Download Complications to the relationship between genotype to phenotype

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup

Behavioural genetics wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetic clock wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup

Saethre–Chotzen syndrome wikipedia , lookup

No-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) Genome Editing wikipedia , lookup

Frameshift mutation wikipedia , lookup

Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup

Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup

Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup

Gene wikipedia , lookup

Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup

Behavioral epigenetics wikipedia , lookup

Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup

Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics in learning and memory wikipedia , lookup

Genetic drift wikipedia , lookup

Epigenomics wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of diabetes Type 2 wikipedia , lookup

Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup

Hardy–Weinberg principle wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics in stem-cell differentiation wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Cancer epigenetics wikipedia , lookup

Mutation wikipedia , lookup

Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup

Population genetics wikipedia , lookup

Epistasis wikipedia , lookup

Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of neurodegenerative diseases wikipedia , lookup

Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Point mutation wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Dominance (genetics) wikipedia , lookup

Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
More complications to Mendel
Complications to the relationship between genotype to phenotype
Commentary written in response to the release of the
first draft of the human genome sequence
From Science Compass August 3, 2001
• Human genome sequencing will reveal thousands of genetic variations
among individuals that many will assume are associated with disease
or phenotypic variation
• But translating such genotypic differences into phenotypic states is
prone to pitfalls
• for example, genetic abnormalities differ in their penetrance;
environmental effects have not been taken into consideration; and
many diseases have complex etiologies that depend on variations in a
number of different genes
• There are very few diseases that are caused by a single gene mutation
1
Start with Phenomenology
Then, where possible, work our way to
explanatory mechanisms
2
The mother and daughter are
heterozygous for the same
dominant mutant allele of the
pax-3 gene
This mutant allele shows
variable expressivity
Expressivity: the degree to
which a particular genotype is
expressed in the phenotype
Variable expressivity: a
variable phenotype is seen
among individuals of the same
genotype (with respect to the
trait in question)
Genes that sense gravity in plants may play a role in
Waardenburg syndome in humans:
http://fire.biol.wwu.edu/trent/trent/BizarreModels.pdf
3
ÒTo assess expressivity, you must examine
a two or more individuals who are the same
genotype with respect to the specific gene
under examination
4
An “extreme”form of variable expressivity:
Penetrance: the proportion of individuals
with a specific genotype who manifest that
genotype at the phenotype level
Incomplete penetrance: not every
individual of a given genotype shows the
expected phenotype; that is, the phenotypic
effects of the allele are not always seen in
the individual
5
Attention to detail.
Is there anything
unusual in this photo?
6
http://fire.biol.wwu.edu/trent/trent/JakeMooreRetinoblastoma.pdf
Meet Jake Moore. In Nov (2005)
a family friend noticed an odd
white reflection in his right eye.
His left eye shows the typical redeye effect seen when the retina
reflects light from a camera flash
7
Jake was subsequently diagnosed with retinoblastoma, a
pediatric eye cancer that affects 1 in 20,000 children.
Jake’s right eye already had two advanced tumors
Retinoblastoma in humans
• Tumor of the retina that forms in retinoblasts (retinal stem cells)
• Can be inherited via an autosomal dominant predisposition
• Rb-= mutant Rb+= normal
• Rb+ Rb+ eye cancers rare (normal)
• Rb+ Rb- 90% of hets get eye cancers (# tumors varies)
• Rb+ Rb- 10% of hets never get eye cancers
• mechanism of incomplete penetrance known (see below)
• Variable # tumors in affected individuals an example of variation
