Download The Dinosaur Heresies

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

DNA barcoding wikipedia , lookup

NEDD9 wikipedia , lookup

Transposable element wikipedia , lookup

Human genome wikipedia , lookup

Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Polyploid wikipedia , lookup

Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup

Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup

Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup

Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup

Genomics wikipedia , lookup

Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup

Gene desert wikipedia , lookup

Ridge (biology) wikipedia , lookup

Metagenomics wikipedia , lookup

Gene nomenclature wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup

Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

Genome editing wikipedia , lookup

Gene wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup

Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup

Helitron (biology) wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
The Rarity of Evolution Through
Gene Shuffling
Gavin Conant
Institut für Informatik, Universität Leipzig and
Department of Biology, The University of New Mexico
Overview

Introduction: Origins of
evolutionary novelty

What is “gene shuffling”?

Frequency of shuffling in genomes

Parting thoughts

Acknowledgements
Origins of novel structures

One of Darwin’s most difficult problems was to explain
how novel structures could be constructed by evolution
From The Dinosaur Heresies, Bakker, 1986
Ji et. al, 2001 Nature 410:1084
Proteins


A linear sequence of
“residues” is encoded in
the genome and
converted to the protein
“alphabet”
By a process that is still
imperfectly understood,
that linear polymer folds
into a specific 3dimensional shape
MTTYRSTAAGHKKTE
Are proteins modular?
?
=
DNA Recombination


Usually requires
some sequence
similarity
Can introduce
chimeras
composed of
parts of 2 genes
Scanning Genomes for “Shuffled Genes”
“Test” Genome
“Reference” Genome
Genes
Similarity Search
Filtering
Analysis details:

All protein-encoding genes in the test
species were compared to the reference
using BLAST

Significant hits were locally aligned

Test species proteins with non-overlapping
hits to two reference species genes were
analyzed with a special purpose algorithm

The result was a list of putatively shuffled
genes
Recent shuffling Events
S. bayanus = Test Species

S. mikatae = Reference
S. paradoxus = Reference

S. cerevisiae ==Test
Reference
Species
~25 Mys
We
hypothesized
that gene
shuffling would
be common…,
but actually it
was rare to
non-existent
Large-scale Analysis

We next took a broad taxonomic approach, surveying
species from all three kingdoms of life:



4 Bacteria, including anthrax and E. coli
4 Eukaryotes: including yeast (again) and fruit fly
2 Archeans
~800 Mys
~100 Mys
Fruit Fly
E. coli
Nematode
Salmonella
Fungi
H. influenzae
Time Calibration

We calibrated our observed shuffling events
against two other kinds of events:




The number of duplication events since the common
ancestor
The average number of gene sequence changes
since the common ancestor
Absolute divergence times are not known for
many test species
“Molecular clocks” can give approximate time
estimates
Conclusions

Examples of gene shuffling were found

Shuffling seems to be quite rare


In fruit flies, only about 1 shuffling event is preserved
every 4 million years

In that same period, at least 40 gene duplications would
be expected (shuffling rates was >10% of duplication
rate across the eukaryotes
Differences in rates between prokaryotes and
eukaryotes may be related to the differential
strength of genetic drift and natural selection in
these populations
Parting Thoughts
Origins of novelty


Gene shuffling is likely still an important
source of evolutionary novelty, especially
in bacteria
Modularity may not be the primary mode
of innovation in protein sequences
Acknowledgements





Andreas Wagner
Annette Evangelisti
Michael Fuller
Michael Gilchrist
The Department of Energy and the Krell Institute