* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download y 1
Epigenetics of neurodegenerative diseases wikipedia , lookup
Hardy–Weinberg principle wikipedia , lookup
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis wikipedia , lookup
Gene desert wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup
Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup
Saethre–Chotzen syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
No-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) Genome Editing wikipedia , lookup
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Genetic drift wikipedia , lookup
Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup
Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Genome editing wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup
Population genetics wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Frameshift mutation wikipedia , lookup
Dominance (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Gene Interaction Mutations of haplosufficient genes are recessive Two models for dominance of a mutation Figure 6-3 Incomplete dominance Figure 6-4 Seven alleles and their interactions in leaf patterning of clover Figure 6-7 A recessive lethal allele, yellow coat Figure 6-8 Tailless, a recessive lethal allele in cats Figure 6-9 Sickled and normal red blood cells Figure 6-5 Heterozygotes can have the protein of both alleles Figure 6-6 The molecular basis of genetic complementation Figure 6-15 Testing complementation by using a heterokaryon Complementation: a common, relatively simple allelism test •Both mutations must be recessive, loss-of-function •Can use leaky or null alleles; different phenotypes are permitted Example: m1/m1 has similar phenotype to m2/m2 Cross: m1/m1 X m2/m2 Results: mutant phenotype fail to complement wild-type phenotype complement “Standard” interpretations: m1/m2 (alleles) m1/+ m2/+ (different genes) Transformation “rescue” is a variation of complementation test m1/m1 without transgene mutant phenotype m1/m1 with transgene mutant phenotype non-complement (transgene does not contain m+ gene) m1/m1 with transgene wild-type phenotype complement (transgene contains the m+ gene) “Standard” interpretation of complementation test Hawley & Gilliland (2006) Fig. 1 “Mutation” of a gene might be due to changes elsewhere! •ald is Drosophila mps1 homolog; isolated four mutations (all rescued by ald+ transgene) •two ald alleles cause meiotic and mitotic defects (ald sequence changes) •two ald “mutations” cause only meiotic defects (normal ald sequence) •both contain Doc element insertion into neighboring gene (silences transcription of neighboring genes in germline cells) Hawley & Gilliland (2006) Fig. 2 “False positive” of transgenic rescue •Ku and Dmblm genes both involved in DNA repair and closely linked on the chromosome •Old mutations of mus309 map to the region genetically •DNA lesions of mus309 lie in Dmblm, but can be rescued with extra copies of Ku (provided on a transgene) Shared regions between genes updYM55 upd3d232a Df(1)os1a updYM55 os1 upd3d232a Df(1)os1a Lethal OS WT Lethal OS OS Lethal Exceptions to “Non-Complementation = Allelism” Intragenic complementation (usually allele-specific) •Multi-domain proteins (e.g., rudimentary) •Transvection – pairing-dependent allelic complementation (stay tuned!) Second-Site Non-Complementation (“SSNC”) •“Poisonous interactions” – products interact to form a toxic product (usually allele-specific) •“Sequestration interactions” – product of one mutation sequesters the other to a suboptimal concentration in the cell (usually one allelespecific) •Combined haplo-insufficiency (allele non-specific) Intragenic complementation in multi-domain proteins Transvection: synapsis-dependent allele complementation E. Lewis (1954) among BX-C mutations in Drosophila Numerous other genes in Drosophila and similar phenomena observed in Neurospora, higher plants, mammals Most due to enhancer elements functioning in trans (allele-specific) Examples of body and wing yellow allele interactions Transvection (allele complementation) Fig. 2 Morris, et al. (1999) Genetics 151: 633–651. Cis-preference enhancer model (Geyer, et al., 1990) W B Br T y2 complements y1#8 (wing & body pigmented) wing enhancer body enhancer bristle enhancer tarsal claw enhancer Y2 is gypsy retrotransposon insertion at the yellow gene Y1#8 780bp promoter deletion Y1 ATG start codon → CTG y2 fails to complement y1 (wing & body pale) Exceptions to “Non-Complementation = Allelism” Intragenic complementation (usually allele-specific) •Multi-domain proteins (e.g., rudimentary) •Transvection – pairing-dependent allelic complementation Second-Site Non-Complementation (“SSNC”) •“Poisonous interactions” – products interact to form a toxic product (usually allele-specific) •“Sequestration interactions” – product of one mutation sequesters the other to a suboptimal concentration in the cell (usually one allelespecific) •Combined haplo-insufficiency (allele non-specific) Example of a “Poisonous interaction” SSNC Hawley & Gilliland (2006) Fig. 4 (after Stearns & Botstein (1988) Genetics 119: 249–260) Non-complementation of non-allelic mutations A model for synthetic lethality Figure 6-23