* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Climate Change
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
Soon and Baliunas controversy wikipedia , lookup
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit email controversy wikipedia , lookup
Michael E. Mann wikipedia , lookup
Climate resilience wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Heaven and Earth (book) wikipedia , lookup
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Physical impacts of climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Saskatchewan wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Teaching the Physics of Climate Change This ppt available on www.vicphysics.org Keith Burrows - Teachers AIP Education Committee - Teaching the Science of Climate Change PHYSCON Feb 2008 6.2.2 Role of scientists in the climate debate These stark conclusions about the threat posed by global climate change and implications for fossil fuel use are not yet appreciated by essential governing bodies … In our view, there is an acute need for science to inform society about the costs of failure to address global warming, because of a fundamental difference between the threat posed by climate change and most prior global threats. J Hansen et al The conclusion from: Dangerous human-made interference with climate: a GISS modelE study J Hansen et al In Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 7, 2287– 2312, 2007 www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/2287/2007/ Authors from: NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, Columbia University Earth Institute, Sigma Space Partners LLC, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, Clean Air Task Force, Boston, Goddard Space Flight Center, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, Department of Geology, Yale University, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Argonne National Laboratory. This presentation is dedicated to our precious grandchildren – and all the others who will inherit the results of our efforts in this decade – the last that has the option to act to avoid dangerous climate change. Climate science Overview – Earth’s energy balance – Interactions between EMR and the atmosphere – The effect of changes in the system Human induced changes – – – – The release of millions of years of stored energy Is the climate changing? How can we understand it? Climate models and their predictions. What can we do? – – – – Fossil fuels Reduce energy use Lower CO2 options Sustainable options The human response – Sceptics, deniers, avoiders – Change the light bulbs – The need for real change Education – That’s where we come in Climate science Earth’s energy balance – The average temperature of the Earth is determined by the balance between incoming solar radiation and outgoing ‘heat’ radiation ~ 1/3 reflected ~ 2/3 absorbed then re-radiated as IR EMR. 175,000 TW in 175,000 TW out (That’s if it is in equilibrium) Climate science Climate science Earth’s energy balance – The average temperature of the Earth is determined by the balance between incoming solar radiation and outgoing ‘heat’ radiation – Not all the IR radiation from the surface escapes immediately... – or the average temperature would be a freezing –15ºC – and there would be much greater swings between night & day, cloud & no cloud Climate science Earth’s energy balance Climate science The Greenhouse effect: – Natural: Water vapour Carbon dioxide – Human produced: Carbon dioxide Methane etc. Human produced Climate science Interactions between EMR and the atmosphere: – Blackbody spectra. All objects at ANY temperature emit EMR – Hot metal emits lots of shorter IR and some visible Climate science Interactions between EMR and the atmosphere: Blackbody spectra. All objects at ANY temperature emit EMR – Cold objects only long IR and no visible – Slightly shorter IR Climate science Interactions between EMR and the atmosphere: – Blackbody spectra – Spectra of stars – or anything else that hot UV IR The Sun is 5800 K – UV Vis IR – Climate science Interactions between EMR and the atmosphere: – Blackbody spectra – Sun and Earth (but note that Earth is less than a millionth of the Sun) Also note that the IR absorbed from the Sun is of much shorter wavelength than that emitted by the Earth – UV Vis short IR – long IR Climate science Interactions between EMR and the atmosphere: – Types of spectra: – Blackbody continuous spectrum Climate science Interactions between EMR and the atmosphere: – Types of spectra: – Blackbody continuous spectrum – Emission line spectrum Climate science Interactions between EMR and the atmosphere: – Types of spectra: This is what we are interested in. Climate science Interactions between EMR and the atmosphere: – – – – – – – First we need to know something about EMR (light). Quantum physics tells us that it comes as ‘photons’ Here’s a red one Here’s a violet one Notice that the violet one has a shorter wavelength But it has more energy (Violet is more violent!) Climate science Interactions between EMR and the atmosphere: – – – – – – – First we need to know something about EMR (light). Quantum physics tells us that it comes as ‘photons’ Here’s an ultraviolet (UV) one – even shorter wavelength Here’s an infrared (IR) one Notice that the IR one has a longer wavelength again It also has much less energy – but it’s IR that is of interest to us Climate science Interactions between EMR and the atmosphere: – The gases in the atmosphere absorb, and then re-radiate some parts of the spectrum but not