* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download How to read a Climate-Fact-Sheet
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
Numerical weather prediction wikipedia , lookup
Michael E. Mann wikipedia , lookup
Heaven and Earth (book) wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia , lookup
Soon and Baliunas controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit email controversy wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
Climate resilience wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Atmospheric model wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Saskatchewan wikipedia , lookup
Physical impacts of climate change wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment wikipedia , lookup
Years of Living Dangerously wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
CLIMATE SERVICE CENTER 2.0 How to read a Climate-Fact-Sheet Instructions for reading and interpretation of the climate-fact-sheets Page 1 Briefing paper How to read a Climate-Fact-Sheet Instructions for reading and interpretation of the Climate-Fact-Sheets Climate Service Center 2.0 Fischertwiete 1 D-20095 Hamburg Telephone: +49-(0)40-226 338 424 Facsimile: +49-(0)40-226 338 163 www.climate-service-center.de 2nd Ed., Hamburg, July 2014 Page 2 Table of Contents 1. Concept and structure of the Climate-Fact-Sheets .............................................................. 3 2. Data underlying the Climate-Fact-Sheets ............................................................................ 3 2.1. Description of the multi-model-ensemble based on global climate projections ............ 4 2.2. Description of the multi-model-ensemble based on regional climate projections available for Europe .................................................................................................... 5 3. The spectrum of climate projections ..................................................................................... 6 4. Geographical variations in climate projections ..................................................................... 7 5. Explanation of diagrams used in the Climate-Fact-Sheets .................................................. 8 5.1. Climate diagrams .......................................................................................................... 8 5.2. Explanation of the projection diagrams ......................................................................... 9 5.2.1. Projection diagrams for Climate-Fact-Sheets based on global climate projections ... 9 5.2.2. Projection diagrams for Climate-Fact-Sheets based on regional climate projections ..................................................................................................................................12 6. Explanation of the evaluation criteria for determining “resilience” and “signal strength” .... 15 7. Description of factors examined in the Climate-Fact-Sheets ............................................. 17 Page 3 1. Concept and structure of the Climate-Fact-Sheets The Climate Service Center 2.0 compiles Climate-Fact-Sheets containing climactic information relating to individual countries. For every country requested there is an individually compiled Climate-Fact-Sheet. Depending upon the individual case in point (and the nature of the assignment), cross-border Climate-Fact-Sheets are also available for certain selected regions. The Climate-Fact-Sheets have a three-part structure, comprising information on the current climate, historical climate development and future climate projections. The sections relating to current and historical climate development are the form of a concise overview. The main focus of the Climate-Fact-Sheets is information relating to projected future climate developments in the country requested and the main bulk of the Climate-Fact-Sheet therefore relates to this. Each Climate-Fact-Sheet delivers as standard information on six climate indices - (mean annual temperature [maximum/minimum temperature], mean annual and monthly precipitation level, periods with low precipitation [dry spells], intensity and frequency of heavy rain events, difference between precipitation and evaporation, rise in sea-level). In addition to this, supplementary indices may also be employed in the creation of each respective Climate-Fact-Sheet. Subregions Where necessary, in a specific country’s available Climate-Fact-Sheet, the territory of that country will be divided into separate climate zones. This is especially applicable to countries with a large surface area, containing several climate zones. These will be analysed individually with regard to future climatic developments. However, information on the current climate, or on historical climate development respectively, apply for the country as a whole, i.e. across the borders of any existent climate zones. 