* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Genetic transfer and genome evolution in MRSA
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of diabetes Type 2 wikipedia , lookup
Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup
Ridge (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup
Copy-number variation wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
No-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) Genome Editing wikipedia , lookup
Transposable element wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Whole genome sequencing wikipedia , lookup
Gene desert wikipedia , lookup
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
Cre-Lox recombination wikipedia , lookup
Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
Genomic library wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Metagenomics wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup
Human Genome Project wikipedia , lookup
Human genome wikipedia , lookup
Helitron (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Genome editing wikipedia , lookup
Microbiology Comment provides a platform for readers of Microbiology to communicate their personal observations and opinions in a more informal way than through the submission of papers. Most of us feel, from time to time, that other authors have not acknowledged the work of our own or other groups or have omitted to interpret important aspects of their own data. Perhaps we have observations that, although not sufficient to merit a full paper, add a further dimension to one published by others. In other instances we may have a useful piece of methodology that we would like to share. The Editors hope that readers will take full advantage of this section and use it to raise matters that hitherto have been confined to a limited audience. Christopher M. Thomas, Editor-in-chief Genetic transfer and genome evolution in MRSA Whole genome sequences for a methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain (N315) and a vancomycin-resistant S. aureus strain (Mu50) have been reported recently (16), and a number of partial genome sequences for other MRSA strains are also available (1, 19, 20), allowing comparison of specific known sequences studied, and the frequency of mutations within them. Three regions of interest are the 16S–23S rDNA intergenic spacer region (ISR), the seven housekeeping genes used in multilocus sequence typing (MLST) (3) and the mecA gene. The purpose of this article is to suggest that the MRSA genome is subject to different mechanisms of evolution ; this suggestion is based on strain differences in these three regions. Variation in the type of ISR found in MRSA strains Interest in the ISR is due to its usefulness in bacterial typing (11) and the identification of highly conserved motifs within the ISR important for folding and for maturation of the rRNA transcripts (12). Early reports (5, 6) characterizing ISR sequences found a total of 10 different ISR types from three MRSA strains (H11, ATCC 33952 and D46). Whole genome sequence analysis from five other strains (N315, 252, Mu50, 8325 and COL) shown in Table 1a shows that (i) each of the ISR types found in the five whole genomes unambiguously matched one of the ISR types found earlier in strains H11, ATCC 33952 and D46 (5, 6) (no additional ISR types were found), (ii) some ISR types were present in some and absent in other strains (e.g. rrnA1 was only present in strain COL), (iii) some ISR types were present in different copy numbers in different strains (e.g. rrnC was absent in strain COL and two copies were present in strain N315) and (iv) there was a variation in the total number of ISR types between strains. Thus ISR type differences in the whole genomes from the five strains listed in Table 1a can be accounted for by the presence or absence of the 10 ISR types characterized earlier (5, 6). Sequence variation within ISR types between MRSA strains A further contribution to differences in ISRs between the whole genomes of the five strains is from single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between identical ISR types when in an individual strain (see Table 1a), e.g. 10\546 (rrnA1), 3\473 (rrnC), 6\469 (rrnE), 7\460 (rrnF), 3\362 (rrnH) and 2\335 (rrnJ). Additionally, differences between alleles of the same ISR type may occur within different strains [e.g. rrnA1 (COL), rrnC (N315), rrnJ (33952 and H11)]. In a previous study a ‘ T ’ at nt 162 of rrnE was found in 92 % of MRSA strains (7) ; this ‘ T ’ was found in rrnA1 of COL and rrnE of H11, 252 and A48074 but not in strains Mu50 and N315. Two copies of the same ISR type that differ by a single nucleotide difference isolated from one strain could be explained by (i) the presence of different alleles in the one genome or (ii) possibly by the occurrence of different bacterial cells with different ISR types within the one culture of one strain. Thus, further strain differences are reflected in SNPs within strain- Microbiology 147, December 2001 Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 18:54:12 specific ISR types. It can be seen that the ISR, a constant and possibly obligatory part of the genome, is genetically dynamic and subject to homogenization, consistent with concerted evolution (5, 9, 10), which is only possible because multiple copies of it occur in the one genome. Sequence variation within seven housekeeping genes MLST (sequencing and subsequent mutation detection of parts of seven housekeeping, i.e. essential, genes) represents a portable, precise and sensitive method for typing MRSA strains (3). The sequence data for parts of the seven housekeeping genes from the whole genome sequences of the five strains listed in Table 1b is included as a standard because of the easy availability of MLST data for a large number of MRSA isolates (3). When the five genomes are compared, the total number of SNPs (31\2645) in all ISR types (Table 1a) is similar to the total number of SNPs (43\3818) found in the seven housekeeping genes (Table 1b). In contrast to the ISR, only one copy of each housekeeping gene is found on each whole genome. Thus, the mechanisms for genetic change are likely to be different to those with ISRs. M GUIDELINES Communications should be in the form of letters and should be brief and to the point. A single small Table or Figure may be included, as may a limited number of references (cited in the text by numbers, and listed in alphabetical order at the end of the letter). A short title (fewer than 50 characters) should be provided. Approval for the publication rests with the Editor-in-Chief, who reserves the right to edit letters and\or to make a brief reply. Other interested persons may also be invited to reply. The Editors of Microbiology do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in Microbiology Comment. Contributions should be addressed to the Editor-in-Chief via the Editorial Office. 3195 Microbiology Comment Table 1. Comparison of SNPs found in 18 alleles from the whole genome sequences of five MRSA strains ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Only those nucleotide positions (written directly below the ISR type or gene designation) that vary between strains are listed – all other nucleotides are identical between strains.The early ISR sequence nomenclature (6) has been used and is recommended in further work on rrns. Strains H11 and ATCC 33952 isolated from the Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre show further differences (strains ATCC 33592 and H11, rrnF at nt 443 and 453, rrnH at nt 8 and 24, and rrnJ at nt 15, 30, 34 and 151 ; strain H11 only has differences at nt 24 and 344 of rrnE). The nucleotide numbering for the ISR is according to the alignment in Gu$ rtler & Barrie (6). The ISR sequence block designations (6) are shown directly below the sequences. Black shading indicates the absence of the entire ISR type within the whole genome sequence of that strain. A dot indicates identity to the top nucleotide in each column ; k indicates absence of the nucleotide, allele or ISR region and j indicates the presence of the whole sequence region or ISR type (e.g. VS5 and rrnA, G, K and L respectively). The MLST housekeeping genes are shown with numbering according to Enright et al. (3). The nucleotide numbering for the coding sequence of the mecA gene is according to GenBank X52593. The mecA sequence from strain COL is identical