* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Methods for identifying microRNA binding motifs
Secreted frizzled-related protein 1 wikipedia , lookup
Eukaryotic transcription wikipedia , lookup
Whole genome sequencing wikipedia , lookup
Community fingerprinting wikipedia , lookup
RNA polymerase II holoenzyme wikipedia , lookup
Immunoprecipitation wikipedia , lookup
Promoter (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Gene regulatory network wikipedia , lookup
Nucleic acid analogue wikipedia , lookup
Exome sequencing wikipedia , lookup
Polyadenylation wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup
Drug design wikipedia , lookup
Silencer (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Two-hybrid screening wikipedia , lookup
Transcriptional regulation wikipedia , lookup
Cooperative binding wikipedia , lookup
Ligand binding assay wikipedia , lookup
Non-coding RNA wikipedia , lookup
Messenger RNA wikipedia , lookup
RNA silencing wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression wikipedia , lookup
RNA interference wikipedia , lookup
Methods for identifying microRNA binding motifs Wenfa Ng Email: [email protected] [email protected] RNA interference (RNAi) • • • • • Highly conserved pathway across species and domains Mammalian (RNAi); Bacteria (CRISPR) Post-transcriptional modulation of gene expression Mediated by formation of RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) with small non-coding (ncRNA) as guide RNA Binding of microRNA to mRNA either results in mRNA cleavage or reduce mRNA stability through deadenylation and exonuclease degradation NCBI 2 Types of miRNA-mRNA interactions Current Genomics, Vol. 14, pp. 127136 3 Search for canonical base-pairing rules in RNAi • Significant effort devoted to searching conserved binding motifs between miRNAs and mRNA, which may inform miRNA biological functions and regulatory mechanisms • Ideal case of exact template dependent base pairing between noncoding RNA and mRNA • But, structural effects such as stem-loop and hairpin structures in mRNA prevent exact base-pairing • Thus, partial sequence complementarity is the norm rather than the exception • Manifest as graduation in inhibition, cleavage and translation block 4 But non-canonical interactions abound • • • • Bulges and G:U wobbles Non seed pairing Seedless interactions Non-canonical interactions could occur in 3’ UTR, 5’ UTR, promoter and coding DNA sequence (CDS) • Generally, non-canonical interactions are “typical,” while only a quarter of miRNA-mRNA interactions follow canonical rules 5 Additional caveats • Uninterrupted, bulge free base pairing to the 5’ end of miRNA may not lead to substantial repression • Coincidence of multiple G:U pairs with ≥1 single nucleotide bulges in the seed region could result in significant repression • Asymmetric, single nucleotide seed region bulges on miRNA side does not necessarily abolish repression 6 Site accessibility versus sequence complementarily • Intra- and intermolecular base pairing accounts for a large fraction of miRNA-mRNA interactions • Tight secondary structures found to hinder access of RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) to binding site • Efficient interactions between miRNA and target require unpairing of short sequence flanking binding motif • Equal proportion of identified seed regions in random regions and genomic areas with open conformation Nature Genetics, Vol. 39, No. 10, pp. 1278-1284 7 Genome-wide isolation of miRNA targets and determination of binding motifs • Ago pull-down, crosslinking and RNase digestion (HTIS-CLIP) • Crosslinking and immunoprecipitation followed by high throughput sequencing (CLIP-Seq) • Photoactivatable ribonucleoside enhanced crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (PAR-CLIP) • Crosslinking, ligation and sequencing of hybrids (CLASH) • Computational sequence and energetics based miRNA target prediction for deciphering immunoprecipitation cum sequencing data 8 Computational miRNA target prediction • Sequence complementarily between 5’ seed of miRNA and 3’ UTR of mRNA • Conservation of the miRNA binding site • Topology of base pairing at 5’ seed region of miRNA • Structural accessibility of target sequences and the flanking regions • Favourable minimum free energy of miRNA-target hybridisation (-15 to -10 kcal/mol, -25 kcal/mol stringent cut-off) 9 Overview of crosslinking precipitation approaches Commonalities • Formation of miRISC, crosslinking Ago protein (nestled with miRNA) to mRNA, immunoprecipitation of complex, release of bound RNA for identification of recognition sequence, readout by short-read sequencing • Amenable to large-scale analysis but unable to differentiate between direct and indirect miRNA-target interactions Nature Reviews Genetics, Vol. 15, No. 9, pp.. 599 - 612 10 HITS-CLIP (High throughput sequencing of crosslinking immunoprecipitation) • • • • • • Formation of Ago-miRNA-mRNA