2. Data underlying the Climate-Fact-Sheets As mentioned above, the Climate-Fact-Sheets provide a brief overview of the current climate in the target country as well as climatic developments in the past, while also providing a detailed synopsis of projected climatic change. Correspondingly, various sources of data have been referred to. In order to plot the current climate and past climatic conditions and, in addition to the values from the literature as listed in the respective fact-sheet, globally available observation data from the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia in Norwich (UK) is referred to. More commonly known as CRU, these data sets are often used as reference material in climate research. An estimation of future climate change is made on the basis of projections of global and/or regional climate models. A so-called multi-model-ensemble always forms the basis of this. This means that no single climate projection in any single model is analysed, but instead a variety of projections from a variety of models. The intention is to increase the resilience of projections regarding future climatic change, since one can generally assume that conclusions suggested by any single model, given the necessary simplification of naturally Page 4 occurring processes within that model, are only conditionally applicable. As these simplifying methods are employed differently in the case of each model, one can assume that when considering several models (i.e. a multi-model-ensemble), that the robustness of the results will rise. At present, climate projections from a multi-model-ensemble of global climate models are available for all regions of the world, the spatial resolution of which, however, lies between approximately 100 and 500 kilometres. An additional ensemble is available for Europe with a spatial resolution of 25 to 50 kilometres. Depending upon the country in question, the climate projections in the fact-sheets refer to either the global projection ensemble or, in the case of a European country, to a combined regional and global climate projection ensemble. The respective ensembles are described below in sections 2.1. and 2.2.. The Climate-Fact-Sheets only contain projected future changes. In the case of all values and scenarios mentioned in the Climate-Fact-Sheets these changes always refer to the mean of the climatic normal period between 1961 and 1990, selected to make up the reference period. This period forms the generally applicable climatic normal period. This averaging over thirty years ensures that short-term climate changes (e.g. annual or decadal fluctuations) do not adulterate the long-term climate change signal. This is why, in the case of the projection diagrams shown in section 5, a moving average is shown over thirty years. Climate values calculated on a daily basis form an exception to this thirty-year averaging. In the case of the global climate model ensemble, we only have available data for two twenty-year annual periods (see Table 1). However, on the scale of regional climate projections, several annual periods of thirty years can be referred to. 2.1. Description of the multi-model-ensemble based on global climate projections These model simulations were created within the framework of the “Coupled Model Intercomparision Project No. 3” (CMIP3) and form the data basis of climate projections for the fourth assessment report of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), published in 2007. Model simulations are available from several different global climate models for a low (B1); medium (A1B) and high (A2) emissions scenario 1, all of which find consideration within the Climate-Fact-Sheets. This makes it possible to examine all of the scenarios together, or specific scenarios individually. The examination of all of the scenarios makes sense, since it is not possible at the current time to estimate which emissions scenario is the most likely. Admittedly at present many factors point to a strong increase in emissions, nevertheless, it is no more or less likely that this will ultimately occur than in the case of the other less severe scenarios. Separate consideration of the scenarios makes it easier to estimate which climatic changes are projected in the “best case scenario” (low emission scenario – B1) or in the “worst case scenario” (high emission scenario – A2). In order to ascertain the projected changes in averaged values (annual mean temperature (maximum/minimum temperatures), mean annual and monthly precipitation values, mean annual evaporation and runoff), it is sufficient to consult data of model simulations with a temporal resolution of one month. For this data (with monthly temporal resolution), simulations from a multitude of climate models exist for the complete period between 1900 1 The classifications low, moderate and high refer to an increase in greenhouse-gas concentrations in the future atmosphere. The projected development of the CO2 concentration is here used as an appropriate example. The current level is approximately 385 ppm (level as of 2010). Up to the year 2100, the following atmospheric CO2 concentrations are projected, depending on the scenario: B1-> 540ppm; A1B-> 700ppm; A2-> 825ppm. For more information on emissions scenarios visit http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/emission/index.htm. Page 5 and 2100 and for each of the three scenarios (see table below). In order to estimate any changes in the duration of heat waves, cold spells and dry spells, or to evaluate changes in the intensity and frequency