* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Evolution
Primary transcript wikipedia , lookup
Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of diabetes Type 2 wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics in stem-cell differentiation wikipedia , lookup
Essential gene wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Long non-coding RNA wikipedia , lookup
Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Ridge (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup
Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup
Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup
Embryogenesis Embryogenesis can be divided into two phases Morphogenesis phase or Embryo Patterning: the basic body plan (bauplan) is established. Regional specification of apical-basal and radial domains. Fixation of polarity and specification of shoot-root axis. Formation of embryonic tissues and organ systems Maturation phase: Embryo cell division declines. Embryo cell growth occurs. Accumulation of storage reserves. At the end of the maturation phase the embryo becomes quiescent. The maturation phase can be viewed as an interruption of an ancestral life cycle. Embryo Patterning The first few cell cycles after fertilization introduce many of the morphogenetic events crucial for patterning the seedlings. WUSCHEL-related homeodomain (WOX) transcription factors mark each domain of the early axis, with segregation of apical and basal elements occurring as early as the zygotic division. MERISTEM LAYER1 (ML1) marks how are embryo domains generated? And how do different domains interact to refine the body pattern? Differential Expression of WOX Genes Mediates Apical-Basal Axis Formation in the Arabidopsis Embryo WOX2 and WOX8 are initially coexpressed in the egg cell and the zygote, but become restricted to the apical (WOX2) and basal (WOX8) lineages after the zygotic division. WOX9 is also expressed in the basal cell lineage. At 16 Cell WUS and WOX5 initiate their expression to establish stem cell niches for SAM and RAM. WOX genes Periclinal divisions have set up the protoderm (pd) in wild-type at the 16-cell stage (C). wox2-1 embryos show abnormal anticlinal divisions in the prospective shoot domain (arrows in [D] and [E]) and subsequently form only single cotyledon primordia (cp) ([F]; compare with wild-type,inset in [F]). WOX1, WOX2 and WOX3 (PRS) act redundantly in shoot patterning. WOX 5 strongly enhances shoot patterning defects. wox8 wox9 wild type WOX genes Neither the suspensor nor the proembryo developed normally in wox8 wox9 double mutants. WOX genes Marker cell of basal and quiescent center are disrupted in the wox8 wox9 double mutant Aberrant phenotype in the upper part of the embryo suggest that WOX 8 and WOX 9 act in a noncell autonomous manner, activating WOX2 in the pro-embryo. ZLL marks proembryo cells Expression of PIN1 is dependent on WOX 8 and WOX 9, and thus auxin becomes uniformely as DR5::GFP shows WOX genes and ARF5 MP WOX2 and WOX8 appear to act redundantly with MP to promote PIN1:PIN1-GFP expression in the cotyledon vasculature, and both affect the formation of localized auxin response maxima. mp also fails to initiate root development. The zygote expresses a mixture of the homeodomain transcription factors WOX2 and WOX8, which act as key regulators of apical and basal fates, respectively. By an as yet unknown mechanism, the expression domains of these regulators become separated with the asymmetric zygotic division, providing each daughter cell with a specific transcription program and setting the stage for the organization of auxin flux and response in the early embryo In summary, all combinations of wox2 and wox8 with the mp mutant displayed defects that appeared more severe than expected from an additive combination of the single mutant phenotypes, suggesting that the WOX and MP pathways in embryo patterning converge at some point. How the WOX pathway is activated during early Arabidopsis patterning? Auxin is not affecting gWOX8:YFP expression, even with treatments with 2,4D Using WOX8 promoter fragments with the conserved expression pattern, WRKY2 was isolated using one hybrid screens. WRKY2 is expressed as WOX 8 WRKY2 transcription factor is essential for activating WOX8 and WOX9 genes In a strong wrky2 