Download Activation of Lymphocyte Signaling by the R1 Protein of Rhesus

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

P-type ATPase wikipedia , lookup

Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup

Tissue engineering wikipedia , lookup

Cell culture wikipedia , lookup

Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup

Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup

Cytoplasmic streaming wikipedia , lookup

G protein–coupled receptor wikipedia , lookup

Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup

Phosphorylation wikipedia , lookup

Tyrosine kinase wikipedia , lookup

Amitosis wikipedia , lookup

List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Western blot wikipedia , lookup

Paracrine signalling wikipedia , lookup

VLDL receptor wikipedia , lookup

Protein phosphorylation wikipedia , lookup

Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, Mar. 2000, p. 2721–2730
0022-538X/00/$04.00⫹0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Vol. 74, No. 6
Activation of Lymphocyte Signaling by the R1 Protein
of Rhesus Monkey Rhadinovirus
BLOSSOM DAMANIA, MARYANN DEMARIA, JAE U. JUNG,
AND RONALD C. DESROSIERS*
New England Regional Primate Research Center, Harvard Medical School,
Southborough, Massachusetts 01772-9102
Received 11 November 1999/Accepted 17 December 1999
Rhesus monkey rhadinovirus (RRV) is a gamma-2 herpesvirus that exhibits a considerable degree of similarity
to the human Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV). The R1 protein of RRV is distantly related to the
K1 protein of KSHV, and R1, like K1, can contribute to cell growth transformation. In this study we analyzed
the ability of the cytoplasmic tail of R1 to function as a signal transducer. The cytoplasmic domain of the R1
protein contains several tyrosine residues whose phosphorylation is induced in cells expressing Syk kinase.
Expression of a CD8 chimera protein containing the extracellular and transmembrane domains of CD8 fused
to the cytoplasmic domain of R1 mobilized intracellular calcium and induced cellular tyrosine phosphorylation
in B cells upon stimulation with anti-CD8 antibody. None of the CD8-R1 cytoplasmic deletion mutants tested
were able to mobilize intracellular calcium or to induce tyrosine phosphorylation to a significant extent upon
addition of anti-CD8 antibody. Expression of wild-type R1 protein activated nuclear factor of activated T
lymphocytes (NFAT) eightfold in B cells in the absence of antibody stimulation; expression of the CD8-R1C
chimera strongly induced NFAT activity (60-fold) but only upon the addition of anti-CD8 antibody. We
conclude that the cytoplasmic domain of R1 is capable of transducing signals that elicit B-lymphocyte
activation events. The signal-inducing properties of R1 appear to be similar to those of K1 but differ in that
the required sequences are distributed over a much longer stretch of the cytoplasmic domain (>150 amino
acids). In addition, the induction of calcium mobilization was considerably longer in duration and stronger
with R1 than with K1.
component of the BCR complex. In the resting state of B cells,
the Src family of protein tyrosine kinases is associated with the
Ig␣ subunit of the Ig␣-Ig␤ heterodimer. Binding of antigen to
the membrane Ig results in a higher affinity of the Src kinase
family members for the BCR, leading to the phosphorylation
of the tyrosine residues present in the ITAMs of the Ig␣ and
Ig␤ subunits. This in turn recruits the Syk family of protein
kinases to the BCR complex in a manner that is SH2 domain
dependent. The immediate effect is an activated receptor complex that provides binding sites for signal adapter and transducer proteins that initiate a signal cascade leading to proliferation and differentiation of the B cell.
Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), also called
Human herpesvirus 8, has been consistently identified in Kaposi’s sarcomas, body cavity-based lymphomas, and some forms
of multicentric Castleman’s disease (7, 14, 25, 26, 30). Recently
a new herpesvirus called Rhesus monkey rhadinovirus (RRV),
which is closely related to but distinct from KSHV, has been
isolated from rhesus monkeys (10). RRV is the closest known
relative of KSHV on the basis of sequence similarities and
structural organization of the genomes (1, 27). Similar to
KSHV, RRV has been shown to be present predominantly in
B lymphocytes (22). At a genomic location equivalent to that
of the saimiri transforming protein (STP) of herpesvirus
saimiri (HVS) and K1 of KSHV, we have identified a novel
open reading frame called the R1 open reading frame at the
left end of the RRV genome (9). The R1 protein is a glycosylated transmembrane protein of approximately 70 kDa. Expression of R1 in rodent fibroblasts induces transformation,
resulting in morphological changes and focus formation (9).
Injection of R1-expressing cells into nude mice induced the
formation of multifocal, disseminated tumors (9). A recombinant herpesvirus in which the STP oncogene of HVS was
Src homology-2 (SH2) domains are present in a number of
signal-transducing proteins including protein kinases, phosphatases, and phospholipases (6, 23, 24). Sequences that bind
to SH2 domains are characterized by phosphorylated tyrosine
residues present in a variety of cellular signaling proteins such
as lymphocyte receptors, adapter proteins, protein kinases, and
transcription factors. The sequences containing these phosphorylated tyrosine residues are referred to as SH2 binding
motifs and serve to recruit cellular proteins containing SH2
domains into lymphocyte receptor-mediated signaling complexes. SH2 binding motifs consist of a tyrosine residue followed by three amino acids, YXX(L/I/V), whose sequence is
specific for binding a particular SH2 domain (23, 28). These
motifs can occur in either a singular or tandem fashion. Hematopoietic lymphocyte receptors including immunoglobulin-␣ (Ig␣), Ig␤, T-cell receptor-ε, IgE-␤, and IgE-␥ contain
two such SH2 binding motifs in tandem, and this motif has
been termed the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation
motif (ITAM) (3, 4, 13, 16, 32, 33). The archetypal ITAM
consists of a stretch of negatively charged amino acids preceding the two tyrosine-containing sequences: (D/E)X7(D/E)X2
YX2LX7–10YX2L/I, where X is any amino acid. In B cells, T
cells, and mast cells, the ITAMs have been shown to be critical
for interactions with Src family (Src, Lyn, Blk, Lck, and Fyn)
and Syk family (Syk and Zap70) kinases (16, 19, 29). The