to mecA from S. sciuri (GenBank SSK8MECA) and the mecA sequence from strain Mu50 is identical to the mecA sequences from S. epidermidis (GenBank SEMECAPB) and MRSA strain 8325 (GenBank SAMECAPB). (a) 16S–23S rDNA ISR Strain rrnA1 Length (nt) … 546 Position … 114444555 2565678011 4727624079 N315‡¶ 252§ Mu50‡¶ 8325§ COL‡§ CGTATAAAGC TACGGGCTAA cvvvvvvvvv SSSSSSSSSS 1226666666 rrnC 473 rrnE 469 rrnF 460 rrnH 362 rrnJ 335 4 223 563 1 1 1 2V 95676S 072515 44455 7813922 9801568 44 422 367 3 48 36 GAC ..T TC. ..T TACAAj .....j AGTGG.....j .....j TC. TC. ccv SSS 115 T-- iicvvvv llSSSSS ee25666 (b) Single copy genes – seven housekeeping genes and mecA Strain arcC aroE glp Length (nt) … 570 536 576 Position … N315¶ 252§ Mu50¶ 8325§ COL§ rrnG* rrnK* rrnL* CTA CTA CTA cvv SSS 155 Copy no.† CA 5 .- 3 5 G-TTTTA AACGCGG vvvvvv SSSSSS 122235 rrnA* j j T. 5 7 cc SS 12 gmk 488 pta 575 tpi 475 yqiL 598 mecA 2002 122223 245315562 314484568 1112345 3580581 35002739 1134 3484 4177 1334444 7360035 7465680 1234 33243 33925 223 057 428 1123345 2323673 3178820 7 73 59 CCAGTCACA .TGAATGTG ......... .T...TGT. GT...TGT. CGTATCGC .A.GCA.T ........ A.A...A. R TCGC ATAT .... .... .... TTTCAGT ...TGAC ....... CCATG.. CCATG.. AGGAA GAACG ..... ...C. ...C. TCA CT. ... .TT. .TT GTAGCTT AC.AT.A ....... ..GAT.A ..GATCA CG A. A. A. AA * There are no SNPs in ISR types rrnA, G, K and L. ISR types rrnA, K and L are present in strain ATCC 33592 and ISR type rrnG is present in strain H11. † The total number of ISR types found in the genome of each strain : there are seven and five for strains ATCC 33592 and H11, respectively. ‡ Strain N315 has two copies of ISR types rrnC and rrnE ; Mu50 has two copies of ISR type rrnE and COL has two copies of ISR types rrnA1 [A48073 in Gu$ rtler (5)] and rrnH. § Taken from the partially completed whole genome sequences of strains COL (20), 8325 (1) and 252 (EMRSA-16) (19). R The aroE sequence for strain COL was unavailable. ¶ Taken from the full genome sequences of strains N315 (methicillin-resistant) and Mu50 (vancomycin-resistant) reported in Kuroda et al. (16). 3196 Microbiology 147, December 2001 Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 18:54:12 Microbiology Comment The mecA gene has less nucleotide differences than other MRSA sequences The mecA gene is located on the staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCC) which is a new class of genetic element that is transferred horizontally (2, 13–16, 21). Only two nucleotide positions vary in the mecA gene sequences obtained from MRSA, Staphylococus epidermidis and Staphylococcus sciuri strains (Table 1b). The number of differences in the ISR types (31\2645) and the seven housekeeping genes (43\3818) is 15 times greater than in the mecA gene sequence (2\2002). Recombination or gene conversion between rrn operons on a genome may play a role in homogenizing the sequences of ISR types (5, 17). Similarly, it has been shown that recombination is responsible for SNPs in the seven housekeeping genes of MRSA analysed by MLST (4). If this is the case, the introduction of mutations by recombination may be many times more frequent than during or after the horizontal transfer of SCCmec. While it is probable that the introduction of mecA into S. aureus is a relatively recent event, it is possible that the event is more ancient and its introduction is more likely due to increased transmission in hospitals and by a higher exposure to antibiotics than occurs in nature. However, the low rate of mutation in mecA (compared to ISRs and housekeeping genes) must raise the question as to whether there are different mechanisms of mutation in different parts of the bacterial genome. Measurement of genome evolution in MRSA It has been proposed that the value and stability of typing and taxonomy of bacteria are highly dependent on mechanisms of genome evolution, with different regions of the bacterial chromosome undergoing different rates of genome evolution (8). The data presented here suggest that at least three mechanisms of genome evolution in MRSA exist including (i) recombination and\or gene conversion of the rrn operon resulting in sequence homogeneity in some regions and rearrangements, insertions