others. – The structure of the molecule determines what sort of energy is absorbed. – Oxygen and Nitrogen molecules are ‘tight’ and it takes a lot of energy to ‘shake’ them. – IR and visible EMR goes right past – Only high energy UV can give its energy to oxygen – (but there’s very little of that even in sunlight) Climate science Interactions between EMR and the atmosphere: – – – – – – – H2O and CO2 molecules (and other GHGs) are more ‘floppy’ and so take on energy more easily IR gives them energy which they re-radiate – in random directions. So some goes back down to Earth keeping us warmer The Greenhouse effect! Climate science The effect of changes – Remember we wouldn’t be here without it! – Water vapour is the main GHG – But what if we add more CO2? Climate science The effect of changes – Feedback and Forcing – More CO2 → more warmth → more H2O (evaporation) → more warmth → more H2O → more warmth → ??? – Water vapour goes in and out of the atmosphere very quickly – Carbon dioxide is there for ~ 100 years – That makes a very big difference in the way they act Climate science The effect of changes – Feedback and Forcing – Human added H2O is not a problem – it soon rains out again. – But CO2 is another story! Climate pseudo science The effect of changes – Feedback and Forcing “the combined effect of these greenhouse gases is to warm Earth's atmosphere by about 33 ºC, from a chilly -18 ºC in their absence to a pleasant +15 ºC in their presence. 95% (31.35 ºC) of this warming is produced by water vapour, which is far and away the most important greenhouse gas. The other trace gases contribute 5% (1.65 ºC) of the greenhouse warming, amongst which carbon dioxide corresponds to 3.65% (1.19 ºC). The human-caused contribution corresponds to about 3% of the total carbon dioxide in the present atmosphere, the great majority of which is derived from natural sources. Therefore, the probable effect of human-injected carbon dioxide is a miniscule 0.12% of the greenhouse warming, that is a temperature rise of 0.036 ºC. Put another way, 99.88% of the greenhouse effect has nothing to do with carbon dioxide emissions from human activity.” Prof. Bob Carter, Research Professor at James Cook University, palaeontologist, stratigrapher, marine geologist and environmental scientist. [Web link to source of this quote as well as the RealClimate discussion are given on the notes page below] Climate pseudo science The effect of changes – Feedback and Forcing – His argument in short: – GHE → 33°C (–18ºC to 15ºC) – H2O → 95% of this (ie.31ºC) – OGHG → 5% of which CO2 → 3.6% – Human CO2 is 3% of CO2 so only 0.1% of GHE – ie. 0.04°C No worries ☺ Climate Real science The effect of changes – Feedback and Forcing – Sounds impressive – if only! – but – www.realclimate.org A group of real climate scientists who try to help people like Carter – and us. RealClimate.org Gavin A. Schmidt: climate modeller at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies Dr. Michael E. Mann: Penn State University Departments of Meteorology and Geosciences and the Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, IPCC lead author Dr. Caspar Ammann: National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). Dr. Rasmus E. Benestad: Norwegian project called RegClim, Norwegian Meteorological Institute Prof. Raymond S. Bradley: Director of the Climate System Research Center University of Massachusetts, Ray Bradley: Advisor to U.S., Swiss, Swedish, and U.K. National Science Foundations, NOAA, IPCC, IGBP, Stockholm. William M. Connolley: Climate modeller with the British Antarctic Survey. Prof. Stefan Rahmstorf: New Zealand Oceanographic Institute, Institute of Marine Science in Kiel, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany, IPCC. Dr. Eric Steig: Isotope geochemist, University of Washington Dr. Thibault de Garidel: Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences at Rutgers University. Dr. David Archer: Computational ocean chemist at the University of Chicago. Climate Real science The effect of changes – Feedback and Forcing – H2O 95% should actually be 90-95% and is for clouds also. H2Oleaving 5-10% for – Can’t simply subtract GHGs. CO2 – H2O and CO2 absorb different parts of the IR radiation spectrum.CH4 Climate Real science The effect of changes – Feedback and Forcing – So it doesn’t matter how much water vapour is in the atmosphere, adding CO2 and CH4 will absorb more IR because they absorb different parts of the IR radiation spectrum. Climate Real science The effect of changes – Feedback and Forcing The Real Science: – Take away all H2O: OGHGs absorb ~34% – Take away OGHGs: H2O absorb ~85% – So effect of H2O ~ 66% – 85% [100 – 34 = 66] – Not a linear problem! – So Carter’s 5% for OGHGs should be ~ 15% – 34% [100 – 85 = 15] – So CO2 on its own is 9% – 26% of the GHE [As CO2 is about 60% of GHGs] – Assuming Carter’s linearity → ΔT ~ 3 to 9°C – (But it isn’t a linear problem) Climate pseudo science The effect of changes – Feedback and Forcing – Carter also said that human CO2 is 3% of CO2 so 0.1% of GHE – ie. 0.04°C No worries ☺ – But where did he get that figure from? ? Climate Real science The effect of changes – Feedback and Forcing – Anthropogenic CO2 is NOT 3%! Climate Real science The effect of changes – Feedback and Forcing – Anthropogenic CO2: < 300 ppm → 380 ppm – Rise of > 30% – linear extrapolation: AGHG → 1 to 2.6°C (AGHG = Anthropogenic GHGs) – so we can all look forward to more time on the beach! Climate science The effect of changes – Feedback and Forcing – Carter