antigen binding site of the B-cell receptor (BCR) is a membrane-bound Ig that is noncovalently attached to a disulfidelinked Ig␣-Ig␤ heterodimer that serves as the major signaling
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: New England Regional
Primate Research Center, Harvard Medical School, One Pine Hill Dr.,
Box 9102, Southborough, MA 01772-9102. Phone: (508) 624-8041.
Fax: (508) 624-8190. E-mail: [email protected].
2721
2722
DAMANIA ET AL.
replaced with the R1 gene was capable of immortalizing T
lymphocytes to interleukin-2-independent growth, further indicating the transforming potential of the R1 protein (9).
R1, like K1, has features of a receptor protein. While the
predicted extracellular domain of R1 of RRV exhibits considerable homology and is similar in length to the extracellular
domain of K1 of KSHV, the cytoplasmic domain of R1 is
markedly different from that of K1. The K1 protein has a short
cytoplasmic tail containing only 38 amino acids (20). This short
cytoplasmic tail has been shown to contain an ITAM that is
capable of eliciting cellular signal transduction, evidenced by
the induction of cellular tyrosine phosphorylation and calcium
mobilization in B cells (17, 19). In contrast, the R1 protein has
a 171-amino-acid cytoplasmic tail. Unlike K1, which contains 2
tyrosine residues in a single ITAM sequence in its cytoplasmic
tail, R1 contains a total of 13 tyrosine residues in its cytoplasmic domain. Five of these 13 tyrosines are present in contiguous YXXL ITAM-like sequences and are localized to a defined stretch proximal to the carboxyl terminus.
To investigate the potential signal-transducing activity of the
cytoplasmic region of R1, we constructed a chimeric protein in
which the cytoplasmic tail of the human CD8␣ polypeptide was
replaced with that of R1. We demonstrate that expression of
this chimera in B cells induced cellular tyrosine phosphorylation, intracellular calcium mobilization, and nuclear factor of
activated T lymphocytes (NFAT) activity upon stimulation
with an anti-CD8 antibody. Our results demonstrate that the
cytoplasmic domain of the RRV transforming protein R1 is an
efficient transducer of signals to elicit lymphocyte activation
events.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plasmids. The pFJ-R1 expression plasmid has been described previously (9).
For the CD8-R1 chimera proteins, the coding sequences for the cytoplasmic
deletion mutants of R1 were cloned in-frame with those for the CD8 extracellular and transmembrane domains into the EcoRI-XbaI site of the pcDNA3CD8⌬ vector, which contained the coding sequences for the CD8 extracellular
and transmembrane domains inserted in the BglII and EcoRI sites. The R1
cytoplasmic deletions were obtained by PCR using EcoRI and XbaI containing
primers. To facilitate detection, the CD8-R1 chimeras were tagged with the AU1
epitope (BAbCO) at the C-terminal end. PFJ-K1 has been described previously
(19). The NFAT-luciferase construct was obtained from Don Ganem. The Syk
expression plasmid was provided by A. Veillette, and the Src expression plasmid
was provided by T. M. Roberts.
Cell culture and transfection. Cos-1 cells and Rat-1 fibroblasts were grown in
Dulbecco modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum
(FCS). Calcium phosphate was used for transient transfection of Cos-1 cells. For
Rat-1 fibroblasts stably expressing the R1 constructs, cells were transfected using
Lipofectamine (Gibco-BRL) and stable transfectants were selected using 2 mg of
geneticin per ml. BJAB cells were cultured in RPMI media containing 10% FCS.
Ten micrograms of each CD8-R1 chimera plasmid was electroporated into BJAB
cells at 200 V and 960 ␮F in Optimem (Gibco-BRL) media. Forty-eight hours
postelectroporation, cells were pelleted and transferred into RPMI media supplemented with geneticin (2 mg per ml) and cultured for 5 weeks. Cells were
sorted by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).
FACS analysis. For FACS, 2 ⫻ 107 B cells expressing chimera proteins were
washed with Optimem and stained with phycoerythrin-conjugated CD8 antibody
(Pharmingen) for 30 min at 4°C. Excess antibody was washed away, and cells
were sorted based on CD8 expression using a FACSVantage (Becton Dickinson). After being sorted, cells were washed and cultured in complete RPMI
media.
Calcium mobilization assay. Cells (106) were resuspended in 2 ml of complete
RPMI medium and incubated with 1 ␮M indo-1 for 20 min at 37°C. The cells
were subsequently placed on ice till ready to be used. Five minutes prior to use,
cells were warmed at 37°C and baseline calcium levels were read for 1 min. Cells
were then stimulated with 10 ␮g of anti-CD8 antibody, OKT8 (American Type
Culture Collection), or anti-human IgM antibody (Upstate Biotechnology), and
data were collected for 4 min for the IgM stimulation and 8 min for the OKT8
stimulation. A FACSVantage (Becton Dickinson) was used for data collection
and analysis.
Antibody stimulation. Cells (106) were stimulated with 10 ␮g of OKT8 antibody or anti-human IgM antibody, after which cells were flash frozen in liquid
nitrogen and subsequently thawed and lysed in cold lysis buffer containing 1 mM
J. VIROL.
FIG. 1. Amino acid sequences of the R1 cytoplasmic tail. The 170 amino
acids of the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of R1 are shown. The cytoplasmic
domain of R1 contains several potential SH2 binding motifs (boldface). Dotted
underlining, SH2 binding motifs YXXA, YXXV, YXXT, and YXXP; solid
underlining, last five YXXL motifs. The third and fourth and fourth and fifth
YXXL motifs resemble ITAMs in that they and the surrounding sequences are
spaced in a fashion consistent with the consensus sequence, (D/E)X7(D/E)
X2YX2LX7–10YX2L/I. These motifs are boxed.
Na2VO3 and protease inhibitors. Cell lysates were used for immunoprecipitation
and Western analysis.
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting. After transfection and antibody
stimulation, cells were harvested and lysed in NP-40 lysis buffer (0.15 M NaCl, 50
mM Tris [pH 8], 1% NP-40) containing 1 mM Na2VO3, and protease inhibitors.
Cellular debris was pelleted at 10,000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatants were
used for immunoprecipitation with the appropriate antibody and protein A/GSepharose beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Immune complexes were pelleted
and washed at least five times with lysis buffer. Complexes were resolved by
sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and
transferred to nitrocellulose. Immunoblot detection was performed using the
