* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download climate change adaptation in nigeria
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
Myron Ebell wikipedia , lookup
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
Michael E. Mann wikipedia , lookup
Soon and Baliunas controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit email controversy wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Heaven and Earth (book) wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Climate resilience wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Saskatchewan wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Appraisal of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria Olumide David Onafeso Department of Geography, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Nigeria Introduction Today, climate change is one of the most serious threats to sustainable development. This is due to its anticipated adverse impacts on the environment, human health, food security, economic activity, natural resources and physical infrastructure. Although, the global climate varies naturally, it has become generally agreed that rising concentrations of anthropogenically-produced greenhouse gases in the Earth’s atmosphere are causing changes in the climate (United Nations, 1992). The general effects of climate change have already been observed, and scientific findings indicate that precautionary and prompt action is necessary (Schneider et al, 2000). Whereas mitigation has traditionally been the essential approach in meeting the challenge, adaptation to the effects of climate change is now acknowledged as necessary for responding effectively and equitably to the impacts of both climate change and climate variability. In recent years, adaptation has become a key focus of the scientific and policy-making communities and is now a major area of discussion in the multilateral climate change process. Adaptation has been implicitly and explicitly linked with development-focused action, particularly as the IPCC has underscored that developing countries are disproportionately vulnerable to climate change and lack adaptive capacity. Development processes and trajectories will be affected by the rate of climate change, and this is especially important for developing countries with growing economies. Adaptation is recognized as a crucial response because even if current agreements to limit emissions are implemented, they will not stabilize atmospheric concentrations of GHG emissions and climate (Wigley, 1998). Particular attention will therefore be needed to be paid to the management of water and other natural resources, agricultural activities, and the sources and generation of energy. Under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), adaptation appears as a cross-cutting theme (United Nations, 1992). While the first Conference of the Parties (COP 1) in 1995 addressed funding for adaptation, it was not until the adoption of the “Marrakesh Accords” in 2001 that adaptation began to be more widely seen as a prominent area for action. Following the 1 release of the IPCC’s Third Assessment Report, COP 9 in 2003 requested the UNFCCC Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA) to initiate work on the scientific, technical and socioeconomic aspects of, and vulnerability and adaptation to, climate change. Parties reached a milestone at COP 10 in 2004, known as the Buenos Aires Programme of Work on Adaptation and Response Measures. COP 10 set up two complementary tracks for adaptation: the development of a structured five-year programme of work on the scientific, technical and socioeconomic aspects of vulnerability and adaptation to climate change under SBSTA, which was adopted at COP 11 in 2005; and the improvement of information and methodologies, implementation of concrete adaptation activities, technology transfer and capacity building under the Subsidiary Body for Implementation (SBI). At COP 12, parties concluded the initial list of activities to be undertaken under the five-year SBSTA programme of work and renamed it the “Nairobi Work Programme on Impacts, Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change” or NWP. Parties also made progress on the governing principles of the Adaptation Fund, which was established by the Kyoto Protocol to fund adaptation activities through a two-percent levy on emission reduction projects undertaken under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). The IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report and key finding from Working Group II on impacts, adaptation and vulnerability indicates that hundreds of millions of people will be exposed to increased water stress, that many millions more people will be exposed to flooding every year, and that access to food in many African countries will be severely compromised. Furthermore, the report states that adaptation will be necessary but that many impacts can be avoided, reduced or delayed by mitigation. At COP 13, held in Bali, Indonesia, in December 2007, a roadmap for a post-2012 climate regime was agreed, with adaptation as one of the four building blocks (along with mitigation, finance and technology). Delegates further developed details and modalities of the Adaptation Fund at COP 14, held in Poznań in December 2008. The Fund is expected to be operational soon; however, a new agreement was concluded at Copenhagen in December 2009 during COP 15. The issues of climate change have indeed generated significant global attention in recent time. These concerns have not been without the traditional partitioning of major international interests along economic and development lines. While the developing world continues to wonder what the pertinent issues resulting from global warming are, the industrialized nations are divided on the intensity of the crises and perhaps also on the appropriate responses. The urgency of the need to 2 arrest the alarming rate at which the world is warming also seems to be another point of division. One major issue is the response of nations to the signing and compliance with the Kyoto Agreement to reduce carbon emission rates. Another political partitioning in global reaction to the issues of climate change is in terms of academic research and findings. While some frontline climate scientists opine that the primary causes of climate change are traceable to increasing and alarming rates of atmospheric temperature due to the earth trappings