* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download slide presentation
Polymorphism (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Dual inheritance theory wikipedia , lookup
Behavioural genetics wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup
Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup
Group selection wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup
Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup
Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
Human genome wikipedia , lookup
Population genetics wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Genomic library wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Whole genome sequencing wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup
Genome editing wikipedia , lookup
Plant community and traits assembly Alain Franc INRA, UMR BioGeCo, France DEB workshop, Amsterdam, January 2008 How can order emerge from noise? How can order emerge from noise? By which miracle can mathematical modelling be relevant for biological diversity? Evolutionary convergence Ilex aquifolium Aquifoliaceae Aquifoliales Quercus ilex Fagaceae Fagales A series of hypothesis 1 - A plant is an assamblage of traits 2 - This assemblage is non random 3 - But the outcome of an evolutionary process 4 - Under selection pressure due to biotic intercations 5 - It is possible to study it through evolutionary biology models Evolution by selection (Lewontin, 1970) Mecanism 1: There exist variability of the trait between units Mécanism 2: There exist selection of units which contribute to the next generation Mecanism 3: There exist transmission of the trait by units Lewontin R.C., 1970. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1: 1-18 Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. Euphorbiaceae and Cactaceae Caryophyllales Malpighiales Weight of history … … and local adaptation ! Convergence in architecture for trees Selection for trait assembly? Lewontin programme for trait assembly variation selection inheritance Some basic ideas Law (1999) : Constant exchange between regional pool and local assemblages Ricklefs (2004) : Selection within local assemblages Model’s hypothesis A community is described by the abundances of species building it Local community is in relation wit a regional pool Introductions from pool occur with regular time step (say, 1 y) Between introductions, abundances are driven by L.-V. model Emphasis on weight of competition : Hence Pool and local assemblage Pool Local assemblage (community) Expulsion (failure) Digestion (success) Digestion with extinctions Outcome Long distance dispersal selected randomly at regular time step Pool and local assemblage Pool Local assemblage (community) Expulsion (failure) Digestion (success) Digestion with extinctions Outcome Long distance dispersal selected randomly at regular time step Extinction Invasion Local L.-V. Questions adressed Influence of the structure of matrix A on community assembly Parameters of the programme 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.4 Size 0 200 400 600 Time A mess, as in Lawton’s paper Uniform law 800 1000 25 20 15 10 Nbr species 0 20 40 60 Time Macroscopic regularitie, as in Lawton’s paper 80 100 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.4 Size 0 200 400 600 Time Improving? Gaussian law 800 1000 0 20 40 60 Time 80 100 6 7 8 Nbr species 9 10 Plants as trait assemblages A competition matrix has bee computed, wih the hypothesis that - Interacting plants are trait assemblages - competition coefficient aij is calculated knowing the traits in each plant Each trait is binary Phenotypes are labelled 0 or 1 There exist four interacting types: (0,0) ; (0,1) ; (1,0) ; (1,1) Fitness for plant i when interacting with plant j (simply) is the average of fitness for each trait Programme : simple (R) 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.4 Size 0 200 400 600 800 Time Trait assemblage 1000 0 20 40 60 Time 80 100 10 15 Nbr species 20 Perspectives : analogies Perspectives : analogies Quick translation into genetic algorithms Perspectives : analogies Quick translation into genetic algorithms Classical: Fitness = f(genome environnement) Perspectives : analogies Quick translation into genetic algorithms Classical: Fitness = f(genome environnement) Here: + biotic intercations (which is true …) Perspectives : analogies Quick translation into genetic algorithms Classical: Fitness = f(genome environnement) Here: + biotic intercations (which is true …) Assemblage : assemblage of traits modelled as a genome example: example : 011001101 Perspectives : analogies Quick translation into genetic algorithms Classical: Fitness = f(genome environnement) Here: + biotic intercations (which is true …) Assemblage : assemblage of traits modelled as a genome example: example : 011001101 Fitness = f(génome genome environnement) Perspectives : analogies Quick translation into genetic algorithms Classical: Fitness = f(genome environnement) Here: + biotic intercations (which is true …) Assemblage : assemblage of traits modelled as a genome example: example : 011001101 Fitness = f(génome genome environnement) Very close to a model of co-evolution Perspectives : analogies Quick translation into genetic algorithms Classical: Fitness = f(genome environnement) Here: + biotic intercations (which is true …) Assemblage : assemblage of traits modelled as a genome example: example : 011001101 Fitness = f(génome genome environnement) Very close to a model of co-evolution Towards community assembly as evolution of genomes assembly