of heavy rainfall events, however, we need to refer to the daily output provided by the climate models. Daily data of climate models, however, requires a huge storage capacity. Therefore this data is only available for shorter time periods in the IPCC archives: for the reference period between 1960 and 1990 and for two twenty-year periods in the future (2046 to 2065 and 2081 to 2100). All values represented in the ClimateFact-Sheets – including their derivations - are described in more detail in the glossary. Table 1: Overview of the availability of data in the global multi-model-ensemble Emissions scenarios Low (B1) scenario Medium (A1B) scenario High (A2) scenario All scenarios together Monthly data Daily data (available for time period 1900 to 2100) (available for time slices: 1961-90; 2046-65; 2081-00) 20 simulations 16 simulations 23 simulations 17 simulations 19 simulations 14 simulations 62 simulations 47 simulations 2.2. Description of the multi-model-ensemble based on regional climate projections available for Europe The regional climate projections were created within the framework of the EU project ENSEMBLES. The data is freely accessible and has been elucidated in, among others, the ENSEMBLES Final Report (report is freely available for download at http://ensembleseu.metoffice.com/docs/Ensembles_final_report_Nov09.pdf). For more information on the ENSEMBLES project visit www.ensembles-eu.org. Using the Climate-Fact-Sheets for European countries, one can refer to twenty climate projections, based on a medium (A1B) emissions scenario. These climate projections were created using 9 different climate models. The spatial resolution of this data is 25 or 50 km and therefore much higher than that of the global climate projections. All simulations cover the time period between at least 1961 and 2099, inclusive, so that both a continuous evaluation of the whole century (2000 until 2100) and separate analyses of the concrete time periods between 2006 to 2035; 2036 to 2065 and 2071 to 2100 can be made. Since regional climate projections are available for the medium A1B scenario only, the global climate simulations, as described in section 2.1., are also fed into the analysis to ensure that the complete spectrum of available scenarios is considered. Page 6 3. The bandwidth of climate projections It is not possible on the basis of climate projections from several models to state a concrete value for future climate change in a specific region. However, it is possible to indicate a range of possible developments. In addition to the natural variability of a complex climatic system, the reason for this is to be found in certain assumptions about the future development of greenhouse gas emissions, whereby we are at present only minimally able to assess, for example, how technical or political processes will operate in the future. In addition to this, real meteorological processes are simplified for inclusion in the climate models and in some cases also incorrectly depicted, which in turn generates a further range. Using the specifications provided by the IPCC, the range of projected changes in the Climate-Fact-Sheets is divided into two categories. According to the IPCC, an area of change is to be categorized as “likely” when 66 percent of all changes projected through the various models lie within this range. However, should the area contain 90 percent of all projected changes, then it can, according to the IPCC, be categorized as “very likely”. In the Climate-Fact-Sheets these areas have in each case been defined around the median (50 percent value) of the projected changes. This means that 33 percent of the projected changes in an area categorized as “likely” lie above and 33 percent below the median of all changes. In the case of the “very likely” category, we resultantly find 45 percent of the changes above and 45 percent below the median (see figure 1). For Climate-Fact-Sheets based on regional climate simulations with a smaller number of model projections available (20 regional model simulations, as opposed to 62 global model simulations), the complete range (the area between minimal and maximal change) of the projected changes will be shown instead of the “very likely” area. Variable Max 45% 33% Median -33% -45% Min Value of today Today Figure1: Theoretical scheme to highlight the bandwidth of climate projections Future “likely” “very likely” Page 7 4. Geographical variations in climate projections Both observed and projected climate changes are geographically variable. In the ClimateFact-Sheets we attempt to cover at least part of this variability by dividing the selected country into separate climate zones. However, doing this allows only a small part of any geographic variation to be quantified explicitly, since the climate change signal will not be uniformly pronounced, e.g. in countries and regions merely extending across the climate zone. Where it became necessary to introduce such information, the Climate-Fact-Sheets necessarily contained qualitative evidence of geographical variations in the climate change signal, an example of which is the statement that a rise in temperature inland tends to be greater than that on the coast. Furthermore, by