of anthropogenic greenhouse gases since the industrial era (Hansen et al., 1981; 1990a; 1990b; 1997a; 1997b; 1997c; 1998; 2000), others argue that the causes of climate change are largely due to natural forcings such as the fluctuations in the solar cycles (Lean and Rind, 1998; Foukal and Lean, 1990; Friis-Christensen and Lassen1991), the Milankovitch theory which suggests that normal cyclical variations in three of the Earth's orbital characteristics is probably responsible for some past climatic change (Berger, 1988; Valdes and Glover, 1999). Yet another school have maintained that abrupt climatic change is normal in the history of the planet earth. In a landmark research result, Lockwood (2001) considered the climate system as a dissipative, highly non-linear system with non-equilibrum conditions and has concluded that some unusual properties should be expected. These unusual properties include bifurcation points with marked instability just before the point, magnification of semi-periodic oscillations around bifurcation points and variations in the strength of teleconnections with distance from equilibrium. He discussed these properties and illustrated the climatic system using both the historical, Holocene and glacial climate records. Abrupt climatic changes and oscillations were found on all time-scales, while the amplitudes and frequencies of climate variability and teleconnections were found to vary between different time periods. A number of persistent oscillations were observed, particularly one about 1500 years, but their amplitudes were found to vary considerably between time periods. The Holocene was concluded to be no more climatically benign than the similar period in the Eemian. Furthermore, Lockwood (2001) observed that the North Atlantic thermohaline circulations appear to be of major importance in explaining many abrupt climate oscillations. This is because thermohaline circulations show many features of non-linear systems. When cooled, water with the salinity normal in the world’s oceans becomes denser, but does not reach its maximum density until near its freezing point, at about -2°C. The case of freshwater is however different, in that, it is densest at about 4°C, so that when the surface is cooled below that temperature, the coldest water 3 stays on top, and at 0ºC, floating ice is formed. When the salt water of the deep oceans cooled at the surface, convection occurs, hence the coldest and densest portions gradually sink to the depths. Low density surface layers in the oceans usually arise either due to surface heating or due to the addition of relatively fresh continental runoff or precipitation onto the ocean surface. However, the surface heating in the tropics effectively creates low density surface layers which continuously seek to spread over the entire surface of the ocean. This creates the thermohaline circulation whereby the warm, low density, surface water of tropical and sub-tropical origin spreads out towards higher latitudes, and after cooling by evaporation and sensible heat loss, leaves the surface and moves equator-ward at depth. The importance of thermohaline circulation in the climate system is thus, because it provides the major oceanic share of the transfer of warmth towards the pole (Rahmstorf, 1999; Lockwood, 2001). It may however, be impossible to conceptually separate the oceanic wind-driven from the oceanic thermohaline circulation since the wind-driven circulation is forced by wind stress variations, whereas the thermohaline circulation is forced by density anomalous owing to air sea fluxes of heat and fresh water imputs extending form the surface to the abyssal ocean. In reality, both circulations are coupled to each other, especially in the North Atlantic. The thermohaline circulation plays a crucial role in the climate system because of its large atmosphere (Bryden et al., 1991; Roemmich and Wunsch, 1984; Pierrehumbert, 2000). Furthermore, while some key policy makers have maintained that adaptation to climate change is the most appropriate approach to reducing its effects on the most vulnerable areas of the world, others have insisted that mitigation of the causative factors and a complete change of industrial and development attitude is the only way to bring down the impacts to the barest minimum. Whereas, others have adopted a blend of both approaches thereby forming another rounds of partitioning in the conceptual view of both the climate change problem as well as its solution. The economic costs of the different approaches have also led to divisions among nations. In Africa for example, where the vulnerability to climate change is likely to multiply significantly in the nearest future, budgetary allocation towards adaptation are either low or completely absent. This however contrasts the case of the European Commission which is spending huge amounts on mitigation policies such as alternative and renewable energy. Given Nigeria’s status as a fossil-fuel dependent economy with a large climate sensitive agricultural sector, the development of a climate change policy and response strategy is critical; as 4 climate change portends a serious threat to poverty eradication and sustainable development in general. One of the key pillars of the Vision 20:2020 is investment in low carbon fuels and renewable energy. Achieving the goal of low carbon, high growth and resilient socio-economic system for equitable and sustainable socio-economic and environmental development faces some challenges which include stability and sustainability of enabling environment, adequate institutional and human resources capacity and availability of adequate resources to address mitigation and adaptation initiatives to address climate change. Thus Government need to ensure that economic growth, resource management and climate change mitigation and adaptation can all happen simultaneously if this will be done effectively. The National Adaptation Strategy and Plan of Action on Climate Change for Nigeria (NASPACCN) which was established in December 2011 acknowledged that Nigeria’s climate is already changing. To prepare for and respond effectively to the impacts of climate change, adaptation is the key. Adaptation should be comprehensive and articulated in a way that recognizes the varying needs and vulnerabilities of all sections of the society. Accordingly, the Government of Nigeria and a number of civil society organizations embarked upon the development of National Adaptation