* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Membrane nanodomains in plants: capturing form, function, and
Survey
Document related concepts
Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup
G protein–coupled receptor wikipedia , lookup
Protein phosphorylation wikipedia , lookup
Lipid bilayer wikipedia , lookup
SNARE (protein) wikipedia , lookup
Theories of general anaesthetic action wikipedia , lookup
Magnesium transporter wikipedia , lookup
Model lipid bilayer wikipedia , lookup
Protein moonlighting wikipedia , lookup
Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup
Intrinsically disordered proteins wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Cell membrane wikipedia , lookup
Western blot wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 66, No. 6 pp. 1573–1586, 2015 doi:10.1093/jxb/erv054 Advance Access publication 27 February 2015 Review Paper Membrane nanodomains in plants: capturing form, function, and movement Wiebke Tapken and Angus S. Murphy* Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] Received 24 November 2014; Revised 20 January 2015; Accepted 27 January 2015 Abstract The plasma membrane is the interface between the cell and the external environment. Plasma membrane lipids provide scaffolds for proteins and protein complexes that are involved in cell to cell communication, signal transduction, immune responses, and transport of small molecules. In animals, fungi, and plants, a substantial subset of these plasma membrane proteins function within ordered sterol- and sphingolipid-rich nanodomains. High-resolution microscopy, lipid dyes, pharmacological inhibitors of lipid biosynthesis, and lipid biosynthetic mutants have been employed to examine the relationship between the lipid environment and protein activity in plants. They have also been used to identify proteins associated with nanodomains and the pathways by which nanodomain-associated proteins are trafficked to their plasma membrane destinations. These studies suggest that plant membrane nanodomains function in a context-specific manner, analogous to similar structures in animals and fungi. In addition to the highly conserved flotillin and remorin markers, some members of the B and G subclasses of ATP binding cassette transporters have emerged as functional markers for plant nanodomains. Further, the glycophosphatidylinositol-anchored fasciclin-like arabinogalactan proteins, that are often associated with detergent-resistant membranes, appear also to have a functional role in membrane nanodomains. Key words: Detergent-resistant membranes, membrane nanodomains, nanodomain function, ordered membrane domains, plasma membrane ABC proteins, sphingolipids, sterols. Introduction Lipid membranes define the boundary of a cell, its organelles, and secretory subcompartments. They spatially separate incompatible biochemical processes, provide structural support for transporters and receptors, function as exchange surfaces for mineral ions and signalling molecules, and are the initial point of contact for host–pathogen interactions. Glycerolipids [mainly phospholipids (PLs)], sphingolipids (SLs), and sterols are the three main lipid classes that constitute the plant plasma membrane (PM), and define membrane organization and function. Recent combinatorial studies using high-resolution microscopy and lipid biosynthesis inhibitors suggest that proteins form specialized laterally defined PM microenvironments characterized by SLs and sterols (Lasserre et al., 2008, Raffaele et al., 2009; Demir et al., 2014; Jarsch et al., 2014). These nanodomain (ND) structures have been shown to increase the stability and activity of embedded proteins and protein complexes: NDs have been associated with receptor complex function (Sun et al., 2002), transporter efficiency (Blakeslee et al., 2007; Titapiwatanakun et al., 2009), channel regulation (Demir et al., 2013), protein trafficking (Men et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2013), and plant–bacterial interactions (Bhat et al., 2005; Haney and Long, 2010; Lefebvre et al., 2010). The terms lipid rafts and detergent-resistant membranes (DRMs) are often used synonymously with NDs, largely for historical reasons. The concept of lipid rafts was introduced to describe membrane ‘patches’ in which discrete groups of proteins were localized in mammalian cells (Simons and Ikonen, © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected] 1574 | Tapken and Murphy 1997). DRMs are physically isolated fractions of denser sterol- and SL-enriched membranes, which are obtained through extraction at 4 °C with non-ionic detergents, such as Triton X-100 (Brown and Rose, 1992; Mongrand et al., 2004; Borner et al., 2005; Martin et al., 2005). The term ‘lipid raft’ emerged as a conceptualization of immiscible, steroland SL-rich ordered membrane domains with compositions similar to those of DRMs. Co-purification of certain proteins with DRMs suggested that SLs and sterols could form distinct sites of viral entry in mammalian cells (Nguyen and Hildreth, 2000; Samuel et al., 2001; Bavari et al., 2002; Chazal and Gerlier, 2003). This concept was later also applied to plants, and thus DRM analyses paved the way for studies that associated ordered membrane domains, or NDs, with physiological functions (Lasserre et al., 2008; Demir et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2013). Biochemical association of lipids and proteins with DRMs does not directly establish the presence of ordered protein and membrane complexes in plants any more than a sucrose density gradient fractionation of membranes conclusively demonstrates association of a particular protein with a specific cellular membrane structure. Interchangeable use of the terms ‘lipid raft’ and DRM is, therefore, inappropriate. Some authors suggest that the term ‘lipid raft’ should not be used to describe any type of plant-associated ordered membrane domain and question that these domains occur in plants (Tanner et al., 2011). This review does not in any way imply that this metaphorical term should be used in the plant literature. A number of artefacts are generated in DRM preparation. For instance, the strength of the non-ionic detergent used to isolate DRMs can alter the composition of enriched sterols, SLs, and associated proteins, and can also increase the membrane affinity of cytosolic proteins (Titapiwatanakun et al., 2008; Tanner et al., 2011). More importantly, solubilization with Triton X-100 results in the temperature-dependent restructuring of lipid domains, as observed in giant unilamellar vesicles (Heerklotz, 2002; Casadei et al., 2014). Thus, DRM extraction is a selective isolation method and it is possible that the composition of functional NDs differs in living cells. Due to its dependence on the isolation method used, the lipid and protein composition of isolated DRMs is not identical to that of NDs. However, there is increasing evidence that ordered membrane structures do exist in plants and that they are functionally relevant. Technological advances within the field of microscopy, including new probes for atomic force microscopy (AFM), super resolution confocal microscopy, high-resolution total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF), the variable angle epifluorescence microscopy (VAEM) variant of TIRF used in plants (Konopka and Bednarek, 2008), and enhanced fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), have enabled more precise definition of the size and composition of ND structures (Gutierrez et al., 2010; Truong-Quang and Lenne, 2014). The identification of SL and sterol biosynthesis mutants in Arabidopsis, in conjunction with these high-resolution imaging techniques, has provided a context for analyses of the contribution of these lipids to protein trafficking, membrane structure, and physiology (Willemsen et al., 2003; Men et al., 2008; Roudier et al., 2010; Markham et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2013). As a consequence, ND size estimations in plants have progressively decreased, from the micrometre scale to the order of 10–100 nm, which is comparable with large protein complexes, such as the cellulose synthase complex (Kimura et al., 1999; Cacas et al., 2012; Truang-Quong and Lenne, 2013). The wide range of ND sizes has spawned the use of the ‘microdomain’ and ‘nanodomain’ nomenclature to better distinguish between differently sized complexes (Mongrand et al., 2010; Demir et al., 2013). However, the terms still lack concrete size delimitation. In summary, the current consensus is that the term DRM is utilized for lipids and proteins that have been biochemically associated with SL- and sterolenriched membranes, and NDs as the functional assemblies of lipids and proteins, when determined by biophysical or microscopic techniques such as super resolution, TIRF, or AFM. In this review we will discuss the current understanding of what determines protein association with NDs, where these functional domains are formed, and how the lipid environment affects the trafficking of PM proteins. In particular, we focus on the role of NDs in regulating the trafficking, localization, stability, mechanistic function, and interactions of PM proteins, with an emphasis on ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporters from the B and G subgroups in Arabidopsis. Characteristics of the plant lipidome Cholesterol and ergosterol are the most abundant sterols in vertebrates and fungi, respectively (Shieh et al., 1977; Dupont et al., 2012). Yeast DRMs are enriched in ergosterol (Bagnat et al., 2000; Mongrand et al., 2004; Roche et al., 2008; Yang and Murphy, 2009), while plant DRMs are mostly enriched in the primary PM sterols β-sitosterol and campesterol. The sterols of the Arabidopsis PM and DRM fractions contain 80% β-sitosterol and 10% campesterol, with no measureable stigmasterol content (Kierszniowska et al., 2009). Stigmasterol is more highly abundant in the PM and DRMs from oat and maize roots (Grandmougin et al., 1989; Norberg and Liljenberg, 1991; Borner et al., 2005). Sterol concentrations in PM and DRM fractions from tobacco bright yellow 2 (BY2) cell cultures contain ~50% stigmasterol, ~20% 24-methyl cholesterol, ~14% cholesterol, and only ~14% sitosterol (Mongrand et al., 2004). Plant sterols can also be conjugated with sugars, which in turn can be fatty acylated to form steryl glycosides and acyl-steryl glycosides. Steryl glycosides and acyl-steryl glycosides are enriched in Arabidopsis DRMs (Laloi et al., 2007; Minami et al., 2008). Experiments with artificial membranes suggest that the lipid diversity in plants decreases the temperature sensitivity and enhances lipid affinity for lipid raft formation (Xu et al., 2001; Beck et al., 2007). Sphingosine and its derivative sphingomyelin are the most common backbones of animal SLs (Cacas et al., 2012), but are largely absent in plants. Instead, the hydroxysphinganine phytosphingosine is the primary plant SL backbone. In Plant nanodomains and protein function | 1575 place of the glycosylceramides that are abundant in mammals, glycosyl inositol phosphoceramides (GIPCs) are the predominant SLs in plants (Sperling et al., 2005; Pata et al., 2010; Blaas and Humpf, 2013). GIPC formation requires the enzyme inositol phosphorylceramide glucuronyltransferase1 (IPUT1), which is localized to the Golgi (Rennie et al., 2014). GIPCs are highly abundant in membranes of Arabidopsis leaves (Markham et al., 2006) and are also enriched in DRMs (Borner et al., 2005). However, tobacco BY2 cell cultures are more enriched in glycosphingolipids (Mongrand et al., 2004). Hydrogen bonding between membrane-intercalated sterols and either long chain bases (fatty acids) or large hydrophobic head groups of SLs are energetically favoured over interactions with PL (Lingwood and Simons, 2010). This increases the potential for SL/sterol partitioning and lateral immiscibility, which forces them into a denser, liquid-ordered state. The long SL fatty acid chains confer a higher melting temperature (Brown and London, 1998) and are thought to increase the thickness of the PM in the presence of sterols. However, although largely accepted, the latter might in fact result from the presence of proteins in these lipid environments, rather than the presence of sterols (Mitra et al., 2003). Chemical stripping experiments have shown that NDs are dependent on the presence of sterols and SLs, and therefore the rigidity of the liquid-ordered state is assumed to be the basis of the structured nature of ND-associated proteins and their potential to associate into highly stable protein complexes. Proteins localized to NDs Although DRMs and NDs should not be thought of interchangeably in the context of their biochemical and biophysical properties, proteomic analyses of DRMs have provided important information about proteins that could potentially associate with NDs through their affinity for sterols and SLs (Borner et al., 2005; Morel et al., 2006; Minami et al., 2008; Fujiwara et al., 2009; Takahashi et al., 2012, 2013). These proteomic exercises have been the jumping-off point for studies seeking to relate NDs to specific functions such as signal transduction (Demir et al., 2013; Srivastava et al., 2013; Matsui et al., 2014; Zauber et al., 2014), substrate transport (Sutter et al., 2006; Blakeslee et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2013), stress responses (Beck et al., 2007; Minami et al., 2008; Li et al., 2011), and pathogen responses (Bhat et al., 2005; Raffaele et al., 2009; van der Meer-Janssen et al., 2010; Bozkurt et al., 2014). A non-exhaustive list of ND and/or DRM-localized proteins referenced herein can be found in Table 1. For example, the inward-rectifying potassium channel KAT1 is a guard cell-localized protein, which has been implicated in abscisic acid- (ABA) dependent stomatal movement (Sutter et al., 2007). KAT1 function at the guard cell PM is dependent on syntaxin of plants 121 (SYP121/PEN1), and KAT1 forms large protein aggregates of ~500 nm in diameter, consisting of an estimated 50 homo-tetramers (Sutter et al., 2006; Reuff et al., 2010). Lateral movement of KAT1 at the PM is very slow, as observed through pulse–chase-like strategies in conjunction with kymographic analyses (Sutter et al., 2006). Another stomatal protein, slow anion channel homolog 3 (SLAH3), interacts with calcium dependent protein kinase 22 (CPK21) in guard cell NDs (Demir et al., 2013). ABA binding to the receptor regulatory components of ABA receptor1/PYR1 (pyrobactin resistance 1)-like proteinc9 (RCAR/PYL9) results in recruitment of the ABA insensitive 1 (ABI1) protein phosphatase 2C to the SLAH3/ CPK21 complex and rapid activation of the anion channel. It appears that the ordered ND environment is in this case essential to complex formation and function. SYP121, also known as PENETRATION1 (PEN1), appears to function in rapid recruitment of proteins to NDs. SYP121 is recruited to sites of Blumeria graminis (powdery mildew) infection in Arabidopsis, where it is required for papillae formation on the apoplastic side of the PM (Assaad et al., 2004). In unchallenged cells, SYP121 is continuously cycled between the endomembrane system and the PM, but rapidly partitions into NDs after pathogen infection (Bhat et al., 2005; Nielsen et al., 2012), in a manner similar to what is observed with KAT1 in guard cells. Plasma membrane intrinsic protein2;1 (PIP2;1/PIP2A) is a member of the aquaporin family that facilitate water movement across the PM (Santoni et al., 2003; Katsuhara et al., 2008). PIP2;1 partitions into DRMs (Demir et al., 2013) and its association with NDs has been investigated in great detail (Li et al., 2011). In control conditions, PIP2;1 is more or less homogenously distributed at the PM. However, under salt stress (NaCl) it increasingly co-localizes with Flotillin1 in specific foci at the PM, which is accompanied by the reduction of its lateral mobility (Li et al., 2011). This restriction was suggested to lead ultimately to PIP2;1 internalization from the PM. PIP2;1 appears to be able to move in and out of NDs. As PIP2;1 functions as an oligomer, this flexibility has been suggested to facilitate protein–protein interactions at the PM (Li et al., 2011). Notably, the NDs with which PIP2;1 associates are distinct from ABCB19, as FEN (a sterol biosynthesis inhibitor) treatment does not alter PIP2;1 localization at the PM (whereas ABCB19 is affected), and salt treatment did not alter ABCB19 localization (Yang et al., 2013). Emergence of standard ND marker proteins One highly conserved ND protein family, which was initially identified in other kingdoms, has become a useful ND marker in plants. In animal cells, flotillins are proteins of unknown function that are associated with caveolae, which are steroland SL-rich membrane invaginations that mediate a variety of cell to cell communication processes (Bickel, 1997; Babuke and Tikkanen, 2007; Takeshita et al., 2012). Arabidopsis Flotillin1 forms highly dynamic punctate structures at the PM (Li et al., 2012). Plant flotillins appear to have a role in symbiotic interactions with nitrogen-fixing bacteria (Haney and Long, 2010). Another important marker for NDs are the remorins, which were originally identified in the Solanaceae (Farmer 1576 | Tapken and Murphy Table 1. Proteins associated with liquid-ordered domains Protein Function ND identified (microscopy) SL/sterol dependence in DRMs References ABCB1 Auxin transport – Demir et al. (2013) ABCB4 Auxin transport Yes Extracted with 1% Brij and Triton X-100 SL dependent ABCB19 Auxin transport Yes ABCB21 Auxin transport – ABCG36/PEN3 Pathogen response – Not MβCD-responsive ABCG37/PIS1 – FB1 and FEN treatment induce no changes in PM localization FLA2 Coumarin and auxinic compound transport Cell adhesion – Sterol dependent (MβCD); extracted with 1% Brij and Triton X-100 FLA proteins Cell adhesion Sterol dependent (MβCD) Kierszniowska et al. (2009) Flotillin1 and flotillins Pathogen response Yes Sterol dependent (MβCD) KAT1 Potassium channel Yes Not sensitive to MβCD PIN1 Auxin transport Yes PIN2 Auxin transport Yes FB1 and tsc10a (SL) show more intracellular structures; cpi1-1 (sterol) cpi1-1, cvp1-3, and fackel-J79 (sterol); DRM preparation Borner et al. (2005); Haney and Long (2010); Li et al. (2012); Jarsch et al. (2014) Sutter et al. (2006); Reuff et al. (2010); Jarsch et al. (2014) Blakeslee et al. (2007); Men et al. (2008); Yang et al. (2013) PIP2;1 Aquaporin Yes Sterol dependent (MβCD); not sensitive to FB1 (SL) or FEN (SL); extracted with 1% Brij and Triton X-100 Remorin1.3 Pathogen response Yes Sterol dependent (MβCD); extracted with 1% Brij and Triton X-100 Remorins Pathogen response Yes SLAH3 SYP121/PEN1 Nitrate, ABA signalling Pathogen response Yes Yes et al., 1989; Reymond et al., 1996). Remorins are plant-specific, peripheral membrane proteins that aggregate in clusters of ~70 nm in diameter (Raffaele et al., 2009). One of the most commonly used ND markers, Remorin1.3, has been shown to function in immune responses upon infection with the Potato virus X and Phytophtora infestans (Perraki et al., 2012; Bozkurt et al., 2014), but remorins remain otherwise functionally uncharacterized. Flotillin and remorin isoforms associate with distinct ND types (Jarsch et al., 2014), and are therefore increasingly used to analyse functional relationships between proteins and specific NDs. Other identified ND markers are KAT1, SLAH3 (mentioned above), and multiple members of the ABC transporter family of the subclasses B and G. ABC transporters form a superfamily of membrane transporters that is ubiquitously Mainly SL, but also sterol dependent Extracted with 1% Brij and Triton X-100 Sterol dependent In structures marked by filipin (sterol); in DRMs of rice Borner et al. (2005); Titapiwatanakun et al. (2009); Yang et al. (2013) Titapiwatanakun et al. (2009); Yang et al. (2013) Demir et al. (2013) Minami et al. (2008); Kierszniowska et al. (2009) Yang et al. (2013); Fourcroy et al. (2014) Kierszniowska et al. (2009); Demir et al. (2013) Men et al. (2008); Pan et al. (2009); Titapiwatanakun et al. (2009) Li et al. (2011); Demir et al. (2013); Yang et al. (2013) Raffaele et al. (2009); Demir et al. (2013) Mongrand et al. (2004); Lefebvre et al. (2010); Jarsch et al. (2014) Demir et al. (2013) Assaad et al. (2004); Bhat et al. (2005); Fujiwara et al. (2009) found across kingdoms. Arabidopsis ABCs cluster into eight subclasses on the basis of sequence homology and domain organization (Verrier et al., 2008). Plant ABCs of the subclass B transport organic acid compounds such as indole-3-acetic acid (the principle auxin IAA; ABCB1, ABCB4, ABCB19, ABCB21; Noh et al., 2001; Geisler et al., 2005; Terasaka et al., 2005; Kamimoto et al., 2012), and malate and citrate (ABCB14; Kaneda et al., 2011). The full-length ABCGs ABCG36/PEN3 and ABCG37/PIS1 transport a greater range of substrates, including xenobiotics (ABCG37; Ito and Gray, 2006), compounds involved in pathogen responses (ABCG36; Stein et al., 2006), cadmium (ABCG36; Kim et al., 2007), and the artificial auxin 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) (ABCG37; Ito and Gray, 2006) as well as the IAA precursor indole-3-butyric acid (ABCG36&ABCG37; Strader and Plant nanodomains and protein function | 1577 Bartel, 2009; Růžička et al., 2010), and coumarin compounds (ABCG37; Fourcroy et al., 2014). Although all of these transporters have been associated with NDs and/or DRMs, ABCB4, ABCB19, and ABCG37 are most commonly identified in these structures (Minami et al., 2008; Kierszniowska et al., 2009; Demir et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2013). The glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored fasciclin-like arabinogalactan (FLA) proteins and some jacalin lectin proteins are recurrent residents of DRMs (Borner et al., 2005; Kierszniowska et al., 2009; Demir et al., 2013) that are also used as ND markers. The potential of these proteins to mediate interactions of NDs with cell walls makes them prime targets for investigation. Determinants for ND association of proteins Protein association with DRMs depends on electrostatic (hydrogen bonds) and hydrophobic interactions with the lipids (Murray et al., 1997; Cacas et al., 2012). These interactions appear to contribute to the formation and stability of functional NDs and associated protein complexes. An example is the interaction of the two Arabidopsis auxin transporters ABCB19 and PINFORMED1 (PIN1; Fig. 2). ABCB19 is associated with a subset of DRMs characterized primarily by SLs, but also sterols (Titapiwatanakun et al., 2009; Yang et al., 2013). PIN1 is a highly polarized transporter and is the primary mediator of polar auxin streams required for organogenesis and shootward auxin transport (Gälweiler et al., 1998; Benková et al., 2003; Reinhardt et al., 2005; Marhavý et al., 2011). PIN1 polar localization in some cell types is destabilized in mutants that are deficient in sterol biosynthesis (Willemsen et al., 2003). ABCB19 and PIN1 have been shown to interact in DRMs (Titapiwatanakun et al., 2009), and ABCB19 stabilizes PIN1 in discrete domains when the two proteins co-occur. Loss of ABCB19 in cells where it otherwise would co-localize with PIN1 results in reduced abundance of PIN1 at the PM (Blakeslee et al., 2007; Titapiwatanakun et al., 2009; Yang et al., 2013). PIN1 was also observed to exhibit increased intracellular abundance in cells within the normal ABCB19 expression domain in both the abcb19 mutant and the wild type, treated with sterol/SL biosynthesis inhibitors and/or stripping reagents (Yang et al., 2013). Co-purification of FLA2 with ABCB19 suggests that the GPI-anchored FLA2 could be part of the ABCB19/PIN1 ND (Fig. 2). Finally, PM localization of ABCB19 itself was substantially reduced in SL- and sterol-deficient mutants. The sterol and SL dependence of ABCB19 transport function and PIN1 interaction has been demonstrated in heterologous systems and in planta. Auxin transport activity of ABCB19 in heterologous systems (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) is increased by addition of sterols (Titapiwatanakun et al., 2009) or when ergosterol-containing membrane domains are present (Yang and Murphy, 2009). When ABCB19 and PIN1 are co-expressed, a synergistic increase in auxin transport and substrate specificity is observed (Blakeslee et al., 2007), and loss of either ABCB19 or PIN1 increases polar transport of benzoic acid (Blakeslee et al., 2007), which is normally not transported in a polar manner. GPI and S-acylation modifications are hallmarks of ND-associated proteins in animals (Garner et al., 2007). GPI anchoring and some S-acylation modifications appear in some cases to be solely sufficient for conferring DRM partitioning in plant cells (Borner et al., 2005; Sorek et al., 2007). About 1% of the Arabidopsis proteome encodes GPI-anchored proteins (Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, 2000; Borner et al., 2003). GPI anchoring results in protein targeting to the exoplasmic leaflet in animals and plants (Ikonen and Simons, 1998). Failure to generate GPI anchors in the abnormal pollen tube guidance 1 (aptg1) mutant aptg1 results in embryo lethality (Dai et al., 2014), highlighting the importance of GPIanchored proteins for plant development and reproduction. Many proteins involved in cell to cell communication during seed coat and pollen development are over-represented in the GPI proteome (Borner et al., 2003; Tsukamoto et al., 2010; Edstam and Edqvist, 2014). One of these is COBRALIKE 10 (COBL10), a polar-localized GPI-anchored pollen tube protein that interacts with female chemotropic signals to direct growth within the pistil, leading to successful fertilization (Li et al., 2013). In aptg1 heterozygotes, COBL10 fails to localize to the PM (Dai et al., 2014). Plasmodesmata (PDs) connect neighbouring plant cells and are crucial for facilitating the intercellular exchange of nutrients and hormones, and to provide passageways for pathogens. PDs are enriched in sterols and SLs, and many PD proteins are represented in the GPI proteome (FernandezCalvino et al., 2011). Among these are members of the PD callose binding protein (PDCB) family that adjusts PD pore size by regulating the amount of callus deposition. PDCBs have been experimentally verified to be GPI anchored (Simpson et al., 2009). S-Acylation is the post-translational addition of a palmitate or, less frequently, a stearate moiety to a cysteine residue of the target protein. Recent proteomic studies suggest that S-acylation is the most frequent lipid modification of proteins, with a total of 581 S-acylated proteins (~2% of the proteome) identified in Arabidopsis (Hemsley et al., 2013; Hemsley, 2014). For instance, some members of the remorin family are S-acylated (Hemsley et al., 2013; Konrad et al., 2014). Two acylating enzymes, protein S-acyltransferase 10 (PAT10), located in the Golgi and tonoplast, and TIP GROWTH DEFECTIVE 1 (TIP1), localized to the PM, acylate proteins in Arabidopsis (Hemsley et al., 2005; Zhou et al., 2013; Qi et al., 2013). S-Acylation is the only fully reversible lipid modification, making it particularly important in lipid signalling (Smotrys and Linder, 2004). Notable examples of S-acylated proteins in Arabidopsis are members of the large family of leucine-rich repeats (LRR) receptorlike kinases, soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) such as SYP121/ PEN1, and members of the Rho-like GTPases in plants (ROPs; Sorek et al., 2007; Craddock et al., 2012). GTPbound ROPs have been localized to DRMs and they regulate cell division, morphogenesis, and cell polarity (Yalovsky et al., 2008). S-Acylation within the G-domain in ROP6 (at 1578 | Tapken and Murphy which GTP binding and hydrolysis takes place) is vital for its association with DRMs and, thus, probaby its function in vivo (Sorek et al., 2007, 2010). Inactive, GDP-bound ROPs can exhibit other lipid modifications such as prenylation, but locate to the cytosol. N-Myristoylation is the addition of the 14-carbon saturated fatty acid myristate (myristoyl-CoA) through N-myristoyltransferases (NMT) to an N-terminal glycine of a target protein (Qi et al., 2000; Sharma, 2004; Martinez et al., 2008). The myristate moiety interacts with negatively charged phosphatidylserine or phosphatidylinositol phosphates in the endoplasmic leaflet to enhance protein affinity for the PM (Resh, 2013). N-Myristoylation alone is not sufficient for DRM association in animals and plants, but tandem N-myristoylation in conjunction with single S-acylation appears to provide a viable signal for DRM partitioning in animal cells (Zacharias et al., 2002). The virulence of some bacteria and viruses depends on this lipid modification, as it confers PM association of their effector proteins, such as members of the HopZ family from Pseudomonas syringae and AC4 of the East African cassava mosaic Cameroon virus (Fondong et al., 2007; Lewis et al., 2007). However, N-myristoylation of ND-associated proteins has not been unequivocally demonstrated in plants. Prenylation, like N-myristoylation, enhances the affinity of proteins for the PM. C-15 farnesyl or C-20 geranylgeranyl isoprenoid moieties are added by protein farnesyl transferase (PFT) and protein geranyl-geranyltransferase-1 (PGGT-1), respectively, to target proteins. Both enzymes consist of one α-and one β-subunit, with the β-subunit conferring substrate specificity (Maurer-Stroh et al., 2003). PFT and PGGT-1 recognize the motif cysteine-a1-a2-X, where ‘a’ corresponds to aliphatic amino acids and X can be cysteine, methionine, serine, glutamine, alanine, or leucine (Sorek et al., 2011). The amino acid at the ‘X’ position generally determines whether a protein is farnesylated (serine, glutamine, methionine, alanine) or geranylgeranylated (leucine) (Reid et al., 2004; Resh, 2006). However, to date, prenylated proteins have been shown to associate exclusively with phospholipid domains. A summary of software currently available to predict co-and post-translational modifications is given in Table 2. Recent evidence suggests that some protein structures could directly confer protein association with NDs. Experiments utilizing a fusion of yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) to the C-terminus of potato Remorin1.3 (RemCA) containing an α-helical structure that forms a tight amphipathic hairpin within the lipid bilayer showed that this structure alone was sufficient to target the protein to DRMs (Perraki et al., 2012). Homologous peptides were subsequently identified in publicly available databases (Raffaele et al., 2013), but have not been confirmed. Multiple members of the remorin family in Arabidopsis are predicted and/or verified to be S-acylated at C-terminal cysteine residues, which is not sufficient for their interaction with the PM, but rather appears to enhance their interaction with this lipid environment (Hemsley et al., 2013; Konrad et al., 2014). A putative S-acylation site was also predicted for Flotillin1 (Borner et al., 2005), but still awaits experimental confirmation. Sterol and SL inhibitors and dyes used to analyse ND function Sterol and SL biosynthetic inhibitors have been extensively used to dissect ND function (Laloi et al., 2007; Titapiwatanakun et al., 2009; Li et al., 2011; Markham et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2013). The effects of pharmacological inhibitors can be controlled in a spatiotemporal manner that increases the chances to pinpoint the involvement of specific lipid species in ND formation. In combination with microscopic techniques, dyes allow for the direct visualization of the effects of sterol and SL depletion in real-time. However, care must be taken to avoid indirect or solvent effects on membrane integrity that increase marker protein degradation. Some of these inhibitors have been adopted from animal and fungal studies (Baloch et al., 1984; Bagnat et al., 2000) and can be used to distinguish the effects of structural sterol depletion from those of the reduction of steroid hormones Table 2. Searchable databases for protein modifications Modification Software Source Plant Specific General ScanProsite ARAMEMNON ExPASy PredGPI BIG_PI Plant Predictor GPI-SOM FragAnchor CSS-Palm 2.0 PalmPred NBA-Palm NMT-The Myr Predictor ExPASy Myristoylator PlantsP TermiNator3 PrePS de Castro et al. (2006) Schwacke et al. (2003) Artimo et al. (2012) Pierleoni et al. (2008) Eisenhaber et al. (2003) Fankhauser and Mäser (2005) Poisson et al. (2007) Ren et al. (2008) Kumari et al. (2014) Xue et al. (2006) http://mendel.imp.ac.at/myristate/SUPLpredictor.htm http://web.expasy.org/myristoylator/ Podell and Gribskov (2004) Martinez et al. (2008) Maurer-Stroh and Eisenhaber (2005) No Yes No Yes Yes Included Included No No No No Included Yes Included No GPI anchors S-Acylation N-Myristoylation Prenylation Plant nanodomains and protein function | 1579 (brassinosteroids) in plants (Yang et al., 2013). For example, fenpropimorph (FEN) is a chemical inhibitor of sterol synthesis that targets the plant-specific, endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-localized cycloeucalenol-obtusifoliol isomerase, but also has some impact on glucosylceramide (SL) accumulation (Fig. 1; Rahier et al., 1989; Laloi et al., 2007; Men et al., 2008). FEN treatment decreased the amount of Δ5-sterols, glucosylceramide, and overall DRM content of PM fractions from leek seedlings (Laloi et al., 2007). Propiconazol and brassinolide are inhibitors of steroid hormone biosynthesis that can be used to distinguish the effects of structural sterol depletion from hormone signalling (Hartwig et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2013). Methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD) can selectively bind the small sterols in its hydrophobic cavity (Zidovetzki and Levitan, 