in expressivity
Fragile X Syndrome Phenomenology
8
Explore Genetics Home Reference http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/gene/FMR1
Fragile X syndrome is one of the most common forms of inherited mental retardation.
The syndrome occurs in approximately 1 in 3600 males and 1 in 4000 to 6000 females"
(fragilex.org). Fragile X results in apparently normal neurological development, with
the effects becoming apparent during early learning (age 3-5). This disease is one of
several CAG expansion diseases
Human Molecular Genetics, 1997, Vol. 6, No. 11 1791–1801
One son (II-4) inherited a normal chromosome and the other five inherited the fragile-X
chromosome
9
What mechanisms could explain
incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity?
10
How can two individuals with the same genotype (for a particular trait)
show different phenotypes?
A norm of reaction describes the pattern of phenotypic expression of a single genotype
across a range of environments
11
Mechanisms underlying incomplete penetrance
and variable expressivity
(i) variations in the environment to which the individuals are exposed
(ii) inherent element of randomness (noise) in molecular, biochemical and developmental
processes such as:
• random variation in the growth and division or differentiation of cells during
development
• random variation in gene expression – perhaps related to epigenetic events such as
DNA methylation and/or histone modification
• effects of random events -- somatic mutations that produce cancer
(iii) variations in the genotype at other loci -- that is, variation in genetic background
(such as at modifier or suppressor loci)
12
Required Reading:
The Interpretation of Genes
Natural History 10/02 pg. 52-58
http://fire.biol.wwu.edu/trent/trent/interpretationofgenes.pdf
The theme of this article:
The “expression of a genome is best understood as a dialogue with
an organism’s environment.
SEE examples on the following pages: we will not discuss all of
them in class. If you find a interesting example of a
gene X environment interaction in the specification of a welldefined phenotype, please bring it to CT’s attention.
13
Other dramatic examples of the effects of environment on phenotype
The water flea Daphnia lumholtzi usually reproduces
parthenogenetically:
• diploid females produce diploid daughters without interference by the rare
and much smaller males.
• the progeny of this form of parthenogenesis are genetic clones of the female
(in contrast to what we saw with the Komodo Dragon)
The individuals shown are genetic clones:
• the animal on the left was exposed to
chemical cues from predaceous fish
• the animal on the right was a control
• The sharp helmet and extended tail
spine of the flea on the left protects
it from predators
Science 294:
321 Oct 12, 2001
14
from Natural History article referenced above
These sisters are 75% identical in genotype
Whether they become soldiers, workers or queens depends on a set of
environmental cues -- food, temperature and light
15
16
PKU= recessive, loss-of-function mutation in enyzme that catalyzes step A in
the diagram on the next page
1/12,000 (Caucasian births) affected with PKU (autosomal recessive )
Info about PKU
http://www.ygyh.org/
PAH = phenyl alanine hydroxylase
17
PKU= recessive,
loss-of-function
mutation in enzyme
(PAH) that catalyzes
step A
See also text reading
assignments
18
aspartame: nutrasweet Asp-Phe dipeptide
19
What does the term stochastic mean?
20
Òinvolving a random variable
Òhaving an inherent element of randomness or chance
A model of phenotypic determination that shows how genes, environment
and developmental noise interact to produce a phenotype
21
Mechanisms underlying incomplete penetrance and variable
expressivity
(i) variations in the environment to which the individuals are exposed
(ii) inherent element of randomness (noise) in molecular, biochemical
and developmental processes such as:
• random variation in the growth, division, migration or differentiation
of cells during development
• random variation in gene expression – perhaps related to epigenetic
events such as DNA methylation and/or histone modification
• effects of random events such as somatic mutations that produce
cancer
(iii) variations in the genotype at other loci -- that is, variation in genetic background
(such as at modifier or suppressor loci)
22
Role of spontaneous somatic mutation in retinoblastoma, a
childhood disease marked by retinal tumors
Inherited retinoblastoma: autosomal dominant predisposition to the