Strategy and Plan of Action on Climate Change for Nigeria (NASPA-CNN). World leaders including the Nigerian delegation have recently converged in New York and then in Paris for two important meetings bothering on global future. The New York meeting, on one hand, adopted the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as the new global development framework. These SDGs – a set of 17 integrated goals and 169 time-bound targets, which are the successors to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), that were implemented mostly in developing countries from 2000 to 2015, with mixed results – are designed to continue where the MDGs left off and have been touted as the mechanism through which the world would be radically transformed in the next 15 years. The Paris meeting, on the other hand, produced and adopted by consensus an agreement negotiated during the 21st Conference of the Parties of the UNFCCC (COP 21). Apart from seeking to hold the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels, recognizing that this would significantly reduce the risks and impacts of climate change; the new COP 21 agreement also aim at increasing the ability to adapt to the adverse impacts of climate change and foster climate resilience and low greenhouse gas emissions development, in a manner that does not threaten food production; while also making finance flows 5 consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development. This paper therefore attempts an appraisal of the Nigeria’s approach to climate adaptation. Politics, Awareness and Perception of Climate Change In the midst of these politics, world leaders have taken to different degrees of commitment towards the global drive to reverse or at least slow down the pace of the crisis. This is due to the fact that no scientific evidence has denied the present trend of global warming even though there remain doubts over the rate. The impacts of climate change have been vivid in every portion of the earth, from the poles to the equator and from the temperate regions of the world to the tropics. This consensus, have lead to continued discussion on the climate change topic. The profound impacts such as biodepletion, flooding, drought, energy inefficiency and sea level rise have forced key decision makers in the world to continue to negotiate a way out of this singular problem facing development in a sustainable manner. It is in this light, after several campaigns and misgivings, that the Heads of State, Heads of Government, Ministers, and other heads of delegation present at the United Nations Climate Change Conference 2009 in Copenhagen endorsed both decision x/CP.15 that extends the mandate of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long term cooperative action and decision x/CMP.5 that requests the Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments of Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol to continue its work. The agreement that the Copenhagen Accord be operational immediately is an indication however, of a new dimension to the global politics of climate change. This is an important milestone in the history of global efforts to agree on terms towards meeting the challenge of the changing global climate. However, the few countries which boycotted the Copenhagen Summit shortly before its commencement may constitute another partition in the global concerted effort at meeting the climate change problem. In the concluding remarks of Simbine et al. (2008), special efforts to build internal capacity to integrate climate risk management into the policy and planning process of the Nigerian economy were advocated. Political will and commitment to develop a “National Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Strategy” was also advocated for Nigeria. 6 Doubtless that the international knowledge and awareness of climate change is increasing by the day. However, people’s perception of, and reaction to, climatic change issue vary not only along economic status and literary levels, but also there appears to be a spatial gradient in perception people’s from rural to urban areas (Gbadegesin and Ogundele, 2008). While regular perception studies are conducted in form of opinion survey in most developed countries, such surveys which are necessary in order to create awareness about climate change and to assess the public level of knowledge about this global phenomenon have been advocated (Gbadegesin and Ogundele, 2008). Similarly, Adelekan and Gbadegesin (2005) have concluded that climate issues be integrated into environmental studies curriculum of primary and secondary schools in Nigeria and other African countries, as this will “go great lengths” in building environmental responsibility in citizens. According to Gbadegesin and Ogundele (2008), environmental perception can be described as a piece of knowledge that is acquired by the individual as a result of his visual, tactile, verbal and auditory contact with the environment. From their studies, confirmation abounds that respondents’ knowledge of climate change and its consequences are higher in the more urban coastal (Lagos) areas than in the hinterland (Ibadan) areas. Although, the differences in the years of the studies may account for the differences (Adelekan and Gbadegesin, 2005; Gbadegesin and Ogundele, 2008), the conclusion that African nations need to include climate change issues as a vital component of long-term policy and planning, can not be over echoed. This is particularly important as since the majority of developing countries are highly-vulnerable to the potential effects of the changing global climate (Gbadegesin and Ogundele, 2008). Key Impacts of Climate Change in Nigeria Nigeria has started experiencing adverse climate conditions with unfavourable impacts on the wellbeing of her inhabitants. Persistent droughts and flooding, off season rains and dry spells have greatly affected growing seasons (Hulme, 2001), whereas the country is largely dependent on rain fed agriculture. Consequent rivers and lakes are drying up and a reduction in river flow is being experienced in the northern areas especially resulting in alterations in water supplies for use in agriculture, hydro-power generation and other users. Following the release of the 4th IPCC Assessment report, Climate Change has been confirmed with Africa expected to be worst hit by the effects with Nigeria inclusive (Christensen et al, 2007). 