enhanced chemiluminescence ECL kit (Amersham).
For immunoprecipitations and immunoblotting, anti-AU1 antibody was obtained from BAbCO. Anti-Src and anti-Syk antibodies were obtained from Upstate Biotechnology. Anti-pTyr (4G10) primary antibody and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antiphosphotyrosine (anti-pTyr) antibody was obtained from
Upstate Biotechnology.
In vitro kinase assay. Coimmunoprecipitations were performed as described
above. After being washed, the complexes were incubated with 5 ␮Ci of
[␥-32P]ATP in kinase buffer (50 mM Tris, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM CaCl2) for 30
min at room temperature. At the end of the incubation, complexes were subjected to SDS-PAGE, and the gel was subsequently exposed to X-ray film.
Luciferase assays. Luciferase assays were performed by a method similar to
the previously described protocol with a few modifications (18). BJAB cells (106)
were electroporated with 20 ␮g of NFAT luciferase plasmid, 40 ␮g of pFJ-R1 or
pFJ-K1 plasmids, and 5 ␮g of ␤-galactosidase expression plasmid. Cells were
harvested 24 h posttransfection, and luciferase assays were performed using the
luciferase assay kit from Promega. For the experiments involving antibody stimulation, BJAB cells were electroporated with the indicated plasmids and 24 h
postelectroporation cells were pelleted and washed in serum-free media. Cells
were incubated with anti-CD8 antibody for 5 min at 37°C and subsequently
resuspended in 10 ml of medium and placed in the incubator. Aliquots of cells
were removed at various time points, and luciferase assays were performed as
described above.
RESULTS
R1 contains multiple YXXL motifs in its cytoplasmic domain. The cytoplasmic domain of R1 contains several potential
SH2 binding motifs (Fig. 1). Analysis of the tyrosine residues
and their surrounding sequences revealed similarities to sequences that are capable of binding the SH2 domains of signal
transducer proteins. YXXA, YXXP, YXXT, and YXXV motifs have been shown to bind SH2 domains within proteins such
as the Src family of kinases, Shc, Abl, Nck, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (6, 29). Five of the 13 tyrosines in the cytoplasmic domain of R1 have such a sequence (Fig. 1). The five Cterminal tyrosines in R1 are present within YXXL sequences.
Similar YXXL sequence elements have been previously shown
to be important for the binding of B-cell-specific Syk kinase
(16, 19, 29). The third and fourth and fourth and fifth YXXL
motifs resemble ITAMs in that they and the surrounding sequences are spaced in a fashion consistent with that of the
ITAM consensus sequence, (D/E)X7(D/E)X2YX2LX7–10YX2L/I
(Fig. 1).
VOL. 74, 2000
ACTIVATION OF LYMPHOCYTE SIGNALING BY R1 OF RRV
FIG. 2. Construction of CD8-R1 chimeras. The cytoplasmic domain (Cyt) of
R1 was fused to the extracellular (Ext) and transmembrane (T.M.) domains of
CD8. The CD8 chimera containing the full-length cytoplasmic domain of R1
(CD8⌬-R1C) and cytoplasmic domains with various deletions (CD8⌬-D1,
CD8⌬-D2, CD8⌬-D3, CD8⌬-D4, CD8⌬-D5) are depicted. YXXX, tyrosine residues and their surrounding sequences.
Construction of CD8⌬-R1 chimeras. The full-length R1 cytoplasmic domain (R1C) and deletion mutants derived from it
were fused to the extracellular and transmembrane domains of
CD8 in order to analyze the contributions of the various tyrosine-containing elements to B-cell signaling. Six CD8⌬-R1
chimera constructs were made (Fig. 2). The cytoplasmic deletion mutations were selected based on the types of SH2 binding motifs present in the R1 cytoplasmic domain. The last five
tyrosine residues in R1 are all present in YXXL motifs, and
some or all could potentially function as ITAMs. Hence, this
region was separated from the remaining portion which contains a more diverse set of tyrosine-containing motifs. CD8⌬R1C represents the full-length R1 cytoplasmic tail extending
from amino acids 253 to 423 fused to the CD8 extracellular
domain and transmembrane region. CD8⌬-D1 contains the
first 121 amino acids of the R1 cytoplasmic tail which includes
7 tyrosine residues, 2 of which are in YXXP sequences, 1 of
which is in a YXXA sequence, and another of which is in a
YXXT sequence. Such sequences have been previously shown
to function as SH2 binding motifs and protein tyrosine kinase
docking sites in T-cell receptors, BCRs, Epstein-Barr virus
(EBV) LMP2A, and KSHV K1 (2, 3, 5, 8, 16, 18, 20, 23, 32, 33).
The CD8⌬-D4 construct has a stretch of 106 amino acids
extending from the first tyrosine residue (amino acid 265) in
the R1 cytoplasmic tail to amino acid 373, which is the amino
acid preceding the start of the putative ITAMs in the R1
cytoplasmic domain. Hence, CD8⌬-D4 differs from CD8⌬-D1
in that it is missing amino acids 253 to 264, a region that is
immediately adjacent to the R1 transmembrane domain.
CD8⌬-D2 contains a short stretch of 13 amino acids in the R1
cytoplasmic tail and is devoid of any tyrosine residues.
CD8⌬-D3 contains the five YXXL motifs present at the Cterminal end of R1. CD8⌬-D5 contains the same stretch of
amino acids as CD8⌬-D2 in addition to the residues extending
from amino acid 345 to amino acid 423. All chimera proteins,
including CD8⌬-R1C, were tagged with the AU1 epitope at
the C-terminal end.
In order to construct stable cell lines expressing the six
CD8⌬-R1 chimera proteins, BJAB (EBV⫺ KSHV⫺) cells were
electroporated with plasmids encoding the individual chi-
2723
meras. pCDNA3 constructs containing CD8⌬, CD8⌬-R1C,
CD8⌬-D1, CD8⌬-D2, CD8⌬-D3, CD8⌬-D4 and CD8⌬-D5
coding sequences were electroporated into BJAB cells, and
neomycin-resistant cells were selected for 6 weeks. To further
enrich for CD8 chimera-expressing cell lines, an anti-CD8 antibody was used to sort these cell lines by flow cytometry to
obtain a population of cells, greater than 95% of which expressed the CD8⌬-R1 chimeric proteins. The CD8⌬-R1C cell
line was sequentially sorted four times in order to obtain a
⬎95% pure population of cells (data not shown).
The cytoplasmic tail of R1 can elicit a calcium response in
B cells. Many B- and T-lymphocyte receptors, when activated
by extracellular stimulation, are capable of transducing signals
that cause the release of calcium from intracellular stores.
Since R1 has several SH2 binding motifs, we tested the ability
of the CD8⌬-R1 chimeras to induce intracellular calcium mobilization in B cells. BJAB cells expressing the chimeric proteins were individually stimulated with either anti-IgM antibody or anti-CD8 antibody, and levels of free intracellular