considering the level of significance in the Climate-Fact-Sheets, we can rudimentarily trace the geographical variation. This means that only that percentage of an individual country or region delivering a significant change signal is examined. In any given Climate-Fact-Sheet, a pronouncedly heterogeneous distribution of climate change signals for a chosen region tends to lead to weaker geographical significance and, for example, to many regions displaying minimal (non-significant) change levels. For more on the subject of geographic significance, see section 6. Due to the brevity of the Climate-Fact-Sheets, it is unfortunately not possible to reach more detailed conclusions on geographic variability. Because conclusions reached using different projections from different climate models or emissions scenarios can prove to be just as variegated, very detailed studies need to be carried out. The very rough spatial resolution of the climate models also often impedes any further statements on the geographic variability of the climate change signal. Page 8 5. Explanation of diagrams used in the Climate-Fact-Sheets 5.1. Climate diagrams In order to adequately represent the current climate in the various countries and regions in fact-sheet form, Walter-Lieth climate diagrams (figure 2) are used, showing observed values for temperature and precipitation. These are included as a 30-year mean value (normal climatic period) and offer a useful overview of the annual cycles of temperature and precipitation as well as annual mean temperature and annual total precipitation. In extremely simplified form a dependence of evapotranspiration on air temperature is assumed. Meaning that when the precipitation curve runs above the temperature curve, conditions will be humid and in the opposite case scenario, arid. The boundary between arid and humid conditions runs through the point where the precipitation value [mm] is double that of the mean temperature [°C]. The temperature and precipitation scales are therefore plotted in a ratio of 1:2. In this illustration, for example, we can see that the period from mid-March to mid-November is humid (blue areas), while in the other months arid conditions (bright red areas) predominate. The months from April until October show high rainfall (a change in rainfall level of a factor of 10 – dark blue area). The mean annual temperature is 24.7°C, the annual total precipitation is 1564 mm. annual mean temperature in °C annual total precipitation in mm per year threshold above which precipitation scales by factor 10 red line: Annual cycle of monthly mean temperature in °C blue-coloured area: humid conditions above threshold light-red coloured area: arid conditions blue-colored area: humid conditions below threshold blue line: annual cycle of monthly precipitation in mm/month Months from January to December Figure 2: Climate diagram after Walter-Lieth. Temperature and precipitation scaled to 100mm in ratio 1:2. This serves to mark months with arid (bright red) and humid (blue) conditions. Monthly precipitation values above 100mm are shown in compressed form. Page 9 5.2. Explanation of the projection diagrams 5.2.1. Projection diagrams for Climate-Fact-Sheets based on global climate projections Time series: The projection diagram in figure 3 shows the mean change in a parameter (in this case the temperature in °C): to the left in the time series from 2011 to 2100 (compared to the mean of the reference period 1961 to 1990) and to the right in the 30-year periods 2006-35, 2036-65 and 2071-00 (here also compared to the mean of the reference time period from 1961 until 1990). This time series shows the median of the model simulations (light blue lines), as well as two other ranges: the dark grey area contains 66 percent of all projected values and is here denoted as “likely”, meaning that a climate change where the values fall within this range will probably occur. 90 percent of all projected values lie within the light grey are and are denoted here as “very likely”, meaning that a climate change where the values lie within this range has a high probability of occurring. For instance, in this illustration we can see that between now and 2100, the median projection of change in annual mean temperature of all available projections is for an increase by 3.6°C compared to the reference period. This change is likely to be in the range of 2.5 to 4.8°C and very likely to be somewhere between 1.8 and 5.2°C. The time periods on the right-hand side of the illustration show not only the span of values within all of the model simulations, but also the ranges of the change signals following the scenarios B1, A1B and A2. The structure of the bars corresponds to the time series (lefthand detail): The median lies within both probability ranges. For instance, from the illustration we can see that the median projection of change in annual mean temperature is for an increase by 2.6°C for the time period 2036-2065 according to the scenario A1B. This increase is likely to be in the range of 1.9 to 3.2°C and to very likely to be somewhere between 1.7 and 3.3°C. Unit of displayed variable dark-coloured area - likely: 66% of all projected changes fall