* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Briefing to MT - CHARLIE-GIBBS MARINE PROTECTED AREA
Soon and Baliunas controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate resilience wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit email controversy wikipedia , lookup
ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia , lookup
Heaven and Earth (book) wikipedia , lookup
Michael E. Mann wikipedia , lookup
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Criticism of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Canada wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Future sea level wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the Arctic wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change has changed Presented by WWF Recent observations of ice, atmospheric CO2 and methane, sea level rise and global emissions of greenhouse gases indicate that climate change is impacting natural systems, including the oceans, sooner than predicted in existing modelling and scenarios. Early signs suggest that feedbacks are active now, from marine and coastal environments, which are accelerating climate change and that some tipping points have been passed. Many of these processes are not included in standard climate modelling and predictions. Mitigation efforts are increasingly urgent. What has changed? Since the compilation of the most comprehensive and up to date science; the IPCC’s AR4, published in 2007, several aspects of climate science, understanding and observations in the field have advanced. ● The melt of Arctic summer sea ice in summer September 07 and the record amount of thin and young sea ice in the winter of 2008 demonstrate that the Arctic is losing sea ice decades ahead of projections. This triggers feedback mechanisms which accelerate global warming, climate change and impacts further and faster than currently documented. The majority of Arctic sea ice scientists declare that the Arctic sea ice is past its tipping pointi, the point at which change becomes selfperpetuating until an altogether different state is reached. NSIDC suggest that the North Pole may be ice free this summerii. ● 2007 saw another high in the growth of atmospheric CO2 in recent yearsiii. This coincides with a reduction of the natural carbon sink capacity of the oceans, for example seeiv. Data show that atmospheric CO2 levels are higher than the IPCC worst case scenario, A1F1v. ● Atmospheric methane concentrations have begun to rise again, after a plateau of 10 years. The source of this methane appears to be from northern wetlands, strongly suggesting that the release of methane from boreal and Arctic soils is accelerating vi. ● Sea level is rising faster than forecastvii and some oceans are acidifying faster thanviii; ● Many of the processes observed and detailed above have the potential to feedback to the climate system, exacerbating and accelerating climate changeix. Indications suggest that in some examples, the feedbacks have become active already. 1 Why does this matter? The changes in the Arctic matter in particular for two reasons: i) Speed and causes of impacts. For several key Arctic systems, recently observed changes are happening at rates significantly faster than accommodated for in climate models. This reflects the current limits of scientific understanding of essential processes controlling these Arctic systems and therefore raises questions about the range of predictions that guide mitigation strategies to date. ii) Potential to cause more positive feedback. The most prominent result from losing Arctic sea ice is a positive feedback to warming through the albedo effect, with potentially dangerous consequences. Further consequences will include warming of Arctic shallow shelf seas and the very real danger of release of methane from shallow shelf seas and coasts. Early evidence suggests that methane is increasingly being released from these sources already. Additionally, the Greenland Ice Sheet could also be impacted by loss of Arctic sea ice, through regional warming. The rate of loss of Greenland Ice Sheet has increased three fold between 2004-2006. It is estimated that if Greenland temperatures rise 3oC above pre-industrial levels, the Greenland ice sheet may pass a tipping point and be committed to complete lossx. Loss of Greenland ice has the potential to increase global sea levels by 7.2m over time. NASA’s Hansen recently predicts 3-5m sea level rise by 2100xi. How does this fit in with the other climate science ? Looking at the data in the table below, even big cuts in CO2 emissions carry a serious risk of exceeding 2oC. We have passed the levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere which we would need to stabilise at in order to have a chance of staying below 2 oC. If we stabilise at current levels, we will likely exceed 2oC. What the Arctic is telling us, is that 2oC is too much. Pacific Islanders echo the same conclusion. It is reported that in the past (Pliocene), when global average temperatures were 2-3oC warmer than now and CO2 was around 385-425ppm, sea levels were 25m higher than now (plus or minus 10m)xii. Greenhouse gas levels have risen above the desired stabilisation target of atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, but it is considered that if this is followed by a steep decline in emissions, that it may still be possible to limit temperature rise to below 2oC. However, the modelling clearly demonstrates that any delay, even a few years, in the peak and decline, significantly reduces the possibility to stay even below 2 oC. The table below summarises some data released pre 2007/8 field observations, so these may be an underestimate. 