Download Conjugative plasmids are circular pieces of DNA that not only

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Nucleosome wikipedia , lookup

United Kingdom National DNA Database wikipedia , lookup

Replisome wikipedia , lookup

Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Mutation wikipedia , lookup

SNP genotyping wikipedia , lookup

Chromosome wikipedia , lookup

Gene wikipedia , lookup

Bisulfite sequencing wikipedia , lookup

Gel electrophoresis of nucleic acids wikipedia , lookup

Genomics wikipedia , lookup

Zinc finger nuclease wikipedia , lookup

Cancer epigenetics wikipedia , lookup

Epigenomics wikipedia , lookup

Nucleic acid double helix wikipedia , lookup

DNA damage theory of aging wikipedia , lookup

Genealogical DNA test wikipedia , lookup

Cell-free fetal DNA wikipedia , lookup

Mutagen wikipedia , lookup

Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Genomic library wikipedia , lookup

Nucleic acid analogue wikipedia , lookup

Primary transcript wikipedia , lookup

DNA supercoil wikipedia , lookup

Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Deoxyribozyme wikipedia , lookup

Molecular cloning wikipedia , lookup

Genome editing wikipedia , lookup

Point mutation wikipedia , lookup

Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup

Cre-Lox recombination wikipedia , lookup

CRISPR wikipedia , lookup

Extrachromosomal DNA wikipedia , lookup

Helitron (biology) wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Plasmid wikipedia , lookup

No-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) Genome Editing wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Conjugative plasmids are circular pieces of DNA that not only replicate in host
bacteria, but also encode machinery to transfer itself into bacteria that do not
contain the plasmid. This process is termed conjugation. Nickase is an enzyme
that initiates the transfer of the plasmid from “donor” bacteria into “recipients”,
but is not required for replication in the donor.
1. In Staphylococcus epidermidis, the first CRISPR spacer region is identical to a
region of the Nickase gene (nes) from the conjugative plasmid named pG0400.
In Figure 1B, why is it important that the authors chose to make silent mutations
in the region of nes? Why do the authors focus exclusively on spacer region 1,
what do you think is in the other two spacers?
2. In figure 1, conjugation experiments were performed by mixing an S.
epidermidis donor strain carrying the pG0400 plasmid (RN4220) with recipient
strains that lacked the plasmid, and conjugation was allowed to occur during
growth on a plate overnight. The conjugation efficiency was determined by
dividing the number of transconjugants (the recipient cells that incorporated the
plasmid) by the total number of recipient cells. How was the number of
transconjugates determined? How do you think these cells were distinguished
from recipient (no plasmid) and donor cells (which have the plasmid)?
BTW, there is a mistake in the legend to figure 1. The conjugation efficiency is
calculated as transconjugants/recipients.
3. What was the evidence that suggested to the authors that nes DNA was the
target rather than mRNA? How did the authors test this – what trick did they
use to change the DNA but not the RNA?
4. Why did the authors also test for interference using transformation? What is
the important difference between the plasmids they used for the transformation
experiments and the ones they used for the conjucation assay?
5. If the sequences in the CRISPR spacer regions specify the DNA target to be
interfered with, how does the cell discriminate the sequence on the plasmid from
the DNA sequence that is present in the chromosomal CRISPR locus? I.e., how
do you think CRISPR discriminates self from non-self?