or deletions in others (5, 17), (ii) recombination of essential housekeeping genes (4) and (iii) horizontal transfer (2, 13, 15, 16). Based on sequence data currently available, the mecA gene is a poor candidate for typing because the sequence is highly stable between S. aureus, S. epidermidis and S. sciuri. A more variable region such as the ISR, which may undergo frequent rearrangements, may be more suitable. Some of these questions may be resolved by performing experiments (in S. aureus) similar to those performed in Escherichia coli to measure the mutation rates within different genes (18) as a function of bacterial generation times. Analysis of SNPs in different regions of the S. aureus genome suggest that different evolutionary mechanisms apply to different regions of the genome and further studies to elucidate these mechanisms may shed light on the origin of MRSA. Volker Gu$ rtler and Barrie C. Mayall Department of Microbiology, Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre, Studley Road, Heidelberg 3084, Victoria, Australia. Author for correspondence : V. Gu$ rtler. Tel : j61 3 94963136. Fax : j61 3 94572590. e-mail : volker!austin.unimelb.edu.au 1. Advanced Center for Genome Technology (2001). http :\\www.genome.ou.edu\ 2. Archer, G. L. & Niemeyer, D. M. (1994). Origin and evolution of DNA associated with resistance to methicillin in staphylococci. Trends Microbiol 2, 343–347. 3. Enright, M. C., Day, N. P., Davies, C. E., Peacock, S. J. & Spratt, B. G. (2000). Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 38, 1008–1015. 4. Feil, E. J., Holmes, E. C., Bessen, D. E. & 9 other authors (2001). Recombination within natural populations of pathogenic bacteria : short-term empirical estimates and long-term phylogenetic consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98, 182–187. 5. Gu$ rtler, V. (1999). The role of recombination and mutation in 16S–23S rDNA spacer rearrangements. Gene 238, 241–252. 6. Gu$ rtler, V. & Barrie, H. D. (1995). Typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains by PCR-amplification of variable-length 16S–23S rDNA spacer regions : characterization of spacer sequences. Microbiology 141, 1255–1265. 7. Gu$ rtler, V., Barrie, H. D. & Mayall, B. C. (2001). Use of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis to detect mutations in VS2 of the 16S–23S rDNA spacer amplified from Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Electrophoresis 22, 1920–1924. 8. Gu$ rtler, V. & Mayall, B. C. (2001). Genomic approaches to typing, taxonomy and evolution of bacterial isolates. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51, 3–16. 9. Gu$ rtler, V. & Mayall, B. C. (1999). rDNA spacer rearrangements and concerted evolution. Microbiology 145, 2–3. 10. Gu$ rtler, V., Rao, Y., Pearson, S. R., Bates, S. M. & Mayall, B. C. (1999). DNA sequence heterogeneity in the three copies of the long 16S–23S rDNA spacer of Enterococcus faecalis isolates. Microbiology 145, 1785–1796. 11. Gu$ rtler, V. & Stanisich, V. A. (1996). New approaches to typing and identification of bacteria using the 16S–23S rDNA spacer region. Microbiology 142, 3–16. 12. Iteman, I., Rippka, R., Tandeau de Marsac, N. & Herdman, M. (2000). Comparison of conserved structural and regulatory domains within divergent 16S rRNA–23S rRNA spacer sequences of cyanobacteria. Microbiology 146, 1275–1286. 13. Ito, T., Katayama, Y., Asada, K., Mori, N., Tsutsumimoto, K., Tiensasitorn, C. & Hiramatsu, K. (2001). Structural comparison of three types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec integrated in the chromosome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45, 1323–1336. 14. Ito, T., Katayama, Y. & Hiramatsu, K. (1999). Cloning and nucleotide sequence determination of the entire mec DNA of pre-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus N315. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43, 1449–1458. Microbiology 147, December 2001 Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 18:54:12 15. Katayama, Y., Ito T. & Hiramatsu, K. (2000). A new class of genetic element, staphylococcus cassette chromosome mec, encodes methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44, 1459–1455. 