7 In Nigeria, the impact of the change in climate may be difficult to handle given the present lack of scientific and institutional capacity to improve knowledge and understanding of the prevailing processes involved. In the face of increasing scientific evidences on global warming, the readiness of both Nigerian scientists and the policy/decision makers to fill the widening gap in meeting up with the numerous challenges of climate change is doubtful. The disproportionate impact on Nigeria will therefore ensue for a combination of reasons. While global warming is expected to be greater over land than over sea since land retains heat more than water, there is also increasing evidence that sub-Saharan Africa south of the Sahelian zone will be particularly hit by the effect of vertical rises and falls in air currents which would greatly influence desiccation and extreme climatic events (Hulme, 2001). Nigeria is already experiencing an increasing incidence of disease, declining agricultural productivity, and a rising number of heat waves. Declining rainfall in already desert-prone areas in northern Nigeria is causing increasing desertification, the former food basket in central Nigeria is now empty, and people in the coastal areas who used to depend on fishing have seen their livelihoods destroyed by the rising waters (UNEP/GEF, 1997). The agricultural sector which provides employment for the rural populace contributes some percentage of the Nigerian Gross National Product. Given this dominant role of agriculture, it is evident that even minor climate deteriorations can cause devastating socioeconomic consequences. Environmental degradation and attendant desertification are major threats to the livelihoods of the inhabitants of the frontline states of northern Nigeria. This may lead to increasing population pressure, intensive agricultural land use, overgrazing, bush burning, extraction of fuel wood and other biotic resources. Women and children are particularly expected to be the most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change (Christensen et al, 2007). Suggestions have however been made of a mechanism for tackling climate change and global warming, through the idea of using Carbon Sinks to soak up carbon dioxide (Spittlehouse and Stewart, 2003) such as reforestation or planting of new forests, which is a popular strategy for the logging industry in nations with large forests interests like Nigeria. Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria Adjustment to climate change has been the standard climate policy issue for African countries. Adaptation options are of two main types: reactive, which are measures taken in response to 8 climate change, and preventive measures taken in advance of climate change to minimize or offset adverse impacts. Suggested adaptation strategies for Africa concentrate on the reduction of vulnerability to current climatic events, as well as the inclusion of adaptation policies in planning for long-term sustainable development. Adaptation measures are relevant for a variety of natural resources and socio-economic sectors in Africa such as natural ecosystems, agriculture, managed forests, water resources, coastal zones, energy, and infrastructure. Since the impacts of climate change will depend on changes in temperature, precipitation, sea levels, and concentrations of carbon dioxide, as well as other features of the climate, the ability to adapt to climate change and to reduce vulnerability is expected to be more constrained for the lowincome populations (Wilbanks et al, 2003), particularly in Nigeria. Although our society has a long record of managing the impacts of weather- and climate-related events, nevertheless, additional adaptation measures will be required to reduce the adverse impacts of projected climate change and variability, regardless of the scale of mitigation undertaken at the global level over the next two to three decades. Moreover, vulnerability to climate change can be exacerbated by other stresses such as those arising from, for example, current climate hazards, poverty and unequal access to resources, food insecurity, trends in economic globalisation, conflict and incidence of diseases such as HIV/AIDS (Huq et al, 2005). Adaptation can reduce vulnerability especially when it is embedded within broader sectoral initiatives. There is high confidence that there are viable adaptation options that can be implemented in some sectors at low cost, and/or with high benefit-cost ratios. However, comprehensive estimates of global costs and benefits of adaptation are limited, much less of local costs (IPCC, 2001). A range of barriers limit both the implementation and effectiveness of adaptation measures. The capacity to adapt is dynamic and is influenced by a society’s productive base including: natural and man-made capital assets, social networks and entitlements, human capital and institutions, governance, national income, health and technology (IPCC, 2001). Even societies with seemingly high adaptive capacity may remain vulnerable to climate change, variability and extremes (Gorthmann and Patt, 2005). It is therefore important to take the issues of climate change adaptation more seriously in Nigeria. In Nigeria, climate change adaptation is being coordinated through the “Building Nigeria’s Response to Climate Change” (BNRCC) Project which was established to assist the Nigerian people to organize and have a systematic approach, on a national scale, to address adaptation 9 requirements recognized as necessary to deal with climate change impacts and reduce vulnerability at various levels, especially the local level, closest to peoples lives. The project was intended to help build informed responses by enhancing capacity at the community, state and national levels to implement effective climate change adaptation strategies, policies and actions. BNRCC is also expected to help Nigeria meet its obligations under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. The project is funded by the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) and is being managed and implemented by a consortium of CUSO and Marbek Resource Consultants in partnership with the Nigerian Environmental Study/Action Team (NEST). From the several consultations already carried out, BNRCC has noted that the understanding of vulnerability to climate change impacts and the strategies or pathways for adaptation are currently enveloped in high uncertainties, particularly in West African countries where adequate