mutant, transcription of WOX8 and WOX9 is significantly reduced but was not completely absent suggesting other trans regulatory elements. A second proembryo is established, however with some mix characteristics, since ARR5 and other markers of basal cells are still expressed. Other factors are neccessary. WRKY2 embryos can eventually recover Nucleus of wrky2 zygotes is not assymetrically positioned during zygotic repolarization WRKY2 function is specifically required to reestablish the polar organization of the zygote and to break the symmetry of its division. Model for first assymetric division wt WOX8:YFP Mother wt x wrky pollen Mother wrky x wrky pollen tube WRKY2 is expressed in the egg cell while WOX8 is less expressed. Thus WOX8 is activated post-fertilization in the zygote. Model This model points to a major different between plants and animals, since in animal zygote, transcription is abolished, and in plants, WOX 8/9 should be transcribed de novo to established the first apical-basal axis YODA (YDA) is a MAPKK that regulates extraembryonic cell fate Downstream MAP kinase 3 and 6 lead to similar phenotypes that phosphorylate putative transcription factors. In stomatal cells, meristemoid cells are inhibited by this kinase pathways phosphorilating a serie of TFs and thus promoting assymetric division. A similar pathway might occur in the embryo. Expression of WOX2 in wox8 wox9 embryos under control of the WOX9 promoter results in yda-like zygotic and embryonic phenotypes indicating that WOX2 expression is sufficient to establish various aspects of apical cell fates. However, both pathways are functioning in parallel, SHORT SUSPENSOR (SSP) is an Interleukin receptor associated kinase transcribed in pollen and translated upon fertilization, inducing the YDA pathway, giving a temporal cue for zygote development Self-fertilize ssp plants hemizygous for a functional transgene generate normal and mutant embryos in a ratio of 1:1, which indicates a gametophytic defect. Reciprocal crosses indeed demonstrate that the phenotype of the embryo is strictly dependent on the genotype of the pollen. Suspensor green marker Wt ssp Mutations is CMT3 and KYP deregulate paternal transcription H3K9me2 is closely linked with DNA methylation by CHROMOMETHYLASE 3 (CMT3). CMT3 and KRYPTONITE (KYP), the enzyme responsible for much of H3K9me2 in Arabidopsis, but are related to silence transposable or foreign DNAs. It was found that a maternally inherited mutation in KYP and CMT3 substantially accelerated zygotic activation of paternal genes, resulting in a paternal contribution to the mRNA pool in 2- to 4-cell embryos that is similar to that of wild-type globular embryos. These findings suggest specific maternal control through H3K9 methylation in the temporal regulation of zygotic genes. This is like a machinery from the mother try to delay expression of the father, using the same machinery to avoid foreing DNA. Embryo Patterning Cotyledon development during dicot embryogenesis marks the start of organogenesis and the change from radial to bilateral symmetry at the transition from the globular to heart-stage embryo. Polar auxin transport essentially contributes to the establishment of both bilateral symmetry and apical-basal polarity. Patterning is the output of the interplay between auxin and transcription factors with defined spatial and temporal expression patterns,likely to be established in part by auxin flux. MONOPTEROS (MP, ARF5), ARF7, BODENLOS (IAA12-BDL) have roles in axis patterning, fail to initiate the hypophysis. Also MP is required for PIN expression bdl is a dominant negative mutant always repressing MP, thus mp phenotype is very similar, failing hypophysis specification and root initiation Auxin in embryo patterning A likely scenario is that SSP-YDA pathway and/or WOX2/8/9 pathway would be upstream auxin, maybe by regulating polarity of PIN7, and thus first flux of auxin. Root Patterning The root meristem of Arabidopsis forms at the boundary of the apical and basal lineages. The proembryo contributes the stem cells for vascular, ground, and epidermal tissues, as well as the lateral root cap, while the QC and the columella root cap are derived from a former suspensor cell Root initiation is mediated by a MONOPTEROS dependent-mobile signal The