16. Kuroda, M., Ohta, T., Uchiyama, I. and 34 other authors (2001). Whole genome sequencing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 357, 1225–1240. 17. Liao, D. (2000). Gene conversion drives within genic sequences : concerted evolution of ribosomal RNA genes in bacteria and archaea. J Mol Evol 51, 305–317. 18. Papadopoulos, D., Schneider, D., Meier-Eiss, J., Arber, W., Lenski, R. E. & Blot, M. (1999). Genomic evolution during a 10,000-generation experiment with bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96, 3807–3812. 19. Sanger Centre (2001). http :\\www.sanger.ac.uk\ 20. TIGR (The Institute for Genomic Research) (2001). http :\\www.tigr.org\tdb\mdb\mdbinprogress.html 21. Wu, S. W., de Lencastre, H. & Tomasz, A. (2001). Recruitment of the mecA gene homologue of Staphylococcus sciuri into a resistance determinant and expression of the resistant phenotype in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 183, 2417–2424. A second type III secretion system in Burkholderia pseudomallei : who is the real culprit ? Burkholderia pseudomallei is a Gram-negative motile bacillus that is the causative agent of melioidosis, a severe emerging infection that is endemic in South-East Asia and Northern Australia. Antibiotic therapy of melioidosis is long and difficult, because of the resistance of the bacterium to many antibiotics and a tendency to relapse after recovery from clinical disease (3, 4). Although some potential virulence factors have been suggested, the pathogenesis of the disease is poorly understood (1). Here we report on the presence of a second, Salmonella SPI-1-like, type III secretion gene cluster in B. pseudomallei. In more than a dozen major Gram-negative bacterial pathogens of animals and plants, virulence is largely dependent on type III secretion (TTS) systems. The TTS, triggered by a close contact of the bacterium with eukaryotic host cells, involves the assembly of a dedicated secretion\translocation apparatus enabling the injection of pathogenicity (effector) proteins directly into the host cells. The system components are encoded by a set of approximately 20 genes which are usually clustered in the bacterial genome, forming socalled pathogenicity islands (PIs). A major difference between animal and plant pathogens is that the latter interact with the cell cytoplasm by piercing from outside the 200 nm thick plant cell wall, while animal pathogens have to deal with only about 5 nm thick cell membranes. Accordingly, the protein composition and structure of what is often called the ‘ translocator’ seem to be quite different in these two pathogen groups. 3197 Microbiology Comment .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Fig. 1. Gene organization of TTS-associated clusters of B. pseudomallei and comparison with SPI-1 of S. typhimurium and the HRP cluster of R. solanacearum. ORFs are represented as arrows according to the pattern code of predicted proteins as indicated. Information on the HRP-like locus of B. pseudomallei and the HRP cluster of R. solanacearum are available from GenBank (accession nos AF074878 and RSO245811, respectively). ORFs in the new SPI-1-like locus of B. pseudomallei are annotated as follows : conserved secretion apparatus components are named Sct (7) or Sct2 when the gene already exists within the HRP-like locus ; putative homologues of Salmonella Sip, Sic and Sop proteins are designated Bip, Bic and Bop, respectively ; other ORFs are annotated by the name of their putative homologue, with a Bpm suffix (e.g. prgHBpm). All putative homologues within the new SPI-1like locus are from Salmonella, with the exception of BpH3 (Bordetella pertussis), GacA and PA4094 (Pseudomonas aeruginosa), and IcsB (Shigella flexneri). animal pathogen Salmonella typhimurium, in terms of both gene organization (Fig. 1) and sequence similarity (Table 1). Although the GjC content of this ‘ SPI-1-like’ locus is close to that of the core genome of B. pseudomallei (about 68 mol %), the presence of sequences similar to transposases at one boundary suggests a possibility of horizontal transfer. The predicted proteins encoded at the B. pseudomallei SPI-1-like locus include the conserved secretion apparatus components [annotated here as Scts, as proposed by Hueck (7)] but also putative homologues of the translocators SipC and SipD and of the effectors SipB and SopE (6). By analogy with their function in Salmonella infection, the two latter proteins might be involved in the B. pseudomallei-induced apoptosis, cell fusion and actin-associated membrane protrusion, the phenotypes recently reported (8). No putative homologues of other SPI-1 TTS effectors SipA, SopA, SopB, SptP and AvrA (6) were found in the B. pseudomallei genome. It is possible that genes encoding additional TTS-delivered effectors are scattered throughout the B. pseudomallei genome and await molecular characterization. B. pseudomallei is the first bacterial pathogen apparently armed with one TTS system dedicated to infecting animal cells and another one to interact with plants. This represents a novel level of diversity and complexity in the bacterial world, and challenges us to elucidate the respective origins and roles of these two TTS systems. In several animal pathogens, mutants deficient in TTS have been shown to be avirulent or attenuated in their ability to provoke disease in animal models, thus making TTSsecreted proteins attractive targets for antimicrobial therapy and vaccine development (9). Acknowledgements In addition, the effector proteins are speciesspecific, thus contributing to differences in pathogenicity phenotypes (2, 7). It has been reported that B. pseudomallei contains a cluster of five genes with high similarity to genes of a HRP (hypersensitive response and pathogenicity) locus in the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum (10). The same authors recently expanded this locus, identifying several ORFs showing significant similarity with TTS-associated genes of R. solanacearum, Xanthomonas campestris or Pseudomonas syringae (Fig. 1), thus completing the picture of a plant pathogen-like TTS gene cluster in B. pseudomallei. Although the role of this locus is unknown, an involvement in either symbiotic or pathogenic bacterium–plant interactions can be speculated. Indeed, the predominant environment for B. pseudomallei is rice fields and its relationship with plants and the rhizosphere has already been suggested (5). B. pseudomallei is clearly a human pathogen, and it is unexpected that a plant pathogen-like TTS system would be used for human-cell intoxication. We searched the B. pseudomallei genome using the program with PcrD, a highly conserved component of the secretion apparatus of the human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as the query sequence. This search, performed on the assembly contigs generated through the B. pseudomallei genome sequencing project (www.sanger.ac.uk\Projects\BIpseudomallei), led to the identification of a second cluster of about 25 genes with similarities to TTS systems. The new locus resembles most the TTS-associated SPI-1 of the human\ 3198 We are grateful to Dr Sylvie Elsen for critical reading of the manuscript. Olivier Attree and Ina Attree1 1 Laboratoire de Biochimie et Biophisique des Syste' mes Inte! gre! s, (UMR5092 CNRS/CEA/UJF), DBMS, CEA, 17 rue des Martyrs, 38054 Grenoble, France. Author for correspondence : Ina Attree. Tel : j33 438783483. Fax : j33 438785185. e-mail : iattreedelic!cea.fr 1. Brett, P. J. & Woods, D. E. (2000). Pathogenesis of and immunity to melioidosis. Acta Trop 74, 201–210. 2. Cornelis, G. R. & Van Gijsegem, F. (2000). Assembly and function of type III secretory systems. Annu Rev Microbiol 54, 735–774. 3. Dance, D. A. (2000). Burkholderia pseudomallei infections. Clin Infect Dis 30, 235–236. 4. Dance, D. A. (2000). Melioidosis as an emerging global problem. Acta Trop 74, 115–119. Microbiology 147, December 2001 Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 18:54:12 Microbiology Comment Table 1. Relatedness of B. pseudomallei predicted proteins to proteins encoded within the SPI-1 locus of S. typhimurium and to B. pseudomallei putative proteins from the HRP-like cluster, and the relatedness of B. pseudomallei HRP-like putative proteins to proteins encoded by the HRP cluster of R. solanacearum .