reflected in the shapes of the post-synaptic potentials set up in the fibers by indirect stimulation. However, Membrane length constant Sarcomere length ij-10 msec 0.:") mm 2-5 M 40-200 msec 2.5 mm 6-12 M 10-30 msec 1.5 mm 5-10M Membrane time constant values for cable constants must be interpreted with caution in view of the complex morphology of crustacean muscle fibers (Selverston, 1967). Speeds of contraction and relaxation may differ many-fold in crustacean muscle fibers. For example, the deep abdominal muscles of the crayfish produce contractions which reach peak amplitude in 10-20 msec and relax in 30-40 msec, whereas the depolarized superficial abdominal muscles develop tension slowly over the course of many seconds and require about 10 sec to relax (Abbott and Parnas, 1965; Parnas and Atwood, 1966). In decapod leg muscles, fibers with this degree of difference in speed of contraction often occur in the same muscle. This was demonstrated by Atwood and Dorai Raj (1964) in the accessory flexor muscle of the crab, Cancer magisler. Jn this muscle, there are fibers which contract very slowly when depolarized; tension may continue to increase after depolarization has terminated (Fig. 3). These fibers do not show spikes or graded responses as a rule. Elsewhere in the muscle, such electrical responses are common, and the contraction of the fibers in which they appear is faster. The same differences L FIG. 3. Contraction of a tonic fiber in the accessory flexor muscle of Cancer, showing slow development and relaxation of tension. Calibration: voltage, 40 mV; tension, 0.04 g; time, 1 sec (after Atwood and Dorai Raj, 1964). 530 HAROLD L. ATWOOD ous muscle fibers. The slow-acting fibers of the crab accessory flexor muscle, and the superficial extensor muscles of the crayfish abdomen, remain contracted for many minutes when depolarized by a potassiumrich solution (Atwood and Dorai Raj, 1964; Parnas and Atwood, 1966). The fastcontracting fibers of the crab accessory flexor, and fibers in the leg muscles of the A B crayfish, relax after several seconds or someFIG. 4. Tension developed by spiking (A) and what longer, depending on the amount of gradedly-responding (B) fibers in the stretcher muscle of Cancer magister. In (A), tension does depolarization (Atwood and Dorai Raj, 1964; Zachar and Zacharova, 1966). The not appear at depolarizations below the spiking level. Calibration: voltage, 20 mV; time, 100 msec fast-acting fibers of the deep abdominal (after Atwood, el al., 1965). extensor muscles of the crayfish relax in a are found in other crab leg muscles. Con- few seconds (Parnas and Atwood, 1966). tractions of a spiking fiber and of a There is apparently a wide spectrum of gradedly-responding fiber from the stretch- contractural responses in crustacean fibers. er muscle of Cancer magister are shown in There would appear to be some justificaFigure 4. The contractions of these fibers tion for terming those which can normally are quite different from that shown in maintain prolonged tension "tonic fibers", and those which can maintain only tranFigure 3. It is worth noting that many of the sient tension "phasic fibers", particularly spiking crustacean muscle fibers develop since some of the former (in the tonic little or no tension at depolarizations be- abdominal muscles) are known to receive a low the threshold for spiking (Fig. 4), as is "tonic" (steadily maintained) input from true also in frog twitch fibers (Hodgkin the central nervous system, whereas some and Horowicz, 1960). By contrast, in some of the latter (in the phasic abdominal of the non-spiking crustacean fibers, the muscles) are known to lack this input threshold membrane potential for produc- (Kennedy and Takeda, 1965a, b). Howtion of tension may be very close to the ever, it must be borne in mind that innormal resting potential (Atwood, et al, termediate types of fiber occur between the 1965; Reuben, et al., 1967). two extremes and the terminology is thereThere are also differences in the normal fore somewhat limited in usefulness. The differences in speed of contraction tension-maintaining capabilities of vari- L TABLE 2. Sarcomere length, relaxation time, and electrical responsiveness of some crustacean muscle fibers. Muscle Deep abdominal extensor of crayfish Extensor muscle of crab Contractor epimeralis of crayfish Accessory flexor of crab Superficial abdominal extensor of crayfish Sarcomere Relaxation length of time after fiber contraction Electrical responsiveness Authors 2-3 M 30 msec Spike or large graded response Abbott & Parnas 1965 4-5 M 40 msec Spike or large graded response Selverston 1967 9^ 2 sec Small to large graded response Orkand 1962 10-12/i 2-5 sec Delayed rectification Atwood & Dorai Raj 1964 8-14 M 6-10 sec Delayed rectification or small graded response Abbott & Parnas 1965 Parnas & Atwood 1966 CRUSTACEAN NEUROMUSCULAR MECHANISMS 531 correlate reasonably well with differences in the resting length of sarcomere. This correlation was suggested earlier by Jasper and Pezard (1934) and by Huxley and Niedergerke (1954). Some of the data for crustacean muscle fibers are tabulated in Table 2, in which it is apparent that the slower fibers have the longer sarcomeres. It will be noted, however, that there is not a rigid correlation between speed of contraction and electrical excitability. While it is true that many of the fast-acting fibers produce spikes or large graded responses, some of the slower ones do also. However, spike generation is undoubtedly less common, in the statistical sense, in the slow- FIG. 5. Longitudinal section through a crayfish phasic abdominal muscle fiber; note the relatively short sarcomeres (2 JJ), myoftbrils separated by sarcoplasmic reticulum (S), and diads (After Jahromi and Atwood, 1967.) (arrows). S32 HAROLD L. ATWOOD contracting and tonic fibers. In the crayfish abdominal extensor muscles, very fast-acting, phasic fibers occur in the deep muscles in parallel with very slow-acting, tonic fibers in the superficial muscles (Parnas and Atwood, 1966). The former have much shorter sarcomeres than the latter (Table 2; Figs. 5, 6). This degree of difference in length of sarcomere is not found in vertebrate twitch and tonus fibers (e.g., Page, 1965). However, in the vertebrate fibers there are FIG. 6. Longitudinal section through a crayfish tonic abdominal muscle fiber; note the relatively long sarcomere (7.5 p), wide Z-lines (Z), the separation of the myofibrils by elements of the sarco- plasmic reticulum (arrows), and diads (D). Mitochondrion (M) is indicated. (After Jahromi and A l wood, 1967.) CRUSTACEAN XEUROMUSCULAR MECHANISMS 533 FIG. 7. Transverse sections through crayfish phasic (A) and tonic (B) abdominal muscle fibers, with diads indicated (arrows). The myofibrils are not greatly different in size in the two fibers but the myofilaments are differently arranged (after Jahromi and Atwood, 1967.) considerable differences in the amount of sarcoplasmic reticulum and in the number of contacts (triadic, pentadic, etc.) between the T-system tubules and the sarcoplasmic reticulum, the tonic fibers being poorer in both respects (Page, 1965; Hess, 1965; Hoyle, et al, 1966). One can postulate that the slowness of the vertebrate tonic fibers arises from the sparseness of the sarcoplasmic reticulum, or perhaps from lack of some factor associated with it {e.g., relaxing factor; Gruener and Abbott, 1965). In the crayfish abdominal muscles, the situation may be different. Both phasic and tonic fibers have well-defined myofibrils separated by layers of sarcoplasmic reticulum; the average minimum transverse distance from the center of the myofibril to the sarcoplasmic reticulum is about 0.4 ^ (Figs. 5, 6, 7; Jahromi and Atwood, 1967). The number of diadic contacts between the T-tubules and the sarcoplasmic reticulum is about the same in both types of sarcomere, but since the phasic fibers have much shorter sarcomeres, the number of diads per unit length of fiber is greater in them. The more rapid onset of contraction in the phasic fibers could result at least in part from more effective activation of the sarcoplasmic reticulum by the closely spaced diads. However, the contractile material of both types of fiber is equally accessible to the sarcoplasmic reticulum, and if relaxation is brought about by movement