calcium were monitored by flow cytometry (Fig. 3A). All seven
cell lines, CD8⌬, CD8⌬-R1C, CD8⌬-D1, CD8⌬-D2, CD8⌬D3, CD8⌬-D4, and CD8⌬-D5 cells, were capable of inducing
calcium when stimulated with an anti-IgM antibody, suggesting
that these cells were similarly capable of eliciting intracellular
calcium mobilization through the B-cell antigen receptor (Fig.
3A). In order to test whether the cytoplasmic domain of R1
and the various deletion mutants could elicit calcium mobilization, we stimulated the BJAB cell lines expressing CD8-R1
chimeras with an anti-CD8 antibody. The CD8⌬, CD8⌬-D1,
CD8⌬-D2, CD8⌬-D3, and CD8⌬-D4 cell lines exhibited little
or no calcium mobilization upon stimulation with an anti-CD8
antibody as monitored by flow cytometry (Fig. 3A). However,
BJAB cells expressing the CD8⌬-R1C chimera did mobilize
intracellular calcium, and there was a prolonged period of
calcium release from intracellular stores that lasted more than
5 min (Fig. 3A). This is in sharp contrast to the calcium response seen with the anti-IgM antibody, which peaked rapidly
and returned to the basal level within a short period of time
(Fig. 3A). The calcium response of a CD8⌬-K1cytoplasmic BJAB
cell line (20) was also tested using the anti-CD8 antibody (Fig.
3A), and the response was found to be similar in nature to that
induced by anti-IgM antibody. The prolonged release of calcium observed in the CD8⌬-R1C cell line in response to antiCD8 antibody suggests that the full-length cytoplasmic tail of
R1 can transduce signals to elicit calcium mobilization. None
of the other CD8⌬-R1 deletion mutants could mobilize calcium to a significant extent, including CD8⌬-D3 and CD8⌬D5, which contain the putative ITAM-like sequences. However, all of the tyrosine-containing chimeras did show a very
small increase in intracellular calcium levels, which were only
slightly above baseline (Fig. 3A). In order to determine the
levels of CD8⌬ and CD8⌬-R1 chimeric tagged proteins expressed in the B-cell lines, protein extracts from B cells were
separated by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting was performed
using an anti-AU1 antibody. The data in Fig. 3B indicate that
equivalent levels of CD8⌬ and CD8⌬-R1 chimera proteins
were expressed in the stable cell lines. In addition, the failure
of the deletion mutants to signal could not be explained by
differences in the levels of surface expression of these proteins
as measured by flow cytometry (data not shown).
R1 induces NFAT activity in B cells. The release of calcium
from intracellular stores induces further signaling events that
eventually result in the activation of transcription factors in the
nucleus. Recently Lagunoff et al. (18) demonstrated that the
cytoplasmic domain of the K1 protein, specifically the ITAM,
2724
DAMANIA ET AL.
J. VIROL.
FIG. 3. Mobilization of intracellular free calcium upon antibody stimulation.
(A) Intracellular calcium release from the chimera cell lines was monitored by
flow cytometry. Either an anti-IgM antibody (left) or an anti-CD8 antibody
(right) was used to stimulate cells. Data are presented as histograms of the
numbers of cells expressing blue fluorescence (y axis) versus time. The intensities
of the responses are depicted as different shades of gray, with the darkest shade
representing the highest levels of free calcium in the cell. (B) Western blot
analysis of CD8-R1 chimera cell extracts using an anti-AU1 antibody to detect
expression levels of the AU1-tagged chimera proteins.
is responsible for the activation of NFAT in BJAB (EBV⫺)
and Raji (EBV⫹) cells. NFAT is a transcription factor that is
present in both T and B lymphocytes (31). We tested the ability
of R1 to activate NFAT in BJAB cells using an NFAT-luciferase reporter construct (18). BJAB cells were electroporated
with the NFAT-luciferase reporter construct along with pFJ
vector alone, pFJ-R1, or pFJ-K1 (Fig. 4A), and cells were harvested 24 h posttransfection. A ␤-galactosidase expression plasmid was also included as a control for transfection efficiency.
Figure 4A graphs the result of these experiments. We observed
that R1 could activate NFAT eightfold with respect to the
vector control and that K1 could activate NFAT sevenfold.
We subsequently tested the ability of the CD8⌬-R1 chimeras
to induce NFAT activity in BJAB cells. We performed an
experiment similar to that described above except that this
time each CD8⌬-R1 chimera construct was electroporated into
the B cells in lieu of the pFJ-R1 plasmid. Figure 4B demonstrates that none of the CD8⌬-R1 chimeras were able to induce a significant level of NFAT activity in these cells, including the CD8⌬-R1C chimera. We conducted an additional
experiment in which each CD8⌬-R1 chimera plasmid was electroporated into BJAB cells and 24 h posttransfection these
cells were incubated with an anti-CD8 antibody for different
periods of time (for 12, 24, 36, and 48 h following addition of
anti-CD8 antibody). The results are graphed in Fig. 4C. We
observed that the CD8⌬-R1C chimera, upon stimulation with
anti-CD8 antibody, could strongly induce NFAT activity in B
VOL. 74, 2000
ACTIVATION OF LYMPHOCYTE SIGNALING BY R1 OF RRV
2725
FIG. 4. Activation of NFAT activity in BJAB cells by the R1 protein. (A) BJAB cells were transfected with an NFAT luciferase and ␤-galactosidase reporter plasmid
along with either a pFJ vector control plasmid, a pFJ-R1-expressing plasmid, or a pFJ-K1-expressing plasmid. At 48 h posttransfection cells were harvested and tested
for luciferase activity. Luciferase counts for each sample were normalized with respect to ␤-galactosidase activity. Luciferase assays were repeated three times, and the
average of these values was graphed as the fold activation of NFAT by the R1 and K1 proteins versus that of control vector alone. (B) Transfections similar to those
in panel A except that the CD8⌬-R1 chimera-expressing plasmids indicated in the graph were electroporated into BJAB cells. (C) BJAB cells were transfected with
NFAT luciferase and ␤-galactosidase reporter plasmids along with a CD8⌬-R1C-expressing plasmid. At 24 h posttransfection cells were harvested and incubated with
anti-CD8 antibody for 12, 24, 36, and 48 h. Ab, antibody.
cells. The effect of this activation peaked 24 h after the addition of the anti-CD8 antibody, inducing a 60-fold increase in
the level of NFAT activity compared to that induced by the
CD8⌬ chimera alone. Similar experiments conducted with the
other CD8⌬-R1 deletion mutants showed them incapable of
