* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Global Change, Eco-Apartheid and Population Health, 11/7/2007
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the Arctic wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on oceans wikipedia , lookup
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Canada wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Years of Living Dangerously wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Future sea level wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Business action on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Global Change, Eco-Apartheid and Population Health William E. Rees, PhD University of BC GLOBAL CHANGE AND HEALTH: WHO ARE THE VULNERABLE? Ottawa, Ontario 5 November 2007 Context: An Anomalous Period of Geometric Growth Population has quadrupled to 6.3 billion Energy use is up 16-fold Industrial production has grown 40-fold Water use has increased 9 times Fish catches higher by a factor of 35 Carbon Dioxide emissions are 17 times higher Sulphur emissions have increased 13-fold Other air pollutants are up by a factor of 5 Accelerating tropical deforestation and desertification Estimated Human Population over the 2007 Population: 6.6 billion Past Two Millennia (Cohen 1995) Continuous growth—population and economic—is an anomaly. The growth spurt that recent generations take to be normal is the single most abnormal period of human history. Symptom: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide: Up 30% in the past century Pre-industrial concentration of GHGs: 280 ppm Present concentration: 430 ppm (a 54% increase) N. Hemisphere Temp. Reconstruction (blue); Instrumental Measurements (red) Climate Change Summary (IPCC 2006 Consensus) Atmospheric carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases are at the highest levels in at least 650,000 years. It is very likely that greenhouse gas forcing has been the dominant cause of the observed global warming over the past 50 years. Global average temperatures this century will rise by between 2C° (the target ‘allowable’ increase) and 4.5C°. The increase could be enhanced a further 1.5C° as a result of “positive feedbacks.” Some warming has been offset by cooling from other anthropogenic factors (suspended aerosols). (Without this effect, mean global temperatures would be even higher.) Recent Conclusions (Oct 2007) The Arctic’s floating sea ice is headed toward summer disintegration as early as 2013, a century ahead of the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projections. The rapid loss of Arctic sea ice will speed up the disintegration of the Greenland ice sheet and a rise in sea levels by even as much as 5 metres by the turn of this century is possible. The Antarctic ice shelf also reacts far more sensitively to warming temperatures than previously believed. Unprecedented Losses of Sea Ice In 2007 Such massive ecological changes in the circumpolar Arctic threaten wildlife—we may see the extirpation of polar bears from much of the North—and herald the permanent loss of the Inuit way of life. Diabetes and related health risks are clearly associated with replacement of ‘country food’ with store-bought junk food in Northerners’ diets. Have we passed a tipping point? IPCC Projections: Way Off Meltdown: A hundred years ahead of schedule? Multi-Layered Auto-Catalysis? (Potential for runaway positive feedback) Increasing greenhouse gases - Melting permafrost - Release of gas hydrates - More forest fires Global warming Decreased albedo (more heat retention) Melting polar sea ice Recent Findings (Oct 2007), Part 2 Temperatures are now within ≈1°C of the maximum temperature of the past million years. It is now “very unlikely” (≤ 10%) that the world can avoid a potentially catastrophic mean global temperature increase of 2 C° Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are now growing more rapidly than "business-as-usual", the most pessimistic of the IPCC scenarios. (Increases are 35% higher than expected since 2000.) Long-term climate sensitivity may be double the IPCC standard (of 3C° for a doubling of atmospheric CO2) Probable Impacts of a 3-4 Celsius Degree Increase in MGT (Stern Report) Major declines in crop yields over entire regions. Sea level rise threatening London, Shanghai, New York, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Cairo and areas inhabited by 5% of the world’s population (350,000,000 people). Collapse of the Amazon rainforest. Collapse of the Gulf Stream (European cooling) and irreversible climate feedbacks, e.g., methane release. Loss of up to 40% of the world’s species. Loss of the world’s major glaciers; shifting precipitation spreading deserts here, major flood risks there (or both). Major health epidemics particularly among the poor and the displaced. The Economic Driver: Our Ecological Footprints The ‘ecological footprint’ of a specified population is the area of land and water ecosystems required to produce the resources that the population consumes, and to assimilate the wastes that the population produces,wherever on Earth the relevant land/water may be located. Eco-Footprints Vary with Income The average per capita ecological footprints of residents of highincome countries range between four and ten hectares (10 to 25 acres). The residents of the poorest countries survive on less than half a hectare. Ethio pia Worl d Indi a Moza mbiq ue Paki stan Som alia Country Peru Hung ary Mexi co Braz il Chi n a Thai land Nige ri a Indo nesia Germ any Neth erlan ds Japa n Spai n Geec e Cana da Aust ralia Uni te d Kin gdom tes (Gha/Capita) Uni te d Sta Per Capita Ecological Footprints of Selected Countries (2003 data from WWF 2006) 12 Eco-Footprint 10 8 6 4 2 0 B ioc a pa c ities a nd E c olog ic a l F ootprints of S elec ted C ountries C ompa red to World (2003 d ata fro m WWF 2006 16 14 Domestic Biocapacity Gha/Cap Ecological Footprint 12 10 8 6 4 2 Country World Canada Somalia India Japan Netherlands Germany United Kingdom United States 0 All countries that run ecodeficits are