Arabidopsis root system is initiated in the embryo by the specification of a single extra-embryonic suspensor cell as hypophysis. This root founder cell divides asymmetrically and generates the quiescent centre, the future organizer cells in the root meristem. Hypophysis specification depends on ARF5/MP, since auxin dependent degradation of BDL, releases MP and allows activation of target genes. MP acts non-cell autonomously. Target of MONOPTEROS (TMO) Isolated as genes responding to auxindependent MP activation in a microarrays in embryos. TMO are bHLH genes. In situ hybridization TMO::TMO-GFP ChIP assay using MP-GFP TMO::TMO-GFP in mp mutant Alll four genes are expressed as MP in the adjacent cell to the hypophysis and are transcriptionally controled by MP. TMO5 and 7 genes are required for root initiation Silencing TMO7 causes a mp-like phenotype with rootless seedlings. TMO7 but not TMO5, is able to move from proembryo to the hypophysis because is not strictly correlated with its expression pattern Expression of TMO7 is able to complement mp mutants Root patterning Root meristem initiation: Upon the initiation of the root meristem, the identity of this area is specified through a family of AP2-type transcription factors encoded by the PLETHORA (PLT) genes. plt mutants are similar to embryos defective in auxin perception. PLT gene expression depends on MP, but probably not through direct binding. GUS staining PLT1::PLT-GUS There are four PLT genes In situ plt1 Root Patterning Multiple plt mutants produce reduction of stem cell niche. Wt plt1 plt2 plt1plt2 Wt SCR::YFP is expressed in plt1plt2 double mutant and viceversa, suggesting independent pathways ply1plt2 In double plt1plt2 double mutants root hairs are formed at the tip indicating a loss of stem cells. QC markers are lost. RAM: Root apical meristem The auxinPLETHORA (PLT) pathway provides positional information to set up the QC and surrounding stem cells whose activities depend on WOX5 and SHORT ROOT (SHR) /SCARECROW (SCR) transcription factors APC/CCCS52A complexes control meristem maintenance in the Arabidopsis root a1 a2 In multicellular organisms, Cyclins control mitotic phase progressions and are subsequently degraded by an ubiquitin system that involves ligase complex APC. The plant homologous named CCS52A, compose of two genes A1 and A2 with opposite roles. a1 mutant contains more dividing cells while a2 contains more. Expression patterns are also different. CCS52A2 affects quiescent centre but not auxin maxima Marker of quiescent zone Marker of auxin response Root Patterning Phenotype of pRPS5::LhG4 x pOp:PLT2. RPS5 is a marker of the proembryo. Root are ectopically emerging with fully functional Root Meristems. These results indicate that ectopic expression of PLT2 prevents normal hypocotyl, cotyledon, and SAM formation and induces ectopic roots with active stem cells. plt1 plt2 plt3 triple mutants show rootless seedlings PLT4 also contribute, know as BABYBOOM (BBM) gene. Root patterning PLT1 PLT2 PLT3 BBM PLT::CFP DR5::GUS PLT::PLT-GFP All four PLT genes are transcribed and translated in a graded form, as the auxin gradient. It is concluded that PLT promoter activity leads to protein gradients with maximum expression in the stem cell niche. PLT1 and PLT2 expression maxima broadly encompass the niche, whereas PLT3 and BBM are more restricted. Root patterning TOPLESS (TPL), a co-repressor interact with BDL. tpl bdl double mutant are supressed, it is concluded that tpl can suppress bdl defects. Evidence indicates that BDL could not repress in the tpl background Full repression needs TPL co-repressor. and also might repress indirectly PLT genes in the shoot since tpl mutants produces embryo without shoots. Loops of transcription factors complexes are functioning in root cell specification. GL2 SHORTROOT (SHR) is expressed in the vascular tissue and moves into cortex where is sequestered by SCARECROW (SCR) in the nucleus. TF complex induces GLABRA2 (NH fate) and Caprice complex (CPC), which moves and represses GL2 (H fate) Embryo patterning Members of the class III HD-ZIP gene family. PHAVOLUTA (PHV) which interacts with DORNROSCHEN (DRN) and DRNL), PHABULOSA (PHB), REVOLUTA (REV) are implicated in the establishment of bilateral symmetry and differentiation of the