2 Status in 2007 IPCC 2007xiii IPCC 2007ibid (NASA) Hansen et alxiv (ippr) Baer and Mastrandreaxv Meinshausenxvi Parry et al.xvii Projected or target global mean temp rise since pre-industrial 0.76oC Associated CO2 ppm or Equivalents Stabilisation level. 385ppm CO2 430equiv 2-2.4oC in B1, 350-400 CO2 best scenario 0.6-1.4oC 350equiv 1.7oC total 300-350ppm CO2 o <=2 C total 366-380ppm CO2 2oC total 2oC Predicted sea level rise by 2100 in metres 17mm/y Peak in emissions by given year or since paper published Associated Reduction in global CO2 emissions by 2050 0.5m 2000-2015 50-85%(or more) below 2000 levels 3 to 5m A few years Risk of overshooting 2oC 350equiv=0-31%(mean 8%) 400equiv =2-57%(mean 27%) 400-470ppm CO2 equiv 2010 81% below 1990 = 9-26% risk of exceeding 2oC For 400ppm 30-40% below CO2 e model, 1990 levels 2-5y from ‘06 80% below 1990 When the predictions for emissions targets and temperature increase targets are combined with the new field observations from 2007 and 2008, it becomes clear that the system seems to be reacting faster and more sensitively than predicted. The modelling and predictions need to be updated and the mitigations targets established on the basis of these re-calculated data. Conclusions This new information indicates that many aspects of climate change have been underestimated; the impacts are felt sooner, the feedbacks are active sooner, the climate is more sensitive than anticipated and the models used for IPCC 4th AR have failed to accurately predict the pace of change. While it is already considered a challenge to limit global average temperature rise to below 2oC, given the impacts underway, the feedbacks in action and tipping points, it is now highly likely that a rise of 2oC would be too much. The aim of UNFCCC is to avoid “dangerous interference with the climate system”; the changes now underway and the feedbacks in action indicate that we may have already reached ‘dangerous’ levels of climate change. The implication of this recent evidence is that our mitigation and adaptation responses to climate change now need to be more rapidly implemented and greater than previously assessed. 3 i ii WWF, 2008. Arctic Climate Impact Science – an update since ACIA. Pp 1-123. National Snow and Ice Data Centre, 2008. http://nsidc.org/Arcticseaicenews/2008/050508.html iii Pieter Tans, NOAA/ESRL, ph. 303 497 6678, [email protected], http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/ iv Le Quéré, C et al. 2007. Saturation of the Southern Ocean CO2 Sink Due to Recent Climate Change. Science 316:1735-1738. v IPCC, 2000. A Special Report of Working Group III of the IPCC, Based on a draft prepared by:N. Nakic´enovic´, O. Davidson, G. Davis, A. Grübler, T. Kram, E. Lebre La Rovere, B. Metz, T. Morita, W. Pepper, H. Pitcher, A. Sankovski, P. Shukla, R. Swart, R. Watson, Z. Dadi. vi Hofmann, D. 2008. The NOAA Annual Greenhouse Gas Index. NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, R/GMD, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305-3328 vii Surminski, S. 2008, Insurance Risk at the Coast. In, Proceedings of the Coastal Management for Sustainability, Coastal Futures 2008 – Review and Future Trends viii Feely, R., C. Sabine, M. Hernandez-Ayon D. Ianson and B Hales, 2008. Evidence for Upwelling of Corrosive "Acidified" Water onto the Continental Shelf. Science DOI: 10.1126/science.1155676 ix Reid, C. et al., 2008, Impacts of the Oceans on Climate Change. Submission to OSAPR Commission. ACIA, 2005. Arctic Climate Impact Assessment, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. xi Hansen, J., Sato, M., Pushker, K, Beerling, D., Masson-Delmotte, V., Pagani, M., Raymo, M., Royer, D. and Zachos, J. 2008. Target Atmospheric CO2: Where Should Humanity Aim?. Pp1-38. xii Hansen, J., M. Sato, P. Kharecha, G. Russell, D. Lea and M Siddall, 2007. Climate change and trace gases. Phil Trans Royal Soc. A. (2007) 365, 1925-1954. xiii Solomon, S., et al., 2007: Technical Summary. In: Climate Change, 2007: The Physical Basis. Contribution to Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, UK and USA. xiv Hansen, J., Sato, M., Pushker, K, Beerling, D., Masson-Delmotte, V., Pagani, M., Raymo, M., Royer, D. and Zachos, J. 2008. Target Atmospheric CO2: Where Should Humanity Aim?. Pp1-38. xv Baer, P. and Mastrandrea, M. 2006. High Stakes: Designing emissions pathways to reduce the risk of dangerous climate change. ippr. Pp 1-37. xvi Meinshausen, M. 2006. What Does a 2°C Target Mean for Greenhouse Gas Concentrations? In Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, Editor, Schellnhuber. Camb Uni Press. Pp 1-406. xvii Parry, M., Palutikof, J., Hanson, C., Lowe, J. 2008. Climate Policy: Squaring up to Reality. Nature Reviews, Climate Change. 29th May 2008. x 4