inducing NFAT activity even when incubated with the antiCD8 antibody (data not shown). These results demonstrate
that the CD8⌬-R1C chimera requires antibody stimulation to
induce NFAT activity.
The cytoplasmic tail of R1 induces cellular phosphorylation.
Calcium mobilization and NFAT activation are indicators of
lymphocyte activation. The ability of the cytoplasmic tail of R1
to induce calcium mobilization prompted us to determine
whether this event involved cellular tyrosine phosphorylation
as is the case with BCR activation.
We stimulated the CD8⌬-R1C-expressing cell line with an
anti-IgM or an anti-CD8 antibody and performed Western blot
analysis with cellular extract using an anti-pTyr antibody. As
shown in Fig. 5A, both the anti-IgM and anti-CD8 antibodies
were capable of inducing tyrosine phosphorylation in the B-cell
line compared to unstimulated cells. Cross-linking with the
anti-CD8 antibody induced the phosphorylation of an additional 48-kDa protein, whose molecular mass correlates with
that of the CD8⌬-R1C protein (Fig. 5A).
We next tested the abilities of the different R1 cytoplasmic
deletion mutants to induce cellular tyrosine phosphorylation
(Fig. 5B, top). In contrast to what was seen for cells expressing
CD8⌬-R1C, which showed a marked degree of cellular tyrosine phosphorylation upon stimulation with the anti-CD8
antibody, a very slight increase in tyrosine phosphorylation was
seen with the CD8⌬-D1 and CD8⌬-D4 deletion mutants (Fig.
5B, top). In order to control for the level of CD8⌬-R1 chimera
2726
DAMANIA ET AL.
J. VIROL.
FIG. 5. Induction of cellular tyrosine phosphorylation upon antibody stimulation. (A) Comparison of anti-IgM- and anti-CD8-stimulated CD8⌬-R1C cells.
Cross-linking of the CD8⌬-R1C cell line with an anti-IgM or anti-CD8 (OKT8) antibody (Ab) induced tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular proteins as determined by
Western analysis using an anti-pTyr antibody. Asterisk, 50-kDa phosphorylated protein seen in the CD8 antibody-stimulated, but not IgM antibody-stimulated, B cells.
(B) Mutational analysis of CD8⌬-R1 chimeras for the induction of tyrosine phosphorylation upon antibody stimulation. Cells were incubated in the absence (⫺) or
presence (⫹) of anti-CD8 antibody for 1 min at 37°C and immediately lysed. Cell extracts were subjected to gel electrophoresis, transferred to nitrocellulose, and reacted
with an anti-pTyr antibody (top). Cell extracts were probed with an anti-AU1 antibody (bottom) to show comparative levels of chimeric proteins in these cells. Asterisks,
heavy and light chains of the CD8 antibody used for stimulation. I.B., immunoblotting.
expression, we reacted extracts from stimulated and unstimulated cells with an anti-AU1 antibody and observed that similar
levels of chimeric proteins were expressed in these cells (Fig.
5B, bottom). These results indicate that an intact cytoplasmic
tail of the R1 protein is required not only for the calcium
mobilization described above but also for the induction of
tyrosine phosphorylation in cells, although the deletion mutants may exhibit partial function.
The wild-type CD8⌬-R1C cell line showed the presence of
an ⬃70 kDa protein whose phosphorylation was increased
upon antibody stimulation. The molecular mass of this protein
corresponds with that of Syk kinase. In order to determine
whether the hyperphosphorylated band represented phosphorylated Syk kinase, we performed immunoprecipitations using
an anti-Syk antibody with the same extracts from anti-CD8stimulated and unstimulated cells. The immunoprecipitated
complexes were subjected to Western blot analysis using antipTyr antibody. Extracts from stimulated CD8⌬-R1C cells
showed the presence of Syk kinase as a 70-kDa protein which
was phosphorylated to a greater extent than Syk in unstimulated CD8⌬-R1C cells (Fig. 6). In addition, the stimulated
CD8⌬-R1C cells showed a phosphorylated protein of ⬃50 kDa
coimmunoprecipitating with Syk kinase. This protein corresponds in size to the CD8⌬-R1C chimera protein itself,
suggesting that the phosphorylated full-length R1 cytoplasmic domain is complexed with phosphorylated Syk kinase
when activated. The CD8⌬-D3 and CD8⌬-D4 immunoprecipitation complexes (Fig. 6) revealed a slight increase in the
levels of phosphorylated Syk kinase compared to that of unstimulated cells.
Syk kinase can induce phosphorylation of R1. The above
results indicated that the cytoplasmic domain of R1 is phosphorylated and raised the possibility that R1 may potentially be
phosphorylated by a B-cell kinase. Since Syk is a major B-cell
kinase, we conducted additional experiments to determine
whether Syk kinase can induce phosphorylation of the R1
protein. Cos-1 cells were cotransfected with a Syk expression
plasmid in the presence or absence of a vector expressing a
C-terminal, AU1 epitope-tagged R1 protein (Fig. 7). Fortyeight hours after transfection, lysates from transfected cells
were reacted with anti-AU1 antibody and immune complexes
were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose,
and reacted with a pTyr antibody. Tyrosine phosphorylation of
a 70-kDa protein was detected only in cells transfected with
Syk and R1 expression plasmids (Fig. 7A). Since both Syk and
R1 have an apparent molecular mass of 70 kDa, it is possible
that both of these proteins were represented in the 70-kDa
phosphorylated band. We also performed coimmunoprecipitations using an anti-pTyr antibody and a Western analysis with
an anti-AU1 antibody to detect the presence of phosphorylated R1 protein. We observed that the R1 protein was tyrosine
FIG. 6. Tyrosine phosphorylation of Syk kinase and CD8 chimeras. Shown is
the induction of tyrosine phosphorylation by Syk kinase. The CD8-R1 chimera
cell lines were incubated with (⫹) or without (⫺) anti-CD8 antibody. Extracts
were subjected to immunoprecipitation (I.P.) with an anti-Syk antibody (Ab),
and immune complexes were resolved by gel electrophoresis and subjected to a
Western blot analysis using an anti-pTyr antibody.
VOL. 74, 2000
ACTIVATION OF LYMPHOCYTE SIGNALING BY R1 OF RRV
FIG. 7. Syk kinase induces the phosphorylation of full-length R1. (A) Cotransfection of R1 and Syk expression plasmids in Cos-1 cells. A full-length,
C-terminal AU1 epitope-tagged R1-expressing plasmid was transfected into
Cos-1 cells either alone or in the presence of Syk kinase. Cells were harvested
48 h posttransfection, and extracts were subjected to immunoprecipitation (I.P.)
with an anti-AU1 antibody followed by a Western blot analysis (I.B.) using an
anti-pTyr antibody. (B) The same extracts were coimmunoprecipitated with an
