* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Conformity: the essentials - King Edward VI Handsworth School VLE
Social facilitation wikipedia , lookup
Social loafing wikipedia , lookup
First impression (psychology) wikipedia , lookup
Group polarization wikipedia , lookup
Milgram experiment wikipedia , lookup
Belongingness wikipedia , lookup
Impression formation wikipedia , lookup
Self-categorization theory wikipedia , lookup
Attitude change wikipedia , lookup
Social perception wikipedia , lookup
Introspection illusion wikipedia , lookup
Carolyn Sherif wikipedia , lookup
False consensus effect wikipedia , lookup
Group dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Social tuning wikipedia , lookup
Solomon Asch wikipedia , lookup
Compliance (psychology) wikipedia , lookup
Memory conformity wikipedia , lookup
King Edward VI Handsworth School Psychology Department Conformity: the essentials PSYB2 Social influence What is conformity? Conformity occurs when people change their behaviour or attitudes to come into line with the behaviour or attitudes of a group of other people. It is an example of the impact of majority influence on individual behaviour. Related processes are independence, where an individual’s behaviour is unaffected by the group’s and anti-conformity, where a person alters their behaviour so that it conflicts with the group’s. How has conformity been investigated? Jenness (1932) asked social science students to estimate the number of beans in a jar. He found that when students were aware of what other people had estimated, they tended to give estimates in line with this. Sherif (1935), in a refinement of this procedure, asked student participants to estimate the distance a light moved in a dark room (it didn’t really move, it was an illusion). Participants who did the task alone gave a wide range of estimates, but when they were made aware of others’ views, participants’ estimates tended to converge to be quite close to each other. Both Jenness’ and Sherif’s studies were based around ambiguous situations: where it came to estimating the number of beans or the movement of the light there was no obvious correct answer. Asch (1953), by contrast, used a situation where the correct answer was obvious and tried to make participants conform to a wrong one. Participants were given a simple line matching task. They carried A B C this out in a room with several other people who they thought were other participants, but who were in fact confederates following the researcher’s instructions. The confederates had been instructed to give an obviously wrong answer to the task some of the time. Alone, the participants gave the correct answer nearly all of the time. However, when surrounded by confederates giving the wrong answer, the participant would follow suit about a third of the time. Questioned afterwards, the conforming participants gave a number of reasons including not wanting to stand out from the group, not wanting to upset the experiment and genuinely believing that the confederates knew better than them. What do these studies tell us? Obviously, these studies show that people will change their behaviour and their judgments if these conflict with the group’s. They also suggest that, depending on the situation, different processes may be at work. In studies like Jenness’ and Sherif’s, it seems that the group’s influence caused participants to alter their judgements and adopt these new judgements as their own. In other words, they internalised the new judgements. In the Asch study, by contrast, few (if any) of the participants who conformed really believed they were giving the right answer; they just acted as if they agreed with the group. In other words, they complied with the group’s behaviour but they did not internalise it. What makes people more or less likely to conform? Further studies have identified some of the variables that make it more or less likely that a person will conform as a result of majority influence. Surprisingly, the size of the majority doesn’t make much difference: bigger majorities don’t generally lead to higher rates of conformity. More A.B.Sammons Created on 9/11/2008 11:39:00 AM ASConformityEssentials.doc King Edward VI Handsworth School Psychology Department important is whether the majority all agree with each other (i.e. whether they are unanimous). The presence of one dissenter in the majority causes conformity to drop substantially. The relative status of the majority and the person being pressured also matters: a low-status individual is likely to conform to a high status group but the reverse is not true. Also significant is the difficulty of the task being undertaken. The more difficult it is for the individual to judge the correct response, the more likely they are to conform to the group. Why do people conform? The research findings about conformity suggest that people’s reasons for conforming fall into two main categories. Sometimes, conformity is motivated by the desire to be correct. This is likely to occur when people are unsure of what they should think or do. Faced with uncertainty, and lacking other sources of information, they may use other members of the group as a source of information about how to think or act, and follow the behaviour of the group in the belief that it is the right thing to do. Psychologists call this informational influence. This process accounts for conformity in the Sherif and Jenness studies: faced with an ambiguous situation, and made uncertain by the lack of agreement in their estimates, participants used each other’s views to reach new estimates which, as a result, converged on each other. Informational influence accounts for why conformity rises with the difficulty of the task: as it becomes harder to judge correctly, uncertainty increases and the views of the group become more influential as a reference point. In other circumstances, conformity is motivated by the desire to fit in with the group. This is likely to occur when belonging to the group is important to the individual (e.g. because the group has the power to reward or punish them in various ways). If the group’s behaviour or views conflicts with the individual’s, they may change their thinking or behaviour because remaining a member of the group is more important to them than maintaining their original thinking or behaviour. This is termed normative influence and is clearly what took place in the Asch study, at least for some of the participants. Although they knew the confederates’ answer to be wrong, it was more important for them to avoid ‘rocking the boat’ by disagreeing. One even said afterwards that he didn’t want to be a ‘social outcast’. It is pertinent to ask of the Asch study why it was so important for the participants to fit in with a group that only existed for the purpose of an experiment: surely the group did not mean that much to the participant. It is worth remembering that not all the participants conformed. Probably what matters here is the participant’s perception of the situation, the extent to which they value social acceptance and approval, and the extent to which they find being in conflict with others unpleasant. What cannot be disputed is that all the participants felt under pressure to conform even though not all did. Normative influence accounts for a number of important findings including the influence of relative status – a high status group has more power to reward or punish the individual and so pressure to conform is higher. How do different conformity processes relate to each other? It stands to reason that informational influence, which occurs when an individual is unsure how to think or act, is likely to result in internalisation. If the person does not have a strong prior opinion or inclination to act then there is no reason for them not to adopt the ideas or behaviour of the group as their own. Normative influence is likely to bring about compliance where the individual’s beliefs conflict with the group’s, especially where the group is a powerful one but it should not be assumed that normative influence only causes compliance. Many people initially take on behaviours or attitudes in order to fit in with a social group but – even after a very short time - internalise these as their own ways of acting or thinking. Conversely, informational influence may be stronger if it comes from people who belong to the same social group as the individual being pressured. So whilst informational and normative influence are relatively distinct processes, they are strongly related and may both be at work in situations where groups exert an influence on individuals. A.B.Sammons Created on 9/11/2008 11:39:00 AM ASConformityEssentials.doc