Download A Comparison of Concentration Methods for Low Copy Number

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Mutation wikipedia , lookup

DNA barcoding wikipedia , lookup

DNA sequencing wikipedia , lookup

DNA repair wikipedia , lookup

Molecular evolution wikipedia , lookup

Agarose gel electrophoresis wikipedia , lookup

Comparative genomic hybridization wikipedia , lookup

Replisome wikipedia , lookup

Maurice Wilkins wikipedia , lookup

Nucleosome wikipedia , lookup

DNA profiling wikipedia , lookup

SNP genotyping wikipedia , lookup

Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup

Transformation (genetics) wikipedia , lookup

Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup

Real-time polymerase chain reaction wikipedia , lookup

Molecular cloning wikipedia , lookup

Nucleic acid analogue wikipedia , lookup

Gel electrophoresis of nucleic acids wikipedia , lookup

Bisulfite sequencing wikipedia , lookup

Cre-Lox recombination wikipedia , lookup

Community fingerprinting wikipedia , lookup

Deoxyribozyme wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
A COMPARISON OF CONCENTRATION METHODS FOR LOW COPY NUMBER FORENSIC DNA
ANALYSIS
Aaron LeFebvre PhD, Sheri Ayers MS, Rick Staub PhD, Sid Sinha
Orchid Cellmark Inc., 13988 Diplomat Dr., Suite 100, Farmers Branch, TX 75234
A commonly encountered hurdle in the processing of forensic DNA samples is the amount of
DNA available for STR genotyping. This can be a function of either the sample itself, the
collection of DNA from the sample, or the DNA extraction process. Standard low copy number
(LCN) DNA typing techniques are typically performed as part of, or following, the amplification
process. These include but are not limited to: increased amplification cycles, reduced
amplification reaction volumes, increased injection voltage and/or time, and post-amplification
purification. Due to the relatively small amount of input DNA utilized in amplification of LCN
samples these methods are highly controversial as a result of stochastic effects which
complicate the data analysis interpretation process. However, LCN typing techniques may be
avoided or reduced by improved processes prior to amplification of purified DNA such as
improved sample storage, DNA collection, DNA extraction, or concentration of extracted DNA.
In the study presented, several commonly used methods of DNA concentration were tested
including MilliporeTM Amicon-Ultra centrifugal filters, sample dry-down to specific volumes,
sample dry-down and re-suspension, ethanol precipitation, and polyethylene glycol
precipitation. Furthermore, the use of different carrier molecules were evaluated (i.e. carrier
RNA, non-human carrier DNA) to determine their utility in each method and to what degree
they influenced recovery of LCN DNA. Finally, the ability of each technique to effectively
concentrate degraded DNA was tested. A comparison of percentage recovery and increase in
final DNA yield and concentration was performed in order to determine the best approach for
processing low-level DNA samples prior to amplification, thereby minimizing or eliminating
stochastic effects a priori.