anti-pTyr antibody followed by Western blotting with an anti-AU1 antibody.
phosphorylated when Cos-1 cells were cotransfected with Syk
expression and R1 expression plasmids (Fig. 7B).
An in vitro kinase assay was performed using extracts from
cells cotransfected with an R1 expression plasmid in the absence or presence of Syk kinase- or Src kinase-expressing plasmids (Fig. 8A). Anti-AU1 immune complexes from these cells
were washed extensively and incubated with [␥-32P]ATP. The
in vitro kinase assay showed that a 70-kDa phosphorylated
protein was specifically immunoprecipitated with the AU1 antibody (Fig. 8A). In order to confirm that R1 was indeed
phosphorylated in Syk kinase-expressing cells, we cotransfected Cos-1 cells with a Syk kinase expression vector and
individual CD8⌬-R1 chimera expression plasmids. Figure 8B
shows that Syk kinase induced phosphorylation of the CD8⌬R1C protein as well as of the three other tyrosine-containing
mutants, CD8⌬-D1, CD8⌬-D3, and CD8⌬-D4. Syk kinase
2727
could not induce phosphorylation of the CD8⌬-D2 mutant,
which does not contain any tyrosine residues. These results
show that the cytoplasmic domain of the R1 protein contains
several phosphorylation sites whose phosphorylation is induced in cells expressing Syk kinase.
Syk kinase can interact with R1. To investigate whether the
interaction between Syk and R1 is sufficiently stable to be
detected by coimmunoprecipitation, Cos-1 cells were transfected with vectors expressing Src kinase or Syk kinase together with the AU1-tagged R1 gene, and immunoprecipitations were performed using an anti-Src or anti-Syk antibody.
Immune complexes were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred
to nitrocellulose, and reacted with the anti-AU1 epitope antibody. As shown in Fig. 9, R1 was specifically coimmunoprecipitated with Syk kinase but not with Src kinase. The lower
panel indicates that there was equal expression of Syk kinase
and Src kinase in these cells. Thus, these data indicate that Syk
kinase can interact with and induce phosphorylation of R1.
We compared the abilities of both Syk and Src kinases to
phosphorylate RRV R1 and KSHV K1 proteins. Cos-1 cells
were cotransfected with plasmids expressing R1 or K1 in the
presence or absence of Src kinase or Syk kinase expression
plasmids (Fig. 10). The top panel represents an immunoblot of
the corresponding cell extracts reacted with an anti-pTyr antibody and shows that Syk kinase can phosphorylate R1 to a
greater extent than K1, whereas the levels of R1 and K1 phosphorylation induced by Src kinase are similar. The bottom
panel represents the same reaction mixtures probed with an
AU1 antibody and demonstrates that equivalent levels of K1
and R1 were expressed in these cells.
DISCUSSION
The R1 open reading frame, the first open reading frame of
RRV, encodes a transmembrane protein predicted to contain
an extracellular amino-terminal domain and a cytoplasmic carboxy-terminal domain. The extracellular domain of R1 is similar in length and sequence to that of KSHV K1 and shows
homology to the Ig receptor superfamily. These properties
suggest that R1, like other receptor proteins, may be capable of
FIG. 8. Syk-induced phosphorylation of R1 and CD8⌬-R1 chimeras. (A)
Phosphorylation of R1 in vitro. An in vitro kinase assay was performed using
extracts from Cos-1 cells transfected with R1 alone or in combination with Syk
and Src kinase. Immune complexes were washed extensively and subsequently
incubated with [␥-32P]ATP. Complexes were then separated by gel electrophoresis and exposed to autoradiography. Arrow, presence of a 70 kDa phosphorylated
protein that corresponds to the molecular sizes of both Syk and R1. (B) Tyrosine
phosphorylation of CD8⌬-R1 chimeras induced by Syk kinase. Cos-1 cells were
cotransfected with a Syk expression plasmid along with the CD8⌬-R1 chimeraexpressing plasmids. The chimeras were tagged with an anti-AU1 antibody.
Immunoprecipitations (I.P.) were performed using an anti-AU1 antibody and an
anti-pTyr antibody was used for a Western blot analysis (I.B.). Dots, positions of
mutant proteins.
2728
DAMANIA ET AL.
FIG. 9. R1 can specifically interact with Syk kinase. Coimmunoprecipitations
(I.P.) were performed using an anti-Src or anti-Syk kinase antibody on cells
transfected with an AU1-tagged R1-expressing plasmid alone or together with
Src or Syk kinase-expressing plasmids. Immune complexes were subjected to gel
electrophoresis. The gel was transferred to nitrocellulose and subsequently
probed with an anti-AU1 antibody. Bottom, levels of Syk and Src kinase in
transfected cells. I.B., immunoblotting.
binding a stimulating ligand, which can result in the transduction of signals inside the cell.
Our results demonstrate that upon cross-linking with an
anti-CD8 antibody, B cells expressing a CD8⌬-R1C chimera
protein containing the full-length cytoplasmic domain of R1
become fully activated, as indicated by the release of free
calcium from intracellular stores. This event differs from that
induced by BCR cross-linking by an anti-IgM antibody in that
the release of free calcium is prolonged, lasting significantly
longer than the BCR-induced response. Importantly, none of
the R1 deletion mutants could elicit calcium mobilization to
a significant degree. Mutants CD8⌬-D1 and CD8⌬-D4, which
contain putative SH2 binding domains, as well as CD8⌬-D3,
which contains putative ITAM-like sequences, showed only a
marginal increase in calcium mobilization, suggesting that the
release of calcium from intracellular stores is dependent on the
full-length cytoplasmic tail. The fact that the CD8⌬-D3 mutant
could not significantly mobilize calcium was surprising since it
contains sequences that match well with the ITAM consensus.
One possibility that we considered was that the CD8⌬-D3
mutant requires a linker sequence between the CD8 extracellular and transmembrane domains and the carboxy-terminal
SH2 binding motifs in R1 in order to induce calcium mobilization. However, CD8⌬-D5, which contains such a linker sequence, was also incapable of eliciting a significant calcium
response. Thus these data are supportive of the need for the
full-length R1 cytoplasmic domain for calcium mobilization.
The differences in the lengths of the R1 versus K1 cytoplasmic
domains required to achieve calcium mobilization could possibly result from additional functions for R1 that remain to be
determined or could reflect the fact that the K1 protein is more
highly evolved. It seems likely that the amino acids that are
