* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download R24Summary Statement - University of Illinois Archives
Holonomic brain theory wikipedia , lookup
Electrophysiology wikipedia , lookup
Neuroanatomy wikipedia , lookup
Multielectrode array wikipedia , lookup
Synaptogenesis wikipedia , lookup
Biochemistry of Alzheimer's disease wikipedia , lookup
Development of the nervous system wikipedia , lookup
Nervous system network models wikipedia , lookup
Optogenetics wikipedia , lookup
Molecular neuroscience wikipedia , lookup
Stimulus (physiology) wikipedia , lookup
Clinical neurochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Feature detection (nervous system) wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
De novo protein synthesis theory of memory formation wikipedia , lookup
Collaborative information seeking wikipedia , lookup
Apical dendrite wikipedia , lookup
RESUME: This is an application for a large-scale collaborative project to examine the properties of neuronal dendrites. There are advantages to looking at dendrites rather than at single cells, and the investigators are well suited to the task. Too little emphasis seems to have been placed on the physiology of dendrites, and there was some discussion that the proposed industrial collaborator might not be the most appropriate. The administrative aspects of the proposed collaborative effort appear to have been well thought out. Despite the relatively minor concerns raised, this is a timely area for further investigation, and the potential for a synergistic effort that will result in important new information is substantial. DESCRIPTION: This project focuses on the dendrites of neurons and includes a group of 22 investigators in the field of dendrite biology. The principal investigators are James Eberwine, Ph.D., Department of Pharmacology and Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, and William T. Greenough, Ph.D., Department of Psychology, Psychiatry and Cell and Structural Biology, Beckman Institute, University of Illinois. The major scientific initiatives, all focused on dendrites, are: mechanisms of dendrite protein synthesis; trafficking of messenger RNA (mRNA), protein synthesis components and proteins; mechanisms of receptor signaling and interactions among signaling pathways; and generation and flow-of-information-bearing electrical signals within and between dendritic compartments. One initiative that will tie all of the investigators together s called "discerning the elements of plastic neuronal change." CRITIQUE: There is no question that greater conceptual insight into dendrites is very desirable. There is also no question that the group of investigators that have been assembled have the requisite expertise. Although the phase I proposal itself does not present particularly novel ideas, there are compelling scientific reasons to encourage a "dendrite biology consortium" at this time. Dendrites are the major sites of input to individual neurons. The background material presented lays out nicely the intellectual history of dendrite biology. We now recognize that dendrite chemistry and geometry are subject to modification through experience, providing one cell biological locus for understanding potentiation, learning, and memory. The proposal claims, with some justice, that the geometry of neurons gives students of this biology an advantage over those who study information processing in other kinds of cells. The geometrical specializations of neurons place much of the information input in one region of the cell, albeit a big one. This provides a conceptual and a practical approach to working out complex information processing pathways. Since it is now well demonstrated that dendrites not only contain enzymes that modify existing proteins but also the machinery for protein synthesis, several aspects of the general mechanisms for cellular information processing will almost certainly emerge from the kinds of studies proposed here. Other studies, not emphasized in the proposal, show that neuronal signals induce changes in levels of transcription, which in turn have impact on the proteins that can be synthesized at any one time. This aspect of both neuronal and general cellular information processing may not be so well assessed by the strategy that the proposal describes. It is, however, possible in their system to look directly at the ways in which mRNA is moved within cells and how this process might be regulated. This aspect of "central dogma" information processing is likely to be of significance in neurons. While it may be less important in other cells, it is nonetheless a process that is well worth trying to understand. The science that will be undertaken with this collaborative effort is of great importance. The problem described is sufficiently complex that the major collaborative funding mechanism seems an appropriate way to enhance the science being done; the idea of tackling such a hard project in this way makes good sense. One example in support of this view is the interaction that is now being discovered between signaling pathways that were previously regarded as independent, or perhaps parallel. More recent work has revealed the extent to which such "pathways" talk to one another at almost every step along the way, making them information processing networks rather than pathways. Dendrites contain an enormous number of receptors that initiate a multitude of signaling pathways, and the mindset of neuroscientists has, in general, been towards understanding the ways in which these pathways might interact to help the cell to decide whether or not to fire and how easily to fire in the future. This group is, therefore, poised to analyze cross-talk between pathways from the very start, an important aspect of coming to grips with the complexity of biological signaling and a nice justification for the collaborative efforts that are proposed. One concern is the paucity of initiatives that involve the "fast-signaling machinery" of the dendrite. Given the very exciting progress in this general area, the relative absence of electrophysiology in the proposed consortium is a potential weakness. The emphasis on slower biochemical processes such as protein synthesis and mRNA trafficking undoubtedly reflects the PIs' main expertise. The PIs of this project are both leaders in their field, and the participating investigators are numerous, widely situated. They present CVs that support the contention they are all wellestablished investigators with good track records for scientific productivity on their own and collaborative activity more generally. While the density of truly distinguished scientists is not as high as one might like, each of the investigators seems well qualified to carry out the projects they will undertake within this collaborative structure, and the whole fabric seems sound. In addition, the group has already begun to develop important collaborative tools that take significant advantage of internet communication and the excellent computer facilities at Illinois. The designer of the biology workbench program is one of their collaborators, and he has specifically designed an interactive computer tool called "neuro-informatics universal workbench for analysis and environment" (NIUWAE), which is an integral part of the project proposed. This and other specific plans for collaborative interaction give credibility to this interactive proposal. However, there was some discussion whether the commercial collaborator proposed was appropriate. The administrative plan seems reasonable, and the PI has clearly thought through many of the key issues involved, including intellectual property and the details of project management. The only universal criticism of the proposal by all reviewers was that the choice of font was small enough to make reviewing it quite difficult. BUDGET: The budget is recommended as requested. HRS