scientific data are lacking in many respects. BNRCC has thus concluded that research is needed to support improved understanding of the extent of past, current and future climate variability and potential climate change in Nigeria, as one basis for developing adaptation options likely to ensure that poor and disadvantaged groups also benefit from the adaptation process rather than bearing the burdens. Social, economic, technological and institutional factors or issues are other bases identified for appropriate action and information on adaptation. However, BNRCC has already completed secondary research in Nigeria to assess climate change impacts in the following multi-sector clusters: human settlements and health; water resources, wetlands and freshwater ecosystems; energy, industry, commerce and financial services; agriculture, food security, land degradation/desertification, forestry and biodiversity; and coastal zones and marine ecosystems. These multi-sector clusters are scientifically concluded and could form a baseline for subsequent studies and formulation of climate change adaptation strategies in Nigeria. Nonetheless, it is important to emphasize the importance of the special adaptation requirement in the areas of water resources and agriculture, giving the global attention and the local demands for water and food 10 security which has been concluded the primary effects of climate change for which adaptation is inevitable (Easterling et al., 2003). Water Resources Management and Adaptation Water is a fundamental component of many economic activities. The impact of climate change on the quality and quantity of water therefore will be felt by such economic activities in one way or another. Water managers are accustomed to adapting to changing circumstances, many of which can be regarded as prototypes of future climate change, and a wide range of adaptive options has been developed. However, supply-side options are more familiar to most water managers; hence demand-side options may require more attention. Water management is evolving continually, and this evolution will affect the impact of climate change in practice. Climate change is therefore likely to challenge existing water management practices, especially in Nigeria with less experience in incorporating uncertainty into water planning. The generic issue is incorporation of climate change into the types of uncertainty traditionally treated in water planning. Integrated water resources management (IWRM) (Bogardi and Nachtnebel, 1994; Kindler, 2000) which is here recommended for Nigeria is increasingly globally regarded as the most effective way to manage water resources in a changing environment with competing demands. IWRM essentially involves three major components which include: explicit consideration of all potential supply-side and demand-side actions, inclusion of all stakeholders in the decision process, and continual monitoring and review of the water resources situation. IWRM is an effective approach in the absence of climate change, and there already are many good reasons for it to be implemented. Adopting integrated water resources management will go a long way toward increasing the ability of water managers to adapt to climate change. Agricultural Management and Adaptation The agriculture sector historically has shown enormous capacity to adjust to social and environmental stimuli that are analogous to climate stimuli. Historical analogs of the adaptability of agriculture to climate change include experience with historical climate fluctuations, deliberate translocation of crops across different agroclimatic zones, rapid substitution of new crops for old ones, and resource substitutions induced by scarcity (Easterling, 1996). Increasing numbers of 11 studies have investigated the effectiveness of agronomic adaptation strategies (e.g., adjustments in planting dates, fertilization rates, irrigation applications, cultivar traits) in coping with climateinduced yield losses and gains (Parry et al, 1999; Darwin 1999; Darwin and Kennedy, 2000). Considerable costs could be involved in this process of adaptation, however—for example, in learning about and gaining experience with different crops or if irrigation becomes necessary. In some cases, a lack of water resulting from climate change might mean that increased irrigation demands cannot be met. Adaptation is unlikely to come without cost. In a literature survey, Tol et al. (1998) concluded that adaptation costs (as opposed to net costs of damages) are not reported in most impact studies. Yet transition costs (e.g., to retrain farmers in new practices) and equilibrium costs (e.g., to develop additional irrigation or apply more fertilizer) may be considerable. The absence of a benefit-cost calculus for adaptation is a key deficiency. Existing studies also fail to account for the process of long-term, endogenous adaptation of technology in ways that are consistent with the extensive economic literature on that subject (Antle, 1996). This process also will involve significant costs. An extensive body of economic research has studied the benefits and costs of agricultural research and has shown that institutions that are responsible for agricultural research adapt agricultural technology across space and time in response to relative resource scarcity (Hayami and Ruttan, 1985). Quiggin and Horowitz (1999) argued that changes in fixed capital for on-farm and off-farm infrastructure may be the most significant cost associated with adaptation to climate change. Significant costs can be incurred to counter the effects of climate change on animal production; moreover, the impact of a warmer climate in terms of costs is not linear: Larger changes in climate can increase costs exponentially (Hahn and Morgan, 1999). Possible benefits of climate change during cooler seasons are not well documented, but the benefits are likely to be less than the consequential negative hot weather impacts (Hahn et al., 1992). The ability of livestock managers to cope with climate is demonstrated daily in their coping with normally varying conditions. A variety of management adaptations are available for livestock production systems. For example, Hahn and Mader (1997) outline a series of proactive management countermeasures that can be taken during heat waves (e.g., shades and/or sprinklers) to reduce excessive heat loads. Historical success in coping with climate variability suggests that livestock producers are