Download PPT

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Point mutation wikipedia , lookup

Population genetics wikipedia , lookup

Copy-number variation wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of neurodegenerative diseases wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of diabetes Type 2 wikipedia , lookup

Epistasis wikipedia , lookup

Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Essential gene wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup

Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

NEDD9 wikipedia , lookup

Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup

Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Gene nomenclature wikipedia , lookup

Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup

X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup

Gene desert wikipedia , lookup

Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Ridge (biology) wikipedia , lookup

Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup

Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup

Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup

Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

Gene wikipedia , lookup

Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Review
• Mendelian: genes are NOT linked and follow
rules of simple dominance
• Linked genes
• Meiosis: tetrads and chromatid segregation
• Crossing over/recombination
• Clarify “recombination frequency”
– 20%, 50%
Crossing-Over
Perspective: Historically, the conclusions of
genetic experiments were based on the results of
selected matings; In other words, we didn’t know
what was happening inside the cell, but we could
make conclusions based on the phenotypic results
(e.g. ratios) of the offspring.
It was only recently that scientists were able to
physically illustrate what happens during many of
these complicated events, such as “crossovers”
Perspective: These lectures are based on the
relationship between genes; within a cell,
within an individual, and within a population.
When we throw terms out there like
“Mendelian” or “recombinant” or
“nonparental” or “independent (segregation)”,
we are not making statements about all of the
genes, but rather about one gene relative to
another; or one gene relative to a few others…
…If we were to pick 1 gene at random, it
might have 2 alleles that act in a manner of
simple dominance; if we were to then pick
another gene at random, it might be on a
separate chromosome, which means it
segregates independently of Gene 1; and if the
trait associated with Gene 2 also exhibited
simple dominance, then we would have
picked two genes that fall under the
description of Mendelian genetics…
…If instead, our Gene 2 was located on the
same chromosome, we would now refer to the
relationship between the 2 genes as “linked”,
which is non-Mendelian. If we couldn’t
actually “see” the 2 genes to know they were
linked, we could find out by conducting
several matings and counting the number of
offspring with each possible phenotype.