of calcium from the contractile material into the sarcoplasmic reticulum, it may be necessary to postulate a difference in the nature of the sarcoplasmic reticulum, or of the contractile filaments, to explain the very considerable difference in the rate of relaxation. The arrangement of the contractile filaments is also different in the two types of fibers, there being a 3:1 ratio of thin to thick filaments in the phasic fibers and a 5:1 to 6:1 ratio in the tonic fibers. The arrangement in the phasic fibers is similar to that in insect flight muscle (Huxley and Hanson, 1957), whereas the arrangement in the tonic fibers is like that in insect leg or visceral muscles (Hagopian, 1966; Smith, et al., 1966), The major ultrastructural dif- 534 HAROLD L. ATWOOD ferences between the phasic and tonic fibers in the crayfish abdomen are the length of sarcomere, the longitudinal spacing of the diads, and the arrangement of the myofilaments, rather than the relative amount of sarcoplasmic reticulum. From this it would seem that the mechanisms underlying the different speeds of contraction in these crustacean fibers are different from those which operate in vertebrate fibers. However, more observations are required to elucidate the factors which limit the speed of contraction in both vertebrate and crustacean fibers. From the above discussion, it is at least apparent that there is within crustacean muscles a substrate for production of fast and slow contractions, in the form of fastand slow-acting muscle fibers. The diversity of fibers within a single crustacean muscle (especially certain crab leg muscles) may exceed that in any known vertebrate muscle. On the other hand, there may be uniformity of substrate, as in the medial deep abdominal extensor muscle of the crayfish (Abbott and Parnas, 1965). Even homologous muscles in different appendages of one animal may have different contractile substrates. In the American lobster, many of the fibers of the fast-acting cutter-claw closer muscle have sarcomeres of about 3 jx, whereas all the fibers of the same muscle in the slow-acting crusher-claw have sarcomeres of 7-10 fi (Jahromi and Atwood, unpublished). The next step in pursuing the discussion of fast and slow contraction is to consider the ways in which the central nervous system can call the different muscle fibers into play. Neuromuscular physiology of abdominal muscles The abdominal muscles of crayfish and rock lobster (Abbott and Parnas, 1965; Kennedy and Takeda, 1965a, b; Parnas and Atwood, 1966) provide a case in which phasic and tonic contractile elements have been separated into distinct muscles. One set of muscles, the deep, contains only phasic fibers, and the other set, the super- M SEL mm LI L2 FIG. 8. Diagram o£ the preparation of the abdominal extensor muscles of the crayfish, showing the medial deep extensor muscle (DEAM), the lateral deep extensor muscles (L 1, L 2), the medial and lateral superficial extensor muscles (SEM, SEL), the abdominal segmentation (S 2-4), stimulating electrodes positioned on the nerves to the two sets of muscles (El, E2), and a recording microelectrode (M) positioned in the medial deep extensors. (After Parnas and Atwood, J. Cell. Physiol. 68, 1966.) ficial, contains only tonic fibers. The gross anatomy of the abdominal extensor muscles in the crayfish is shown in Figure 8. It is not surprising, in view of the nature of the contractile elements in the two sets of muscles, that the deep muscles produce rapid twitches and tetani with indirect stimulation, whereas the superficial muscles produce smooth, slowly developing contractions (Kennedy and Takeda 1965a, b; Parnas and Atwood, 1966). Another feature, linked to the first, is the specialization of the motor axons supplying the two sets of muscles. The innervation of the deep extensor muscles of the crayfish is shown in Figure 9. From each of the middle segmental ganglia, six axons supply the deep muscles, five being excitatory and one inhibitory. Some of these axons supply not only the muscles in their own segment, but those in the next posterior segment also. Thus each of the medial deep extensors receives a triple excitatory innervation and a double inhibitory innervation. This type of innervation is also found in Lx of the lateral extensors, but is reduced to double ex- CRUSTACEAN NEUROMUSCULAR MECHANISMS L FIG. 9. Diagram o[ the deep extensors in segments 3 and 4 of the crayfish, showing the distribution of the innervation entering segment 3. Tracings of representative electrical responses are also shown. Axons are numbered 1 to 6; axon 5 is inhibitory. Calibration: 1-4, 20 mV; 5, 4 mV; time, 20 msec (after Parnas and Atwood, 1966). citatory and single or double inhibitory in L2. In the rock lobster, the pattern of innervation differs in detail from that in the crayfish, but there are many features in common (Parnas and Atwood, 1966; Fig. 10). In both rock lobster and crayfish, the inhibitory axons have the most widespread distribution. The electrical responses which they produce in the muscle fibers are in the form of small depolarizing or hyperpolarizing, post-synaptic potentials (p.s.p's; Fig. 9, 10). Activity of these axons is effective in reducing the electrical and mechanical responses set up by the motor axons, as will be discussed more fully in a later section. The motor axons generate spike-shaped responses or large p.s.p's with each stimulus, as shown in Figures 9 and 10. The mechanical response is a sharp twitch. Mechanical activity does not occur unless some form of graded or spike-shaped response is present; the p.s.p's alone are not sufficient to produce contraction. Transmission of the motor axons is sub- 535 ject to rapid fatigue with repetitive stimulation. Apparently the axons are specialized for a large output of transmitter over a brief period of time, in keeping with their functional role in rapid swimming. The superficial muscles also receive five excitatory axons and one inhibitory axon. The axons are distributed in a complex manner to various fibers within the muscles (Kennedy, et al., 1966), as in the superficial flexor muscles (Kennedy and Takeda, 19656). Some fibers receive no inhibitory innervation. Most receive at least three motor axons, which give p.s.p's of various sizes in response to single stimuli. The p.s.p's are seldom as large as those encountered in the deep muscles, but some have considerable powers of facilitation (Fig. 11). Perhaps the outstanding difference between these axons and the ones supplying the deep extensors is their ability to resist fatigue with prolonged stimulation. They seem specialized for prolonged, lowlevel output of transmitter substance, which fits them well for their normal role in control of abdominal posture and tone. The superficial muscles do not produce any rapid contractions, although some of the fibers can generate an occasional graded response (Fig. 11). As mentioned previously, development of tension and relaxation is always very gradual. There is no comparable slow change in the electrical response (Fig. 11). In comparing the two sets of abdominal muscles, it can be seen that both the muscle fibers and the motor axons are specialized for either fast or slow contraction. This clear-cut separation is not found in the leg muscles, but it may be profitable to approach them with the example of the abdominal muscles as a reference point. Nenromuscular physiology of singly-motor-innervated leg muscles Many of the singly-motor-innervated leg muscles have a variety of muscle fibers within them. This was first found in the accessory flexor muscle of the crab in which structural diversity was shown by Cohen (1963), and in which Dorai Raj (1964) 536 H A R O L D L. L 2 L, A ^ ^ > LI 4 M ATWOOD M L, L2 •3 ^ 4' " ™\ 3 JL II J FIG. 10. Diagram of the inncrvalion of the deep extensors in segments 3 and 4 of the rock lobstei, showing the distribution of the inncrvalion entering segment 3. Nfedial (M) and lateral (LI, L2) mm divisions of the deep extensors are indicated. Axon 5 is inhibitory. Calibration: voltage. 