* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download PositiveTest-DNAevidence
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Metagenomics wikipedia , lookup
Genomic library wikipedia , lookup
Primary transcript wikipedia , lookup
Cancer epigenetics wikipedia , lookup
DNA polymerase wikipedia , lookup
DNA paternity testing wikipedia , lookup
SNP genotyping wikipedia , lookup
Comparative genomic hybridization wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Bisulfite sequencing wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup
DNA damage theory of aging wikipedia , lookup
Nucleic acid analogue wikipedia , lookup
Molecular cloning wikipedia , lookup
Gel electrophoresis of nucleic acids wikipedia , lookup
Epigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup
Cre-Lox recombination wikipedia , lookup
Helitron (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Cell-free fetal DNA wikipedia , lookup
Extrachromosomal DNA wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Nucleic acid double helix wikipedia , lookup
DNA profiling wikipedia , lookup
DNA supercoil wikipedia , lookup
Deoxyribozyme wikipedia , lookup
m a D t N c g A h i n A sample of DNA from a crime scene ‘matches’ a sample from the suspect. How strong is this evidence? The data: • An evidence sample from the crime scene is compared with a reference sample taken from the suspect. • DNA profiles are unique to each individual person (other than identical twins, triplets, …) • The whole DNA profile is not matched, but only around 13 points. • But matching 13 particular points of comparison, say, means that the probability of a match by chance is very small – less than the probability that you choose all 6 lottery numbers this week! A sample of DNA from a crime scene ‘matches’ a sample from the suspect. How strong is this evidence? • In fact, the probability that two samples of DNA match by chance may be as small as 1 in a billion. • So surely, this must be absolutely certain evidence that the person is guilty? • Well, with other evidence, it may be, but there are several arguments which should be considered before a decision is made. If the chance of a match is 1 in a million, that means the probability that someone else is guilty is 1 in a million. The correct argument: • The chance is 1 in a million that some other particular person left the evidence at the crime scene. • This is NOT the same as the chance that someone (anyone) else left that evidence. • If the population size with access to the crime scene is 1 million, then a chance match is perfectly possible. Since there thousands of people who might be a match for this DNA, the chance that this particular person is guilty is only 1 in several thousands. This would only be correct if all these other people had the same access to the crime scene. Dependence and independence • The calculation of the probability 1 in a billion uses the product rule for independent events. • It does not apply when events are not independent. • So if the local population is mixed or inbred, so that the distribution of DNA is not typical of the population generally, then the strength of the DNA evidence may be over-stated. Close relatives have very similar DNA. • If the suspect is not the guilty party, then the similarity between the DNA samples needs to be explained. • A relative may be the guilty person. • There is always a small probability of a false positive test. There is also a small • This does not mean that two chance of error in people might have the same the tests because of the way that the DNA, but it does mean that evidence was there can be error in the test collected, or how the process. test was conducted, or how the test results were reported.