Download PDF - World Allergy Organization Journal

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Epigenetics in learning and memory wikipedia , lookup

Point mutation wikipedia , lookup

Ridge (biology) wikipedia , lookup

Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Copy-number variation wikipedia , lookup

Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup

NEDD9 wikipedia , lookup

Long non-coding RNA wikipedia , lookup

Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Saethre–Chotzen syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Gene wikipedia , lookup

Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of neurodegenerative diseases wikipedia , lookup

Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup

Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

The Selfish Gene wikipedia , lookup

Mir-92 microRNA precursor family wikipedia , lookup

Gene desert wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

Gene nomenclature wikipedia , lookup

Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of diabetes Type 2 wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup

Helitron (biology) wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Shoda et al. World Allergy Organization Journal 2015, 8(Suppl 1):A176
http://www.waojournal.org/content/8/S1/A176
MEETING ABSTRACT
Open Access
Gene expression profiles of mucosal biopsy
specimens in children with eosinophilic gastritis
Tetsuo Shoda1*, Ichiro Nomura1, Akio Matsuda1, Kyoko Futamura1, Kanami Orihara1, Hideaki Morita1,
Katsuhiro Arai1, Hirotaka Shimizu1, Masami Narita1, Yukihiro Ohya1, Yoshiyuki Yamada2, Hirohisa Saito1,
Kenji Matsumoto1
From 3rd WAO International Scientific Conference (WISC) 2014
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 6-9 December 2014
Background
Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGID) are clinicopathologically characterized by massive eosinophilic
infiltration into the gastrointestinal tract and are classified into eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), gastritis (EG),
gastroenteritis, enteritis and colitis according to the site
of infiltration. Studies of the pathogenic mechanism of
EoE, whose incidence and prevalence are increasing in
Western countries, revealed that eotaxin-3 plays a crucial role in inducing selective recruitment of eosinophils
into the esophageal epithelium. In contrast, the pathogenic mechanism of EG remains obscure. In order to elucidate whether EG’s pathogenic mechanism is similar to
that of EoE, we performed transcriptome analysis of gastric biopsy specimens from EG patients and compared
the identified gene signature to the previous microarray
data for EoE patients (J Clin Invest, 116:536-47, 2006).
Methods
We enrolled pediatric EG patients (n = 5) and agematched controls (n = 5) who, after we obtained
informed consent from their guardians, underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy due to clinical symptoms. EG
was diagnosed on the basis of ≥30 eosinophils/HPF, limited to the stomach, according to Lwin’s criteria (Modern Pathology 24:556-63, 2011). The gene expression
profiles of the gastric biopsies were assessed using
microarray technology with Agilent SurePrint G3
Human GE 8 × 60k. The differentially expressed genes
of EG and EoE were compared by systematic analysis
using the NextBio search engine.
Results
Of 42,545 transcripts represented on the microarray,
2,282 were differentially expressed between the EG and
control samples (≥2 fold change and adjusted p-value of
<0.05). In agreement with a previous study on EoE
patients, eotaxin-3 was the most upregulated (>2,000fold) gene compared with the control subjects. Of the
2,282 transcripts composing the EG-related gene signature, 58, including eotaxin-3, were identified as commonly upregulated genes in EoE.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that eotaxin-3 plays a crucial effector role in the pathogenesis of EG as well as EoE. On
the other hand, 97.5% of the gene signature we identified for EG was distinct from that previously identified
for EoE, suggesting that distinct mechanisms may be
involved in the pathogenesis of EG and EoE.Background
Authors’ details
1
National Research Institute for Child Health & Development, Japan. 2Gunma
Children’s Medical Center, Japan.
Published: 8 April 2015
doi:10.1186/1939-4551-8-S1-A176
Cite this article as: Shoda et al.: Gene expression profiles of mucosal
biopsy specimens in children with eosinophilic gastritis. World Allergy
Organization Journal 2015 8(Suppl 1):A176.
1
National Research Institute for Child Health & Development, Japan
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
© 2015 Shoda et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://
creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.