central–peripheral axis. KANADI genes (KAN1 to KAN4), members of the GARP transcription family, exhibit expression pattern complementary to class III HD-ZIP family. kan mutants lead to ectopic leaves. Ectopic leaves are radialized -adiaxalizedand do not arise from ectopic meristems since STM, WUS and CLV expression is identical than do in the wild type. Ectopic leaves in kan mutants arise due to PIN1 mislocalization and ectopic auxin maxima (DR5 marker) Embryonic radial phenotype in phb phv rev mutants is correlated with lack of symmetry of PIN1 expression Kanadi and homeodomain sextuple mutants Unique radialized leaf instead SAM The phenotype of kan1 kan2 kan4 phv phb rev embryos indicates that the loss of bilateral symmetry in phb phv rev embryos is attributable to ectopic KANADI activity in the central region of the embryo and that PHB, PHV, and REV are not absolutely required for the establishment of bilateral symmetry. Auxin flow during embryogenesis Based on the antagonistic and complementary relationship between the KANADI and the Class III HD-Zip genes, it is possible that ectopic expression of the Class III HD-Zip genes is responsible for the kan1 kan2 kan4 embryo phenotype and, conversely, that ectopic expression of KANADI is responsible for the phb phv rev phenotype. The result of the bidirectional auxin flow is to create auxin maxima at the periphery of the embryo, resulting in the induction of cotyledon primordia This scenario also implies that the effects of auxin maxima differ between the central and peripheral regions, with only the peripheral domain being responsive to auxin maxima with respect to leaf primordium initiation, Based on the patterns of PIN1 expression demonstrated and inferred in multiple mutant genotypes, it is proposed that KANADI genes pattern tissues within the plant by regulating auxin flow, thereby modulating where and when reversals in PIN polarity occur. Class III HD-Zip genes may modulate the response of cells to auxin maxima, promoting meristem fate and preventing leaf initiation in response to auxin in the central part of the embryo. Three genes have been implicated to be major regulators of the maturation phase LEAFY COTILEDONS 2 (LEC 2) ABA INSENSITIVE 3 (ABI 3) FUSCA 3 (FUS 3) The three genes contain similar DNA binding domains lec2 mutants caused defects in embryo filling, seed protein accumulation and desiccation tolerance. Conversely, 35S::LEC2 causes ectopic accumulation of lipids and proteins and ectopic formation of embryo-like structures. To isolate target genes for LEC2 transcription factor, 35S::LEC2-GR seedlings were treated with dexamethasone where the endogenous gene is not active, a microarray was conducted. The activated genes included 2S and 12S storage proteins, LATERAL BOUNDARY 40 (LOB40),IAA30, AGL15, etc. All contain RY motif that can serve as a LEC2 binding site. MADS gene expressed in embryo and endosperm AGL15 expression in embryo AGL18 expression in free cell endosperm AGL15 is preferentially expressed in embryos Ectopic embryo-like structures and cotyledons-like organs in 35S::AGL15 plants Embryo cultures could be maintained over 6 years growing continuously in an embryonic mode AGL15 direct regulates a GA 2 Oxidase (DTA 1) Downstream Target of AGL15 DTA1:GUS GA 2 Oxidases convert active form of GA into inactive forms. Most aspects of the 35S::AGL15 plants could be alleviated by spraying with biologically active GAs Type I MADS box genes expressed in the female gametophyte and early seed development AGL23 (A) is involved in the early phase of gametogenesis. The agl23 embryo sac arrests at FG1. AGL23 also regulates chloroplast biogenesis, which occurs in the embryo at the globular stage (C). AGL80 ([B] and [C]) disruption affects central cell differentiation. AGL80 interacts with AGL61, and genetic evidence supports the yeast two-hybrid assays, as agl61 embryo sacs develop defective central cells. AGL62 (C) suppresses cellularization and promotes nuclear proliferation during early endosperm development The role of AGL80 during endosperm development has yet to be clarified. Type I MADS box genes expressed in the female gametophyte and early seed development Type I MADS box genes expressed in the female gametophyte and early seed development MADS gene expressed in roots ANR1 expression