1-4, 20 mV; 5, 4 mV; time, 20 msec (after 1'arnas and Atwood, I9G6). distinguished slow-contracting, long-sarcomered, electrically passive fibers in the proximal part of the muscle, and fastcontracting, short-sarcomered, spiking or gradedly-responding fibers in the distal part, with intermediates of various sorts in between. All fibers receive the same motor axon, together with an inhibitor. The density of innervation of the different fibers may be variable since some have much larger p.s.p's than others of similar input resistance (Dorai Raj, 1964; Atwood and Dorai Raj, 1964). However, the association of different muscle fibers with qualitatively distinct motor axons, as in the crayfish abdomen, does not occur here. Repetitive stimulation of the single motor axon produces a slow, sustained contraction at one end of the muscle, and a series of twitches or an incompletely fused tetanus at the other end. Both fast and slow contractions are generated, but by the same axon. The same general finding has been made in other singly-motor-innervated crab muscles, such as the stretcher of Cancer magister and the opener of Chionecetes ianneri (Atwood, 1965ft; Atwood, et al., 1965). In these, the phasic, tonic, and interme- 537 CRUSTACEAN NEUROMUSCULAR MECHANISMS L FIG. 11. Electrical responses recorded from a fiber of the superficial abdominal extensors of the crayfish. A: Excitatory p.s.p's evoked by three motor axons. B: Facilitation and summation of one of the p.s.p's with repetitive stimulation; note single graded response. Calibration: voltage, A, 10 raV; JS, 20 mV; lime. A, 20 msec, B, 1 sec. (After I'arnas and Atwood, 1966.) diate types of muscle fiber can be distinguished on the basis of observations of morphological and electrical and contractile performance. In Chionecetes some of the tonic fibers start to contract with indirect stimulation at 3/sec. The excitatory p.s.p's are very large and slow in these fibers, requiring as long as 1 sec to decay completely. At relatively low frequencies of stimulation, a substantial depolarization plateau is built up (Fig. 12, D-F), and a slow contraction of the fiber is observed. The phasic fibers in the same muscle have relatively small and brief p.s.p's (Fig. 12, A), which facilitate with repetitive stimulation (Fig. 12, B). No contraction is observed until fairly high frequencies of stimulation are applied. Spike-shaped electrical responses and twitch contractions then result (Fig. 12, C). Once again it is evident that the power of fast and slow contraction exists in these crab muscles, and that both types of contraction can be brought about by the same axon. However, only the slow contraction appears at low frequencies of stimulation. Presumably, short bursts of stimulation at a high frequency bring in the fast contraction without much of the slow, and this may occur normally when rapid movement is required. In the opener muscles of the crayfish leg and claw, there has been no evidence so far for diversity of muscle fibers. Since these muscles have been used extensively by many investigators, features of the type described above would probably have attracted attention. Possibly, in these muscles the contractile substrate and the innervation are more uniform than in the crab muscles, but direct evidence for this has not been given. Similarly, in the opener muscle of the hermit crab, Pa gurus bernhardi, Wiersma and Bobbert (1961) concluded that all fibers behaved similarly in response to motor axon stimulation and were capable of generating spike-like electrical responses and fast contractions as well as a maintained depolarization and slow contraction. Neuromuscular physiology of doubly-motorinnervated leg muscles Even though fast and slow contraction of crustaceaii muscles was originally described in the doubly-motor-innervated decapod leg muscles (Lucas, 1917), the mechanisms responsible for the two types of contraction B L FIG. 12. Responses of two fibers (A-C, D-F) in the opener muscle of Chionecetes, during stimulation of the motor axon with single shocks (A, D) and with trains of stimuli at 25/sec (B), 75/sec (C), 1.4/sec (E), and 6/sec (F). Calibration: \oltage, 20 mV; time, 40 msec (A), 100 msec. (D), I sec (II, C, E, F). (After Atwood, 19656). 538 HAROLD L. ATWOOD A B FIG. 13. Whole-muscle tension (lower traces) and electrical response from a single muscle fiber (upper traces) in the closer muscle of Randallia, during stimulation of the fast (A) and slow (B) axons at 30/sec, showing the "paradox" phenomenon. Calibration: voltage, 20 mV; time, 2 sec. (After Atwood and Hoyle, 1965.) have remained difficult to ascertain in this material. Several confusing observations have contributed to the difficulty. Observations by van Harreveld (1939) indicated that all fibers in some of the doubly-motorinnervated muscles receive both motor axons and an inhibitor. This gave rise to the idea that each muscle fiber could produce two types of contraction, the fast and the slow (Wiersma, 1961). In some muscles, particularly the closer of the crab, Randallia, and the crayfish claw closer, which were thought to have a uniformlyinnervated population of muscle fibers, the electrical responses set up by the slow axon in the muscle as a whole (Wiersma and van Harreveld, 1938) or in impaled single fibers (Hoyle and Wiersma, 1958c) were smaller than those set up by the fast axon at the same frequency; yet the slow contraction was larger (Fig. 13). This observation, termed the "paradox", led to the hypothesis that contraction is mediated by direct action of transmitter substances on the contractile apparatus, the chemical of the slow axon being more effective, and the membrane electrical events being unimportant (Hoyle and Wiersma, 1958a; Wiersma, 1961). This hypothesis has been proven wrong by several more recent observations. First, it has been possible to record tension of single innervated muscle fibers while stimulating the motor axons. When the depolarization set up by nerve stimulation is not large enough to exceed the threshold membrane potential for contraction as determined by direct electrical depolarization, the muscle fiber develops no tension (Fig. 14 A). When the indirectly induced depolarization is sufficiently large to exceed the threshold, tension appears, but it can be abolished by hyperpolarizing current (Fig. 14 C). Clearly, membrane depolarization past a critical level is part of the sequence of events leading to production of tension by the motor axons (Atwood, et al., 1965). This conclusion was indicated earlier by experiments of Orkand (1962), who first employed intracellular depolarization to induce contractions in single crustacean muscle fibers. In some of the fibers of the closer of Cancer magister, tension was recorded while both fast and slow axons were stimulated. In some cases the electrical responses were similar, and the tension responses were also similar. It was not possible to show that a single muscle fiber could produce two types of contraction when the electrical events associated with stimulation of the two axons were similar (Atwood, et al, 1965). Re-examination of one of the "paradox" muscles, the closer of Randallia, showed that there were fibers within the muscle L B C FIG. 14. Tension (lower traces) and electrical responses (upper traces) in a single fiber of the stretcher muscle of Cancer. In (A), stimulation of the motor axon at 50/sec fails to produce tension. In (B), the membrane potential is depolarized from 70 mV to 56 mV by excess potassium; injected depolarizing current is more effective in producing tension after the shift in membrane potential (right). In (C), stimulation of the motor axon is effective in producing tension, but injection of hyperpolarizing current abolishes the tension. •Calibration: voltage, 20 mV; tension, 0.05 gm; time, 1 sec. (After Atwood, Hoyle, and Smyth, 1965). 