* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Bio-ultrasonics Group
Endomembrane system wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup
Cell growth wikipedia , lookup
Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup
Tissue engineering wikipedia , lookup
Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup
Cell culture wikipedia , lookup
Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup
Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup
Dr. Despina Bazou Cardiff School of Biosciences Connective Tissue Biology Laboratories Cardiff CF10 3US UK Tel: +44 (0)29 20 87 5158 Fax: +44 (0)29 20 87 4594 Research Behaviour of cells in ultrasonic standing wave systems Physical approaches such as optical trapping, dielectrophoresis, magnetic labelling and ultrasound trapping offer means of manipulating cells in suspension. Ultrasound trapping approaches are studies in our lab with a view to develop new methodologies that can significantly improve the study of biological systems. The technique employs a physical ultrasound standing wave trap (Fig. 1) that drives particles, cells or droplets rapidly (less that 1 s) into a plane (the pressure nodal plane) that is already in optical microscopic focus (Fig. 2). They then move within that focussed plane to form 2- or 3-D aggregates that can be held and levitated in suspension, for hours (Fig. 3). Cell-cell interactions in suspension The principal interest of our laboratory lies in understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms of cell-cell interactions with a specific focus on the temporal progression of these interactions from the early stages of receptor engagement to cytoskeletal organisation in a range of cell systems (neural progenitor, HepG2, prostate epithelial and cancer cell lines, articular cartilage and chick mesenchymal primary cells), using an ultrasound standing wave trap capable of levitating cells in suspension, free of the substratum effects that are known to influence cell properties. The function of the ultrasound trap is to hold cells close together so that the likelihood of cell receptor interaction is increased very significantly over the ‘encounter in suspension’ situation. Significant numbers of interactions can take place as an aggregate with a diameter of 1 mm contains approximately 5,000 cells. The structure of the aggregate, the outcome of cell-cell interactions in a suspended aggregate and their consequences for cell behaviour have been shown not to be compromised by or dependent on the physical environment of the ultrasound trap. We have also shown that the synchronous adhering cells, following membrane receptor interactions, undergo the intracellular F-actin, catenin and connexin responses on rapid time scales. Cells aggregated, spread their cell-cell contact interface and developed confluent-culture-like F-actin patterns over the period of 1-30 min in the trap (Fig. 4), as well as Cx43 distribution (Fig. 4) that was consistent with measured gap junction functionality over the period of 1-60 min in the trap. The potential of the ultrasound trap in the area of cancer biology has been also recognised. We have shown that the ultrasound trap is a technique sensitive enough to aid in the identification of the adhesive properties of cancer cells. Cancer cells expressed proteins of the cadherin/catenin complex to a lesser extent than their noncancerous counterparts and as a result they were classified as less adhesive. An integrated view of the development of a cell monolayer in the ultrasound trap can be seen as a non biological concentration of cells under millimetre range acoustic forces, a non-intrusive effect of the micron scale acoustic particle interaction force that is small compared to the van der Waals interaction, acoustic-independent cell receptor interactions that modify the short range interactions leading to adhesion and then acoustic-independent progression of intracellular processes to form the adhesively