likely to adjust to climate change successfully. Johnson (1965) provides examples from advances in genetics and breeding as related to the environment. These capabilities should allow adaptation to changing, 12 less favourable circumstances associated with projected rates of climate change. However, coping can entail significant dislocation costs for certain producers. For individual producers, uncertainties associated with potential climate change imply additional risks related to how and when to adapt current production practices (Lewandrowski and Schimmelpfennig, 1999). Conclusion Preventive adaptation options are considered on the basis of two basic criteria, namely flexibility and the potential for net benefits. Adaptation options from the global perspectives should be implemented in Nigeria if they yield net benefits independent of climate change. High priority should be given to the preventive adaptation options that would not be effective if implemented as reactive policies. Examples of situations where preventive policies are needed relate to irreversible or catastrophic impacts, when decisions affect long-term investments, and when trends are unfavourable. Reduction of vulnerability to climate change is probably a more realistic adaptation policy for Nigeria than efforts to reduce GHG emissions which is not to be left undone, though. This is because vulnerability relates to several key sectors. A more comprehensive illustration of adaptation to climate change vulnerability in Nigeria would need a separate article, but a couple of examples can be mentioned here. 1) The dependency on bio-fuels constitutes a serious energy management issue in Nigeria and indeed most countries in Africa, often leading to local deforestation. Thus, increasing the range of substitution possibilities for household energy consumption also represents an adaptation measure. 2) In agriculture, relatively small climatic changes may have profound effects on the farming capacity. Agricultural research promoting drought-resistant seeds or climate-adapted species, or developing new sources of income for farmers can reduce vulnerability to climate change (Adelekan and Gbadegesin, 2005). 3) Improved education for farming communities will increase mobility, income, and increase material standards and thus reduce vulnerability to climate change. 13 4) Likewise, improvements in public health will increase the population’s resistance to climate change and the impacts of disease vectors spreading into new areas. Policies to curb the climate change by reducing the consumption of fossil fuels like oil, gas or carbon, have significant economical impacts on the producers or rather the suppliers of these fuels. Nigeria is the eighth largest oil supplier in the world and the ninth largest deposits of gas. The Nigerian national economy would be massively affected by a sustainable reduction of fossil energy consumption. Nigeria is practically a monoculture: about 80% of the government income, 90-95% of the export earnings and more than 90% of the foreign exchange revenues evolve from the oil sector. However, during the last years the government of Nigeria have tried to diversify. Special attention is nowadays paid to gas which emerges in the joint-production of oil. So far the gas has mainly been flared (75%), simply due to the lack of technical facilities to make use of it. A study commissioned by the World Bank in 2007 indicates that Nigeria accounts for roughly onesixth of the world-wide gas flaring which in turn, spews some 400 million tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. However, the World Bank survey has listed Nigeria and 15 other oil producers, as countries that have progressively reduced gas flaring. Following the Kyoto-Protocol is a double-edged sword for Nigeria: The probably positive long term effects on the climate change are opposed to the negative short term effects for the economic development. Observing the Kyoto-Protocol would reduce the income of the OPEC – States, amongst them Nigeria, about 25% until 2010. This would be a catastrophe for the Nigerian development plan. The prospects of a changing climate have a variety of implications for the Federal Government in Nigeria. Scientific attention and public questions about climate change may have begun to increase pressure for research to provide answers, and for elected officials to make decisions about whether and how to address climate change. This is evident in the numerous recent attempts of government officials to either make statement on the issue of climate change or decide on how to tackle climate change impacts such as flooding, drought and desertification. Although, it is not clear how much is invested by the Nigerian government yearly on climate change research, voluntary programs, and financial incentives to advance low-GHG-emitting technologies, there is no doubt that a paltry amount have been spent from time to time on combating the obvious effects of climate change. For example, the problematic flooding of the Lagos coastal areas has recently attracted the financial attention of the Federal Government of Nigeria. However, setting clear and realistic objectives for research and programs remain a near-term challenge for federal programs, but such measures 14 would facilitate sustainable oversight of program performance and improvements. Of particular interest may be questions about the rate at which science (also integrated with economics) can narrow uncertainties about the magnitude, rate, geographic distribution, and other characteristics of climate change, and the degree to which changes may be predictable, hence facilitating effective and timely adaptation. These questions bear importantly on the trade-off between acting sooner with imperfect information versus delaying action in expectation of reducing uncertainties. Furthermore, the federal government manages many assets that may potentially be affected by climate change. For example, climate change could bring benefits or threats to public lands, particularly to national parks and other physical and biological assets valued for their high natural and cultural amenities. As climate change alters grasslands, forests, fisheries, and other resources, their values will change, as may appropriate management objectives and plans. Similarly, climate change may affect the demand and supply of energy for the operations of government, with implications for infrastructure planning, expenses, and