539 CRUSTACEAN NEUROMUSCULAR MECHANISMS which gave larger electrical responses to the "slow" axon than to the "fast", at a given frequency of stimulation (Fig. 15). These fibers were found at the ends of the muscle, and apparently were not sampled in previous studies (Atwood and Hoyle, 1965). When the tendon of the muscle was cut so that only these atypical fibers were left innervated, stimulation of the slow axon caused them to contract, but stimulation of the fast axon was ineffective (Atwood, unpublished). There seems little doubt that the tension generated by the slow axon at "paradox" frequencies is confined to these atypical fibers, and that the others contract only at higher frequencies of stimulation. FIG. 15. Responses of a fiber in the closer of Randallia to stimulation of the fast (A-C) and slow (D-F) motor axons at frequencies of 10/sec (A, D), 25/sec (B, E), and 40/sec (C,F). Wholemusole tension is registered in the lower traces. Note that in this fiber the slow electrical response is larger than the fast. Calibration: voltage, 20 mV; tension, 3 g; rime, 4 sec. (After Atwood and Hoyle, 1965.) Studies on other crab muscles, such as the closer of Pachygrapsus (Hoyle and Wiersma, 1958a), the closer of Carcinus (Atwood, 1963a, b), and the closer of Chionecetes (Atwood, 19656), have indicated that diversity of response to indirect stimulation is a common feature. In Carcinus, and Chionecetes, the more common fibers are doubly-motor-innervated, showing relatively modest p.s.p's for both axons (Fig. 16). There are also fibers which show very large p.s.p's for the fast B B FIG. 16. Slow (b) and fast (c) excitatory p.s.p's in a fiber of the closer of Carcinus; membrane response to injected current is also shown (a). Timeconstants estimated from a, b, and c are similar, about 22 msec. (After Atwood, 19636). axon, and small, or no, p.s.p's for the slow axon (Figs. 17, 18). Often large graded or spike-shaped responses appear in these fibers, even with single stimuli to the fast axon (Fig. 18 B). Still other fibers resemble the atpical fibers of Randallia in their relatively large responses to the slow axon, their small responses to the fast axon, and the absence of graded responses (Fig. 19). In some of the latter, the fast electrical response may be entirely absent. Similar fibers occur in Pachygrapsus (Hoyle and Wiersma, 1958a). The difference in form of the fast and slow contractions is pronounced even in Randallia (Figs. 13, 15). In Carcinus it is even more striking (Fig. 19). At low frequencies of stimulation the fast response is a series of small twitches, while the slow response is a gradually developing contraction which relaxes many times more 4 0 mV 10 msec FIG. 17. Responses of a Carcinus closer muscle fiber to stimulation of the fast axon at 5/sec, showing the development of large graded responses. 540 HAROLD L. ATWOOD FFG. 18. Responses of two fibers of the closer of Chionecetes to single stimuli. In (A), fasl (large) and slow (small) p.s.p's are registered, and in (B), a spike-shaped response is generated by the fast axon. Calibration: voltage, 20 mV; time, 40 msec (A), 20 msec (B). (After Atwood, 19656). slowly than the fast contraction. The difference in the speed of relaxation is in itself a strong indication that the two contractions are being produced by different muscle fibers at this frequency. In Chionecetes and Pachygrapsus, it is possible to observe visually the fibers which are contracting at the low frequencies of stimulation, and to confirm that only a few fibers— those with electrical response as shown in Figures 17 and 18—are participating in the fast contraction at these frequencies. Similarly, the slow contraction can be seen to be associated with fibers of the type shown in Figure 19. The properties of the contractions suggest that, once again, fibers with different morphological and contractile characteristics may be involved, with differences in electrical behavior superimposed. This situation was confirmed in Chionecetes, in which short-sarcomered, fast-contracting fibers and long-sarcomered, slow-contracting fibers were responsible for the fast and slow contractions, respectively, at low frequencies of indirect stimulation. In certain other crustaceans, the range of muscle fiber types may be less extreme, and the differences between the fast and slow contractions therefore less pronounced. For example, in the crusher-claw closer of the lobster, in which the short-sarcomered fibers are not present, Wiersma (1955) found little difference between the fast and slow contractions, whereas in the cutter-claw closer, which contains shortsarcomered fibers, the difference is pronounced. In Nephros, the differences between the fast and slow contractions in walking-leg closers may be explained largely in terms of differences in the form of the electrical responses set up by the two axons; no convincing evidence was found for extreme variation in properties of muscle fibers (Atwood, 1963c). In the crayfish claw closer, however, the fast and slow contractions have very different speeds at low frequencies of stimulation. The fast axon twitch occupies 50-150 msec, whereas 0.25 q 2 sec FIG. 19. Responses of a fiber in the closer of Carcinus to stimulation of the fast and slow axons; tension of the whole muscle is registered in the lower traces. CRUSTACEAN XEUROMUSCULAR MECHANISMS l_ B FIG. 20. Responses to stimulation ot the slow axon in the claw of the crayfish, Aslacus palhpes. In (A), electrical responses of a single fiber are registered, along with tension of the whole muscle (lower trace). In (B-D), tension responses to repetitive stimulation at 10/sec (15), to a single shock (C), and to paired shocks (3 msec separation, 2/sec), arc shown at higher amplification. Note the prolonged lime coiuse of the slow "twitches". Calibration: Voltage. 20 mV; tension, 4 g (A), 0.2 g (B-D); time, 0.4 sec (A), 1 sec (15), 50 msec (C, D). (After At wood, 1963fl.) the slow axon "twitch" which can sometimes be measured by sensitive recording methods, lasts for at least 500 msec (Fig. 20) . Probably different fibers are involved in generation of these responses, although this remains to be shown. It is important to emphasize that the differences between the fast and slow contractions, if any, are most apparent at the low frequencies of stimulation. At higher frequencies large numbers of fibers are recruited. Since many of these respond well to both axons, they may contribute to both fast and slow contractions. Any differences in the contractions of these fibers in response to the two axons would be mediated through differences in electrical behavior which undoubtedly often occur (Hoyle and Wiersma, 1958«). The relative abundance of the doublymotor-innervated fibers is apparent in the generalized scheme presented in Figure 21, which is based on findings made in crab muscles. The behavior of the muscle at the low frequencies of stimulation is dominated by the extreme types of muscle fiber (Types A and B). At higher frequencies of stimulation, the more typical fibers (Type C) play a greater role. The general conclusion to be drawn 541 from the above information is that the contractile behavior of any muscle under consideration is influenced by the nature of the responding muscle fibers, the nature of the nerve endings supplying them, and the way in which the connections between the axons and the muscle fibers are set up (in other words, the "wiring diagram"). Further consideration of the possible differences between the motor axons involves more detailed study of the behavior of individual neuromuscular junctions. PROPERTIES OF EXCITATORY SYNAPSES Electrical behavior By means of the technique of extracellular recording with a microelectrode (Fatt and Katz, 1952), it is possible to study the electrical behavior of individual crustacean neuromuscular junctions (Dudel and Kuffler, I961o-c). This technique has now been FIG. 21. Innervation scheme of a crab closer muscle (based largely on findings in Carcinus and Chioneceles; diagrammatic). The postulated distributions of fast (F), slow (S), and inhibitory (I) axons are indicated. The muscle fibers fall roughly into three categories: Type A (mainly fast axon innervation), Type B (mainly slow and inhibitory innervation), and Type C (mainly triply innervated). 