strong and communicating monolayer. We believe that by unraveling the early molecular events involved in cell-cell adhesion as well as the underlying molecular regulatory networks we will ultimately understand fundamental biological processes such as tissue construction, differentiation, cancer development and metastasis. A technique for the encapsulation of high cell density aggregates The alginate encapsulation of cells to confine biomass within microcapsules for cell grafts and its recent combination with biosil capsule coating is an active area of research. We are interested in our group to develop a gel encapsulation technique that departs from the minimum surface area to volume restriction of spherical microcapsules and allows gelation of preformed cell aggregates reducing the need for pre-graft incubation. The process involves forming a discoid cell aggregate in an ultrasound standing wave resonator and then introducing an alginate/CaCl2 pre-gel into the ultrasound trap where it preferentially sets about the cell aggregate. The discrete encapsulated cell aggregates (discrete capsules) are discoid in shape and have a thickness that allows accessibility to nutrient and gas exchange. The technique has potential applications in the field of tissue engineering and the development of new scaffold-free approaches used to repair, for example, cartilage defects as well as in the development of in vitro biosensor device based on mammalian cells for real-time toxicity analyses. Recent publications Bazou D, Coakley WT, Hayes AJ, Jackson SK. (2007) Long-term viability and proliferation of alginate-encapsulated 3-D HepG2 aggregates formed in an ultrasound trap. Submitted Bazou D, Blain EJ, Coakley WT. (2007) NCAM and PSA-NCAM dependent membrane spreading and F-actin reorganization in suspended adhering neural cells. In press Kuznetsova L, Bazou D and Coakley WT. (2007) Stability of 2-D particle aggregates held against flow stress in an ultrasound trap. In press Edwards GO, Bazou D, Kuznetsova L, Coakley WT. (2007) Cell adhesion dynamics and actin reorganisation in HepG2 cell aggregates. In press Kuznetsova LA, and Coakley WT. (2006) Applications of ultrasound streaming and radiation force in biosensors. In press Bazou D, Dowthwaite GP, Khan IM, Archer CW, Ralphs JR, Coakley WT. (2006) Gap junctional intercellular communication and cytoskeletal organization in chondrocytes in suspension in an ultrasound trap. Mol Membr Biol. 2006 Mar-Apr; 23(2):195-205. Khanna S, Hudson B, Pepper CJ, Amso NN, Coakley WT. (2006) Fluorescein isothiocynate-dextran uptake by chinese hamster ovary cells in a 1.5 MHz ultrasonic standing wave in the presence of contrast agent. Ultrasound Med Biol. Feb; 32(2):289-95. Coakley WT, Bazou D. (2005) Particle and cell manipulation by radiation force in ultrasound standing waves. In: Bubble and Particle Dynamics in Acoustic Fields: Modern Trends and Applications (Ed. Alexander A. Doinikov). Research Signpost, Transworld Research Network. Pp.313-338 Borthwick KA, Love TE, McDonnell MB, Coakley WT.(2005) Improvement of immunodetection of bacterial spore antigen by ultrasonic cavitation. Anal Chem. Nov 15; 77(22):7242-5. Kuznetsova LA, Martin SP, Coakley WT. (2005) Sub-micron particle behaviour and capture at an immuno-sensor surface in an ultrasonic standing wave. Biosens Bioelectron. Dec 15; 21(6):940-8. Martin SP, Townsend RJ, Kuznetsova LA, Borthwick KA, Hill M, McDonnell MB, Coakley WT. (2005) Spore and micro-particle capture on an immunosensor surface in an ultrasound standing wave system. Biosens Bioelectron. Nov 15; 21(5):758-67. Zourob M, Hawkes JJ, Coakley WT, Treves Brown BJ, Fielden PR, McDonnell MB, Goddard NJ. (2005) Optical leaky waveguide sensor for detection of bacteria with ultrasound attractor force. Anal Chem. Oct 1; 77(19):6163-8. Bazou D, Foster GA, Ralphs JR, Coakley WT.