* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Introduction - Università degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata"
Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of neurodegenerative diseases wikipedia , lookup
Essential gene wikipedia , lookup
Genetic testing wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Behavioural genetics wikipedia , lookup
Population genetics wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup
Ridge (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup
Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Introduction Male infertility, pleiotropic genes, and increased risk of diseases in future generations Bruno Dallapiccola Cattedra di Genetica Medica Università La Sapienza di Roma Infertility affects up to 15% of the potentially fertile human population (WHO, 1990). This is in obvious contrast with the genetic program of any individual which is expected to work towards a peak of efficiency to achieve the reproduction. Modern individuals are made up of a range of heritable characteristics, each of which in past generations as found in those ancestors who generated most descendants (i.e. had the greatest reproductive success). Thus, the failure of some people to reproduce raises an important question: why have these people’s genetic programmes, shaped and honed so ruthlessly over past millenia, failed to translate survival and actions into reproduction? Two main causes of infertility may be recognized: clinical and behavioural. Clinical infertility seems high, particularly in western societies. A WHO study in 25 countries and covering more than 10 000 infertile couples showed that tubal blockage for females and testicular malfunction for males were the main causes in the majority of definitive diagnoses (WHO, 1990). Most of these causes are probably the result of past or current infections, or the consequence of exposure to a wide range of modern environmental pollutants. It is possible that physiological responses that would have led to reproduction in the past environments now falter or fail, some individuals never encountering in their life-time the particular circumstances that in previous generations would have triggered reproduction. People carrying alleles of particular genes which react in a maladaptive way with environment will be selected against. Natural selection is therefore active on people whose reproductive success is below average just as ruthlessly as it has ever done in the evolutionary past. Male reproductive genes are subjected to a rapid evolution driven by sexual selection, suggesting a higher mutation rate (Wyckoff et al., 2000). Infertile people may now have some opportunity to take advantage of assisted conception techniques and to reproduce. The result may be the persistence and expansion of lineages which are only adapted to reproduce in the modern environment. It is therefore mandatory to know the biological effects of alleles associated to human infertility. Many genes involved in infertility have “pleiotropic” effects. It is the case of CFTR (see Mastella and Castellani in this issue), a glycoprotein active in several exocrin glands which is associated with cystic fibrosis when altered in the structure and in the production. The gene encoding CFTR is also mutated in about 66% of patients with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD). The reproduction of males carrying CFTR mutations by MESA/ICSI techniques could raises the risk of offspring with a (mild or severe) form of cystic fibrosis to 50%. For couples with CBAVD-related infertility CFTR mutation analysis and genetic counselling of the patient and his partner is essential before MESA/ICSI procedures are performed. According Harper (1998), two important questions which need to be asked (but frequently are not) by those attempting to investigate and treat infertility are: 1. Is the infertility one aspect of a genetic disorder that might be transmitted? 2. Will correction of infertility give an increased risk of malformations in the offspring? The genetic causes of male infertility are numerous and involves primarily genes active in a) failure of germ-cell migration; b) spermatozoan defects; c) germ-cell maturation impairment. Most of the genes involved in these processes have been studied in animal models (see articles of Animal models section) by transgenic experiments. These models have provide biological evidence of the “pleiotropic nature” of spermatogenic-related genes. Some of them, affects haematopoiesis, and melanogenesis (c-kit and SCF); germline cell division, oocyte differentiation and membrane cytoskeleton (Lis1); proteolysis, meiotic control and chromatic reorganization (ubiquitin-related genes); muscle weakness, atrophy, myotonia and hypogonadism (DMPK, myotonin protein kinase). Since only limited human studies are available on these genes, an exact risk value in offspring it is difficult at present (see Clinical genetic problems with fertility implications). Interestingly, children born after ICSI procedure are twice as likely to have major congenital abnormalities as children conceived naturally, as well as an increase risk of neurodegenerative diseases (i.e. spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy) in future generations (ISLAT Working Group, 1999; Dowsing et al., 1999). However, the absence of large scale follow-up studies, give unrealistic any possible conclusion at present (Hawkins et al., 1999). In any case, biological and clinical consideration on ICSI hazard are mainly focused on chromosome anomalies and Y-linked genes. What is the risk for future generations when mutated alleles of male infertility genes with pleiotropic effects are transmitted the progeny? To answer at this conundrum, careful and meticulous genetic and epidemiological studies should be established on parents and children. However, I am confident that this goal will be reached subsequently to a complete elucidation of the biological role of all genes active in male reproduction. WHO (1990) Global estimates for health situation assessment and projections. WHO, Geneva. Dowsing A.T., Young E.L., Clark M., McLachlan R.I., de Kretser D.M., Trounson A.O. (1999) Linkage between male infertility and trinucleotide repeat expansion in the androgen-receptor gene. Lancet, 354, 640-643. Hawkins M.M., Barratt C.L.R., Sutcliffe A.G., Cooke I.D. (1999) Male infertility and increased risk of diseases in future generations. Lancet, 354, 1906-1907. ISLAT Working Group (1999) ART into Science: Regulation of Fertility Techniques. Science, 281, 651-653. Harper P.S. (1998) Practical Genetic Counselling. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford. Wyckoff G.J., Wannnng W., Wu CI (2000) Rapid evolution of male reproductive genes in the descent of man. Nature, 403, 304-306.