in roots linked to transduction pathway that respond to external stimuli AGL12 expression in roots AGL19 expression in roots AGL16 expression in leaves Guard cells trichomes Evolution of MADS box genes Evolution Evolution Phylogenies and ancestral character reconstructions of developmental regulators provide the historical framework for studies of the evolution of developmental genetic pathways and give useful clues about the molecular basis of morphological evolution, thus linking the fields of development and evolution. Changes in genes encoding transcriptional regulators can alter development and are important components of the molecular mechanisms of morphological evolution. Evolution Mapping analyses suggest that the MADS box ancestral pattern of expression was a generalized one, and that duplications gave rise to genes with restricted spatiotemporal expression patterns probably recruited to specialized functions in either reproductive or vegetative structures. MADS box genes expressed in vegetative tissues belong to a separate phylogenetic clade than ones expressed or related to flowers while sequence similarity often predict their function (with caution). A second criterion is their expression pattern. Evolution After duplication loss of function (1) subfunctionalization (2) neofunctionalization (3) (1) Many examples found in genome wide projects (2) Duplication of AG homologous gene in rice, one important for carpel development and floral determinacy and the second important for stamen development. AG clade diversification in Arabidopsis with four partial redundant genes, AG, STK, SHP1 and SHP2 Gene duplication and speciation. Examples of PLENA/FARINELLI, AG/SHP and TAG/TAGL1 (paralogs) Evolution (3) Even more rarely, occasionally ocurred. In Physalis (Solanaceae), the sepals resume growing after pollination and encapsule the mature fruit. This is caused by MPF2, an AP1 homologous gene. In mpf2 mutants, sepals fall after pollination. Heterotopic expression in S. tuberosum causes enlargement of sepals. Evolution Duplicated genes differ from specie to specie. Example, Petunia and Tomato have at least two AP3 genes (euAP3 and paleoAP3 genes) that act redundantly in specifying stamens but not petals. euap3 mutants show conversion of petals to sepals but retain normal stamens. Petunia tomato Evolution Changes in expression pattern of MADS box genes respect to the general model are present in nature (e.g. Lilies and Tulips show less petals, so called tepals). Thus, in the evolution of floral structures like in the Liliaceae the presence, absence or composition of particular floral quartets have ‘‘engineered’’ their novel floral morphology. There are many examples of structural novelties that could be explained at least some MADS box “misexpression”. Evolution The ABC model is conserved in all eudicots and monocots. The different structures between dicots and monocots have prove to be genetically similar, since orthologs of the Arabidopsis class B and C function were found in maize and rice, with identical expression pattern and null mutation phenotype In maize SILKY1 is similar to AP3 and ZAG is the ortolog of AG WT silky1 Phylogenetic tree for MADS box proteins Evolution MADS SRFlike MADS MEF2like Evolution Evolution Numerous MIKC type II genes are found in gimnospem B and C classes conserved in sequence and expression patterns, reproductive structures in flowering are fundamentally similar and evolutionarily conserved even in non flowering plants. The fact that gymnosperms have no flowers suggests that the ancestral B function homologs may regulate only male reproductive organs, and C function homologs may control both male and female reproductive organs. Evolution Several MADS box genes have been found in Cryptogamous species, however, no orthologies could be assigned. Expression was found relatively ubiquitously in both sporophytes and gametophytes. The moss Physcomitrella patens is useful because genetic studies could be made as in angiosperms and the complete sequence is achieved. Contains six MADS box genes. Moss MADS::GUS Single mutants fail to show altered phenotypes Evolution of TALE class of genes Evolution Diagrammatic representation of theChlamydomonas life cycle Gsp1 and Gsm1 are transcription factors that accumulate