Download Edwin Barangan

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup

Cytosol wikipedia , lookup

Cell membrane wikipedia , lookup

Biochemical switches in the cell cycle wikipedia , lookup

Amitosis wikipedia , lookup

Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup

Endomembrane system wikipedia , lookup

Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup

SULF1 wikipedia , lookup

JADE1 wikipedia , lookup

Cell culture wikipedia , lookup

Programmed cell death wikipedia , lookup

Cell cycle wikipedia , lookup

Cell wall wikipedia , lookup

Mitosis wikipedia , lookup

Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup

Cell growth wikipedia , lookup

Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup

List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Cost Effective
Analysis of Cell
Saver Program at
UCSF Medical Center
Contracted Vendor versus InHouse Program
What is Cell Saver?

Cell salvage or cell saver is a technique
used during surgery to collect blood that a
patient loses during surgery, process the
collected blood, and reinfuse the blood
into the patient.
Current Situation
UCSF Medical Center’s Moffitt-Long
Operating Room contracts cell saver
service to an outside vendor.
 Autotransfusion, Inc. provides the service
 UCSF Medical Center pays approx.
$48,300 a month to Autotransfusion, Inc.
to provide the service.

Services that utilize Cell Saver
Neuro-Spine Service
 Ortho-Spine Service
 Vascular Service
 Liver Transplant Service

Current Cell Saver Costs
Autotransfusion, Inc.
 Costs for providing cell saver service:
Neuro-Spine = $700.00 a patient
Ortho-Spine = $700.00 a patient
Vascular = $700.00 a patient
Liver Transplant = $928.86

Proposed Solution

Implement in-house cell saver program

Discontinue using contracted vendor,
Autotransfusion, Inc.
Cost Effective Analysis of UCSF
Cell Saver Program vs.
Autotransfusion, Inc.
Neuro-Spine Service (Feb.-Mar. 2006)
 18 procedures / 124 hours
 Autotransfusion, Inc. = $12,600
 UCSF Cell Saver Program (Full-time
employee and supply) = $5,544
 Cost Savings = $7,056(56% cost savings)

Cost Effective Analysis of UCSF
Cell Saver Program vs.
Autotransfusion, Inc.
Ortho-Spine Service (Feb.-Mar. 2006)
 54 procedures / 525 hours
 Autotransfusion, Inc. = $37,800
 UCSF Cell Saver Program (Full-time
employee and supply) = $20,763
 Cost Savings = $17,037(45% cost savings)

Cost Effective Analysis of UCSF
Cell Saver Program vs.
Autotransfusion, Inc.
Vascular Service (Feb.-Mar. 2006)
 11 procedures / 66 hours
 Autotransfusion, Inc. = $7,700
 UCSF Cell Saver Program (Full-time
employee and supply) = $3,124
 Cost Savings = $4,576(59% cost savings)

Cost Effective Analysis of UCSF
Cell Saver Program vs.
Autotransfusion, Inc.
Liver Transplant Service (Feb.-Mar. 2006)
 34 procedures / 254 hours
 Autotransfusion, Inc. = $31,581.24
 UCSF Cell Saver Program (Full-time
employee and supply) = $19,739.24
 Cost Savings = $11,842(27% cost
savings)

Summary



UCSF paid Autotransfusion, Inc. $89,681.24 in
Feb./Mar. 2006 to provide cell saver services to
the Moffitt-Long operating room.
If UCSF had its own cell saver program the
medical center would have spent $49,170.24 in
Feb/Mar. 2006 to provide the service.
The medical center could have saved
$40,511.00
Summary

UCSF Medical Center should consider
implementing its own cell saver program.

42% to 45% yearly cost savings.