dependent on ‘surplus’ biocapacity (exergy) imported from low density countries (like Canada) and the global commons. Symptom: Biodiversity Loss (The Competitive Exclusion Principle) Growing the human enterprise necessarily degrades ecosystems and displaces other species from their habitats (biodiversity loss). The current rate of species extinction is approximately 1000 times the pre-industrial rate. With increasing resource scarcity, global change, and the morals of the ‘new world order’, the rich will also increasingly exclude the poor. Competitive Exclusion: The expansion of the human enterprise… Human Ecological Footprint 1961-2003 …necessarily displaces non-humans (Vulnerable ecosystems collapse before the human onslaught.) Living Planet Index 1970-2003 20% of population 20% of population 75% of world income 1.5% of world income Social Justice and the Income Gap Income ratio between world’s richest and poorest countries in 1820: three to one. In 1998: 19 to one. The richest 500 people in the world enjoy a combined income greater than that of the poorest 416 million. The three richest people in the world had assets that exceeded the combined gross domestic product of the 48 least developed countries. Income disparity is increasing both between and within countries, including Canada. Symptom: Eco-apartheid - Competitively Excluding the Poor ‘Eco-Apartheid’ is the effective segregation of people along environmental gradients With increasing resource scarcity, global change, and the competitive ethic of the world economic order, the gradient is steepening. Eco-apartheid is a contemporary reality—The rich live in the world’s healthiest, most productive habitats. Impoverished people and racial minorities are often segregated in urban slums and degraded landscapes characterized by toxic waste, polluted air and water and contaminated food with obvious public health implications. Sunrise in Suzhou: What is Canada’s contribution to eco-degradation and damage to population health in China? A Lesson from “Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed” (J. Diamond 2005) Any society contains a built-in blueprint for failure if elites insulate themselves from the ecological and social consequences of irresponsible decisions. (This is the pattern among governing elites throughout history.) By extracting wealth from ordinary people, distant countries and the global commons, they remain ‘well fed’ while everyone else suffers the effects of general decline. The US [Canada?] is now a country in which elites increasingly cocoon themselves in gated communities guarded by private security patrols and filled with people who drink bottled water, depend on private pensions, and send their children to private schools (Moyers 2006). With Knowledge Comes Responsibility At the limits of biophysical carrying capacity, routine acts of non-essential consumption can result in violent harm to the poor and racial minorities. Wealthy consumers who are ignorant of the distant systemic consequences of their material habits might be excused. However,... Once we raise to collective consciousness the link between consumption, pollution and eco-violence, society has an obligation to view such violence for what it is. Not acting to reduce or prevent eco-injustice converts erstwhile blameless consumer choices into acts of positive aggression. Knowledge: Where We’re Likely Headed 2015 is the last year in which “the world can afford a net rise in greenhouse gas emissions, after which ‘very sharp reductions’ are required” (IPCC Chairman, Sept 2007) 5% or more of the worlds people (350,000,000) are likely to be displaced from their settlements by sealevel rise. (Stern report, 2006). Up to two billion people worldwide will face water shortages and up to 30 per cent of plant and animal species would be put at risk of extinction if the average rise in temperature stabilises at 1.5C to 2.5C (IPCC, Sept 2007) Solution: What the Science Says “Industrialized world reductions in material consumption, energy use, and environmental degradation of over 90% will be required by 2040 to meet the needs of a growing world population fairly within the planet’s ecological means.” (BCSD 1993; ‘Getting Eco-Efficient’) To avoid a mean global temperature increase above 2 C degrees, the world must reduce carbon emissions by 90% by 2050.” (Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research 2006) For sustainability with equity, North Americans should be taking steps to reduce their ecological footprints by 80% to their equitable Earth-share (1.8 gha). The Other Inconvenient Truth: EcoFootprints are Correlated With Lifestyle 12 April 2007 ‘Losing weight’ need not be painful In many rich countries neither objective nor felt well-being are still associated with rising GDP/income per capita. On the contrary, “here we see US data showing “…the strange, seemingly contradictory pattern … of rising real income and a falling index of subjective well-being” (Lane 2000). What do we Gain from GDP Growth in Rich Countries? (Siegel 2006) Wasted Wealth: Diminishing Returns from Health Care Expenditures (Siegel 2006) Essential Criteria for Sustainability Biophysical: A society is sustainable only if it does not consume resources faster than nature produces. produce wastes faster than nature assimilates. Social: A lifestyle is sustainable only if it could be extended to the entire human family without degrading the ecosphere and overloading global life-support systems. Question: Can the already wealthy be persuaded to live on smaller footprints so the poor may live The Good News The Bad News We have the technology today to enable a 75%-80% reduction in energy and (some) material consumption while actually improving quality of life. Yet we do not act. Privileged elites with the greatest stake in the status quo control the policy levers. Ordinary people hold to the expansionist myth. North American society remains in ecoparalysis. “The ecologically necessary is politically infeasible but the politically feasible is ecologically irrelevant.”