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Relatedness is measured as percentage of identical amino acid matches (percentage of similar amino acid matches). S. typhimurium SPI-1 cluster InvF InvG InvE InvA InvB InvC SpaO SpaP SpaQ SpaR SpaS SicA SipB SipC SipD PrgH PrgI PrgJ PrgK B. pseudomallei SPI-1-like cluster 33 (48) 38 (52) 30 (44) 55 (72) 26 (44) 54 (66) 24 (37) 58 (75) 54 (77) 38 (55) 43 (61) 58 (72) 31 (46) 16 (30) 22 (36) 20 (33) 52 (62) 28 (44) 39 (55) InvFBpm SctC2 SctW SctV2 InvBBpm SctN2 SctQ2 SctR2 SctS2 SctT2 SctU2 BicA BipB BipC BipD PrgHBpm SctF SctI SctJ2 B. pseudomallei HRP-like cluster R. solanacearum HRP cluster 26 (43) SctC 44 (60) HrcC 36 (56) SctV 57 (70) HrcV 45 (62) 21 (33) 35 (60) 33 (57) 24 (36) 25 (44) SctN SctQ SctR SctS SctT SctU 63 (77) 23 (39) 64 (78) 56 (71) 41 (59) 49 (67) HrcN HrcQ HrcR HrcS HrcT HrcU 24 (41) SctJ 48 (62) HrcJ 5. Dharakul, T. & Songsivilai, S. (1999). The many facets of melioidosis. Trends Microbiol 7, 138–140. 6. Hansen-Wester, I. & Hensel, M. (2001). Salmonella pathogenicity islands encoding type III secretion systems. Microb Infect 3, 549–559. 7. Hueck, C. J. (1998). Type III protein secretion systems in bacterial pathogens of animals and plants. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62, 379–433. 8. Kespichayawattana, W., Rattanachetkul, S., Wanun, T., Utaisincharoen, P. & Sirisinha, S. (2000). Burkholderia pseudomallei induces cell fusion and actinassociated membrane protrusion : a possible mechanism for cell-to-cell spreading. Infect Immun 68, 5377–5384. 9. Turbyfill, K. R., Hartman, A. B. & Oaks, E. V. (2000). Isolation and characterization of a Shigella flexneri invasin complex subunit vaccine. Infect Immun 68, 6624–6632. 10. Winstanley, C., Hales, B. A. & Hart, C. A. (1999). Evidence for the presence in Burkholderia pseudomallei of a type III secretion system-associated gene cluster. J Med Microbiol 48, 649–656. Lipoxygenase in bacteria : a horizontal transfer event ? Lipoxygenase (LOX ; EC 1;13;11;12) is a non-haem iron-containing dioxygenase that catalyses the addition of molecular oxygen to polyunsaturated fatty acids with a (Z,Z)-1,4pentadiene system to give an unsaturated fatty acid hydroperoxide. The oxygen can be added to either end of the pentadiene system (regiospecificity). In plants, linoleic and linolenic acids are the most abundant fatty acids and the principal substrates of LOX. Its products have several functions which include mediators of the stress response and products with bactericidal activity (2). In animals the predominant substrate of LOX is arachidonic acid. Its products include bioregulators, mainly prostaglandins, thromboxanes and leukotrienes, with a role in the maintenance of the homeostasis of the animal cell (4). Until now, LOX had been found in plants, fungi and animals, but it was not known to be present in yeast and bacteria. A careful search of reported LOX sequences showed two bacterial LOXs, one from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (accession no. AE004547) annotated as a putative LOX, and the other from Sorangium cellulosum (accession no. AX024393). The sequences of S. cellulosum and P. aeruginosa were obtained with the search program of the bacterial database (http :\\ www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\BLAST\), using as template the Arabidopsis thaliana LOX2 (1). The identification of a LOX gene in P. aeruginosa may not be surprising, since LOX activity has been reported in the periplasmic Microbiology 147, December 2001 Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 18:54:12 space of Pseudomonas (3). Besides, for S. cellulosum, an -dopa decarboxylase has been reported that was thought to be present only in eukaryotes (6) and LOX seems to be another example of a eukaryote-related gene present in this bacterium. Although LOX activity has not been demonstrated for the specific sequences of S. cellulosum and P. aeruginosa, results from primary amino acid sequence analysis showed that the residues involved in the iron binding of soybean L-1 [His499, His504, His690, Asn694 and Ile839 (5)], are conserved in an equivalent position in S. cellulosum and P. aeruginosa LOXs, suggesting that the active site of bacterial and plant LOX is similar (Fig. 1a). The comparison of the S. cellulosum