during the development of + and - haploid strains, respectively. Upon cell fusion the two proteins are present in the same diploid cell and form dimers. This Gsm1–Gsp1 complex moves into the nucleus where it modulates the transcription of genes that promote meiosis and other aspects of the diploid developmental program. Coexpression of Gsp1 and Gsm1 is sufficient for diploid development. Gsp1 (BELL related) and Gsm1 (KNOX) are members of the Evolution The idea is that this particular KNOX-BELL related interaction that triggers meiosis and gamete formation was replaced by a KNOXtrue BELL interaction which develops the sporophyte bauplan and postpone meiosis for a particular subset of diploid cells to give a multicellular haploid gametophyte. This means that KNOX-true BELL homeogenes will function only in sporophytes which is the case functioning in meristematic cells that account for the bauplan of a particular green organism. In “lower” land plant and mosses, 3-5 KNOX genes are present only in sporophyte meristem. Evolution KNOX proteins are closely related to myeloid ecotropic viral integration site (MEIS) proteins in humans owing to a conserved N-terminus region. This domain, called MEINOX knox genes fall into two classes on the basis of the similarity of certain residues within the homeodomain, intron position, and expression patterns. Phylogenetic analysis based on either the homeodomain, the meinox domain or the full sequence supports monophyly of the knox family, as well as monophyly of the two subclasses Evolution Homeodomain phylogram. All known Arabidopsis (black), rice (red), gymnosperm (blue), fern (turquoise), bryophyte (violet), and green algae (green) homeodomains from BELL and KNOX proteins were aligned using the Muscle alignment program Evolution Several studies point strongly to a unicellular (or colonial) last common ancestor. The basic mechanisms of pattern formation and of cell-cell communication in development appear to be independently derived in plants and animals. Nonetheless, there are some surprising similarities in the overall logic of development in the two lineages. Evolution Multicellularity Mechanisms of multicellular development developed independently in plants and animals. The last ancestor of plants and animals was a unicellular eucaryote. Gene comparisons show there is not much homology between the genes that make up the body plan of plants and animals. Although homeobox- as well as MADS box genes existed in the last common ancestor, the MADS box gene family plays an important part in regulation of plant development, but not in animal development, where homeobox genes are important. Another example is dorso/ventral specification similar to abaxial-adaxial patterning but the actors are completely different. Animals use TGF-αfamily protein, an EGF receptor, a receptor tyrosine kinase, a Ras activated cascade, etc. Plants use REVOLUTA/PHABULOSA/PHAVOLUTA REV/PHAB/PHAV homeobox proteins, KANADI genes, and the YABBY family of transcription factors. Recently a TGF related factor was identified in plants. Chromatin processes: CLF and E(z) are clearly related genes, and they carry out similar functions in the regulatory logic, but note that while E(z) regulates a Hox gene, CLF regulates a MADS box gene. Evolution Cell:cell signaling: In animals, one common and important family of cell signaling receptors are the receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). Plants certainly do have receptor kinases, and carry out cell signaling quite well, but are more likely to use a receptor serine/threonine kinase like CLAVATA 1-3. The plant and fungal/animal lineages are thought to have radiated independently for at least a billion years; they also share deep eukaryotic ancestral roots. The finding that both lineages use homeoproteins in the same life-cycle context suggests that the homeoprotein family may have served as components of an ancient— perhaps the pioneering—sexual strategy in deep eukaryotic ancestors. The bottom line is that plants and animals clearly arose from a common ancestor, almost certainly single-celled, and that they've evolved the processes that allow cells to cooperate and communicate and assemble into complex, elaborate entities with tissues and organs nearly completely independently