within this range light-blue line: Median of all model projections red: bandwidth of all projected changes according to the high scenario (A2) orange: bandwidth of all projected changes according to the medium scenario (A1B) yellow: bandwidth of all projected changes according to the low scenario (B1) grey: bandwidth of all projected changes for all scenarios Time-series of 30-year running mean data from2011 to 2100 Time-slice: mean over 30 years light-coloured area - very likely: 90% of all projected changes fall within this range Figure 3: Example for the standard diagram used to present time series of projected changes of global climate models in the Climate-Fact-Sheets. Page 10 Time slices: The projection diagram in figure 4 shows the change in a parameter (in this case changes in the duration of long-lasting cold spells in days) as averaged over two periods of twenty years: 2046-2065 and 2081-2100 (compared to the mean of the reference period 1961 to 1990). As with the previous illustration, we can also see the median of the model projections, as well as the ranges denoted as “likely” and “very likely”. The time periods show the change signal with a span covering the value of all available model simulations (grey bars) and according to scenarios B1 (yellow bar), A1B (orange bar) and A2 (red bar). The median (light blue line) lies within both ranges. For instance, we can see from the illustration that for the period 2081-2100, the median projection of change in the duration of long-lasting cold spells is for a decrease by 2 days according to scenario A1B. The projected change is likely to be in the range of -4 to -1 days and very likely to be between -5 and +8 days. dark-coloured area - likely: 66% of all projected changes fall within this range Unit of displayed variable light-blue line: Median of all model projections red: bandwidth of all projected changes according to the high scenario (A2) orange: bandwidth of all projected changes according to the medium scenario (A1B) yellow: bandwidth of all projected changes according to the low scenario (B1) light-coloured area - very likely: 90% of all projected changes fall within this range grey: bandwidth of all projected changes for all scenarios Averaged over period 2046 to 2065 Averaged over period 2081 to 2100 Figure 4: Example for the standard diagram used to present time slices of projected changes of global climate models in the Climate-Fact-Sheets. Annual cycle: The projection diagram in figure 5 shows the changes within the annual cycle of a parameter (in this case precipitation amounts in percent). The change refers to a thirty-year average at the end of the century (2071 to 2100), as compared to the reference period 1961-1990. As in the previous illustrations, two ranges are indicated around the median of all model simulations (light blue line): the dark grey area contains 66 percent of all projected values. It is denoted here as “likely”, meaning that a climatic change, which has values within this area, will probably occur. The light grey area contains 90 percent of all projected values. In keeping with the previous diagram, this area is denoted as “very likely”, meaning that a projected climatic change, which has values within this range has a high probability of occurring. Another piece of information that we can extract from the illustration is the difference in the Page 11 annual cycle of the parameter separated according to the individual scenarios. To facilitate ease of overview, only the median of projected changes will be represented in the case of each of the scenarios B1 (yellow curve), A1B (orange curve) and A2 (red curve). For instance for the A2 scenario, we can see from this illustration that the median projection of change in monthly precipitation is for a decrease during the summer season (maximum decrease in August by -21 percent) and for an increase during the winter and spring seasons (maximum increase in April by 11 percent). Unit of displayed variable dark-coloured area - likely: 66% of all projected changes fall within this range light-coloured area - very likely: 90% of all projected changes fall within this range red: median of all projected changes according to the high scenario (A2) orange: median of all projected changes according to the medium scenario (A1B) light-blue line: Median of all model projections Months from January to December yellow: median of all projected changes according to the low scenario (B1) grey: bandwidth of all projected changes for all scenarios Figure 5: Example for the standard diagram used to present projected changes in the annual cycle of parameters simulated by global climate models in the Climate-Fact-Sheets. Page 12 5.2.2. Projection diagrams for Climate-Fact-Sheets based on regional climate projections Time series: The projection diagram in figure 6 shows the average change in a parameter (in this case, temperature in °C): to the left in the time series from 2006 to 2100 (in comparison to the mean of the reference time period 1961 to 1990) and on the right in the 30-year time periods 2006-35, 2036-65 and 2071-00 (here also in comparison to the mean from the reference time period 1961 to 1990). This time series shows the median