2007). Treatment of tissues with MβCD strips membrane sterols, and, in most cases, releases or destabilizes sterol-dependent membrane proteins (Ohvo and Slotte, 1996; Zidovetzki and Levitan, 2007; Kierszniowska et al., 2009). It is also possible that MβCD treatment induces endocytosis, as is seen with Flotillin1 (Li et al., 2012). MβCD will displace many ND proteins during transit through secretory compartments beginning at the smooth ER, the initial point of sterol incorporation. However, short-term treatments can be used to restrict MβCD stripping to the PM, and internalization of PM proteins resulting from sterol depletion can be observed within 30–60 min of the treatment (Li et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2013). MβCD treatment has also been used as a tool in proteomic analyses to differentiate membrane proteins that partition into DRMs due to sterol association from other DRM proteins (Kierszniowska et al., 2009). This study showed that regulatory/signalling membrane proteins are less consistently found to be associated with DRMs compared with, for instance, the FLAs. Filipin is an antibiotic with sterol-binding fluorochrome properties. Its fluorescent property (excitation 360 nm, emission 480 nm) makes it a useful sterol visualization agent (Norman et al., 1972; Drabikowski et al., 1973). However, filipin also disrupts sterol interactions and has been used to interfere with internalization of PIN2 (Men et al., 2008). Filipin also binds to PL when used at higher concentrations (Drabikowski et al., 1973) and can introduce lesions in the lipid bilayer, which could lead to unspecific internalization or clustering of proteins (Santos et al., 1998). The primary pharmacological SL biosynthesis inhibitor used in plant ND studies is the mycotoxin fumonisin B1 (FB1). FB1 inhibits ceramide synthase activity and has been shown to interrupt SL biosynthesis in plants (Wang et al., 1991; Abbas et al., 1994). However, as SLs are highly stable, depletion of SLs from membranes after FB1 treatment is relatively slow (Yang et al., 2013). 1-Phenyl-2-palmitoylamino3-morpholino-1-propanol, which is a glycosylceramide synthase inhibitor, is also used as an SL synthesis inhibitor (Yang et al., 2013), but is thought to have multiple targets in Fig. 1. Sites of alteration of lipid biosynthesis/content resulting from genetic lesions or pharmacological inhibition. Sphingolipid biosynthetic inhibitors are marked in red, sterol inhibitors are blue, and trafficking inhibitors are in black. Short-term treatment with FEN and MβCD leads to the internalization of sterol-dependent PM proteins. FEN-sensitive PM proteins have been found to be internalized to TGN/EE compartments (marked by ‘1st’) and characterized by SYP61 (green spiked vesicle). After extended treatment with MβCD and FEN, internalized proteins can first be found in the PVC/MVB (marked by ‘2nd’). The SYP61 compartment functions primarily in anterograde secretion of PM proteins (thicker arrow) but also receives a subset of PM proteins after endocytosis. Nanodomain-associated ABCB proteins co-localize with so-called ‘endosin bodies’ marked by SYP61 that are formed after treatment with ES-1 (Robert et al., 2008). ConcA, which induces fusion of PVC/MVB vesicles with TGN/EE vesicles, is marked by SYP61 and SLs. The thiol protease inhibitor E-64d inhibits the fusion of SYP61 with the PVC/MVB in an SL-dependent manner. PVC/MVB, pre-vacuolar compartment/ multivesicular body; TGN/EE, trans-Golgi network/early endosome; ConcA, concanamycin A; ES-1, endosidin1; FEN, fenpropimorph; FB1, fumonisin B1. Mutations: gcs, glycosylceramide synthase; pas1, pasticcino1; loh1,3: LAG1 homologue; tsc10a-2, temperature-sensitive CSG2 suppressor; cvp1-3, cotyledon vascular pattern1; cpi1-1, cyclopropylsterol isomerase1, erh1, enhancing RPW8-mediated HR-like cell death, codes for IPCS. 1580 | Tapken and Murphy plants. An overview of where the pharmacological inhibitors and lipid stripping agents function in the plant cell is shown in Fig. 1. Use of sterol and SL biosynthetic mutants to analyse ND function An alternative to the use of sterol and SL biosynthetic inhibitors is the use of well-characterized sterol and SL biosynthesis mutants in Arabidopsis (Willemsen et al., 2003; Men et al., 2008; Pan et al., 2009; Carland et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2013). Biosynthetic mutants are particularly useful, as lesions in genes encoding enzymes in the biosynthetic pathway can eliminate a desired lipid species. For example, cotyledon vascular pattern 1 (cvp1) is defective in sterol methyl transferase 2 (SMT2) and contains low levels of structural sterols, but not low levels of steroid hormones (Carland et al., 2010). The cvp1-3 mutant develops in a relatively normal fashion and sets seed. It also expresses lower levels of SMT1 and SMT3, thus reducing structural sterol levels in the root epidermis where high- resolution light microscopy analyses of fluorescent proteins and membrane dyes are most effective. Studies of cvp1-3 have been used to identify defects in trafficking of sterol-associated proteins such as PIN2, ABCB4, and ABCB19 (Pan et al., 2009; Yang et al., 2013). However, the residual levels of structural sterols in cvp1-3 epidermal cells and their contribution to PM protein stability are difficult to determine. An alternative is the use of mutants with lesions in cyclopropylsterol isomerase1/cycloeucalenol-obtusifoliol isomerase (cpi1/coi) that is expressed in epidermal cells (Men et al., 2008), and has been used to analyse trafficking of sterol-associated proteins (Men et al., 2008; Pan et al., 2009; Yang et al., 2013). However, cpi1 mutants are severely stunted and are defective in brassinosteroid biosynthesis (Men et al., 2008). Further, levels of the minority structural sterols cycloeucalenol and 24-methylenecycloartanol are higher in cpi1 than in the wild type, and potentially substitute for stigmasterol and sitosterol, leading to false-negative results (Men et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2013). Other mutants that have been utilized in trafficking studies are fackel, a weak sterol C14 reductase allele that is defective in later steps of sterol biosynthesis and exhibits faulty stomatal precursor cell division (Jang et al., 2000; Qian et al., 2013), and sterol methyltransferase 1 (smt1orc) that is defective in conversion of 24-methylenelophenol into citrostadienol, a precursor of stigmasterol, and exhibits dwarfism and cotyledon defects (Willemsen et al., 2003). Both of these mutants exhibit faulty PM localization of PIN proteins (Willemsen et al., 2003; Pan et al., 2009). Reduction of SL levels results in a visible effect on localization of ND-associated proteins. Reductions of very long chain fatty acids that contribute to SL formation in pasticcino1 mutants and multiple SLs in lag1 homolog 1 and 3 result in reduced auxin transport and partial mislocalization of PIN1 (Roudier et al., 2010; Markham et al., 2011), similar to what is observed in the abcb19 mutant. The temperature-sensitive CSG2 suppressor gene (tsc10a-2) encodes a 3-ketodihydrosphinganine reductase, a SL biosynthesis mutant that exhibits increased tricotyledon formation (Chao et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2013) and phenotypes similar to abcb19 (Yang et al., 2013). ABCB19 was shown to aggregate partially in compartments marked by SYP61 and the V-SNARE VTI12 in tsc10a, and PIN1 exhibited mislocalization similar to that observed in abcb19 mutants. Trafficking of ND-associated proteins Plant sterols and SLs are initially synthesized in the smooth ER and then are elaborated by glycosylation, acylation, and lipidification during anterograde movement through the secretory system (Bowles et al., 1977; Moreau et al., 1998; Melkonian et al., 1999; Rennie et al., 2014). Analysis of membrane fractions from leek seedlings showed that DRMs are only present in post-ER membrane compartments (Laloi et al., 2007), and NDs appear first to assemble within the Golgi and trans-Golgi network (TGN) (Laloi et al., 2007; Klemm et al., 2009). However, the exact timing of formation of specific types of NDs, the extent to which ND-associated proteins help nucleate and maintain NDs, and the relative roles of lipid species in the process remain unresolved. These questions are increasingly being examined in live imaging studies using variants of laser scanning confocal and TIRF microscopy in combination with lipid dyes, pharmacological inhibitors, mutants, and subcellular trafficking markers. In these studies, ND–protein associations have been confirmed to occur primarily in post-Golgi compartments, especially at the TGN/early endosome (EE), where exocytotic and endocytotic events co-occur (Dettmer et al., 2006). For example, PM abundance of the auxin transporter PIN2 is regulated by both secretion and endocytosis from the PM. In the sterol biosynthesis mutant cpi1-1, an increase of PIN2 at the PM is detected (Men et al., 2008). FRAP analysis in the presence of the vesicle trafficking inhibitor brefeldin A (BFA) suggested that the increase of PIN2 at the PM is due to reduced endocytosis of the protein. This regulation is consistent with the observed regulation of PIN2 abundance by ROP GTPases (Chen et al., 2012; Lin et al., 2012) that have been independently shown to associate with NDs (Prior et al., 2001, Sorek et al., 2007, 2010). ABCB19 occurs in NDs that appear to be compositionally different from the most common forms, and has been shown to recruit PIN1 into, or maintain PIN1 within these domains (Titapiwatanakun et al., 2009). The ABCB19/PIN1-ND is formed during anterograde trafficking through the secretory pathway (Yang et al., 2013). Short-term treatment with FEN results in the initial accumulation of ABCB19 in a TGN/EE compartment labelled by SYP61 before ultimate diversion to the pre-vacuolar compartment (PVC) via vesicles marked by VTI12 (Yang et al., 2013). This SYP61 compartment is part of both exocytotic and endocytotic streams, and thus contains lipids and proteins from both pathways (Dettmer et al., 2006). FRAP analysis of ABCB19–green fluorescent protein (GFP) showed slow recovery of PM signals and enhanced fluorescence recovery in FEN-treated SYP61 compartments, Plant nanodomains and protein function | 1581 indicating that indeed exit of ABCB19–GFP from the SYP61 compartment is impaired in the presence of FEN. Thus, only the last step in trafficking of ABCB19 through the secretory pathway is dependent on sterols. However, depletion of SLs resulted in the accumulation of ABCB19–GFP in a different compartment. Treatment with FB1 resulted in the accumulation of ABCB19–GFP in the Golgi, and only a fraction was able to reach the TGN and PM (Yang et al., 2013). Similar results were observed in the SL biosynthesis mutant tsc10a-2. These experiments indicate that SLs and sterols assemble with proteins associated with this class of NDs in discrete stages, with SL association preceding sterol packing. Although these results differ from what had been previously proposed for DRMs (Laloi et al., 2007), it is also more consistent with the more recent recognition of GIPC abundance in Arabidopsis PMs (Blaas and Humpf, 2013; Markham et al., 2013). ABCB4 is regularly detected in canonical DRMs (Borner et