sequence with other LOXs reveals 39n7 % and 42n3 % similarity with soybean L-3 and human LOX5, respectively. P. aeruginosa LOX has 36n3 %, 36n3 % and 36n5 % similarity with potato H3 LOX, human LOX5 and S. cellulosum LOX, respectively. A phylogenetic tree was constructed from the aligned protein sequences of LOX from different origins : 19 plant LOXs with 13-, 13\9-, and 9-LOX proven activities, three human LOXs with 5-, 12-, and 15-LOX activity (accession numbers P09917, O75342, O15296, respectively) ; a red alga Porphyra purpurea LOX (accession number U08842) ; and P. aeruginosa and S. cellulosum LOXs. The alignment used for the phylogenetic analysis was generated with the program (http :\\www.ebi.ac.uk\clustalw\). The tree was constructed with the search program (Wisconsin Package Version 10.1, Genetics Computer Group, Madison, WI), and drawn with the program. This tree is the best tree by parsimony and it was also the shortest distance tree. Results showed that plant LOXs can be divided into five groups representing four different plant families : Solanaceae, Fabaceae, Curcubitaceae, Poaceae and, in a different group, chloroplastic LOXs from several plant families. There is not phylogenetic relationship between the plant LOXs based on regiospecificity. Bacterial and red algal LOXs were grouped with human LOXs. This result indicates that bacterial and red algal LOXs appear to be more closely related to human than to plant LOXs (Fig. 1b). Two methods (parsimony and distance) agree on the tree topology with moderate to high bootstrap support from 1000 replicas. The presence of LOX gene in S. cellulosum and P. aeruginosa may be interpreted as separate events of horizontal transfer. It is not an artefact of the phylogenetic method, because different methods agree, and there is statistical support. Furthermore, the search did not report another LOX sequence from other reported bacterial genomes. A horizontal gene transfer has been also suggested for the -dopa decarboxylase gene of S. cellulosum (6). 3199 Microbiology Comment (a) (b) ..................................................................................................... Fig. 1. (a) Alignment of Glycine max (G. max), S. cellulosum, P. aeruginosa and human LOX5. Numbers in the right margin refer to nucleotide residues. The asterisks indicate residues involved in iron-atom binding at the active site of LOX (5). (b) Phylogenetic tree of LOX amino acid sequences including 19 plant LOXs, human 5-, 12- and 15-LOXs, red alga, and bacterial LOXs. This tree is the best tree by parsimony and it was also the shortest distance tree. The numbers indicate the bootstrap values (parsimony\ distance) from 1000 replicas. Helena Porta and Mario Rocha-Sosa Departamento de Biologia Molecular de Plantas, Instituto de Biotecnologia, Universidad Nacional Auto! noma de Me! xico, Apdo. Postal 510-3, Cuernacava, Mor. 62250, Me! xico. Author for correspondence : Mario RochaSosa. Tel : j52 7 329 1652. Fax : j52 73 172388. e-mail : rocha!ibt.unam.mx 1. Bell, E. & Mullet, J. E. (1993). Characterization of an Arabidopsis lipoxygenase gene responsive to methyl jasmonate and wounding. Plant Physiol 103, 1133–1137. 2. Creelman, R. A. & Mullet, J. E. (1997). Biosynthesis and action of jasmonates in plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48, 355–381. 3. Guerrero, A., Casals, I., Busquets, M., Leo! n, Y. & Manresa, A. (1997). Oxidation of oleic acid to (E)-10hydroperoxy-8-octadecenoic and (E)-10-hydroxy-8octadecenoic acids by Pseudomonas sp. 42A2. Biochim Biophys Acta 12, 75–81. 3200 4. Kuhn, H. & Thiele, B. (1999). The diversity of the lipoxygenase family : many sequence data but little information on biological significance. FEBS Lett 449, 7–11. 5. Minor, W., Steczko, J., Stec, B., Otwinowski, Z., Bolin, T. J., Walter, R. & Axelrod, B. (1996). Crystal structure of soybean lipoxygenase L-1 at 1n4 AH resolution. Biochemistry 35, 10687–10701. 6. Muller, R., Gerth, K., Brandt, P., Blocker, H. & Beyer, S. (2000). Identification of an -dopa decarboxylase gene from Sorangium cellulosum So ce90. Arch Microbiol 173, 303–306. Microbiology 147, December 2001 Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 18:54:12