542 HAROLD L. ATWOOD used to study the properties of the synapses of a number of different crustacean motor axons, in order to see whether the pattern of transmission elucidated for the opener-stretcher motor axon of the crayfish walking leg (Dudel and Kuffler, 1961a, b) is present at other crustacean motor synapses. In using this technique, care was taken to record differentially between two microelectrodes, one placed at the synapse and the other a few microns above it. This procedure was necessary to eliminate nonspecific potentials arising from nearby junctions and muscle fibers. The criteria used in deciding whether a junctional region had been located included discreteness of localization, and presence of extracellularly recorded spontaneous miniature potentials. Sometimes a nerve terminal potential was also present, but this feature was often lacking in records obtained at what appeared to be well-localized junctions. In the deep extensor muscles of the crayfish abdomen, the potentials set up by the synaptic currents were quite different from those reported for the crayfish leg opener (Dudel and Kuffler, 1961a, b; Takeuchi and Takeuchi, 1964, 1966b). At low frequencies of stimulation of any of the motor axons, the synaptic currents were of fairly large size, usually several times the quantal unit, as estimated from the spontaneous miniature potentials (Fig. 22C). Failures of transmission were rare except in fatigued preparations. At some junctions there was appreciable fluctuation in magnitude of the synaptic current with successive stimuli (Fig. 22 A,B), but often there was rather little fluctuation (Fig. 22 C,D). Furthermore, the facilitation of the synaptic current at higher frequencies of stimulation was modest. In all these respects, there was a contrast with the synaptic currents of the crayfish leg opener muscle, which were smaller, showed a high rate of failure at low frequencies of stimulation, and exhibited pronounced facilitation. The observations on the phasic abdominal muscles, therefore, show that the FIG. 22. Measurements of synaptic currents (upper traces) and post-synaptic potentials (lower traces) in crayfish phasic abdominal extensor muscles, at 1/sec stimulation. (A) and (B) are from a fiber in muscle L2, showing variation in the synaptic current. (C) and (D) are from the medial muscle, showing synaptic currents several times the size of the spontaneous miniature potential (arrow), and with little fluctuation in magnitude. Calibration: voltage, top traces, 400 ^V (A, B), 1 mV (C, D); bottom traces, 20 mV; time, 4 msec. events at individual junctions reflect those recorded with internal electrodes, and in particular, that the large post-synaptic potentials result from a relatively large output of transmitter substance at each junction (by crustacean standards), and not merely from the occurrence of large numbers of endings on the muscle fiber. Recordings were also obtained from the superficial abdominal extensor muscles (Fig. 23). However, the records of synaptic currents were not as satisfactory as in most of the other muscles, perhaps because of the inherent difficulty in getting an electrode tip close enough to the synapses on these muscle fibers (see Fig. 28). Spontaneous miniature potentials were seldom seen. The synaptic currents were much smaller than those in the deep extensors. For some axons the amplitude of the synaptic current was remarkably constant at frequencies of occurrence of 1-10/sec, although for other axons it increased with frequency. The internally recorded p.s.p's set up by these axons reflected the behavior of the synaptic currents. It was frequently possible to record two, or even three, synaptic currents at one 543 CRUSTACEAN NEUROMUSCULAR MECHANISMS synaptic facilitation in some cases in which an impulse in one excitatory axon arrived just before an impulse in a second one (Fig. 23). A phenomenon which may be related to this is the potentiation of the fast contraction by the slow in the crayfish claw, and vice versa (Wiersma and van Harreveld, 1939). The mechanism underlying this phenomenon awaits further study. Comparison of the synaptic currents measured in the crayfish leg opener and in the abdominal muscles indicates that there can be considerable variation in performance among endings of different axons. This variation extends also to different endings of the same axon in many cases. Indications of this situation appear in records of internally recorded p.s.p's, which in some fibers show facilitation, and in others little or none, even within the same muscle and in response to the same axon. An example has been described in the closer muscle of Randallia for the fast axon (Atwood and Hoyle 1965). Even better examples can be found in the opener and stretcher muscles of TV B Pachygrapsus (Fig. 24). L FIG. 23. Synaptic currents and post-synaptic potentials in a crayfish tonic extensor muscle fiber. In (A), one of the motor axons was stimulated at 10/ sec, producing a synaptic current of small but constant amplitude. In (B), stimulation of a second axon was timed to set up a response just before that of the first axon. A second synaptic current of small amplitude (arrow) was recorded. The synaptic current and p.s.p. of the first axon were facilitated. Calibration: voltage, top traces, 400 jtV; bottom traces, 20 mV; time, 10 msec. locus by stimulating various axons (Fig. 23 B). From this observation, one would suspect that synapses of the different axons occur close together, and this is borne out by electron microscopy (Fig. 28). An interesting phenomenon, as yet unexplained, was the appearance of hetero- Recordings of synaptic currents in the latter muscles have shown that, whereas some synapses behave much like those of the crayfish opener-stretcher axon, and are characterized by frequent failures and low amplitudes at frequencies of stimulation of 1-2/sec. (Fig. 25 A,B), others are more like those of the axons supplying the phasic abdominal muscles, and show few or no failures at low frequencies of stimulation (Fig. 25 C). In the latter type, the currents C D FIG. 24. Poorly facilitating (A, B) and strongly facilitating (C, D) p.s.p's from two fibers in the opener muscle of Pachygrapsus. Calibration: voltage, 10 mV; time, 1 sec. 544 HAROLD L. ATWOOD transmission occur at low frequencies, whereas at others, there are no failures in fresh preparations. The fluctuation in amplitude of the synaptic currents is much more pronounced in this preparation than, for example, in the crayfish abdominal muscles. However, on the average the endings show a higher probability of transmitter output (Fig. 27) than the endings of the opener-stretcher motor axon. FIG. 25. Synaplic currents from facilitating (A, Ii) and poorly facilitating (C) junctions, in Pachygrapsus. J11 (A) and (15), currents of one and two quanta! units, respectively, are shown. In (C). the currents are several times the quantal unit (the size of which is comparable to the spontaneous potential indicated by the arrow). Calibration: voltage, top traces, 400 ^V; Ixittom traces, 20 mV, time, 4 msec. are typically several times the size of the quantal unit. They may vary little in amplitude (Fig. 31), and frequently they show little or no facilitation with an increase in the frequency of stimulation. The fast closer axon of Pachygrapsus has also now been thoroughly investigated in this respect. Here, too, different endings of the axon show differences in behavior (Figs. 26, 27). At some, failures of 7 FIG. 26. Synaptic currents at a fast axon junction in the Pachygrapsus closer muscle. In (A), there was failure of transmission at this junction. In (B) and (C), synaptic currents of variable size were generated. Note the occurrence of spontaneous potentials in (A) and (B). Calibration: voltage, top traces, 1 mV; bottom traces, 20 mV; time, 10 msec. FIG. 27. Synaptic currents at a junction of the fast axon in the Pachygrapsus closer, showing the great variation in amplitude encountered at 1/sec stimulation. Calibration; voltage, top traces, 400 ^V; bottom traces, 20 mV; time, 4 msec. In the doubly-motor-innervated muscles of the lobster and the rock lobster, it is sometimes possible to record both fast-axon and slow-axon synaptic currents at one locus, but just as often, only one can be registered. Thus the synaptic arrangements are probably variable (Atwood, Dorai Raj, and Parnas, unpublished). In these muscles relatively little difference in behavior of synapses of the two motor axons was apparent. A general conclusion which emerges from this comparative work is that crustacean motor synapses can vary a great deal in their performance. The properties of a particular motor axon may depend very much upon the relative numbers of facilitating and poorly facilitating synapses associated with it. The question which must next be answered is: what causes the variation in behavior? An initial step in CRUSTACEAN NEUROMUSCULAR MECHANISMS FIG. 28. Electron micrograph through a tonic fiber of the crayfish abdominal extensor muscles cut in longitudinal section, showing five axons, of which four contain synaptic vesicles and three answering this question has been made with electron microscopy. 