* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download neuron - UC San Diego
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Magnesium transporter wikipedia , lookup
Cell nucleus wikipedia , lookup
Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup
Cell membrane wikipedia , lookup
Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup
Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup
Cell growth wikipedia , lookup
Tissue engineering wikipedia , lookup
Programmed cell death wikipedia , lookup
Cell culture wikipedia , lookup
Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup
Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup
Neuroanatomical Techniques General avenues in neuroanatomy • Descriptive neuroanatomy: – What does a structure (cell/cell group/nucleus) look like? – Where is a structure localized? – Which neuron connects with what? • Functional neuroanatomy – What structure is associated with what function? – How does manipulation, injury, disease and experience influence the structure and connectivity of the nervous system? Objectives • • • • Short history of modern neuroanatomy Histochemical stains Neuronal and axonal tracing Immmunohistochemistry & in situ hybridization • Genetic labeling of cells and connections History of modern neuroanatomy Rudolf Albert von Kölliker (1817-1905) nucleus of Kölliker (Rexed lamina X), continuity of axon and neuron Heinrich Wilhelm Gottfried Waldeyer (1837-1921) Introduced the term “neuron” and “chromosome” Camilio Golgi (1843-1926) Golgi method; Golgi cells; Golgi apparatus; Golgi tendon organ; Golgi-Mazzoni corpuscle Santiago Ramon y Cajal (1852-1934) Cajal's gold-sublimate method for astrocytes horizontal cell of Cajal (Retzius-Cajal cell in cortex) interstitial nucleus of Cajal Common immunohistochemical stains • • • • • • Golgi: sparse, but random Hematoxylin/Eosin: cell stain Nissl (thionin): cell body stain Kluver Barrera: mixed cell fiber stain Weil: myelinated fiber stain Acetycholine-esterase; cytochrome oxidase Golgi Stain Jim Conner, UCSD Nissl (thionin) stain Brainmaps.org Brain-map.org Cytochrome oxidase Adams, Sincich and Horton, J Neuroscience 2007 “Metabolic marker” Mitochondria in dendrites and somata Anterograde and Retrograde Tracing • Anterograde tracing: identification of projections – Uptake of the tracer by cell body – Transport along axon – Axon is labeled • Retrograde tracing: identification of the cells that give rise to afferent projections – Injection of tracer in fiber tract, terminal field or peripheral target – Uptake of the tracer by axons – Cell body is labeled • Anterograde tracing: identification of projections – Uptake of the tracer by cell bodies (1 or many) – Transport along axon/s – Axon/s labeled • Retrograde tracing: identification of the cells that give rise to afferent projections – Injection of tracer in fiber tract, terminal field or peripheral target – Uptake of the tracer by axons – Cell bodies labeled (1 or many) Retrograde labeling with HRP First introduced by Kristensson & Olsson (1971) LaVail & LaVail (1972) Spinal cord motor neurons 1: 40 µm (TMB) 2: 1 µm (TMB) 3: 7 µm (TMB) 4: 7 µm (DAB) Van der Want et al.1997 Brief History of Tracing • Degeneration techniques: – Anterograde: Wallerian degeneration Silver impregnation methods: Nauta 1950, Nauta and Gygax 1954, Fink and Heimer 1967 – Retrograde chromatolysis (disintegration of Nissl bodies as a result of injury/disease) • Autoradiography: anterograde transport of radioactive amino acids (Grafstein, 1967) • Retrograde transport of HRP (horseradish peroxidase) (Kristensson & Olsson, 1971) Fink-Heimer stain (Heimer 1999) Chromatolysis Normal (10x) Diseased (20x) Anterior horn motor neurons http://cclcm.ccf.org/vm/VM_cases/neuro_cases_PNS_muscle.htm Anterograde tracing with radioactive amino acids First introduced by Grafstein (1967) A: terminal field B: white matter tract Edwards and Hendrickson in: Neuroanatomical tract tracing (Transneuronal) anterograde tracing with radioactive amino acids Uptake Mechanisms • Active uptake: – Lectins bind to sugar moieties of membrane glycoproteins – Uptake at nerve terminals – Uptake by fibers of passage • Passive incorporation: lipophilic substances • Intracellular injection Types of tracers • Lipophilic dyes: DiI, DiO, DiA • Dextran conjugates: BDA, fluororuby… • Lectins: WGA(wheat germ agglutinin), PHA-L (Phaseolus vulgaris leuco-agglutinin) • Bacterial toxins: CTB (cholera toxin beta subunit) • Biocyctin • Viruses: pseudorabies, GFP recombinant viruses… • Retrograde tracers: FB, DiY, Fluorogold, Microspheres • (Transgenic animals) Application of tracers • Pressure injection: glass micropipette Hamilton syringe • Iontophorestic injection: charged tracers – Extracellular and intracellular application – Electrophysiological measurements can be taken before tracer application • Dye Crystals: Carbocyanic dyes, WGA-HRP Transport • Diffusion in membrane: – DiI, DiO, DiA – Slow, dependent on temperature, fixation • Active transport through vesicles – Faster, up to 2 cm/day – HRP & CTB stay in vesicles-granular appearance – PHA-L, FB better cell morphology • Intracellular diffusion Detection • Fluorescence • Enzyme reaction: HRP (WGA-HRP, CTBHRP) • Antibodies • Streptavidin-HRP conjugate for biotinylated tracers e.g. BDA, biocytin Lectins and Toxins • High affinity to specific sugars • Bind to glycoproteins on membrane and are internalized – WGA: wheat germ agglutinin – PHA-L: Phaseolus vulgaris leuco-agglutinin – Concavalin