development of retinoblastomas but the mutant allele is recessive at the
cellular level
HUH?
23
Tumors only arise from retinal cells that carry two mutant Rb− alleles.
(a) In hereditary retinoblastoma, a child receives a normal Rb+ allele from one parent and a mutant
Rb− allele from the other parent. A single mutagenic event in a heterozygous somatic retinal cell that
inactivates the normal allele will result in a cell homozygous for two mutant Rb− alleles.
(b) In sporadic retinoblastoma, a child receives two normal Rb+ alleles. Two separate somatic
mutations, inactivating both alleles in a particular cell, are required to produce a homozygous
Rb−/Rb− retinal cell. (about 1 in 30,000 Rb+/Rb+ individuals will develop retinoblastoma)
24
the stochastic nature of mutational events explains the incomplete
penetrance and variable expressivity
what are the elements of randomness ?
if an Rb à rb mutation occurs in a retinoblast (accounts for
incomplete penetrance)
when and where (which eye and which retinoblast) accounts for
at least some aspects of variable expressivity
25
Frequency of retinoblastoma worldwide:
1/30,000 - 1/20,000 children
5-10% of cases are inherited (pre-existing germline mutation)
20-30% of cases result from a new germline mutation in one parent
60-70% are sporadic somatic mutations
CLICK HERE FOR MORE INTERESTING INFO ON RETINOBLASTOMA:
http://fire.biol.wwu.edu/trent/trent/RBinfo.pdf
26
NOTE: most examples of incomplete penetrance or variable
expressivity are NOT explained by the requirement of a
second mutation to reveal the mutant phenotype
Genetic background (to be explored in subsequent lectures),
the environment, epigenetic effects and other kinds of
stochastic developmental events (noise) will likely underlie
the disconnect between genotype and phenotype
27
Epigenetic effects or changes– heritable
changes in gene expression that do not
involve changes in the DNA sequence
Epigenetic mechanisms are affected by
several factors and processes including
development in utero and in childhood,
environmental chemicals, drugs and
pharmaceuticals, aging, and diet
28
Genes as a Mirror of Your Life
rather than your life as a mirror of your genes
https://commonfund.nih.gov/EPIGENOMICS/figure.aspx
29
30
Figure 1
Mechanisms involved in chromatin modifications
Five broad and interrelated mechanisms are known to affect chromatin structure: DNA
methylation, histone modification, insertion of histone variants, remodeling complexes, and noncoding RNAs. All five have been shown to be essential contributors to the development and cell
fate determination of tissues including in the nervous system, while histone modifications and
DNA methylation have so far been more extensively investigated in the context of adult brain
function.
Nature. 2010 June 10; 465(7299): 728–735.
31
32
Fragile X syndrome: variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance
A loss of function of the FMR-1 gene results in severe learning problems,
intellectual disability (retardation) and, for some, autism or autism-like
behaviors
33
Understanding Fragile X
FMR1 = Fragile X Mental Retardation 1
In family that we are considering, mom is heterozygous for a normal allele with
29 repeats and a “premutation” allele with 65 repeats
34
29/65
~66 & 300
~300
45%
IQ 72
~130-200
~100-270
~170
~170
3%
3%
120
92
~ 29
0%
122
I-2 has a normal allele with ~ 29
CGG repeats and an allele with an
expanded repeat in the pre-mutation
range (~ 65 repeats).
~130-670
100%
58
~170-200
~200 & 530
45%
62
CmepG (methylated) alleles shown in bold and larger font; unmethylated
copies in smaller font
NOTE: all offspring inheriting the permutation (fragile X allele with ~65
repeats) are somatic mosaics – different cells have alleles with different numbers
of repeats and levels of DNA methylation. % methylation at a specific site in
the repeat area indicated by degree of shading and %
35
Somatic mosaicism is the
presence of genetically distinct
populations of somatic cells in a
given organism. It is frequently
masked, but it can also result in
major phenotypic changes
Mosaicism can be caused by
• mutations
• epigenetic alterations of
DNA
• chromosomal abnormalities
• spontaneous reversion of
inherited mutations
Nature Reviews Genetics 3, 748-758 (October 2002) | doi:10.1038/nrg906
36
DNA methylation-induced silencing of FMR-1 transcription results in a loss of
gene function à severe effects on nervous system
http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/gene/FMR1
37