545 synaptic densities (arrows). Other structures include the sarcolemma (S), extensive non-filamentous sarcoplasm (N), a Z line (Z), and the contractile filaments (K). (After Jahromi and Atwood, 1967.) muscles of the crayfish abdomen are supplied by five excitatory axons and one inhibitor, and not all fibers receive the latter Morphological features axon, so there is at least an 85% chance In studying the morphology of crusta- on a priori grounds that any given synapse cean synapses, the problem of identifying is excitatory. Since the motor axons of those associated with the different axons the tonic extensors are all of the relatively supplying a particular muscle fiber imme- low-output, fatigue-resistant type, whereas diately presents itself. For example, how the Pachygrapsus fast closer axon is of the does one tell a slow axon ending from a high-output, fatigue-sensitive type, an infast in a doubly-motor-innervated muscle structive comparison can be made. fiber? The synapses in the tonic abdominal As a start, therefore, it was necessary muscles often occur on several closely assoto choose material in which the identity ciated axons (Fig. 28; Jahromi and Atwood, of the synapses was reasonably certain. In 1967). Very often the synapses are made the closer of Pachygrapsus, there are fibers near the surface of the muscle fiber with which respond only to the fast axon arm-like extensions of non-contractile sar(Atwood, et al., 1967). The tonic extensor coplasm. Sometimes two or more synapses 546 HAROLD L. ATWOOD occur close together. The presynaptic vesicles, which average about 600 A in diameter, are often rather closely packed. Dense accumulations of them appear at the synaptic membranes. The fast axon synapses on Pachygrapsus fibers sometimes occur at the surface, but more usually they are found in sarcolemmal clefts a few microns away from the surface (Fig. 29; Atwood and Johnston, unpublished). There is typically a small amount of non-contractile sarcoplasm associated with the synapse. The endings are usually single, in confirmation of the physiological data (Atwood, et al., 1967). Often there are many synaptic areas on the ending, the apparent region of synaptic contact being fairly extensive (Fig. 30). The vesicles average about 600 A in diameter, but they are usually much less densely packed than in the endings on the tonic abdominal muscles. The main features of contrast between the two types of ending are: the larger diameter of the Pachygrapsus fast axon endings; the higher density of synaptic FIG. 29. Electron micrograph through a fiber in the closer muscle of Pachygrapsus, showing an axon (AX) located in a sarcolemmal invagination (IN); a large nucleus (X) appears near the surface of the fiber. Possible synaptic region is indicated by arrows. (Electron micrograph by H. Johnston.) CRUSTACEAN NEUROMUSCULAR MECHANISMS 547 The experiments of Marmont and Wiersma (1938), Dudel and Kuffler (1961c), Dudel (1965), and Takeuchi and Takeu- chi (1965, 1966) have provided convincing evidence for a process of pre-synaptic inhibition in the opener muscle of the crayfish leg and claw. The basic observations are: first, that the excitatory p.s.p. and the output of transmitter substance (as indicated by measurements of synaptic current) are reduced when the excitatory p.s.p. is closely preceded by an inhibitory impulse; secondly, that the extracellularly-recorded nerve terminal potential is also reduced in amplitude; and thirdly, that this reduction is probably associated with an increased permeability of the nerve terminal to chloride ion, since the reduction is prevented by replacing chloride with an impermeant anion. The mechanism of presynaptic inhibition is thought to involve receptors on the excitatory axon which FIG. 30. A nerve terminal of the Pachygrapsus fast axon (AX), showing areas of synaptic contact (arrows), with associated non-contractile sarcoplasm (N). T tubules (T) leading into the muscle, are also in evidence. (Electron micrograph by H. Johnston.) vesicles in the tonic abdominal axons; the larger ratio of synaptic membrane to available vesicles in the Pachygrapsus endings; and the differences in the amount and arrangement of non-contractile sarcoplasm. The first and third of these features could relate to the differences in transmitter output at low frequencies of stimulation, while the second point could have something to do with the different rates of fatigue. There is no evidence in these findings for qualitatively different transmitters in the two kinds of axons. PERIPHERAL INHIBITION Pre-synaptic inhibition 548 HAROLD L. ATWOOD are sensitive to the transmitter substance released by the inhibitory axon, and which, when activated, bring about the increase in chloride conductance in the axonal membrane. The resulting decrease in amplitude of the nerve terminal potential is linked to a reduction in output of the excitatory transmitter agent. We have extended the observations on pre-synaptic inhibition to the opener and stretcher muscles of crabs. In PachygrapsuSj the dual reduction of the nerve terminal potential and of the synaptic current is well marked when impulses of the specific inhibitor axon are timed to precede the excitatory events (Fig. 31). The inhibition affects both the synapses which normally show no failures of transmission and little fluctuation in amplitude of the synaptic current, and those which show frequent failures of transmission at low frequencies of stimulation. To date, comparable information on the common inhibitor axon of crab muscles is not available. L Post-synaptic inhibition In crustacean muscle fibers, post-synaptic inhibition was established earlier than presynaptic inhibition as an important physiological phenomenon. The work of Fatt and Katz (19536) and of Boistel and Fatt (1958) demonstrated that crustacean muscle fibers undergo an increase in membrane conductance under the influence of inhibitory impulses, and that this change is most likely due to an increased membrane permeability to chloride ion. The basic chemical mechanism may thus be similar to that responsible for pre-synaptic inhibition, differing only in location. The post-synaptic mechanism is considerably more widespread than the pre-synaptic mechanism. The crayfish and crab opener muscles, in which the pre-synaptic mechanism has been demonstrated, also show post-synaptic inhibition for the same inhibitory axons. Kennedy and Evoy (1966) could find no evidence for pre-synaptic inhibition in the crayfish abdominal flexor muscles, and similarly, Atwood, et al. (1967) were not able to demonstrate it in B J'IG. 31. Synaptic currei.ts and nerve terminal potentials (upper traces), and excitatory postsynaptic potentials (lower traces) in a muscle fiber o£ the stretcher of Pachygrapsiis. (A) Responses to 3 successive stimuli to the excitatory axon at 1/sec. The first deflection in the top trace is the nerve terminal potential, and the second deflection is produced by the synaptic current. At this synapse there is little variation in amplitude of the synaptic current. (B) Effect of preceding stimulation of the specific inhibitory axon on the excitatory responses. The first deflection in the top trace is the inhibitory nerve terminal, and the second and third deflections are the excitatory responses, as in (A). Note that the excitatory nerve terminal potential, the synaptic current, and the internally recorded post-synaptic potential are all reduced, and that the synaptic current shows considerable fluctuation. Calibration: voltage, 400 ^V (top), 20 mV (bottom); time, 4 msec. the deep abdominal extensor muscles of the crayfish. In the latter instance, the post-synaptic mechanism is well developed, for inhibitory stimulation can alter the shape of excitatory p.s.p's and eliminate spike-shaped or graded responses (Fig. 32). 