complex UV crosslinking and ligation Isolation of binding motif via enzymatic digestion Dissociation of RNA from protein complex Reverse transcription, PCR amplification, deep sequencing Unable to identify specific target site (resolution of ~100 nt) 11 PAR-CLIP (Photo-activated ribonucleoside enhanced crosslinking and immunoprecipitation) • • • • • Improved CLIP for identifying RNAbinding protein and miRNA targets with more efficient UV crosslinking Transcriptome-wide crosslinking method for RNA-binding proteins with 100-1000 fold improvement in RNA recovery relative to HITS-CLIP Based on incorporation of photoactivable nucleoside (4thiouridine) analogs into nascent RNA during co-incubation in cell culture Site of crosslinking near centre of AGO-miRNA-mRNA complex; home in on specific target sequence Characteristic sequence transition (thymidine to cytidine) in prepared cDNA helps reveal the precise binding site between Ago-miRNA complex and mRNA Cell, Vol. 141, pp. 129141 12 CLASH (Crosslinking, Ligation and Sequencing of Hybrids) • Genome-wide unbiased assay for miRNA-mRNA interactions • UV-crosslinking of miRNA-mRNA duplex in complex with Ago1 followed by sequencing • Most miRNA binding includes the 5’ seed, but sequence analysis reveals that 60% of binding sites are noncanonical • 18% of miRNA-mRNA involves 3’ end of miRNA with little contribution from the 5’ “seed” • miRNA-species specific effect in miRNA-mRNA interactions observed in dataset (>18K), postulated to affect RISC complex formation Cell, Vol. 153, pp. 654665 13 Detailed workflow of CLASH Cell, Vol. 153, pp. 654665 14 Biotinylated miRNA mimic • Biotinylation of the 3’ end of active strand • Able to form miRNA induced silencing complex (miRISC) for downregulating mRNA expression • Does not require crosslinking and require 20 fold lower cell number relative to crosslinking methods • High specificity (~90%) • But dependent on mRNA microarray to identify enriched candidates and is not a direct binding assay for miRNA response elements (MREs) • Reduces background as the strong streptavidin binding affords the use of harsher (but more effective) washing conditions 15 Deficiencies of current methods • Reliant on seed-based (canonical) analysis or predictive algorithms for assigning isolated sequence to miRNA • Require large numbers of cells (20 million cells) • More suitable for miRNA with high expression levels • UV crosslinking introduces background and is inefficient • Photoactivable nucleotides increase specificity but may introduce sequence bias 16 Improved protocol for systems level identification of MREs • • • • Replaced microarray with deep sequencing (Pulldownseq) Addition of RNase step for identifying MREs (IMPACTSeq: Identification of MREs by pull-down and alignment of captive transcriptssequencing) Analysis of transcription factors that regulate target genes via gene ontology and interactome approach Method enabled the rapid identification of target genes and biological functions of a specific miRNA at global level Cell Reports, Vol. 8, pp. 17 1225-1239 miRanda • • • • • • Cross-species conservation filter free identification of miRNA binding sites Identifies putative miRNA binding sites, and subsequently, deduces targeting miRNA No prior knowledge of miRNA needed Approach reveals that some miRNAs could have several thousand targets Significantly larger number of miRNA precursors, miRNA binding sites and targets than hypothesized Binding sites occur in 5’ UTR, CDS and 3’ UTR Cell, Vol. 126, pp. 1203- 18 1217 TargetScan • • • • Checks for perfect Watson-Crick base pairing between the 5’ miRNA seed sequence (7 nt) and 3’ UTR sequence of mRNA Algorithm also considers the free energy of miRNA-mRNA interactions for evaluating heteroduplex stability Scan for homologous binding motif in UTRs of other species A variation of TargetScan, TargetScan S, considers the flanking region of the seed region, but does not take into account free energy of binding Cell, Vol. 115, pp. 787798 19 Summary • • • • • • • Functional importance of miRNA binding in post-transcriptional gene regulation drives effort in identifying conserved binding motifs But non-canonical motifs dominate over those based on seed sequence Experimental approaches based on RISC complex formation and immunoprecipitation help isolate miRNA-mRNA-Ago complex for downstream readout via next-generation sequencing Computational predictive tools (e.g., miRanda, TargetScan) help deduce binding motif from sequence reads Multiple drawbacks such as inefficiencies of UV crosslinking, sequence bias and large cell mass requirement motivate the development of improved techniques One example replaces microarray with deep sequencing, added an RNase step, and used biotinylated miRNA mimic (for abrogating use of crosslinking) Identification of miRNA binding motif together with characterizing the nature of miRNA-mRNA interactions remain outstanding problems in the field