of the model simulations (light blue line) as well as two ranges of change: the dark area contains 66 percent of all projected values from regional climate simulations. It is denoted as “likely”, meaning that a climate change where the values fall within this range will probably occur. The lighter (turquoise) area extends between the minimum and maximum of all projected changes of the regional climate models. For instance, we can see from the illustration that towards 2100 the median projection of change (based on regional climate projections) in annual mean temperature is for an increase by 3.3°C compared to the reference time period. This change is likely to be in the range of 2.7 to 5°C. The range for all projected changes by the regional climate models is between 1.9 and 6.1°C. The time periods on the right-hand side of the illustration show not only the span of values in the regional model simulations (turquoise), but also the projected change signal of the global model ensemble (IPCC-AR4), according to scenario A1B (yellow) and all available scenarios (B1, A1B and A2) combined (red). The bars thereby define the span between respective minimum and maximum of the projected changes. For example, in the illustration we can see that for the global model projections according to the A1B scenario (yellow bar) and the period 2006-2035, the median projection of change in the annual mean temperature is for an increase 1.4°C. The total range of projected changes extends from 0.4 to 2.4°C. Unit of displayed variable dark-coloured area - likely: 66% of all projected changes of the regional models fall within this range light-blue line: median of all regional/global model projections red: bandwidth (Min/Max) of all projected changes of the global models yellow: bandwidth (Min/Max) of projected changes of the global models according to the medium scenario (A1B) Time-series of 30-year running mean data from2011 to 2100 light-coloured area – Min/Max: all projected changes of the regional models fall within this range Time-slice: mean over 30 years turquois: bandwidth (Min/Max) of all projected changes of the regional models according to the medium scenario (A1B) Figure 6: Example for the standard diagram used to present time series of projected changes of regional climate models in the Climate-Fact-Sheets. Page 13 Time slices: The projection diagram in figure 7 shows the changes in a parameter (in this case changes in the duration of long-lasting heat waves in days) as averaged over thirty-year time periods: 2006-2035, 2036-2065 and 2071-2100 (compared with the mean of reference period 1961 to 1990). Here, however, we must also consider that, in the case of the global climate projections (yellow and red bars), we only have access to data for two twenty-year periods (2046-2065 and 2081-2100). As with the previous illustration, we are also presented with the median of the projected changes (light blue line) as well as two ranges of change: the dark “likely” area contains 66 percent of all projected values from regional climate simulations and the complete range of projected changes. The colours of the bars represent the range of regional climate projections (turquoise) as well as the range of global climate projections according to scenario A1B (yellow bar) and all available scenarios combined (red). Unit of displayed variable dark-coloured area - likely: 66% of all projected changes of the regional models fall within this range light-coloured area – Min/Max: all projected changes of the regional models fall within this range turquois: bandwidth (Min/Max) of all projected changes of the regional models according to the medium scenario (A1B) light-blue line: median of all regional/global model projections red: bandwidth (Min/Max) of all projected changes of the global models yellow: bandwidth (Min/Max) of projected changes of the global models according to the medium scenario (A1B) Time-slice: mean over 30 years Figure 7: Example for the standard diagram used to present time slices of projected changes of regional climate models in the Climate-Fact-Sheets. Page 14 Annual cycle: The projection diagram in figure 8 shows the projected changes in the annual cycle of a parameter (in this case monthly precipitation amounts in percent). This change refers to a thirty-year average for the end of the century (2071 to 2100), compared to the reference period 1961-1990. As in the previous illustration, the two ranges of change are shown together with the median of all regional model simulations (light blue line): the darker area contains 66 percent of all projected values for the regional climate models. This is here also denoted as “likely”, meaning that any climatic change with values lying within this range, will probably occur. The lighter area extents between the minimum and maximum of all projected changes in the regional climate models. One further piece of information that we can extract from the illustration is in what way the change in the annual cycle of a parameter towards the end of the century is represented within the global models. In each case, and in order to facilitate ease of overview, only the median of changes for scenario A1B (yellow curve) and