* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download inglés332.92 kb
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit email controversy wikipedia , lookup
Heaven and Earth (book) wikipedia , lookup
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
Soon and Baliunas controversy wikipedia , lookup
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Climate resilience wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Canada wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Views on the Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Business action on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Political Positioning for the Negotiations on a New Global Climate Agreement The Global Network of Civil Society Organisations for Disaster Reduction (GNDR) Latin America and the Caribbean Region 6 November 2015 Introduction Between 30 November and 11 December 2015, Paris will host a new round of negotiations of the Conference of the Parties (COP) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Here, there will be an attempt to agree on a new global climate agreement for the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that will supersede the failed Kyoto Protocol. The Kyoto Protocol was agreed in 1994 with the primary objective of reducing emissions by 5% by the year 2012 compared with GHG emissions in 1990, something that in practice has not been achieved. Quite to the contrary, these emissions have risen since 1990 because efforts made by countries to modify their energy matrices and excessive consumption patterns have not matched commitments made at the UNFCCC. The current situation will have major structural implications. Therefore, the Global Network of Civil Society Organizations for Disaster Reduction (hereinafter referred to as GNDR), which is composed of more than 850 organisations from 137 countries, has decided to speak out in the face of increased climate change and the threats to the social and natural systems this implies. Events such as droughts, floods, rural / forest fires, the El Niño phenomenon, and hurricanes will very probably increase in frequency, intensity and date of occurrence. This will create a higher level of risk of disasters that mostly affect communities with high levels of exposure and technical, economic, environmental and social vulnerability. This document provides an overview of the process of the global negotiations on climate change, emphasising the current situation, which is of particular importance as it may lead to a new climate agreement with global implications. In addition, the document proposes the implementation of policies and adaptation measures on climate change aimed at the reduction of exposure and vulnerability. This is because these are the factors with the greatest relative weight regarding the risk of disasters and their impacts, which is one of the most important effects of climate variability and climate change. Finally, it summarises the political positioning of GNDR relative to the process of global climate negotiations and the challenge of the reversal of trends toward increasing the impact of disasters. Global Network of Civil Society Organisations for Disaster Reduction 8 Waldegrave Rd, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 8HT (United Kingdom) +44 (0)2089 777726 | [email protected] www.gndr.org I. Roadmap and current state of global negotiations of response to climate change Starting in 2007, a first period of crisis in global negotiations on climate change occurred, which at that time revolved around the so-called Bali roadmap. This was agreed to develop, agree and adopt a new global climate agreement on key themes, including financing, adaptation, the Kyoto Protocol, and technology transfer. Despite the fact that between the adoption of the Bali roadmap and the intersessional meeting held in Bangkok in October 2009, when significant progress was achieved in dozens of draft documents on thematic agreements, in the Copenhagen COP on December 15 of that year, these prior agreements were not taken into account when proposing the Copenhagen agreement, which also failed. Since that time, the process of negotiating a new global climate agreement has been conducted in a softened and diluted atmosphere that questions the multilateral character of the UNFCCC. A proof of this is the proposal of the above-mentioned Copenhagen Agreement for each country to provide its own emission reduction targets unilaterally. This idea then took hold with the agreement of the COP 20 in Lima, which aimed to have each country develop a report on Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs). This report had to contain a proposal for a reduction in emissions that had to consider the national capacities of each country, the National Approved Mitigation Actions (NAMAs), the national adaptation plans and the national communications on climate change. As things stand, the goals will depend on what each country considers appropriate in accordance with the corresponding studies. Even the year of reference used for calculating reductions is not yet standard; each country proposes what it most needs without necessarily being consistent with the ultimate objective of the UNFCCC. Therefore, the challenges to negotiation of a new global agreement not only mean the multilateral regime of the UNFCCC is weakened, but also that there are no parameters assumed for all the partners to calculate their emission reductions. Everything depends on their own criteria; in other words, on unilateral decisions taken by each country. In short, we are at a crucial time for defining the future of the UNFCCC and the roadmap for a response to climate change. This is partly because the goals for the reduction of GHG emissions are at stake. In addition, doors are opening to the adoption and implementation of policies and adaptation measures vital for reducing the risk of disasters, the impact of disasters and, at the same time, for promoting security and human dignity. This context is significant for reviewing the importance that the response, and especially adaptation to climate change, has for Latin America. This is happening in a context of continually growing risk and increasing impact of disasters, which demands the adoption of policies and priority measures for reducing the exposure and vulnerability of social and natural systems, given that weather hazards are already evident and cannot be reversed as efficiently as processes and social factors. Global Network of Civil Society Organisations for Disaster Reduction 8 Waldegrave Rd, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 8HT (United Kingdom) +44 (0)2089 777726 | [email protected] www.gndr.org II. The response to climate change must emphasise the reduction of exposure and vulnerability Regardless of whether the UNFCCC achieves its ultimate goal of maintaining an increase in temperature in the range of 1.5° to 2° C above pre-industrial levels, the situation of the broad strata of the population of Latin America and developing countries fully justifies the implementation of adaptation measures to high-risk conditions of prevailing disasters, even without taking climate change into account. According to consolidated statistics, between 1990 and 2011 the records of disasters in Latin America experienced a large increase from 1,773 records per year for the period of 1990-1995 to an astonishing average of 7,359 records per year in the period of 20072011, which implies an increase of 315%.1 Not all of this dynamic is due to climate change. Most of it stems from the configuration of human systems and, consequently, it is essential that the societies most affected by risk and disasters make compromises and develop actions to improve the conditions for human security and development levels in their societies. Only in this way you can we be assured that climate will not be a permanent and growing threat, given the