549 CRUSTACEAN NEUROMUSCULAR MECHANIS:NIS CONCLUSION L FIC. 32. Inliibition in crayfish deep extensor muscles. In (A) and (15), simultaneous records were made from M (top) and L2 (bottom) muscles. Axon 4 produces a p.s.p. in L2 (A). Axon 5 produces an inhibitory p.s.p. in M, and accelerates the decay of the excitatory p.s.p. without reducing its amplitude greatly (B). Initiation of the excitatory p.s.p. at various times relative to the inhibitory p.s.p. (C, arrow) fails to produce attenuation of the excitatory p.s.p. In another preparation (rock lobster, L,), Lhe electrically excited membrane responses set up by the p.s.p. are attenuated when preceded by an inhibitory impulse (arrow). Calibration: voltage, 10 mV (A-B), 20 mV (CD); time, 20 msec. (After Atwood, et al., 1967). Often the excitatory p.s.p's in these muscles show little change in amplitude, indicating little if any pre-synaptic action (Fig. 32). In crab leg muscles, not all of the fibers react physiologically to stimulation of inhibitory axons. In the doubly-motor-innervated muscles, the most phasic fibers, which respond well to the fast axon, are affected only slightly, or not at all, by stimulation of the inhibitory axon (Fig. 33; Atwood, 19656; Atwood, et al, 1967). This finding partly explains the previous ones by Wiersma and Ellis (1942) that the fast contractions of the doubly-motor-innervated muscles are less influenced by inhibitory stimulation than the slow contractions. The presumed lack of inhibitory innervation of certain fibers is incorporated into the scheme of Figure 21. A parallel situation is described by Usherwood and Grundfest (1965) in muscles of insects. The above discussion has been directed mainly toward the problem of the organization of crustacean neuromuscular systems and the gross properties of the components. A striking feature of these systems is their variety and apparent functional adaptability, as exemplified by the two claws of the lobster. The properties of the muscle fibers and of the axons supplying them are extremely variable, and can be utilized in combinations which permit generation of a great variety of responses. The questions may be asked, how the different muscle fibers and axons acquire their properties during development, and how they TTTT rf B l_ FIC. 33. Effects of stimulating the inhibitory axon at 15/sec on membrane voltage responses to applied current pulses in two fibers of Chionecetes (in the closer muscle). Current recording is shown in the lower traces, membrane voltage in the upper traces, and duration of inhibition is indicated by the thick bars. In (A) there is a marked increase in membrane conductance; in (B) there is very little. Calibration: voltage, 20 mV; current, 1.5 /tA; time, 2 sec. (After Atwood, 1905b). 550 HAROLD L. ATWOOD come to be associated together in useful ways. The observations of Dorai Raj (1964) would seem to rule out a specific trophic relationship between nerve and muscle which would determine the characteristics of the muscle fiber (e.g., Buller et al., 1960a, b), for in the accessory flexor muscle of the crab, several different muscle fibers are all supplied by the same axon. The problem thus raised remains open to investigation. Another problem which has not yet been fully explored concerns the chemical mechanisms involved in neuromuscular transmission and in responsiveness of muscle fibers. There is strong evidence, from the recent work of Takeuchi and Takeuchi (1964, 1966a, b) that glutamate stimulates excitatory synapes and may be the excitatory transmitter in crustacean leg muscles. There is so far no good evidence bearing on the question of the identities of the fast and slow transmitters, and whether they are the same, or different. Since the phasic abdominal muscles as well as the leg muscles respond to glutamate (Ozeki and Grundfest, 1967), it is tempting to assume that the same transmitter may be involved in all these muscles. Gamma-aminobutyric acid is a strong candidate for the inhibitory transmitter. The experiments of Kravitz, et al. (1963), Dudel (1965a, b) and Takeuchi and Takeuchi (1965, 1966a) have demonstrated that this substance is present in greater concentrations in crustacean inhibitory neurons than in the excitatory neurons, and that it duplicates the action of the inhibitory transmitter substance in all known respects. The fact that certain crab muscle fibers are not much affected by this substance (Florey and Hoyle, 1961), is explained by the finding that they probably receive little or no inhibitory innervation (Atwood, 19656; Atwood, et al., 1967; Fig. 21). The chemical mechanisms underlying the electrical behavior of crustacean muscle fibers have been explored by many workers. A few of the more recent investigations include those of Hagiwara and Naka (1964), Hagiwara and Takahashi (1967), Abbott and Parnas (1965), Ozeki, et al. (1966a, b), and Ozeki and Grundfest (1967). This work has shown that, while spike potentials are dependent on a gradient of calcium ions across the membrane, the excitatory postsynaptic potentials are probably dependent on transfer of sodium ions The chemical make-up of crustacean muscle fiber membranes is apparently complex, and perhaps variations can easily arise, which would help to explain the variety of types of electrical responsiveness. The large size of crustacean muscle fibers makes them promising experimental material for further investigation. A final problem concerns the normal use made by the animal of the peripheral mechanisms. The complexity of the neuromuscular apparatus can be rationalized as resulting from the relative paucity (by vertebrate standards) of total neurons. The presence of relatively few efferent axons implies that the pattern of activity generated in each of them is of great importance, and investigations by Wilson and Davis (1965) and Kennedy and Takeda (1965a, b) support this idea. Certain strange and apparently illogical features, such as the distribution of the common inhibitor in crabs (Fig. 1), invite further investigation in this area. Abbott, B. C, and I. Parnas. 1965. Electrical and mechanical responses in deep abdominal extensor muscles oE crayfish and lobster. J. Gen. Physiol. 48:919-931. Alexandrowicz, J. S. 1951. Muscle receptor organs in the abdomen of Homarus vulgaris and Palinurus vulgaris. Quart. J. Microscop. Sci. 92:163-199. Alexandrowicz, J. S. 1952. Muscle receptor organs in the Paguridae. J. Marine Biol. Assoc. United Kingdom 31:277-286. Atwood, H. L. 1963a. Investigations on excitation and contraction in crustacean muscles. Ph.D. Thesis. The University of Glasgow. Atwood, H. L. 19366. Differences in muscle fibre properties as a factor in "fast" and "slow" contraction in Carcinus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 10:17-31. Atwood, H. L. 1963c. "Fast" and "slow" responses in Nephrops. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 10:77-81. Atwood, H. L. 1965a. Characteristics of fibers in the extensor muscle of a crab. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 14:205-207. CRUSTACEAN NEUROMUSCULAR MECHANISMS 551 In E. Florey, (ed.) Nervous inhibitions. PerAtwood, H. L. 19656. Excitation and inhibition in gamon Press, Oxford. crab muscle fibres. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 16: 409-426. Gruener, R. P., and B. C. Abbott. 1965. A comparative study of tonic and phasic muscle fiber Atwood, H. L., and B. S. Dorai Raj. 1964. Tension responses to a soluble relaxing factor. Comp. Biodevelopment and membrane responses in phasic chem. Physiol. 14:405-412. and tonic muscle fibres of a crab. J. Cell Comp. Physiol. 64:55-72. Hagiwara, S., and K. Naka. 1964. The initiation of spike potential in barnacle muscle fibers under Atwood, H. L., and Hoyle, G. 1965. A further study low intracellular Ca. J. Gen. Physiol. 48:141-162. of the paradox phenomenon of crustacean muscle. J. Physiol. 181: 225-234. Hagiwara, S., and K. Takahashi. 1967. Surface density of calcium ions and calcium spikes in Atwood, H. L., G. Hoyle, and T. Smyth. 1965. the barnacle muscle fiber membrane. J. Gen. Electrical and mechanical responses of single inPhysiol. 50:583-602. nervated crab-muscle fibres. J. Physiol. 180:449482. Hagopian, M. 1966. The myofilament arrangement in the femoral muscle of the cockroach, LeucoAtwood, H. L., I. Parnas, and C. A. G. Wiersma. phaea maderne Fabricius. J. Cell Biol. 28:545-562. 1967. Inhibition in crustacean phasic neuromuscular systems. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 20: Hess, A. 1965. The sarcoplasmic reticulum, the T system, and the motor terminals of slow and 163-177. twitch muscle fibers in the garter snake. J. Cell Boistel, J., and P. Fatt. 1958. Membrane permeaBiol. 