all available scenarios combined (red curve) is represented. Unit of displayed variable dark-coloured area - likely: 66% of all projected changes of the regional models fall within this range light-coloured area – Min/Max: all projected changes of the regional models fall within this range red: median of all projected changes of the global models light-blue line: median of all regional model projections yellow: median of projected changes of the global models according to the medium scenario (A1B) Months from January to December Figure 8: Example for the standard diagram used to present projected changes in the annual cycle of parameters simulated by regional climate models in the Climate-Fact-Sheets. Page 15 6. Explanation of the evaluation criteria for determining “confidence” in projected changes and the “signal strength” In addition to a representation of projected climate changes, the Climate-Fact-Sheets also present an evaluation of the projected climate changes in terms of the confidence in the changes and the signal strength. Not every parameter described in the Climate-Fact-Sheets can be extracted from climate models to the same. Assertions made for the one parameter will therefore necessarily be more resilient than those of another parameter. Furthermore, there are regional differences in the resilience of climate change projections, which are appropriately marked and identifiable in the Climate-Fact-Sheets. In order to determine the confidence in the projected changes presented in the Climate-Fact-Sheets, definitions have been set; as summarised in table 2. Table 2: Overview of criteria for estimating the confidence in projected changes. Criterium Representation of observed data by the model (validation) Sub-criterium (if required) Premise Evaluation of confidence when both sub-criteria are not realistically represented in the models low when only one of the two sub-criteria is realistically represented in the models medium when seasonality and amount are realistically represented in the models high when the median of the change signal is clearly lower than the spread for “likely” low when spread for “very likely” corresponds to at least twice the value of the spread for ”likely”, or the median of the change signal is lower or equal to the spread for “likely” medium when the spread for “very likely” is lower than twice the value of the spreads for “likely” and the median of the change signal is higher than the spread for “likely” high when less than 66 percent of all model simulations agree in the direction of change (in- or decrease). low (not robust) when at least 66 percent of all model simulations agree in the direction of change (in- or decrease). high (robust) Seasonality and amount/height Change signal Direction/trend in the model projections and spread Strength of the change signal Robustness and significance All criteria are included in equal measure in a 3-tier (high, medium, low) total evaluation; no weights are given to the individual criteria. Page 16 Those criteria that contribute to the determination of the “signal strength”, refer to the level of the median of projected changes towards the end of the 21st century (time period 2071 to 2100), as well as to the geographical significance of the projected changes (however, with a slightly increased emphasis on the magnitude of the climate change signal). This means that, in order to evaluate the signal strength also the geographic distribution of the climate change signal is included. The criteria for designating signal strength are defined in table 3 below: Table 3: Overview of evaluations criteria for estimating signal strength of the projected changes. Criterium Sub-criterium (if required) Level of change Geographic variability Fraction of area showing statistically significant climate change signals (on the 95th confidence level) Premise Evaluation of signal strength Change <15 percent / change in temperature <1°C weak Change 15 - 40 percent / change in temperature 13°C moderate Change >40 percent / change in temperature >3°C strong < 33 percent of projected changes are significant weak Between 33 percent and 66 percent of projected changes are significant moderate > 66 percent of projected changes are significant strong The representations of the confidence in the projected changes and the respective signal strength appear in a combined diagram in the Climate-Fact-Sheets: a example of a case of medium confidence in the projected changes and a moderate signal strength is shown in figure 9 below. In cases with higher (lower) confidence in the projected changes, there is a swing upwards on the confidence scale (or downwards). If the signal strength is estimated to be stronger (weaker), then the red colouration of the thermometer rises (falls). Figure 9: Graphic representation of confidence in the projected changes and the respective signal strength of the projected climate change signal using an example of medium confidence and moderate signal strength. Page 17 7. Description of parameters examined in the Climate-Fact-Sheets Temperature: Those temperatures examined in the Climate-Fact-Sheets refer to the air temperature at the surface of the earth. We distinguish between