current scenarios that show that GHG emissions, far from diminishing, have increased in the last few decades whilst the Kyoto Protocol has been in force. Paradoxically, these emissions have also generated a growing and widespread interest in negotiations for a new global climate agreement. In the face of this, it is important to underline the fact that, in the same way that there is no possible adaptation if we do not reduce emissions by at least 25% below 1990 levels by 2020, nor will there be if we do not address the underlying problems that are at the basis of exposure and vulnerability of the majority of the population of Latin America and the Caribbean. This involves addressing a series of sector-specific themes and assuming a sustainable development approach that is coherent and consistent with the efforts of adaptation. These sectors include agriculture, local capacity-building, housing, transportation, energy, environment, international relations, and the strengthening of local government, to mention the most important. III. The positioning of GNDR in the face of the ongoing process of negotiating a new global agreement in response to climate change Because of the reasons stated above, the GNDR region of Latin America and the Caribbean believes that there are five critical elements that must be revisited in the upcoming negotiations on a new global climate agreement. It is essential to: a. Demand a legally binding global climate agreement that will motivate developed countries to fulfil their prior commitments on emissions reduction, technology 1 OSSO Corporation and the United Nations Office for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR). Impact of disasters in Latin America and the Caribbean 1990-2011. Trends and statistics for 16 countries. Report. S. l. 2013. Global Network of Civil Society Organisations for Disaster Reduction 8 Waldegrave Rd, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 8HT (United Kingdom) +44 (0)2089 777726 | [email protected] www.gndr.org transfer, adaptation, finance and education, among others. Regardless of any new agreement to be adopted at the next COP in Paris, there are already commitments from developed countries to cooperate with developing countries to reduce the observed and projected impacts of climate, and these should not be ignored or replaced by the INDCs. On the contrary, these prior commitments should be restated in the new agreement, which must be legally binding, because otherwise adaptation to current and future climate is simply not feasible. The allocation of resources and the strengthening of national capacities for adaptation are essential, and require financial initiatives such as the Green Climate Fund, the Adaptation Fund, and any others that might be created, to respond to the reality of the most disaster-prone human settlements, while at the same time promoting working relationships with local government and non-governmental organisations with local capacity. b. Avoid the adoption of false solutions to climate change. Measures related to the carbon market, forest conservation, reforestation and everything related to preserving carbon in the soil are desirable for the purposes of financing, adaptation and risk reduction, but should not simply be taken without considering the priority for mitigation. What is important is that GHG emissions are reduced at source, that is, in the developed countries and in some developing countries with high emissions, for which reliable estimates can be obtained concerning the behaviour of the concentration of GHGs in the atmosphere. c. Require Latin American governments to present their commitments or Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) and, in other cases, to raise the bar in terms of their ambition levels. As detailed in Section I, countries have undertaken a series of commitments in terms of formulation and monitoring that were not honoured by a good number of Latin American countries that have not developed the necessary research processes to communicate their INDCs in a scientific way that would truly reflect the capabilities and workable compromises to be made by each country. This is why it is fundamental to the future of the UNFCCC and the fight against climate change to involve the control of organised civil society, both in each country and globally, during the final INDC negotiations. d. Monitor and stress that globally calculated INDCs should be consistent with the goals for mitigation identified by climate science. It has been estimated that developed countries must reduce their emissions by between 25% and 40% relative to 1990 levels by the year 2020; a goal very far from the 5% set by the Kyoto Protocol, and which will not be achieved by that date, given the global trends of increased emissions and GHG concentrations observed in the last two decades. This context poses a complex scenario for the upcoming negotiations, because it reflects resistance of the countries with the highest emissions to take responsibility for the goals defined by the scientific criteria. Consequently, this is one of the most sensitive points that should be dealt with by the new global agreement in response to climate change. Something that is absolutely essential is that, regardless of the range of emissions reduction, the ultimate goal should be to avoid an increase Global Network of Civil Society Organisations for Disaster Reduction 8 Waldegrave Rd, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 8HT (United Kingdom) +44 (0)2089 777726 | [email protected] www.gndr.org above 1.5 °C in global temperature by the year 2100 to avoid devastating effects on social and natural systems. e. Propose initiatives aimed at reducing exposure and vulnerability to the current and future climate in Latin America, and in developing countries in general. Without denying the importance of the reduction of GHG emissions for the mitigation of climate change, the fact is that what is needed is the fundamental transformation of tens of thousands of vulnerable human settlements throughout Latin America. Because of this, Latin American states must ensure adaptation becomes a central component of the new climate agreement, and that it be accorded the same level of priority as mitigation. There is no doubt that reality is already showing that the increase in the impact of disasters is linked primarily to the objective conditions of vulnerability and exposure to threats. By the same token, a scenario of accelerated climate change further justifies an intervention in these areas, especially considering that GHG emissions and climate change are in full flow. The climate change negotiations are at a critical stage that could define the future dynamics of climatic events. In the current scenario, an increase in climate threats can be forecast that will increasingly affect any social and natural systems that are not adapted to absorbing them without major traumatic effects. Global civil society is faced with the challenge of going beyond the role of mere observer in the negotiation process, and must effectively influence the contents of the new global agreement on climate change. This necessarily involves a higher level of knowledge, involvement, cohesion and dialogue with national governments and with decision-making mechanisms of the UNFCCC. A necessary step is the adoption of positions informed by scientific and traditional knowledge, combined with an advocacy strategy toward governments and negotiators from Latin American countries to form a common front in order to demand fundamental objectives for reducing GHG emissions and, above all, adaptation based on the reduction of exposure and vulnerability of the most disadvantaged human systems. Global Network of Civil Society Organisations for Disaster Reduction 8 Waldegrave Rd, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 8HT (United Kingdom) +44 (0)2089 777726 | [email protected] www.gndr.org