ignores complex mechanisms of the GHE. Assumes effects are linear – Just plain wrong. – Overlaps: gases absorb overlapping wavelengths. – Saturation: more gas makes no difference. – Feedback: Particularly important. Positive and negative. – Positive feedback: Climate science The effect of changes – Feedback and Forcing – Examples of feedback: – Increased water vapour → more clouds – reflect sunlight (negative feedback) – trap IR radiation (positive feedback) Climate science The effect of changes – Feedback and Forcing – Water vapour is a ‘feedback’ GHG – CO2, CH4, O3 etc are ‘forcing’ agents – They stay in the atmosphere whatever and ‘force’ more heat into the climate system. – Effect measured by ‘Radiative forcing constant’ "The radiative forcing of the surface-troposphere system due to the perturbation in or the introduction of an agent (say, a change in greenhouse gas concentrations) is the change in net (down minus up) irradiance (solar plus long-wave; in Wm-2) at the tropopause AFTER allowing for stratospheric temperatures to readjust to radiative equilibrium, but with surface and tropospheric temperatures and state held fixed at the unperturbed values". (IPCC) – or: the extra heat flowing into (or out of) the climate system as a result of a change in some part of the system (in W/m²) Climate science The effect of changes – Feedback and Forcing – Computer models are the only way of taking all this into account – a little later. Climate science Overview – Earth’s energy balance – Interactions between EMR and the atmosphere – The effect of changes in the system Human induced changes – – – – The release of millions of years of stored energy Is the climate changing? How can we understand it? Climate models and their predictions. What can we do? – – – – Fossil fuels Reduce energy use Lower CO2 options Sustainable options The human response – Sceptics, deniers, avoiders – Change the light bulbs – The need for real change Education – That’s where we come in Human induced changes The release of solar energy and carbon stored over 100 million years ... Human induced changes The release of solar energy and carbon stored over 100 million years in only 100’s of years That is, a MILLION times faster. We have to ask whether it might have an effect! Human induced changes Is the climate changing? IPCC SynRep Human induced changes Is the climate changing? Human induced changes We now know it has: Human induced changes We now know it has: Human induced changes Franz Josef glacier NZ Human induced changes The Arctic Sea Ice is melting at a much faster rate than predicted. Human induced changes The Arctic Ice is melting at a much faster rate than predicted Human induced changes The Arctic Ice is melting at a much faster rate than predicted. This is a real problem because water absorbs far more solar energy than snow: Average of Earth 0.3 Albedo of snow & ice 0.8 – 0.9 Albedo of water 0.07 A positive feedback effect Human induced changes Is the climate changing? The Greenland summer ice melt is getting larger at a worrying rate. 2001 2002 2003 The Greenland summer ice melt is getting larger at a worrying rate. Human induced changes Is the climate changing? The Greenland summer ice melt is getting larger at a worrying rate. Human induced changes The Arctic sea ice is a concern because of the positive feedback involved Greenland not only has that, but its melt water raises the sea level and makes it less saline. If all Greenland’s ice were to melt it would raise the sea level by around 7 metres The less saline water may interfere with the “global ocean conveyor”. The thermohaline circulation is driven by differences in seawater density (temperature and salt content). It carries CO2 to the deep ocean and distributes heat. It strongly influences climate regimes and the availability of nutrients to marine life. (From UN GEO4) Human induced changes It has been thought (hoped?) that the Antarctic Ice sheets are not melting. NASA Human induced changes It has been thought (hoped?) that the Antarctic Ice sheets are not melting. However (23 Jan 2008): Colours indicate speed of ice loss: Red fast, green slower Loss is on a par with the Greenland ice loss rate. NASA Human induced changes “Drought”? Closer to home: – or changing climate? Human induced changes Human induced changes Is the climate changing? Victorian rainfall 2004 – 2007 (3 years) Human induced changes Is the climate changing? Victorian rainfall 2006 – 2007 Human induced changes Is the climate changing? Australia – Very cold days Human induced changes Is the climate changing? Australia – Warm days Human induced changes Is the climate changing? Australia – Very hot days Human induced changes Is the climate changing? Australia 2007 – mean temperatures Highest on record Human induced changes Is the climate changing? Australia Temperature trend Human induced changes Is the climate changing? Australia Temperature trend According to Andrew Bolt and Alan Moran: Human induced changes According to NASA and the climate scientists. Human induced changes According to NASA and the climate scientists. Human induced changes We now know it has: Human induced changes Is the climate changing? Human induced changes Is the climate changing? 2005 worst on record Human induced changes Is the climate changing? IPCC SynRep IPCC SynRep IPCC SynRep Human induced changes How can we understand it? – It’s all a matter of physics! This ppt can be downloaded from www.vicphysics.org – Teachers - Feedback: - [email protected] - Resources: realclimate.org