A, agglutinins from soy bean, lens, rhicinus… – CTB: cholera toxin beta subunit – Tetanus toxin fragment C • Unmodified, biotinylated or conjugated to HRP or fluorophors WGA-HRP • Retrograde, anterograde and transneuronal transport • Very fast transport: – retrograde: 100 mm/day – anterograde: 300 mm/day • Disadvantages: • wide diffusion • artefact • Tissue is fragile due to need of weak fixation Cholera Toxin beta subunit (CTB) • Retrograde, anterograde and transganglionic • Detection: antibody, HRP conjugate, conjugated to fluorophor • Application: 1 % aqueous solution, iontophoresis or pressure injection • Different efficiency in labeling among different neuronal populations and species PHA-L • • • • • • Mostly anterograde Application: 2.5%, iontophoresis Detection: immunohistochemically Highly sensitive Long transport times (2-7 weeks) Not very effective in old animals Anterograde tracing with PHA-L Nigrostriatal projections Gerfen et al. in: Neuroanatomical tract tracing Lipophilic Carbocyanine Dyes • DiI, DiO, DiA: differ in exc/ems wavelengths • Anterograde and retrograde transport • Can be used in vivo (DiI & DiA) and in fixed tissue (DiI & DiO) for post-mortem labeling • Best choice for fixed tissue: slow diffusion (2 mm/month) • Non-toxic • Slice cultures, cell labeling in vitro, time lapse videomicroscopy Lipophilic Carbocyanine Dyes A. DiI label from corpus callosum, Hoechst counterstain B. DiI (orange) callosal & DiA (green) striatal projection neurons From: Vercelli et al. 2000 Labeling of radial glia Thanos et al. 2000 Dextran amines • • • • Polysaccharides Soluble in water Molecular weights from 3,000 -100,000 kD Anterograde and retrograde transport: uptake by lesioned fibers and cells • One of the best tracers • Conjugated either to biotin or Fluorophores – – – – BDA (biotinylated dextran amine) FR: Fluororuby (tetramethyl rhodamine DA) Fluoro-emerald (fluorescein conjugated DA) Alexa-dye conjugated DA (488, 594, 632...) Biotinylated dextran amine (BDA) • • • • • • Anterograde and retrograde transport Highly sensitive and detailed Iontophoretic and pressure injection Visualization using ABC and DAB Anterograde: MW 10,000 kD Retrograde: MW 3,000 kD (in sodium citrate -HCl pH 3) BDA Reiner et al. 2000 Biocytin/Neurobiotin • Application: 5% solution, pressure injection or iontophoresis • Fast degradation-short survival time 2-3 days • Mostly anterograde transport • Requires glutaraldehyde fixation Fluorogold • Application : 1-10%, pressure injection or iontophoresis • Retrogradely transported • Often granular appearance of labeled cell somata • Antibodies against Fluorogold available • Exc.: 325 nm, emm.:440 nm • Labeling for extended time: several months • Long-term toxicity Fluorogold Fluorescence Immunolabeling Naumann et al. 2000 Cell Filling with Lucifer Yellow Layer V Corticospinal neurons Ling Wang, UCSD Choosing the Right Tracer • Points to consider: – Anterograde or retrograde tracing – Transport time – Efficient transport in investigated system: • Age of animal, species and neuronal population – – – – – Complete cell filling necessary Compatibility with double labeling/ electrophysiology Stability of labeling Spread of tracer at the injection site Cost? In situ Hybridization Method of localizing, either mRNA within the cytoplasm or DNA within the chromosomes, by hybridizing the sequence of interest to a complimentary strand of a nucleotide probe. In situ Hybridization Karin Loew, UCSD Dark grains= mRNA; blue= counterstain In situ Hybridization (bright field detection methods) Allen Brain Atlas http://www.brain-map.org Multiplex mRNA detection Dave Kosman (Ethan Bier and Bill McGinnis labs, UC San Diego) http://superfly.ucsd.edu/%7Edavek/images/quad.html • Specificity of probe Controls – Sequence analysis – Testing by Northern blot • Negative controls: – – – – RNase treatment pre-hybridization Addition of an excess of unlabeled probe Hybridization with sense probe Tissue known not to express the gene of interest • Positive Controls: – Comparison with protein product – Comparison to probes hybridizing to different part of the same mRNA – Tissue known to express the gene of interest – Poly dT probe or housekeeping gene to check RNA integrity Immunohistochemistry • Fixation: formalin, paraformaldehyde, glutaraldehyde • ± parafinn embedding • Tissue cutting: cryostat, sliding microtome, vibratome • Tissue penetration: mild detergents • Blocking of unspecific binding • Primary antibody binding • Secondary antibody for detection Detection Methods • Horseradisch peroxidase: – PAP (peroxidase anti peroxidase) – ABC (avidin-biotin-complex) method: • secondary antibody is biotinylated, • detection with streptavidin-HRP complex • Alkaline phosphatase – APAAP (alkaline phosphatase anti-alkaline phosphatase • TSA (tyramide signal amplification) method =CSA (catalyzed signal amplification) • Fluorescence BAC-transgenic mice expressing GFP or CRE under the control of a gene specific promoter Expression patterns can be due to promoter and/or ‘positional effects’ Transgenic “Golgi” stains • Crossing of YFP mice with transgenics or KO or conditional KO Combining cell type specificity with tracing and molecular ‘anatomy’ Example: DRD4…’experiment’ Viruses • Replication in/competent neurotropic viruses: – HSV – Pseudorabies • Multisynaptic retrograde tracing • Highly sensitive as viruses can replicate after infection • Pathways over several orders of synapses can be followed depending on the survival time • Cell type specific promoters