* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download What are we measuring in EEG and MEG?
Electrophysiology wikipedia , lookup
Neuroplasticity wikipedia , lookup
Neural engineering wikipedia , lookup
Neurolinguistics wikipedia , lookup
Development of the nervous system wikipedia , lookup
Synaptic gating wikipedia , lookup
Stimulus (physiology) wikipedia , lookup
Nervous system network models wikipedia , lookup
Neural oscillation wikipedia , lookup
Neuropsychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup
Apical dendrite wikipedia , lookup
Neural modeling fields wikipedia , lookup
Multielectrode array wikipedia , lookup
Single-unit recording wikipedia , lookup
Chemical synapse wikipedia , lookup
Functional magnetic resonance imaging wikipedia , lookup
Brain–computer interface wikipedia , lookup
Evoked potential wikipedia , lookup
History of neuroimaging wikipedia , lookup
Spike-and-wave wikipedia , lookup
Electroencephalography wikipedia , lookup
What are we measuring in EEG and MEG? Methods for Dummies 2007 Matthew Longo Basic Logic • Electrical activity of neurons produces currents spreading through the head. • These currents reach the surface of the scalp, in the form of voltage changes and magnetic fields, both of which can be measured noninvasively. • Measured voltage changes at the scalp are called the electroencephologram (EEG). • Measured magnetic fields at the scalp are called the magnetoencephologram (MEG). Electrical Activity in the Cortex • Action Potential – Presynaptic – Axonal – Generally notmeasurable by EEG/MEG • Excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) – Postsynaptic – Dendritic – Measurable by EEG/MEG • Apical dendrites are oriented in parallel along the cortical sheet • Apical dendrites thought to contribute strongest signals measurable with EEG/MEG • Axons are more randomly located, resulting in currents from presynaptic action potentials cancelling each other out • Postsynaptic electrical activity (EPSP) sums, creating large “dipole” EEG and MEG Signals • EPSPs of parallel dendrites in cortical columns creates: – Primary current (what we want to know about) – Secondary/volume currents • Measured by EEG • Influenced by intervening tissue – Magnetic field perpendicular to primary current • Measured by MEG • Unaffected by intervening tissue Effects of Dipole Alignment Spatial Resolution • Single synapse on dendrite contributes ~20 fA-m (femto = 10-15 = one quadrillionth) • Empirical observations suggest EEG/MEG signals are typically ~ 10 nA-m (nano = 10-9 = one millionth) • Therefore, typical EEG/MEG signals reflect summed activity of ~ 500,000 – 1,000,000 neurons • ~ 1-5 mm2 of cortex forms lower bound of spatial resolution • In practice, the inverse problem further limits the ability to spatially pinpoint EEG/MEG signals. MEG Signals • MEG measures the fluctuations of frequency (Hz) and amplitude (T) of the brain magnetic signal • 10 fT (10-15) to about several pT (10-12) • Earth’s magnetic field ~ .5 mT • Requires: – Preposterously sensitive magnetometer (SQUID) – Shielding from external noise The SQUID • Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) Pros and Cons of EEG & MEG EEG MEG Signal magnitude Large signal (10 mV), easy to Tiny signal (10 fT), difficult detect to detect Cost Cheap What does signal index? Measures secondary (volume) Measures fields generated by currents primary currents Signal purity Affected by skull, scalp, etc. Unaffected by skull, scalp, etc. Temporal Resolution ~ 1 ms ~ 1 ms Spatial Localization ~ 1 cm ~ 1 mm Experimental Flexibility Allows some movement Requires complete stillness Dipole Orientation Sensitive to tangential and radial dipoles Sensitive only to tangential dipoles Expensive Further Reading • Baillet et al. (2001). Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. • Del Gratta et al. (2001). Reports on the Progress of Physics, 64, 1759-1814. • Hämäläinen et al. (1993). Review of Modern Physics, 65, 413-497. • Murakami & Okada. (2006). Journal of Physiology, 575.3, 925-936. • Nunez & Silberstein. (2000). Brain Topography, 13, 79-96.