supply choices. The federal government may find it desirable to redefine objectives and provide for institutional flexibility and adaptive management as climate, and the resources that depend on specific conditions, change. For example, such ecological impacts as competition among species may lead to conflicts among endangered species or other resource management goals. Evaluations of objectives and practices in light of potential future climate change may enhance future successes of resource management. Although some climate changes and their impacts may occur relatively smoothly, ecosystems frequently exhibit abrupt changes in response to incremental pressures. In terms of socioeconomic consequences, abrupt changes may constitute emergencies or even disasters that would require federal responses and possibly financial and other resources. Preparedness for, and managing aftermaths of, floods, droughts, pest infestations, fires, epidemics, and coastal erosion are a few examples of the physical pressures climate change may bring. Such changes can also create social dislocations and strife. Beyond immediate responses, the federal government also needs to be prepared to act as the insurer of the last resort; this role could expand if private insurance becomes less available or more costly, or if people do not procure adequate insurance. In the same vein, all levels of government may find it useful to consider possible climate change implications when planning their long-lasting infrastructure or other projects, including energy procurement, water supply and flood control, investment in buildings and transportation systems, etc. This could lessen the problem of obsolete, expensive, or stranded assets that could arise with 15 possible climate and policy changes. Furthermore, expected climate changes outside the borders of Nigeria could have important implications for the Federal government as well. For example, climate change impacts in Niger, Chad and other neighbouring countries, could be more adverse than in the Nigeria, due partly to more severe projected climate changes and partly to lower capacity to adapt. While the desert encroachment is causing serious worries of biodepletion in the Northern parts of Nigeria, the severity of the projected drought which is likely to affect these two neighbours may result in serious conflicts which may have untold effects on the bilateral relations. References Adelekan, I. O. and Gbadegesin A. S. (2005) Analysis of the public perception of climate change issues in an indigenous African city. International Journal of Environmental Studies 62 (1): 115-124 Antle, J.M., (1996) Methodological issues in assessing potential impacts of climate change on agriculture. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 80: 67–85. Berger, A. (1988) Milankovitch theory and climate. Review of Geophysics 26:624-657 Bogardi, J.J. and H.-P. Nachtnebel (eds.), 1994: Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Water Resources Management. International Hydrological Programme, UNESCO, Paris, France. Bryden, H.L., Roemmich, D., Church, J. (1991) Oceanic heat transport across 24 degrees N in the Pacific. Deep-Sea Research 37:297-324 Christensen, J.H., B. Hewitson, A. Busuioc, A. Chen, X. Gao, I. Held, R. Jones, R.K. Kolli, W.-T. Kwon, R. Laprise, V. Magaña Rueda, L. Mearns, C.G. Menéndez, J. Räisänen, A. Rinke, A. Sarr and P. Whetton, (2007) Regional Climate Projections. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Darwin, R. and D. Kennedy, (2000) Economic effects of CO2 fertilization of crops: transforming changes in yield into changes in supply. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 5(3): 157-168. Darwin, R., (1999) A farmer’s view of the Ricardian approach to measuring agricultural effects of climatic change. Climatic Change 41: 371–411. Easterling, W.E. (1996) Adapting North American agriculture to climate change in review. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 80: 1–53. 16 Easterling, W.E., Chhetri, N. And Niu, X. (2003) Improving the realism of modeling agronomic adaptation to climate change: simulating technological substitution. Climate Change 60:149-173. Foukal, P. and Lean J. (1990) An empirical model of total solar irradiance variation between 1874 and 1988. Science 247: 556–558. Friis-Christensen, E., and Lassen, K. (1991) Length of the solar cycle:An indicator of solar activity closely associated with climate. Science 254: 698–700. Gbadegesin, A. S. and Ogundele, F. O (2008) People’s Perception of Climate Change in Lagos. In, Challenges of Climate Change for Nigeria – A Multidisciplinary Perspective, (eds.) Tunji Akande and Ajibola Kumuyi. Nigerian Institute of Social and Economic Research (NISER). Ibadan. Pp. 264-284. Gorthmann, T. And Patt, A. (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change 15:199-213. Hahn, G.L. and J.A. Morgan, (1999) Potential consequences of climate change on ruminant livestock production. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Global Change Impacts in the Great Plains, February 25, 1999, Omaha, NE, USA. Hahn, G.L. and T.L. Mader, 1997: Heat waves in relation to thermoregulation, feeding behavior, and mortality of feedlot cattle. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Livestock Environment Symposium, Minneapolis, MN, USA. pp. 563–571. Hahn, G.L., P.L. Klinedinst, and D.A. Wilhite, 1992: Climate Change Impacts on Livestock Production and Management. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI, USA, 16 pp. Hansen, J. E., Lacis, A. A., & Ruedy, R. A. (1990a) Comparison of solar and other influences on long-term climate. In: K. H. Schatten & A. Arking, Hsg.: Climate impact of solar variability. Greenbelt, NASA, p. 142. Hansen, J., Lacis, A., Rind, D., Russell, G., Stone, P., Fung, I., Ruedy, R. & Lerner, J. (1990b) Climate sensitivity: analysis of feedback mechanisms. In: J. E. Hansen & T. Takahashi, Hsg.: Climate processes and climate sensitivity. Geophys. Series 29. Washington, D. C., Am. Geophys. Union (AGU), p. 130 Hansen, J., M. Sato, and R. Ruedy, (1997a) Radiative forcing and climate response. Journal of Geophysical Research 102: 6831-6864. Hansen, J., Sato, M., Ruedy, R., Lacis, A., Asamoah, K., Beckford, K., Borenstein, S., Brown, E., Cairns, B., Carlson, B., Curran, B., de Castro, S., Druyan, L., Etwarrow, P., Ferede, T., Fox, M., Gaffen, D., Glascoe, J., Gordon, H., Hollandsworth, S., Jiang, X., Johnson, C., Lawrence, N., Lean, J., Lerner, J., Lo, K., Logan, J., Luckett, A., McCormick, M.P., McPeters, R., Miller, R., Minnis, P., Ramberran, I., Russell, G., Russell, P., Stone, P., Tegen, I., Thomas, S., Thomason, L., Thompson, A., Wilder, J., Willson, R., Zawodny, J. 17 (1997b) Forcings and chaos in interannual to decadal climate change. Journal of Geophysical Research 102: 25679–25720. Hansen, J.E., Johnson, D., Lacis, A.A., Lebedeff, S., Lee, P., Rind, D., Russell, G. (1981) Climate impact of increasing atmospheric CO2. Science 213: 957–1001. Hansen, J.E., Sato M., Lacis, A., Ruedy, R., Tegen, I., Matthews, E. (1998) Climate forcings in the industrial era. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 95:12753-12758 Hansen, J.E., Sato, M., Lacis, A., Ruedy, R. (1997c) The missing climate forcing. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London B552:231-240 Hansen, J.E., Sato, M., Lacis, A., Ruedy, R., Oinas, V. (2000) Global warming in the twenty-first century: An alternative scenario. Proceedings of National Academy of Science USA 97:9875-9880 Hayami, Y. and V. W. Ruttan, (1985) Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, USA, 506 pp. Hulme, M. (2001) Climate perspectives on Sahelian desiccation; 1973-1998. Global Environmental change 11:19-29. Huq, S., Reid, H., Konate, M. (2005) Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change in Least Developed Countries (LDCs). Climate Policy 4:25-43. IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Johnson, H.D., (1965) Response of animals to heat. Meteorological Monographs 6: 109–122. Kindler, J. (2000) Integrated water resources management: the meanders. Water International 25: 312–319. Lean, J., and Rind, D. (1998) Climate Forcing by Changing Solar Radiation. Journal of Climate 11(12): 3069–3094 Lewandrowski, J. and D. Schimmelpfennig, (1999) Economic implications of climate change for U.S. agriculture: assessing recent evidence. Land Economics 75: 39–57. Lockwood, J.G. (2001) Abrupt and sudden climatic transitions and fluctuations: A review. International Journal of Climatology 21:1153-1179 Mills, E. (2005) Insurance in a climate of change. Science 309(5737):1040-1044. Parry, M., C. Fischer, M. Livermore, C. Rosenzweig, and A. Iglesias, (1999) Climate change and world food security: a new assessment. Global Environmental Change 9: S51–S67. 18 Pierrehumbert, R.T. (2000) Climate change and the tropical pacific: the sleeping dragon awakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 97:1355-1358 Quiggin, J. and J.K. Horowitz, (1999) The impact of global warming on agriculture: a Ricardian analysis: comment. American Economic Review 89: 1044–1045. Rahmstorf, S. (1999) Decadal variability of the thermohaline ocean circulation. In Beyond El Nino: Decadal and Interdecadal Climate Variability, Navarra A. (ed.) Springer-Verlag: Berlin, pp. 309-331 Roemmich, D., Wunsch, C. (1984) Apparent changes in the climate state of the deep North Atlantic Ocean. Nature 307:447-450 Rosenzweig, C., Strzepek, K.M., Major, D.J. (2004) Water resources for agriculture in a changing climate: international case studies. Global Environmental Change 14:345-360. Schneider, S.H., Easterling, W.E. and Mearns, L.O. (2000) Adaptation: sensitivity to natural variability, agent assumptions and dynamic climate changes. Climatic Change 45(1): 203– 221. Simbine, A. T., Ogundele, F. and Okuwa O. B. (2008) Climate Change and International Politics: Lessons for Nigeria. In, Challenges of Climate Change for Nigeria – A Multidisciplinary Perspective, (eds.) Tunji Akande and Ajibola Kumuyi. Nigerian Institute of Social and Economic Research (NISER). Ibadan. Pp. 125-146. Spittlehouse, D.L. and Stewart, R.B. (2003) Adaptation to climate change in forest management. BC J. Ecosystems and Management 4:1-11. Tol, R.S.J., S. Frankhauser, and J.B. Smith, (1998) The scope for adaptation to climate change: what can we learn from the impact literature? Global Environmental Change 8: 109–123. UNEP/GEF (1997) "Country Case Studies on Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Assessments" (Nigeria). Draft reports. 1997 United Nations (1992) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 33 pp. Available online at http://www.unfccc.int/text/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf. Valdes, P.J. and Glover, R.W. (1999) Modelling the climate response to orbital forcing Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London A357:1873-1890 Wigley, T.M.L. (1998) The Kyoto protocol: CO2, CH4 and climate implications. Geophysical Research Letters 25(13): 2285–2288. Wilbanks, T.J., Kane, S.M., Leiby, P.N. (2003) Possible responses to global climate change: Integrating mitigation and adaptation. Environment 45:30-37. 19 Summary Appraisal of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria Olumide David Onafeso Department of Geography, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Nigeria Climate change is one of the most serious threats to sustainable development due to its anticipated adverse impacts on the environment, food, security and physical infrastructure. Global warming due to increased concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is likely to lead to a large scale shift in the pattern of agricultural potential. The water resource sector is one of the most strongly impacted by climatic change, against a background of increasing demand for portable water, sea-level rise may lead to flooding of lowland and sea water intrusion into coastal aquifers, while variability in climate may see more intense rainstorm resulting both in increased run-off leading to increased flooding, reduced recharge and aquifer deflection. The level of awareness and degree of commitment on the path of the government and other relevant agencies towards climate change adaptation is quite discouraging because of the absence of long term policies and planning. Adaptation modes, being proactive and reactive should be put in place where emphasis on preparedness for potential effect of climate change such as educating individuals on the cause and effect of climate change, improvement in public health services to increase resistance to climate change and providing alternatives for bio-fuel for household use. This paper explores the probable effect climate change will have in Nigeria especially with water resources and in the agricultural sector and the level of awareness and various modes of adaptation. Keywords: Climate Change, Water Resources, Impacts, Adaptation, Perception 20