al., 2005), and recently in SYP61 proteomics (Drakakaki et al., 2012). ABCB4 is also reduced in tsc10a-2 and after FB1 treatment, though to a lesser extent than ABCB19 (Yang et al., 2013). ABCB4 localization to the PM is also sensitive to very low concentrations of dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO; 0.05%), which is a common solvent for pharmacological inhibitors, dyes, and growth regulators (Kubeš et al., 2012). DMSO introduces water pores into lipid bilayers (Notman et al., 2006), which could potentially disturb lipid–protein interactions in ND-associated proteins. Such dissociation is likely to contribute to the observed ND dissociation, subsequent internalization, and exposure of proteolytic cleavage sites in ABCB4. For example, mammalian protein kinase C is stable at the membrane when it interacts with acidic lipids. In the presence of phosphatidylserine and diacylglycerol it is destabilized, exposing a proteolytic site within the protein, which ultimately leads to its degradation by Arg-C (Orr et al., 1992). A clear example of ND-dependent recruitment is seen in ABA regulation of Arabidopsis SLAH3. SLAH3 is a PM/ND-localized anion channel that is involved in ABA signalling (Geiger et al., 2011). Without the indirect activation of SLAH3 by the presence of ABA, the protein is primarily found in detergent-soluble endomembranes (Demir et al., 2013). SLAH3 activity depends strongly on its interaction with CPK21 at the PM, but this interaction is inhibited in the absence of ABA through the binding of the signalling phosphatase ABI1 to CPK21. The presence of ABA prevents this interaction, as under these conditions ABI1 preferentially forms a complex with ABA-bound RCAR1/PYL9. In the presence of ABA, the protein complex SLAH3/CPK21 is associated with sterol- and SL-rich NDs (Fig. 2; Demir et al., 2013). CPK21 localization to the ND is sterol dependent, as treatment with MβCD releases it from the PM. SLAH3/ CPK21-ND formation occurs at the PM and not during anterograde trafficking within the secretory pathway. This association has been described as fully reversible and thus appears to differ from ABCB19. ABCG36/PEN3 is associated with multiple stress responses including pathogen responses, suggesting that NDs may function in a manner analogous to pathogen interactions observed in other kingdoms (Triantafilou et al., 2002; Rogers et al., 2012). ABCG36/PEN3 is regarded as a component of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP)triggered immune response in Arabidopsis, and is activated upon infection with the powdery mildew Blumeria graminis (Underwood and Somerville, 2013). ABCG36/PEN3 exhibits a uniform PM distribution in uninfected wild-type leaf cells (Underwood and Somerville, 2013), and is also present within the SYP61 compartment (Drakakaki et al., 2012). Upon attempted fungal penetration, it forms distinct puncta at the site of infection, where it accumulates in the extracellular space within the papillae, into which it facilitates the transport of antimicrobial metabolites. In the roots, ABCG36/PEN3 is polar localized to the basal PM, designated as the outer polar domain, which defines the interface between the plant and the surrounding soil (Langowski et al., 2010). Notably, neither FB1 (SL biosynthesis inhibitor) nor FEN (sterol biosynthesis inhibitor) treatment appear to have a specific effect on its PM localization (Yang et al., 2013). Fig. 2. Schematic representation of the SLAH3/CPK21 and ABCB19/PIN1 membrane nanodomains. Left: SLAH3 is active in the presence of abscisic acid (ABA). Binding of ABA to the RCAR/PYL9 receptor recruits ABI1 to the complex and blocks CPK21 interaction. This allows for the formation of the SLAH3/CPK21 complex in sterol- and SL-rich nanodomains. Whether ABI1 shows preferential binding to either nanodomains (SL shown with yellow head groups, sterols as small grey structures) or phospholipids (blue head groups) of the plasma membrane is not known. Centre: in the absence of ABA, ABI1 binds to CPK21, and SLAH3/CPK21 complex formation is inhibited. Under these conditions, SLAH3 and CPK21 are mainly found in detergent-soluble membranes. Red arrows indicate movement of CPK21 out of the nanodomains. Right: ABCB19/PIN1 interact in nanodomains with the result of increased specificity and effectiveness of polarized auxin transport. Consistent identification of FLA2 and other GPI-anchored fasciclin-like arabinogalactan proteins in nanodomains, and co-purification of FLA2 with ABCB19 suggest that a subclass of FLAs function in nanodomain–cell wall interactions. Schematic representation of FLA2 interaction with the ND via the C-terminal GPI anchor is shown. Grey rectangle, ethanolamine; blue circles, mannose; green circle, glucosamine; red lipid head group, inositol. 1582 | Tapken and Murphy Inositol phosphoryl ceramide synthase (IPCS) converts ceramide (SL) into inositol phosphorylceramide, which can be subsequently converted to GIPC (Rennie et al., 2014). IPCS was originally identified in an enhancer screen for RESISTANCE TO POWDERY MILDEW8 (RPW8), which confers the hypersensitive response to multiple powdery mildew pathogens (Xiao et al., 2001; Wang et al., 2008). In IPCSdefective mutants, the ceramide concentration is increased, resulting in elevated salicylic acid accumulation and RPW8 expression, and ultimately to increased resistance to powdery mildew (Wang et al., 2008). IPCS, like ABCB19, ABCB4, and ABCG36/PEN3, was localized to the SYP61 compartment. Thus, it appears to have a dual role in resistance to powdery mildew, by controlling the amounts of the signalling lipid ceramide through IPCS, and shuttling ABCG36/PEN3 to the sites of infection. Together, this also focuses our attention on the SYP61 compartment as an important component in ND trafficking and formation. The presence of IPCS in this compartment raises the possibility that even after exit from the Golgi, ND formation and restructuring of proteins could still occur. Do cell wall interactions stabilize NDs? Although NDs are clearly shown to stabilize associated protein complexes at the PM, there is currently no evidence that they function directly in polar trafficking events. However, as is the case with polarized PIN1 auxin transporter (Feraru et al., 2011), enzymatic removal and mutational disruption of the cell wall results in a more diffuse and uniform distribution of ABCB auxin transporters at the PM. This suggests that ND interactions with cell walls may occur via embedded proteins with exoplasmic interaction structures. Interestingly, the cell wall itself was shown to be sufficient for constraining the movement of ND-partinioning minimal proteins (containing only the membrane-spanning domains; Martinière et al., 2012). Two groups of proteins that consistently occur in DRM fractions are the FLAs and jacalin lectin proteins. FLAs are considered primary candidates for this function, as they comprise a large family, are GPI anchored, and contain arabinogalactan moieties that would be likely to interact with cell wall carbohydrates (Elortza et al., 2003; Johnson et al., 2003; Huang et al., 2013). However, such a function has not yet been clearly demonstrated for specific NDs. Conclusions The role of ordered membrane domains in regulating the trafficking and function of plant membrane proteins has gradually moved from the realm of speculation to accepted science. Studies of ND function in plants have been greatly enhanced by elucidation of plant and mammalian pathogen responses and the development of lipid-selective isolation techniques. Recent elucidation of SL biosynthetic pathways, development of a wide array of tools to explore PM–cell wall interactions, and the adaptation of new techniques to live imaging of plants have improved the characterization of plant ND formation and function. Wholesale biochemical isolation of DRMs has now been largely replaced by more refined cell biological approaches that track candidate proteins as they are incorporated into and interact with other proteins in sterol- and SL-rich domains. The ability to target and modify ND-associated proteins selectively and visualize them in planta with high-resolution microscopy techniques is likely to clarify the precise functions of ND structures in the near future. Acknowledgements This work was supported by the Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences, grant no. DE-FG02-13ER16405 to ASM. General infrastructure support for the project was provided by the Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station. References Abbas HK, Tanaka T, Duke SO, Porter JK, Wray EM, Hodges L, Sessions AE, Wang E, Merrill AH Jr, Riley RT. 1994. Fumonisin- and AAL-toxin-induced disruption of sphingolipid metablism with accumulation of free sphingoid bases. Plant Physiology 106, 1085–1093. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. 2000. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796–815. Artimo P, Jonnalagedda M, Arnold K, et al. 2012. ExPASy: SIB bioinformatics resource portal. Nucleic Acid Research 40, W597–W603. Assaad FF, Qiu J-L, Youngs H, et al. 2004. The PEN1 syntaxin defines a novel cellular compartment assembly of papillae. Molecular Biology of the Cell 15, 5118–5129. Babuke T, Tikkanen R. 2007. Dissecting the molecular function of reggie/flotillin proteins. European Journal of Cell Biology 86, 525–532. Bagnat M, Keränen S, Shevchenko A, Shevchenko A, Simons K. 2000. Lipid rafts function in biosynthetic delivery of proteins to the cell surface in yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 7, 3255–3259. Baloch RI, Mercer EI, Wiggins TE, Baldwin BC. 1984. Inhibition of ergosterol biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Ustilago maydis by tridemorph, fenpropimorph and fenpropidin. Phytochemistry 23, 2219–2226. Bavari S, Bosio CM, Wiegand E, Ruthel G, Will A, Geisbert T, Hevey M, Schaljohn C, Schmaljohn A, Aman MJ. 2002. Lipid raft microdomains: a gateway for compartmentalized trafficking of Ebola and Marburg viruses. Journal of Experimental Medicine 195, 11–14. Beck JG, Mathieu D, Loudet C, Buchoux S, Dufourc EJ. 2007. Plant sterols in ‘rafts’: a better way to regulate membrane thermal shocks. FASEB Journal 21, 1714–1723. Benková E, Michniewicz M, Sauer M, Teichmann T, Seifertová D, Jürgens G, Friml J. 2003. Local, efflux-dependent auxin gradients as a common module for plant organ formation. Cell 115, 591–602. Bhat RA, Miklis M, Schmelzer E, Schulze-Lefert P, Panstruga R. 2005. Recruitment and interaction dynamics of plant penetration resistance components in a plasma membrane microdomain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102, 3135–3140. Bickel PE. 1997. Flotillin and epidermal surface antigen define a new family of caveolae-associated integral membrane proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry 272, 13793–13802. Blaas N, Humpf H. 2013. Structural profiling and quantitation of glycosyl inositol phosphoceramides in plants with Fourier transform mass spectrometry. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 61, 4257–4269. Blakeslee JJ, Bandyopadhyay A, Lee OR, et al. 2007. Interactions among PIN-FORMED and P-glycoprotein auxin transporters in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 19, 131–147. Borner GHH, Sherrier DJ, Stevens TJ, Arkin IT, Dupree P. 2003. Prediction of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins in Arabidopsis. A genomic analysis. Plant Physiology 129, 486–499. Plant nanodomains and protein function | 1583 Borner GHH, Sherrier DJ, Weimar T, Michaelson LV, Hawkins ND, Macaskill A, Napier JA, Beale MH, Lilley KS, Dupree P. 2005. Analysis of detergent-resistant membranes in Arabidopsis. Evidence for plasma membrane lipid rafts. Plant Physiology 137, 104–116. Bowles D, Lehle L, Kauss H. 1977. Glucosylation of sterols and polyprenolphosphate in the Golgi apparatus of Phaseolus aureus. Planta 134, 177–181. Bozkurt TO, Richardson A, Dagdas YF, Mongrand S, Kamoun S, Raffaele S. 2014. The plant membrane-associated REMORIN1.3 accumulates in discrete perihaustorial domains and enhances susceptibility to Phytophthora infestans. Plant Physiology 165, 1005–1018. Brown DA, London E. 1998. Structure and origin of ordered lipid domains in biological membranes. Journal of Membrane Biology 164, 103–114. Brown DA, Rose JK. 1992. Sorting of GPI-anchored proteins to membrane subdomains during transport to the apical cell surface. Cell 66, 533–544. Cacas J-L, Furt F, Le Guédard M, Schmitter J-M, Buré C, GerbeauPissot P, Moreau P, Bessoule J-J, Simon-Plas F, Mongrand S. 2012. Lipids of plant membrane rafts. Progress in Lipid Research 51, 272–299. Carland F, Fujioka S, Nelson T. 2010. The sterol methyltransferases SMT1, SMT2, and SMT3 influence Arabidopsis development through nonbrassinosteroid products. Plant Physiology 153, 741–756. Casadei BR, Domingues CC, de Paula E, Riske K. 2014. Direct visualization of the action of Triton X-100 on giant vesicles of erythrocyte membrane lipids. Biophysical Journal 106, 2417–2425. Chao D-Y, Gable K, Chen M, et al. 2011. Sphingolipids in the root play an important role in regulating the leaf ionome in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Cell 23, 1061–1081. Chazal N, Gerlier D. 2003. Virus entry, assembly, budding, and membrane rafts. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 67, 226–237. Chen X, Naramoto S, Robert S, Tejos R, Löfke C, Lin D, Yang Z, Friml J. 2012. ABP1 and ROP6 GTPase signaling regulate clathrinmediated endocytosis in Arabidopsis roots. Current Biology 22, 1326–1332. Craddock C, Lavagi I, Yang Z. 2012. New insights into Rho signaling from plant ROP/Rac GTPases. Trends in Cell Biology 22, 492–501. Dai XR, Gao X-Q, Chen GH, Tang LL, Wang H, Zhang XS. 2014. ABNORMAL POLLEN TUBE GUIDANCE1, an endoplasmic reticulum-localized mannosyltransferase homolog of GLYCOSYLPHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL10 in yeast and PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL GLYCAN ANCHOR BIOSYNTHESIS B in human, is required for Arabidopsis pollen tube micropylar guidance and embryo development. Plant Physiology 165, 1544–1556. de Castro E, Sigrist JA, Gattiker A, Bulliard V, LangendijkGenevaux PS, Gasteiger E, Bairoch A, Hulo N. 2006. ScanProsite: detection of PROSITE signature matches and ProRule-associated functional and structural residues in proteins. Nucleic Acid Research 34, W362–W365. Demir F, Horntrich C, Blachutzik JO, Scherzer S, Reinders Y. 2013. Arabidopsis nanodomain-delimited ABA signaling pathway regulates the anion channel SLAH3. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 110, 8296–8301. Dettmer J, Hong-hermesdorf A, Stierhof Y, Schumacher K. 2006. Vacuolar H1-ATPase activity is required for endocytic and secretory trafficking in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 18, 715–730. Drabikowski W, Łagwińska E, Sarzała MG. 1973. Filipin as a fluorescent probe for the location of cholesterol in the membranes of fragmented sarcoplasmic reticulum. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 291, 61–70. Drakakaki G, van de Ven W, Pan S, et al. 2012. Isolation and proteomic analysis of the SYP61 compartment reveal its role in exocytic trafficking in Arabidopsis. Cell Research 22, 413–424. Dupont S, Lemetais G, Ferreira T, Cayot P, Gervais P, Beney L. 2012. Ergosterol biosynthesis: a fungal pathway for life on land? Evolution 66, 2961–2968. Edstam MM, Edqvist J. 2014. Involvement of GPI-anchored lipid transfer proteins in the development of seed coats and pollen in Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiologia Plantarum 152, 32–42. Eisenhaber B, Wildpaner M, Schultz CJ, Borner GHH, Dupree P, Eisenhaber F. 2003. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol lipid anchoring of plant proteins. Sensitive prediction from sequence- and genome-wide studies for Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Physiology 133, 1691–1701. Elortza F, Nühse TS, Foster LJ, Stensballe A, Peck SC, Jensen ON. 2003. Proteomic analysis of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane proteins. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2, 1261–1270. Fankhauser N, Mäser P. 2005. Identification of GPI anchor attachment signals by a Kohonen self-organizing map. Bioinformatics 21, 1846–1852. Farmer EE, Pearce G, Ryan CA. 1989. In vitro phosphorylation of plant plasma membrane proteins in response to the proteinase inhibitor inducing factor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 86, 1539–1542. Feraru E, Feraru MI, Kleine-Vehn J, Martinière A, Mouille G, Vanneste S, Vernhettes S, Runions J, Friml J. 2011. PIN polarity maintenance by the cell wall in Arabidopsis. Current Biology 21, 338–343. Fernandez-Calvino L, Faulkner C, Walshaw J, Saalbach G, Bayer E, Benitez-Alfonso Y, Maule A. 2011. Arabidopsis plasmodesmal proteome. PLoS One 6, e18880. Fondong VN, Reddy RVC, Lu C, Hankoua B, Felton C, Czymmek K, Achenjang F. 2007. The Consensus N-myristoylation motif of a geminivirus AC4 protein is required for membrane binding and pathogenicity. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 20, 380–391. Fourcroy P, Sisó-Terraza P, Sudre D, Savirón M, Reyt G, Gaymard F, Abadía A, Abadia J, Álvarez-Fernández A, Briat J-F. 2014. Involvement of the ABCG37 transporter in secretion of scopoletin and derivatives by Arabidopsis roots in response to iron deficiency. New Phytologist 201, 155–167. Fujiwara M, Hamada S, Hiratsuka M, Fukao Y, Kawasaki T, Shimamoto K. 2009. Proteome analysis of detergent-resistant membranes (DRMs) associated with OsRac1-mediated innate immunity in rice. Plant and Cell Physiology 50, 1191–1200. Gälweiler L, Guan C, Müller A, Wisman E, Mendgen K, Yephremov A, Palme K. 1998. Regulation of polar auxin transport by AtPIN1 in Arabidopsis vascular tissue. Science 282, 2226–2230. Garner AE, Smith DA, Hooper NM. 2007. Sphingomyelin chain length influences the distribution of GPI-anchored proteins in rafts in supported lipid bilayers. Molecular Membrane Biology 24, 233–242. Geiger D, Maierhofer T, Al-Rasheid KAS, et al. 2011. Stomatal closure by fast abscisic acid signaling is mediated by the guard cell anion channel SLAH3 and the receptor RCAR1. Science Signaling 4, ra32. Geisler M, Blakeslee JJ, Bouchard R, et al. 2005. Cellular efflux of auxin catalyzed by the Arabidopsis MDR/PGP transporter AtPGP1. The Plant Journal 44, 179–194. Grandmougin A, Bouvier-Navé P, Ullmann P, Benveniste P, Hartmann MA. 1989. Cyclopropyl sterol and phospholipid composition of membrane fractions from maize roots treated with fenpropimorph. Plant Physiology 90, 591–597. Gutierrez R, Grossmann G, Frommer WB, Ehrhardt DW. 2010. Opportunities to explore plant membrane organization with superresolution microscopy. Plant Physiology 154, 463–466. Haney CH, Long SR. 2010. Plant flotillins are required for infection by nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107, 478–483. Hartwig T, Corvalan C, Best NB, Budka JS, Zhu J-Y, Choe S, Schulz B. 2012. Propiconazole is a specific and accessible brassinosteroid (BR) biosynthesis inhibitor for Arabidopsis and maize. PLoS One 7, e36625. Heerklotz H. 2002. Triton promotes domain formation in lipid raft mixtures. Biophysical Journal 83, 2693–2701. Hemsley PA. 2014. The importance of lipid modified proteins in plants. New Phytologist 205, 476–489. Hemsley PA, Kemp AC, Grierson CS. 2005. The TIP GROWTH DEFECTIVE1 S-acyl transferase regulates plant cell growth in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 17, 2554–2563. Hemsley PA, Weimar T, Lilley KS, Dupree P, Grierson CS. 2013. A proteomic approach identifies many novel palmitoylated proteins in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist 197, 805–814. Huang G-Q, Gong S-Y, Xu W-L, Li W, Li P, Zhang C-J, Li D-D, Zheng Y, Li F-G, Li X-B. 2013. A fasciclin-like arabinogalactan protein, GhFLA1, 1584 | Tapken and Murphy is involved in fiber initiation and elongation of cotton. Plant Physiology 161, 1278–1290. Ikonen E, Simons K. 1998. Protein and lipid sorting from the trans-Golgi network to the plasma membrane in polarized cells. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 9, 503–509. Ito H, Gray WM. 2009. A gain-of-function mutation in the Arabidopsis pleiotropic drug resistance transporter PDR9 confers resistance to auxinic herbicides. Plant Physiology 142, 63–74. Jang J-C, Fujioka S, Tasaka M, Seto H, Takatsuto S, Ishii A, Aida M, Yoshida S, Sheen J. 2000. A critical role of sterols in embryonic patterning and meristem programming revealed by the fackel mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes and Development 14, 1485–1497. Jarsch IK, Konrad SS, Stratil TF, Urbanus SL, Szymanski W, Braun P, Braun K-H, Ott T. 2014. Plasma membranes are subcompartmentalized into a plethora of coexisting and diverse microdomains in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana. The Plant Cell 26, 1698–1711. Johnson KL, Jones BJ, Bacic A, Schultz CJ. 2003. The fasciclin-like arabinogalactan proteins of Arabidopsis. A multigene family of putative cell adhesion molecules. Plant Physiology 133, 1911–1925. Kamimoto Y, Terasaka K, Hamamoto M, et al. 2012. Arabidopsis ABCB21 is a facultative auxin importer/exporter regulated by cytoplasmic auxin concentration. Plant and Cell Physiology 53, 2090–2100. Kaneda M, Schuetz M, Lin BSP, Chanis C, Hamberger B, Western TL, Ehlting J, Samuels AL. 2011. ABC transporters coordinately expressed during lignification of Arabidopsis stems include a set of ABCBs associated with auxin transport. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 2063–2077. Katsuhara, M, Hanba YT, Shiratake K, Maeshima M. 2008. Expanding roles of plant aquaporins in plasma membranes and cell organelles. Functional Plant Biology 35, 1–14. Kierszniowska S, Seiwert B, Schulze WX. 2009. Definition of Arabidopsis sterol-rich membrane microdomains by differential treatment with methyl-beta-cyclodextrin and quantitative proteomics. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 8, 612–623. Kim D-Y, Bovet L, Maeshima M, Martinoia E, Lee Y. 2007. The ABC transporter AtPDR8 is a cadmium extrusion pump conferring heavy metal resistance. The Plant Journal 50, 207–218. Kimura S, Laosinchai W, Itoh T, Cui X, Linder CR, Brown RM. 1999. Immunogold labeling of rosette terminal cellulose-synthesizing complexes in the vascular plant Vigna angularis. The Plant Cell 11, 2075–2085. Klemm RW, Ejsing CS, Surma M, et al. 2009. Segregation of sphingolipids and sterols during formation of secretory vesicles at the trans-Golgi network. Journal of Cell Biology 185, 601–612. Konopka C, Bednarek SY. 2008. Variable-angle epifluorescence microscopy: a new way to look at protein dynamics in the plant cell cortex. The Plant Journal 53, 186–196. Konrad SS, Popp C, Stratil TF, Jarsch IK, Thallmair V, Folgmann J, Marín M, Ott T. 2014. S-acylation anchors remorin proteins to the plasma membrane but does not primarily determine their localization in membrane microdomains. New Phytologist 203, 758–769. Kubeš M, Yang H, Richter GL, et al. 2012. The Arabidopsis concentration-dependent influx/efflux transporter ABCB4 regulates cellular auxin levels in the root epidermis. The Plant Journal 69, 640–654. Kumari B, Kumar R, Kumar M. 2014. PalmPred: an SVM based palmitoylation prediction method using sequence profile information. PLoS One 9, e89246. Laloi M, Perret A-M, Chatre L, et al. 2007. Insights into the role of specific lipids in the formation and delivery of lipid microdomains to the plasma membrane of plant cells. Plant Physiology 143, 461–472. Langowski L, Růzicka K, Naramoto S, Kleine-Vehn J, Friml J. 2010. Trafficking to the outer polar domain defines the root–soil interface. Current Biology 20, 904–908. Lasserre R, Guo X-J, Conchonaud F, et al. 2008. Raft nanodomains contribute to Akt/PKB membrane recruitment and activation. Nature Chemical Biology 4, 538–547 Lefebvre B, Timmers T, Mbengue M, et al. 2010. A remorin protein interacts with symbiotic receptors and regulates bacterial infection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107, 2343–2348. Lewis DR, Miller ND, Splitt BL, Wu G, Spalding EP. 2007. Separating the roles of acropetal and basipetal auxin transport on gravitropism with mutations in two Arabidopsis multidrug resistance-like ABC transporter genes. The Plant Cell 19, 1838–1850. Li S, Ge F-R, Xu M, et al. 2013. Arabidopsis COBRA-LIKE 10, a GPIanchored protein, mediates directional growth of pollen tubes. The Plant Journal 74, 486–497. Li X, Wanh X, Yang Y, Li R, He Q, Fang X, Luu D-T, Maurel C, Lin J. 2011. Single-molecule analysis of PIP2;1 dynamics and partitioning reveals multiple modes of Arabidopsis plasma membrane aquaporin regulation. The Plant Cell 23, 3780–3797 Li R, Liu P, Wan Y, et al. 2012. A membrane microdomain-associated protein, Arabidopsis Flot1, is involved in a clathrin-independent endocytic pathway required for seedling development. The Plant Cell 24, 2105–2122. Lin D, Nagawa S, Chen J, et al. 2012. A ROP GTPase-dependent auxin signaling pathway regulates the subcellular distribution of PIN2 in Arabidopsis roots. Current Biology 22, 1319–1325. Lingwood D, Simons K. 2010. Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle. Science 327, 46–50. Marhavý P, Bielach A, Abas L, et al. 2011. Cytokinin modulates endocytic trafficking of PIN1 auxin efflux carrier to control plant organogenesis. Developmental Cell 21, 796–804. Markham JE, Li J, Cahoon EB, Jaworski JG. 2006. Separation and identification of major plant sphingolipid classes from leaves. Journal of Biological Chemistry 281, 22684–22694. Markham JE, Molino D, Gissot L, Bellec Y, Hématy K, Marion J, Belcram K, Palauqui J-C, Satiat-Jeunemaître B, Faure J-D. 2011. Sphingolipids containing very-long-chain fatty acids define a secretory pathway for specific polar plasma membrane protein targeting in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 23, 2362–2378. Markham JE, Lynch DV, Napier J, Dunn TM, Cahoon EB. 2013. Plant sphingolipids: function follows form. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 16, 350–357. Martin SW, Glover BJ, Davis JM. 2005. Lipid microdomains—plant membranes get organized. Trends in Plant Science 10, 263–265. Martinez A, Traverso JA, Valot B, Ferro M, Espagne C, Ephritikhine G, Zivy M, Giglione C, Meinnel T. 2008. Extent of N-terminal modifications in cytosolic proteins from eukaryotes. Proteomics 8, 2809–2831. Martinière A, Lavagi I, Nageswaran G, et al. 2012. Cell wall constrains lateral diffusion of plant plasma-membrane proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109, 12805–12810. Matsui H, Fujiwara M, Hamada S, Shimamoto K, Nomura Y, Nakagami H, Takahashi A, Hirochika H. 2014. Plasma membrane localization is essential for Oryza sativa Pto-interacting protein 1a-mediated negative regulation of immune signaling in rice. Plant Physiology 166, 327–336. Maurer-Stroh S, Eisenhaber F. 2005. Refinement of prediction of protein prenylation motifs. Genome Biology 6, R55. Maurer-Stroh S, Washietl S, Eisenhaber F. 2003. Protein prenyltransferases. Gene organization and evolutionary history. Genome Biology 4, 212. Melkonian KA, Ostermeyer AG, Chen JZ, Roth MG, Brown DA. 1999. Role of lipid modifications in targeting proteins to detergent-resistant membrane rafts. Many raft proteins are acylated, while few are prenylated. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274, 3910–3917. Men S, Boutté Y, Ikeda Y, Li X, Palme K, Stierhof Y-D, Hartmann M-A, Moritz T, Grebe M. 2008. Sterol-dependent endocytosis mediates post-cytokinetic acquisition of PIN2 auxin efflux carrier polarity. Nature Cell Biology 10, 237–244. Minami A, Fujiwara M, Furuto A, Fukao Y, Yamashita T, Kamo M, Kawamura Y, Uemura M. 2008. Alterations in detergent-resistant plasma membrane microdomains in Arabidopsis thaliana during cold acclimation. Plant and Cell Physiology 50, 341–359. Mitra K, Ubarretxena-Belandia I, Taguchi T, Warren G, Engelman DM. 2003. Modulation of the bilayer thickness of exocytic pathway membranes by membrane proteins rather than cholesterol. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101, 4083–4088. Mongrand S, Morel J, Laroche J, Claverol S, Carde J-P, Hartmann M-A, Bonneu M, Simon-Plas F, Lessire R, Bessoule J-J. 2004. Lipid Plant nanodomains and protein function | 1585 rafts in higher plant cells: purification and characterization of Triton X-100insoluble microdomains from tobacco plasma membrane. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, 36277–36286. Mongrand S, Stanislas T, Bayer EMF, Lherminier J, Simon-Plas F. 2010. Membrane rafts in plant cells. Trends in Plant Science 15, 656–663. Moreau P, Perret A, Cassagne C, France PM. 1998. Transport of sterols to the plasma membrane of leek seedlings. Plant Physiology 24, 931–937. Morel J, Claverol S, Mongrand S, Furt F, Fromentin J, Bessoule J-J, Blein J-P, Simon-Plas F. 2006. Proteomics of plant detergent-resistant membranes. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 5, 1396–1411. Murray D, Ben-Tal N, Honig B, McLaughlin S. 1997. Electrostatic interaction of myristoylated proteins with membranes: simple physics, complicated biology. Structure 5, 985–989. Nguyen DH, Hildreth JEK. 2000. Evidence for budding of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 selectively from glycolipid-enriched membrane lipid rafts. Journal of Virology 74, 3264–3272. Nielsen ME, Feechan A, Böhlenius H, Ueda T, Thordal-Christensen H. 2012. Arabidopsis ARF-GTP exchange factor, GNOM, mediates transport required for innate immunity and focal accumulation of syntaxin PEN1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109, 11443–11448. Noh B, Murphy AS, Spalding EP. 2001. Multidrug resistance-like genes of Arabidopsis required for auxin transport and auxin-mediated development. The Plant Cell 13, 2441–2454. Norberg P, Liljenberg C. 1991. Lipids of the plasma membranes prepared from oat root cells. Plant Physiology 96, 1136–1141. Norman AW, Demel RA, De Kruyff B, Van Deenen LLM. 1972. Studies on the biological properties of polyene antibiotics. Evidence for the direct interaction of filipin with cholesterol. Journal of Biological Chemistry 47, 1918–1929. Notman R, Noro M, Malley BO, Anwar J. 2006. Molecular basis for dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) action on lipid membranes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 128, 13982–13983. Ohvo H, Slotte JP. 1996. Cyclodextrin-mediated removal of sterols from monolayers: effects of sterol structure and phospholipids on desorption rate. Biochemistry 35, 8018–8024. Orr JW, Keranen LM, Newton AC. 1992. Reversible exposure of the pseudosubstrate domain of protein kinase C by phosphatidylserine and diacylglycerol. Journal of Biological Chemistry 267, 15263–15266. Pan J, Fujioka S, Peng J, Chen J, Li G, Chen R. 2009. The E3 ubiquitin ligase SCFTIR1/AFB and membrane sterols play key roles in auxin regulation of endocytosis, recycling, and plasma membrane accumulation of the auxin efflux transporter PIN2 in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Cell 21, 568–580. Pata MO, Hannun YA, Ng CK-Y. 2010. Plant sphingolipids: decoding the enigma of the Sphinx. New Phytologist 185, 611–630. Perraki A, Cacas J-L, Crowet J-M, Lins L, Castroviejo M, GermanRetana S, Mongrand S, Raffaele S. 2012. Plasma membrane localization of Solanum tuberosum remorin from group 1, homolog 3 is mediated by conformational changes in a novel C-terminal anchor and required for the restriction of potato virus X movement. Plant Physiology 160, 624–637. Pierleoni A, Martelli PL, Casadio R. 2008. PredGPI: a GPI-anchor predictor. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 392. Podell S, Gribskov M. 2004. Predicting N-terminal myristoylation sites in plant proteins. BMC Genomics 5, 37. Poisson G, Chauve C, Chen X, Bergeron A. 2007. FragAnchor: a largescale predictor of glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors in eukaryote protein sequences by qualitative scoring. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 5, 121–130. Prior IA, Harding A, Yan J, Sluimer J, Parton RG, Hancock JF. 2001. GTP-dependent segregation of H-ras from lipid rafts is required for biological activity. Nature Cell Biology 3, 368–375. Qi B, Doughty J, Hooley R. 2013. A Golgi and tonoplast localized S-acyl transferase is involved in cell expansion, cell division, vascular patterning and fertility in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist 200, 444–456. Qi Q, Rajala RVS, Anderson W, Jiang C, Rozwadowski K, Selvaraj G, Sharma R, Datla R. 2000. Molecular cloning, genomic organization, and biochemical characteriztion of myristoyl-CoA:protein N-myristoyltransferase from Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275, 9673–9683. Qian P, Han B, Forestier E, Hu Z, Gao N, Lu W, Schaller H, Li J, Hou S. 2013. Sterols are required for cell-fate commitment and maintenance of the stomatal lineage in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 74, 1029–1044. Raffaele S, Bayer E, Lafarge D, et al. 2009. Remorin, a solanaceae protein resident in membrane rafts and plasmodesmata, impairs potato virus X movement. The Plant Cell 21, 1541–1555. Raffaele S, Perraki A, Mongrand S. 2013. The remorin C-terminal anchor was shaped by convergent evolution among membrane binding domains. Plant Signaling and Behavior 8, e23207. Rahier A, Taton M, Benveniste P. 1989. Cycloeucalenol-obtusifoliol isomerase. Structural requirements for transformation or binding of substrates and inhibitors. European Journal of Biochemistry 181, 615–626. Reid TS, Terry KL, Casey PJ, Beese LS. 2004. Crystallographic analysis of CaaX prenyltransferases complexed with substrates defines rules of protein substrate selectivity. Journal of Molecular Biology 343, 417–433. Reinhardt D, Pesce E-R, Stieger P, Mandel T, Baltensperger K, Bennett M, Traas J, Friml J, Kuhlemeier C. 2005. Regulation of phyllotaxis by polar auxin