annual mean temperature and maximum and minimum temperatures. The annual mean temperature is the average of daily mean temperatures throughout the year. The maximum and minimum temperatures are gleaned from daily data which are then averaged for each month, with the respective highest/lowest mean temperatures being selected. The maximum (minimum) temperature provides the highest (lowest) monthly averaged daily maximum (minimum) temperature for a specific year. Long-lasting heatwaves: Heatwaves are defined as a number of consecutive days with a daily mean temperature above a given temperature threshold. For heatwaves the threshold has been set at the 95th percentile of the daily mean temperatures (on 95 percent of all days the daily mean temperature is lower than this value) within the control period 1961 to 1990. Since especially long heatwaves are of importance, only the 95th percentile (95 percent of all heatwaves are shorter) of the duration of heatwaves are examined and described as long-lasting heatwaves. Long-lasting cold spells: Cold spells are defined as a number of consecutive days with a mean daily temperature below a given temperature threshold. For cold spells the threshold has been set at the 5th percentile of the daily mean temperature (on 95 percent of all days the daily mean temperature is higher than this value) for the control period 1961 to 1990. Since especially long cold spells are of importance, only the 95th percentile (95 percent of all cold spells are shorter) of cold spells are examined and described as long-lasting cold spells. Precipitation: Both the annual total precipitation and monthly total precipitation amounts are represented in the Climate-Fact-Sheets. Both amounts are reached by adding together daily precipitation values over the corresponding time periods. Actual evaporation: In the Climate-Fact-Sheets the actual evaporation is derived from the latent heat flux by a functional relation from the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the UN (FAO). The units are mm. As distinct from the potential evaporation, this value also relates to the available water reserves. The values for the actual evaporation are therefore low for arid regions, despite their high energy potential. Climatic water balance: The climatic water balance is the difference between the annual total precipitation and the annual total actual evaporation. Its unit is mm and it provides information about the amount of water theoretically available on the earth’s surface. In scientific language this is often referred to as runoff, whereby this should not be confused with the river runoff. Page 18 Long-lasting dry spells: Dry spells are defined as a number of consecutive days with total precipitation below a given precipitation threshold. For dry spells the threshold value was set at the 5th percentile of daily precipitation (on 95 percent of all days the total daily precipitation is higher than this value) within the control period 1961 to 1990. Since long dry spells are especially important, the 95th percentile of the duration of dry spells (95 percent of all dry spells are shorter) is defined as a long-lasting dry spells. Intensity of heavy rainfall events: The heavy rainfall intensity is defined as the 95th percentile of total daily precipitation values. This is the precipitation value which is not reached on 95 percent of all days (only rainy days with 1 mm precipitation are considered). Frequency of heavy rainfall events: The heavy rainfall frequency is defined as the number days upon which total daily precipitation exceeds the above defined heavy rainfall intensity. Solar irradiation: Solar irradiation refers to the solar radiation that reaches the earth’s surface. In the ClimateFact-Sheets it is presented in kWh/m2 per year. Wind speed: Mean wind speed is defined in the models as being at a height of 10 m above ground surface. As a result of the rough horizontal resolution of global climate models, confidence in this parameter is limited. Intensity of storm events: Storm intensity is defined as the 95th percentile of peak daily wind speeds (gusts). This is therefore the gust that is not reached on 95 percent of all days. This rate is calculated on the basis of the regional climate model data only and is not very resilient. Frequency of storm events: Storm frequency is defined as the number of days upon which the above defined storm intensity was exceeded. This value is calculated on the basis of the regional climate model data only and is not very resilient. Sea level: Projected changes in sea level are the only value in the Climate-Fact-Sheets not extracted from primary data, but instead compiled from the literature. At present only limited conclusions can be drawn from model projections for a change in sea level and those are linked with high uncertainty. In the Climate-Fact-Sheets we therefore avoid making any detailed statements concerning regional rises in sea level. Concerning an observed rise in sea level it must also be taken into consideration that the accuracy of measurement using state-of-the-art, satellite-supported measuring methods is to within 1mm/year, whereas that of tide-gauge measurements is even less accurate.