26:467-476. bility change during inhibitory transmitter acHodgkin, A. L., and P. Horowicz. 1960. Poassium tion in crustacean muscle. J. Physiol. 144:176191. contractures in single muscle fibers. J. Physiol. 153:386-403. Buller, A. J., J. C. Ecdes, and R. M. Eccles. 1960a. Differentiation of fast and slow muscles in the Hoyle, G., P. A. McNeill, and B. Walcott. 1966. Nature of invaginating tubules in Felderstruktur cat hind limb. J. Physiol. 150:399-416. muscles fibers of the garter snake. J. Cell Biol. Buller, A. J., J. C. Eccles, and R. M. Eccles. 19606. 30:197-201. Interactions between motoneurones and muscles in respect of the characteristic speeds of their Hoyle, G., and C. A. G. Wiersma. 1958a. Excitation at neuromuscular junctions in Crustacea. J. responses. J. Physiol. 150:417-439. Physiol. 143:402-425. Cohen, M. J. 1963. Muscle fibres and efferent nerves in a crustacean receptor muscle. Quart. Hoyle, G., and C. A. G. Wiersma. 19586. Inhibition at neuromuscular junctions in Crustacea. J. J. Microscop. Sci. 104:551-559. Physiol. 143:426-440. Dorai Raj, B. S. 1964. Diversity of crab muscle fibers innervated by a single motor axon. J. Hoyle, G., and C. A. G. Wiersma. 1958c. Coupling of membrane potential to contraction in crustacean Cell. Comp. Physiol. 64.41-54. muscles. J. Physiol. 143:441-453. Dudel, J. 1965a. The mechanism of presynaptic inhibition at the crayfish neuromuscular junc- Huxley, A. F., and R. Niedergerke. 1954. Interfertion. Pfliigers Arch. Ges. Physiol. 284:66-80. ence microscopy of living muscle fibers. Nature 173:971-973. Dudel, J. 19656. The action of inhibitory drugs on nerve terminals in crayfish muscle. Pfiiigers Arch. Huxley, H. E., and J. Hanson. 1957. Preliminary Ges. Physiol. 284:81-94. observations on the structure of insect flight muscle. Proc. Stockholm Conf. on Electron MicroDudel, J., and S. W. KufHer. 1961a. The quantal scopy. 1956. (Uppsala): 202-204. Almquist and nature of transmission and spontaneous miniaWilksell, Stockholm: Academic Press, New York. ture potentials at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J. Physiol. 155:514-529. Jahromi. S. S., and H. L. Atwood. 1967. UltraDudel, J., and S. W. Kuffler, 19616. Mechanism of structural features of crayfish phasic and tonic facilitation at the crayfish neuromuscular juncmuscle fibers. Canad. J. Zool. (In press). tion. J. Physiol. 155:530-542. Jasper, H. H., and A. Pezard. 1934. Relation entre Dudel, j . , and S. W. Kuffler. 1961c. Presynaptic inla rapidite d'un muscle strie et sa structure hishibition at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. tologique. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 198: 499-501. J. Physiol. 155:543-562. Fatt, P., and B. Katz. 1952. Spontaneous sublhresh- Kennedy, D., and W. H. Evoy. 1966. The distribuold activity at motor nerve endings. J. Physiol. tion or pre- and postsynaptic inhibition at crus117:109-128. tacean neuromuscular junctions. J. Gen. Physiol. 49:457-468. Fatt, P., and B. Katz. 1953a. The electrical properties of crustacean muscle fibers. J. Physiol. 120: Kennedy, D., W. H. Evoy, and H. L. Fields. 1966. 171-204. The unit basis of some crustacean reflexes. Symp. Soc. Exptl. Biol. 20: (in press). Fatt, P., and B. Katz. 19536. The effect of inhibitory nerve impulses on a crustacean muscle fibre. J. Kennedy, D. and K. Takeda. 1965a. Reflex control Physiol. 121:374-389. of abdominal flexor muscles in the crayfish-I. The twitch system. J. Exptl. Biol. 43:211-227. Florey, E., and G. Hoyle. 1961. Neuromuscular synaptic activity in the crab (Cancer magister). Kennedy, D., and K. Takeda. 19656. Reflex con- 552 HAROLD L. ATWOOD trol of abdominal flexor muscles in the crayfish. II. The tonic system. J. Exptl. Biol. 43:229-246. Kravitz, E. A., S. W. Kuffler, and D. D. Potter. 1963. Camma aminobutyric acid and othtr blocking compounds in Crustacea. III. Their relative concentrations in separated motor and inhibitory axons. J. Neurophysiol. 26:739-751. Kuffller, S. W., and E. M. Vaughan Williams. 1953a. Small-nerve junctional potentials: The distribution of small motor nerves to frog skeletal muscle, and the membrane characteristics of the fibres they innervate. J. Physiol. 121:289-317. Kuffler, S. W., and E. M. Vaughan Williams, 1953b. Properties of the "slow" skeletal muscle fibers of the frog. J. Physiol. 121:318-340. Lucas, K. 1917. On summation of propagated disturbances in the claw of Aslactis and on the double neuromuscular system of the adductor. J. Physiol. 51:1-35. Marmont, G., and C. A. G. Wiersina. 1938. On the mechanism of inhibition and excitation of crayfish muscle. J. Physiol. 121:318-340. Orkand, R. K., 1962. The relation between membrane potential and contraction in single crustacean muscle fibres. J. Physiol. 161:143-159. Ozeki, M., A. R. Freeman, and H. Grundfest. 1966a. The membrane components of crustacean neuromuscular systems. I. Immunity of different electrogenic components to tetrodotoxin and saxitoxin. J. Gen. Physiol. 49: 1319-1334. Ozeki, M., A. R. Freeman, and H. Grundfest. 1966b. The membrane components of crustacean neuromuscular systems. II. Analysis of interactions among the electrogenic components. J. Gen. Physiol. 49:1335-1349. Ozeki, M., and H. Grundfest. 1967. Crayfish muscle fiber: ionic requirements for depolarizing synaptic electrogenesis. Science 155:478-481. Page, S. G. 1965. A comparison of the fine structures of frog slow and twitch muscle fibres. J. Cell Biol. 26:477-498. Parnas, I., and H. L. Atwood. 1966. Phasic and tonic neuromuscular systems in the abdominal extensor muscles of the crayfish and rock lobster. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 18:701-723. Rueben, J. P., P. W. Brandt, H. Garcia, and H. Grundfest. 1967. Excitation-contraction coupling in crayfish. Am. Zoologist 7:623-645. Selverston, A. I. 1967. Structure and function of the transverse tubular system in crustacean muscle fillers. Am. Zoologist 7:515-525. Smith, D. S., B. L. Gupta, and U. Smith. 1966. The organization and myofilament array of insect vis- ceral muscles. J. Cell Sci. 1:49-57. Takeuchi, A., and N. Takeuchi. 1964. The effect on crayfish muscle of ionophoretically applied glutamate. J. Physiol. 170: 296-317. Takeuchi, A., and N. Takeuchi. 1965. Localized action of gamma-aminobutyric acid on the crayfish muscle. J. Physiol. 117:225-238. Takeuchi, A., and N. Takeuchi. 1966a. A study of the inhibitory action of -y-aminobutyric acid on neuromuscular transmission in the crayfish. J. Physiol. 183:418-432. Takeuchi, A., and N. Takeuchi. 19666. On the permeability of the presynaptic terminal of the crayfish neuromuscular junction during syiiaptic inhibition and the action of -y-aminobutyric acid. J. Physiol. 183:433-449. Usherwood, P. N. R., and H. Grundfest. 1965. Peripheral inhibition in skeletal muscles of insects. J. Neurophysiol. 28:497-518. Van Harreveld, A. 1939. The nerve supply of doubly and triply innervated crayfish muscles related to their function. J. Comp. Neurol. 70: 267-284. Wiersma, C. A. G. 1955. An analysis of the functional differences between the contractions of the adductor muscles in the thoracic legs of the lobster Homarus vulgaris L. Arch. N£erl. Zool. 11:1-13. Wiersma, C. A. G. 1961. The neuromuscular system. In T. H. Waterman, (ed.), The physiology of Crustacea, II. Academic Press, New York. Wiersma, C. A. G., and A. C. Bobbert. 1961. Membrane potential changes on activation in crustacean muscle fibers. Acta Physiol. Pharmacol. Neerl. 10:51-72. Wiersma, C. A. G., and C. H. Ellis. 1942. A comparative study of peripheral inhibition in decapod crustaceans. J. Exptl. Biol. 18:223-236. Wiersma, C. A. G., and A. Van Harreveld. 1938. The influence of the frequency of stimulation on the slow and the fast contraction in crustacean muscle. Physiol. Zool. 11:75-81. Wiersma, C. A. G., and A. Van Harreveld. 1939. The interactions of the slow and the fast contraction of crustacean muscle. Physiol. Zool. 12: 43-49. Wilson, D. M., and W. J. Davis. 1965. Nerve impulse patterns and reflex control in the motor system of the crayfish claw. J. Exptl. Biol. 43: 193-210. Zachar, J., and D. Zacharova. 1966. Potassium contractures in single muscle fibres of the crayfish, J. Physiol. 186:596-618.