transport. Nature 426, 255–260. Ren J, Wen L, Gao X, Jin C, Xue J, Yao X. 2008. CSS-Palm 2.0: an updated software for palmitoylation sites prediction. Protein Engineering, Design and Selection 21, 639–644. Rennie EA, Ebert B, Miles GP, et al. 2014. Identification of a sphingolipid α-glucuronosyltransferase that is essential for pollen function in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 26, 3314–3325. Resh MD. 2006. Trafficking and signaling by fatty-acylated and prenylated proteins. Nature Chemical Biology 2, 584–590. Resh MD. 2013. Covalent lipid modifications of proteins. Current Biology 23, R431–R435. Reuff M, Mikosch M, Homann U. 2010. Trafficking, lateral mobility and segregation of the plant K channel KAT1. Plant Biology 12, 99–104. Reymond P, Kunz B, Paul-Pietzer K, Grimm R, Eckerskorn C, Farmer EE. 1996. Cloning of a cDNA encoding a plasma membraneassociated, uronide binding phosphoprotein with physical properties similar to viral movement proteins. The Plant Cell 8, 2265–2276. Robert S, Chary SN, Drakakaki G, Li S, Yang Z, Raikhel NV, Hicks GR. 2008. Endosin1 defines a compartment involved in endocytosis of the brassinosteroid receptor BRI1 and the auxin transporters PIN2 and AUX1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105, 8464–8469. Roche Y, Gerbeau-Pissot P, Buhot B, Thomas D, Bonneau L, Gresti J, Mongrand S, Perrier-Cornet J-M, Simon-Plas F. 2008. Depletion of phytosterols from the plant plasma membrane provides evidence for disruption of lipid rafts. FASEB Journal 22, 3980–3991. Rogers TJ, Thorpe CM, Paton AW, Paton JC. 2012. Role of lipid rafts and flagellin in invasion of colonic epithelial cells by Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli O113:H21. Infection and Immunity 80, 2858–2867. Roudier F, Gissot L, Beaudoin F, et al. 2010. Very-long-chain fatty acids are involved in polar auxin transport and developmental patterning in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 22, 364–375. Růžička K, Strader LC, Bailly A, et al. 2010. Arabidopsis PIS1 encodes the ABCG37 transporter of auxinic compounds including the auxin precursor indole-3-butyric acid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107, 10749–10753. Samuel BU, Mohandas N, Harrison T, McManus H, Rosse W, Reid M, Haldar K. 2001. The role of cholesterol and glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins of erythrocyte rafts in regulating raft protein content and malarial infection. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276, 29319–29329. Santoni V, Vinh J, Pflieger D, Sommerer N, Maurel C. 2003. A proeomic study reveals novel insights into the diversity of aquaporin forms expressed in the plasma membrane of plant roots. Biochemical Journal 373, 289–296. Santos NC, Ter-Ovanesyan E, Zasadzinski JA, Prieto M, Castanho M. 1998. Filipin-induced lesions in planar phospholipid bilayers imaged by atomic force microscopy. Biophysical Journal 75, 1869–1873. Schwacke R, Schneider A, van der Graaff E, Fischer K, Catoni E, Desimone M, Frommer WB, Flügge UI, Kunze R. 2003. 1586 | Tapken and Murphy ARAMEMNON, a novel database for Arabidopsis integral membrane proteins. Plant Physiology 131, 16–26. Sharma RK. 2004. Potential role of N-myristoyltransferase in pathogenic conditions. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 82, 849–859. Shieh HS, Hoard LG, Nordman CE. 1977. Crystal structure of anhydrous cholesterol. Nature 267, 287–289. Simons K, Ikonen E. 1997. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature 387, 569–572. Simpson C, Thomas C, Findlay K, Bayer E, Maule AJ. 2009. An Arabidopsis GPI-anchor plasmodesmal neck protein with callose binding activity and potential to regulate cell-to-cell trafficking. The Plant Cell 21, 581–594. Smotrys JE, Linder ME. 2004. Palmitoylation of intracellular signaling proteins: regulation and function. Annual Review of Biochemistry 73, 559–587. Sorek N, Gutman O, Bar E, et al. 2011. Different effects of prenylation and S-acylation on type I and II ROPS membrane interaction and function. Plant Physiology 155, 706–720. Sorek N, Poraty L, Sternberg H, Bar E, Lewinsohn E, Yalovsky S. 2007. Activation status-coupled transient S acylation determines membrane partitioning of a plant Rho-related GTPase. Molecular and Cellular Biology 27, 2144–2154. Sorek N, Segev O, Gutman O, et al. 2010. An S-acylation switch of conserved G domain cysteines is required for polarty signaling by ROP GTPases. Current Biology 20, 914–920. Sperling P, Franke S, Lüthje S, Heinz E. 2005. Are glucocerebrosides the predominant sphingolipids in plant plasma membranes? Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 43, 1031–1038. Srivastava V, Malm E, Sundqvist G, Bulone V. 2013. Quantitative proteomics reveals that plasma membrane microdomains from poplar cell suspension cultures are enriched in markers of signal transduction, molecular transport, and callose biosynthesis. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 12, 3874–3885. Stein M, Dittgen, Sánchez-Rodríguez C, Hou B-H, Molina A, Schulze-Lefert P, Lipka V, Somerville S. 2006. Arabidopsis PEN3/ PDR8, an ATP binding cassette transporter, contributes to nonhost resistance to inappropriate pathogens that enter by direct penetration. The Plant Cell 18, 731–746. Strader LC, Bartel B. 2009. The Arabidopsis PLEIOTROPIC DRUG RESISTANCE8/ABCG36 ATP binding cassette transporter modulates sensitivity to the auxin precursor indole-3-butyric acid. The Plant Cell 21, 1992–2007. Sun J, Nanjundan M, Pike LJ, Wiedmer T, Sims PJ. 2002. Plasma membrane phospholipid scramblase 1 is enriched in lipid rafts and interacts with the epidermal growth factor receptor. Biochemistry 41, 6338–6345. Sutter J-U, Campanoni P, Tyrrell M, Blatt MR. 2006. Selective mobility and sensitivity to SNAREs is exhibited by the Arabidopsis KAT1 K 1 channel at the plasma membrane. The Plant Cell 18, 935–954. Sutter J-U, Sieben C, Hartel A, Eisenach C, Thiel G, Blatt MR. 2007. Abscisic acid triggers the endocytosis of the arabidopsis KAT1 K+ channel and its recycling to the plasma membrane. Current Biology 17, 1396–1402. Takahashi D, Kawamura Y, Uemura M. 2013. Detergent-resistant plasma membrane proteome to elucidate microdomain functions in plant cells. Frontiers in Plant Science 4, 1–7. Takahashi D, Kawamura Y, Yamashita T, Uemura M. 2012. Detergentresistant plasma membrane proteome in oat and rye: similarities and dissimilarities between two monocotyledonous plants. Journal of Proteome Research 11, 1654–1665. Takeshita N, Diallinas G, Fischer R. 2012. The role of flotillin FloA and stomatin StoA in the maintenance of apical sterol-rich membrane domains and polarity in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans. Molecular Microbiology 83, 1136–1152. Tanner W, Malinský J, Opekarová M. 2011. In plant and animal cells, detergent-resistant membranes do not define functional membrane rafts. The Plant Cell 23, 1191–1193. Terasaka K, Blakeslee JJ, Titapiwatanakun B, et al. 2005. PGP4, an ATP binding cassette P-glycoprotein, catalyzes auxin transport in Arabidopsis thaliana roots. The Plant Cell 17, 2922–2939. Titapiwatanakun B, Blakeslee JJ, Bandyopadhyay A, et al. 2009. ABCB19/PGP19 stabilises PIN1 in membrane microdomains in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 57, 27–44. Triantafilou M, Miyake K, Golenbock DT, Triantafilou K. 2002. Mediators of innate immune recognition of bacteria concentrate in lipid rafts and facilitate lipopolysaccharide-induced cell activation. Journal of Cell Science 115, 2603–2611. Truong-Quong B-A, Lenne P-F. 2014. Membrane microdomains: from seeing to understanding. Frontiers in Plant Science 5, 1–14. Tsukamoto T, Qin Y, Huang Y, Dunatunga D, Palanivelu R. 2010. A role for LORELEI, a putative glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein, in Arabidopsis thaliana double fertilization and early seed development. The Plant Journal 62, 571–588. Underwood W, Somerville SC. 2013. Perception of conserved pathogen elicitors at the plasma membrane leads to relocalization of the Arabidopsis PEN3 transporter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 110, 12492–12497. Van der Meer-Janssen YPM, van Galen J, Batenburg JJ, Helms JB. 2010. Lipids in host–pathogen interactions: pathogens exploit the complexity of the host cell lipidome. Progress in Lipid Research 49, 1–26. Verrier PJ, Bird D, Burla B, et al. 2008. Plant ABC proteins—a unified nomenclature and updated inventory. Trends in Plant Science 13, 151–159. Wang E, Norred WP, Bacon CW, Riley RT, Merrill AH. 1991. Inhibition of sphingolipid biosynthesis by fumonisins. Journal of Biological Chemistry 22, 14486–14490. Wang W, Yang X, Tangchaiburana S, et al. 2008. An inositolphosphorylceramide synthase is involved in regulation of plant programmed cell death associated with defense in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 20, 3163–3179. Willemsen V, Friml J, Grebe M, van den Toorn A, Palme K, Scheres B. 2003. Cell polarity and PIN protein positioning in Arabidopsis require STEROL METHYLTRANSFERASE1 function. The Plant Cell 15, 612–625. Xiao S, Ellwood S, Calis O, Patrick E, Li T, Coleman M, Turner JG. 2001. Broad-spectrum mildew resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana mediated by RPW8. Science 291, 118–120. Xu X, Bittman R, Duportail G, Heissler D, Vilcheze C, London E. 2001. Effect of the structure of natural sterols and sphingolipids on the formation of ordered sphingolipid/sterol domains (rafts). Comparison of cholesterol to plant, fungal, and disease-associated sterols and comparison of sphingomyelin, cerebrosides, and ceramide. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276, 33540–33546. Xue Y, Chen H, Jin C, Sun Z, Yao X. 2006. NBA-Palm: prediction of palmitoylation site implemented in Naïve Bayes algorithm. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 458. Yalovsky S, Bloch D, Sorek N, Kost B. 2008. Regulation of membrane trafficking, cytoskeleton dynamics, and cell polarity by ROP/RAC GTPases. Plant Physiology 147, 1527–1543. Yang H, Murphy AS. 2009. Functional expression and characterization of Arabidopsis ABCB, AUX 1 and PIN auxin transporters in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. The Plant Journal 59, 179–191. Yang H, Richter GL, Wang X, Młodzińska E, Carraro N, Ma G, Jenness M, Chao D, Peer WA, Murphy AS. 2013. Sterols and sphingolipids differentially function in trafficking of the Arabidopsis ABCB19 auxin transporter. The Plant Journal 74, 37–47. Zacharias DA, Violin JD, Newton AC, Tsien RY. 2002. Partitioning of lipid-modified monomeric GFPs into membrane microdomains of live cells. Science 296, 913–916. Zauber H, Burgos A, Garapati P, Schulze WX. 2014. Plasma membrane lipid–protein interactions affect signaling processes in sterol-biosynthesis mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Frontiers in Plant Science 5, 1–18. Zhou L-Z, Li S, Feng Q-N, Zhang Y-L, Zhao X, Zeng Y-I, Wang H, Jiang L, Zhang Y. 2013. PROTEIN S-ACYL TRANSFERASE10 is critical for development and salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 25, 1093– 1107. Zidovetzki R, Levitan I. 2007. Use of cyclodextrins to manipulate plasma membrane cholesterol content: evidence, misconceptions and control strategies. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1768, 1311–1324.