required for calcium mobilization reside in two or more distinct domains in the R1 cytoplasmic tail and that proper folding of the cytoplasmic tail is needed to bring together disparate
parts of the molecule.
In agreement with our calcium mobilization data, we have
also observed that the R1 protein is capable of inducing NFAT
J. VIROL.
activity eightfold in B lymphocytes. Both these events are indicative of B-cell activation. We determined that none of the
CD8⌬-R1 chimera proteins could activate NFAT activity to a
significant level in B cells by themselves, but upon addition of
anti-CD8 antibody we observed a dramatic increase in the
activation of NFAT by the CD8⌬-R1C chimera protein. This is
suggestive of a role for the extracellular and transmembrane
regions of the R1 protein for lymphocyte activation, in addition
to that for a full-length cytoplasmic tail. The extracellular domain of the R1 protein may be binding a ligand present at least
to some extent in the media or on the surfaces of B cells.
Another possibility is that the extracellular and transmembrane domains of R1 may undergo self-oligomerization leading to the phosphorylation of the R1 cytoplasmic domain followed by B-cell activation events.
In agreement with the calcium mobilization assays, we
observed that only the chimera with the full-length R1 cytoplasmic domain (CD8⌬-R1C) could induce a state of cellular
phosphorylation in B cells. Cross-linking of the CD8⌬-R1C
chimeric protein by an anti-CD8 antibody induced a pattern of
tyrosine phosphorylation similar to that seen with BCR.
We detected complex formation between R1 and the major
B-cell kinase, Syk. Although both Src and Syk kinase were
capable of phosphorylating R1, only Syk kinase specifically
interacted detectably with R1. The ability of Src kinase to
phosphorylate R1 may be indirect. Syk induced the phosphorylation of the CD8⌬-R1C chimera. Syk also induced the phosphorylation of the deletion mutants CD8⌬-D1, CD8⌬-D3,
and CD8⌬-D4, and these same mutants showed marginal responses in the calcium mobilization assay. Taken together,
these data suggest that these mutants may exhibit partial
function to a slight extent. In addition, stimulation of the
CD8⌬-R1C cell line with an anti-CD8 antibody resulted in
increased phosphorylation of Syk kinase indicative of the need
FIG. 10. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the R1 and K1 proteins. Comparison
of the phosphorylation of R1 and K1 proteins by Src and Syk kinase. Both R1and K1-expressing plasmids were transfected into Cos-1 cells in the absence or
presence of Src and Syk kinases. The immunoblot (I.B.) was reacted with a pTyr
antibody (Top). Arrows, R1 and K1 proteins. (Bottom) Western blot analysis of
cell extracts used for the immunoprecipitations in the upper panel. The extracts
were probed with an AU1 antibody to detect expression levels of R1 and K1
proteins expressed in transfected cells.
VOL. 74, 2000
ACTIVATION OF LYMPHOCYTE SIGNALING BY R1 OF RRV
for a full-length R1 cytoplasmic protein to elicit tyrosine phosphorylation in B cells.
The cytoplasmic tail of R1 is 170 amino acids in length and
contains 13 tyrosine residues, 5 of which are part of YXXL
motifs at the carboxyl-terminal end of the protein and match
consensus sequences for ITAMs. Five of the other eight tyrosine residues could also potentially function as SH2 binding
motifs since the associated sequences, YXXA, YXXP, YXXT,
and YXXV, match sequences previously shown to bind SH2
domains. YXXA can bind Src, Lyn, Fyn, Shc, phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase, and phospholipase C␥ (28, 29). YXXP has been
shown to interact with Abl, Crk, and Nck SH2 binding domains
(29). Thus the R1 protein has rich potential for interacting with
a number of different signal-transducing molecules. Nonetheless, our data have shown that one contiguous stretch containing seven tyrosines and a separate overlapping stretch containing seven different contiguous tyrosines are insufficient for a
significant mobilization of calcium, induction of tyrosine phosphorylation, and NFAT activity.
Both RRV R1 and KSHV K1 have been shown to transform
rodent fibroblasts, to substitute for STP in HVS-induced immortalization of T cells to interleukin-2-independent growth,
and to induce cellular phosphorylation and signal transduction
(20, 21). Although these proteins have sequence and structural
homology in their external domains, the length of the R1
cytoplasmic domain and the number of potential SH2 binding
motifs contained in this domain differ markedly from those of
K1, which has a short 38-amino-acid cytoplasmic tail and only
two SH2 binding motifs, which constitute a single ITAM (18,
20). One striking difference in the activities of these proteins is
the sustained calcium mobilization induced in B cells by R1
versus K1. This prolonged activation event may be a result of
the phosphorylation of multiple tyrosine residues in the R1
cytoplasmic tail as these residues are part of SH2 binding
motifs that could possibly interact with a variety of cellular
kinases.
Cellular receptors, upon ligand stimulation, are capable of
undergoing oligomerization and of inducing cellular proliferation. LMP1 protein of EBV mimics an activated CD40 receptor by undergoing multimerization of its transmembrane domains in a ligand-independent manner, which results in the
activation of the NF-␬B pathway leading to cellular proliferation (11, 12, 15, 24). It remains to be determined whether
signal induction via R1 and K1 results from stimulation by an
exogenous ligand or self-multimerization. If there is no selfmultimerization, a ligand appears to be present, at least to
some extent, on the surfaces of BJAB cells, in the culture
supernatant, or in the serum. Regardless of the mechanism,
both R1 and K1 appear to be able to activate B cells independent of the traditional BCR engagement.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Don Ganem and Mike Lagunoff for the NFAT-luciferase
plasmid.
This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service grants
RR00168, CA82057, and AI38131. B. Damania is a fellow of the
Cancer Research Institute.
REFERENCES
1. Alexander, L., L. Denenkamp, A. Knapp, M. Auerbach, S. Czajak, B. Damania, and R. C. Desrosiers. 1999. The primary sequence of rhesus rhadinovirus isolate 26-95: sequence similarities to Kaposi’s sarcoma herpesvirus
and rhesus rhadinovirus isolate 17577. J. Virol.
2. Beaufils, P., D. Choquet, R. Z. Mamoun, and B. Malissen. 1993. The
(YXXL/I)2 signaling motif found in the cytoplasmic segments of the bovine