(2005) Molecular adhesion development in a neural cell monolayer forming in an ultrasound trap. Mol Membr Biol. Jul-Aug; 22(4):373. Bazou D, Kuznetsova LA, Coakley WT. (2005) Physical enviroment of 2-D animal cell aggregates formed in a short pathlength ultrasound standing wave trap. Ultrasound Med Biol. Mar; 31(3):423-30. Gherardini L, Cousins CM, Hawkes JJ, Spengler J, Radel S, Lawler H, Devcic-Kuhar B, Groschl M, Coakley WT, McLoughlin AJ. (2005) A new immobilisation method to arrange particles in a gel matrix by ultrasound standing waves. Ultrasound Med Biol. Feb; 31(2):261-72. Kuznetsova LA, Khanna S, Amso NN, Coakley WT, Doinikov AA. (2005) Cavitation bubble-driven cell and particle behavior in an ultrasound standing wave. J Acoust Soc Am. Jan; 117(1):104-12. Borthwick KA, Coakley WT, McDonnell MB, Nowotny H, Benes E, Groschl M. Development of a novel compact sonicator for cell disruption. (2005)J Microbiol Methods.Feb; 60(2):207-16. Hawkes JJ, Barber RW, Emerson DR, Coakley WT. (2004) Continuous cell washing and mixing driven by an ultrasound standing wave within a microfluidic channel. Lab Chip. Oct; 4(5):446-52. Bazou D, Coakley WT, Meek KM, Yang M, Pham DT (2004) Characterisation of the morphology of 2-D particle aggregates in different electrolyte concentrations in an ultrasound trap. Colloids Surf A. Phys Engineer Asp. Aug 20; 243(1-3): 97-104. Coakley WT, Bazou D, Morgan J, Foster GA, Archer CW, Powell K, Borthwick KA, Twomey C, Bishop J. (2004) Cell-cell contact and membrane spreading in an ultrasound trap. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. Apr 15; 34(4):221-30. Hawkes JJ, Long MJ, Coakley WT, McDonnell MB. (2004)Ultrasonic deposition of cells on a surface. Biosens Bioelectron. Apr 15; 19(9):1021-8. Morgan J, Spengler JF, Kuznetsova L, Coakley WT, Xu J, Purcell WM. (2004) Manipulation of in vitro toxicant sensors in an ultrasonic standing wave. Toxicol In Vitro. Feb; 18(1):115-20. Khanna S, Amso NN, Paynter SJ, Coakley WT. (2003) Contrast agent bubble and erythrocyte behavior in a 1.5-MHz standing ultrasound wave. Ultrasound Med Biol. Oct; 29(10):1463-70. Grant support BBSRC (with Prof. Archer and Dr. Ralphs) ‘Progression of cell interactions and intracellular processes triggered on contact in an ultrasound trap’ DTI (with AstraZeneca, HiMedica, QinetiQ, Uniscan Instruments, UWE, National Physics Laboratory, Applied Enzyme Technology Ltd) ‘Development an in vitro biosensor device based on mammalian cells for real-time toxicity analyses’ Collaborators Internal Professor Charlie W. Archer (CITER) Professor Victor Duance (CITER) Dr. James R. Ralphs (CITER) Dr. Emma Blain (CITER) Dr. George A. Foster (Neuroscience) Professor Vincenzo Crunelli (Neuroscience) Dr. Nazar Amso and Dr. Sanjay Khanna (Department of Obstetrics and gynaecology, Cardiff Medical School, Heath Hospital) Dr. Wen G. Jiang (Department of Surgery, Cardiff Medical School, Heath Hospital) External Professor Jean-Paul Thiery (ICMB-Singapore) Dr. Yeh-Shiu Chu (Marie Curie Institute-Paris) Figure 1: Schematic diagram of the cylindrical steel trap assembly, epi-microscope, sample loading and ultrasound generation. Its main components were a 1.5 MHz disc transducer attached to a steel acoustic coupling layer, a sample volume and a glass acoustic reflector. Figure 2: Schematic diagram of the temporal progression (from time zero (i) to less than one second (ii) to tens of seconds (iii)) of aggregation of suspended cells in a single pressure node half-wavelength ultrasound trap. a) b) Figure 3: a) Neural cells suspended in the ultrasound trap 30 min after initiation of ultrasound; a 2-D aggregate is formed (scale bar is 70 μm). b) HepG2 cells suspended in the ultrasound trap 20 min after initiation of ultrasound; a 3-D aggregate is formed (scale bar is 400 μm); pressure, 0.06 MPa. 1 min 60 min Cx43 F-actin Merged Figure 4: Distribution of peripheral (a) and interfacial (d) Cx43, and short (b) and long (e) interfacial F-actin in aggregates isolated from the trap after 1 (a, b) and 60 (d, e) min of ultrasound exposure respectively: (c, f) superimposed images.