Download 13th International Conference on Cochlear Implants and Other

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Auditory system wikipedia, lookup

Audiology and hearing health professionals in developed and developing countries wikipedia, lookup

Earplug wikipedia, lookup

Olivocochlear system wikipedia, lookup

Dysprosody wikipedia, lookup

Sensorineural hearing loss wikipedia, lookup

Noise-induced hearing loss wikipedia, lookup

Hearing loss wikipedia, lookup

Speech perception wikipedia, lookup

Telecommunications relay service wikipedia, lookup

Transcript
S44 Support & aftercare in assistive listening devices growing populations
S44-3
Cochlear implantation-what it takes to sustain & maintain?
1
Mohandas N.D. , Kirtane M.V.
2
1
P D Hinduja National Hospital & Medical Research Centre, ENT, Mumbai, India, 2Hinduja Hospital, ENT, Mumbai, India
Introduction: This study aims to investigate the costs associated with cochlear implantation in India by means of
a phone survey, including not only the costs of procuring the implant but also the costs associated with
maintaining the device post-surgery.
Methods: A structured telephonic interview was administered to parents of pediatric recipients or recipients
themselves (>18 years old).The interview was divided into 4 sections. 1.Demographic data 2.Costs related to
procuring the implant, surgery and post-operative audiology and therapy 3.Costs associated with maintaining the
device 4.Satisfaction and planning for future expenditure. This interview was performed at. Hinduja
Hospital,Mumbai,India by an audiologist & took about 20 minutes to complete.100 randomly selected recipients
implanted between 1996-2007 were taken. A cut-off date of 2007 was applied to restrict data collection to
recipients with at least 5 years of device usage & therefore out of warranty for their external device.
Results: Out of the 100 very few were completely self-funded, rest were either completely or partially funded
through loans, mortgages, employer/company assisted, individual donors or with financial assistance from
relatives and friends. Other costs borne by the recipients for audiological, radiological tests, hearing aid trial &
training, surgery, mapping & habilitation (3 years post surgery), upgrades, batteries & chargers, coils & cables,
microphones & servicing & repair of processors was found out. The total average expenditure borne by a
recipient, excluding the cost of implant and surgery was found to be Rs.4,60,586(US $7489).
Discussion: In our experience we have found that many patients obtain sufficient funding for the initial device
and surgery, but forget to consider the ongoing expenditure post-implantation.
Conclusion: These results will enable us to counsel patients about the expected expenditure from pre-operative
to post-implant management. Clinicians clinics,patients,Government departments & donating agencies should
understand the long term expenses related to implantation. This information should help families to budget the
total expense not just for a CI surgery but also post implant mapping, therapy, servicing of implant, maintenance
of device, as well as to upgrade their device when new technology is available. This is particularly crucial in a
self-funded market and/or when the average wage is low in relation to the cost of intervention.
Learning outcome: As a cochlear implant is a lifelong commitment, patients must also be able to maintain the
device post-implantation & be counseled on appropriate maintenance & post-operative costs in addition to the
costs of the initial implant procedure. Hence this survey aimed to collect data on actual costs and breakdown of
these costs incurred by recipients/families in the 5 or more years since their surgery.
This information will be vital to counsel current and future recipients and to allow them to budget appropriately.
684