leukaemia virus envelope protein and Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane
protein 2A can elicit early and late lymphocyte activation events. EMBO J.
12:5105–5112.
2729
3. Cambier, J. C. 1995. Antigen and Fc receptor signaling. The awesome power
of the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM). J. Immunol.
155:3281–3285.
4. Cambier, J. C., and W. A. Jensen. 1994. The hetero-oligomeric antigen receptor complex and its coupling to cytoplasmic effectors. Curr. Opin. Genet.
Dev. 4:55–63.
5. Cambier, J. C., C. M. Pleiman, and M. R. Clark. 1994. Signal transduction
by the B cell antigen receptor and its coreceptors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12:
457–486.
6. Cantley, L. C., and Z. Songyang. 1994. Specificity in recognition of phosphopeptides by src-homology 2 domains. J. Cell Sci. 18(Suppl.):121–126.
7. Cesarman, E., Y. Chang, P. S. Moore, J. W. Said, and D. M. Knowles. 1995.
Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus-like DNA sequences in AIDS-related body-cavity-based lymphomas. N. Engl. J. Med. 332:1186–1191.
8. Clark, M. R., S. A. Johnson, and J. C. Cambier. 1994. Analysis of Ig-alphatyrosine kinase interaction reveals two levels of binding specificity and tyrosine phosphorylated Ig-alpha stimulation of Fyn activity. EMBO J. 13:1911–
1919.
9. Damania, B., M. Li, J. K. Choi, L. Alexander, J. U. Jung, and R. C. Desrosiers. 1999. Identification of the R1 oncogene and its protein product from
the rhadinovirus of rhesus monkeys. J. Virol. 73:5123–5131.
10. Desrosiers, R. C., V. G. Sasseville, S. Czajak, X. Zhang, K. G. Mansfield, A.
Kaur, R. P. Johnson, A. A. Lackner, and J. U. Jung. 1997. A herpesvirus of
rhesus monkeys related to the human Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus. J. Virol. 71:9764–9769.
11. Devergne, O., E. Hatzivassiliou, K. M. Izumi, K. M. Kaye, M. F. Kleijnen, E.
Kieff, and G. Mosialos. 1996. Association of TRAF1, TRAF2, and TRAF3
with an Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 domain important for B-lymphocyte transformation: role in NF-␬B activation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:7098–7108.
12. Devergne, O., E. C. McFarland, G. Mosialos, K. M. Izumi, C. F. Ware, and
E. Kieff. 1998. Role of the TRAF binding site and NF-␬B activation in
Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1-induced cell gene expression.
J. Virol. 72:7900–7908.
13. Flaswinkel, H., and M. Reth. 1994. Dual role of the tyrosine activation motif
of the Ig-alpha protein during signal transduction via the B cell antigen
receptor. EMBO J. 13:83–89.
14. Gessain, A., A. Sudaka, J. Briere, N. Fouchard, M. A. Nicola, B. Rio, M.
Arborio, X. Troussard, J. Audouin, and J. Diebold. 1996. Kaposi sarcomaassociated herpes-like virus (human herpesvirus type 8) DNA sequences in
multicentric Castleman’s disease: is there any relevant association in nonhuman immunodeficiency virus-infected patients? Blood 87:414–416.
15. Izumi, K. M., and E. D. Kieff. 1997. The Epstein-Barr virus oncogene product latent membrane protein 1 engages the tumor necrosis factor receptorassociated death domain protein to mediate B lymphocyte growth transformation and activate NF-␬B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:12592–12597.
16. Johnson, S. A., C. M. Pleiman, L. Pao, J. Schneringer, K. Hippen, and J. C.
Cambier. 1995. Phosphorylated immunoreceptor signaling motifs (ITAMs)
exhibit unique abilities to bind and activate Lyn and Syk tyrosine kinases.
J. Immunol. 155:4596–4603.
17. Jung, J. U., J. J. Trimble, N. W. King, B. Biesinger, B. W. Fleckenstein, and
R. C. Desrosiers. 1991. Identification of transforming genes of subgroup A
and C strains of Herpesvirus saimiri. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:7051–
7055.
18. Lagunoff, M., R. Majeti, A. Weiss, and D. Ganem. 1999. Deregulated signal
transduction by the K1 gene product of Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:5704–5709.
19. Latour, S., M. Fournel, and A. Veillette. 1997. Regulation of T-cell antigen
receptor signaling by Syk tyrosine protein kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:4434–
4441.
20. Lee, H., J. Guo, M. Li, J. K. Choi, M. DeMaria, M. Rosenzweig, and J. U.
Jung. 1998. Identification of an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation
motif of K1 transforming protein of Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:5219–5228.
21. Lee, H., R. Veazey, K. Williams, M. Li, J. Guo, F. Neipel, B. Fleckenstein, A.
Lackner, R. C. Desrosiers, and J. U. Jung. 1998. Deregulation of cell growth
by the K1 gene of Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus. Nat. Med. 4:
435–440.
22. Mansfield, K., S. V. Westmoreland, C. D. DeBakker, S. Czajak, A. A. Lackner, and R. C. Desrosiers. 1999. Experimental infection of rhesus and pigtailed macaques with macaque rhadinoviruses. J. Virol. 73:10320–10328.
23. Marengere, L. E., Z. Songyang, G. D. Gish, M. D. Schaller, J. T. Parsons,
M. J. Stern, L. C. Cantley, and T. Pawson. 1994. SH2 domain specificity and
activity modified by a single residue. Nature 369:502–505.
24. Mosialos, G., M. Birkenbach, R. Yalamanchili, T. VanArsdale, C. Ware, and
E. Kieff. 1995. The Epstein-Barr virus transforming protein LMP1 engages
signaling proteins for the tumor necrosis factor receptor family. Cell 80:
389–399.
25. Neipel, F., J. C. Albrecht, and B. Fleckenstein. 1998. Human herpesvirus
8—the first human rhadinovirus. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 23:73–77.
26. Pastore, C., A. Gloghini, G. Volpe, J. Nomdedeu, E. Leonardo, U. Mazza, G.
Saglio, A. Carbone, and G. Gaidano. 1995. Distribution of Kaposi’s sarcoma
2730
DAMANIA ET AL.
herpesvirus sequences among lymphoid malignancies in Italy and Spain.
Br. J. Haematol. 91:918–920.
27. Searles, R. P., E. P. Bergquam, M. K. Axthelm, and S. W. Wong. 1999.
Sequence and genomic analysis of a rhesus macaque rhadinovirus with similarity to Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus/human herpesvirus 8.
J. Virol. 73:3040–3053.
28. Songyang, Z., S. E. Shoelson, M. Chaudhuri, G. Gish, T. Pawson, W. G.
Haser, F. King, T. Roberts, S. Ratnofsky, R. J. Lechleider, B. G. Neel, R. B.
Birge, J. E. Fajardo, M. M. Chou, H. Hanafusa, B. Schaffhausen, and L. C.
Cantley. 1993. SH2 domains recognize specific phosphopeptide sequences.
Cell 72:767–778.
29. Songyang, Z., S. E. Shoelson, J. McGlade, P. Olivier, T. Pawson, X. R.
Bustelo, M. Barbacid, H. Sabe, H. Hanafusa, T. Yi, R. Ren, D. Baltimore, S.
Ratnofsky, R. A. Feldman, and L. C. Cantley. 1994. Specific motifs recognized by the SH2 domains of Csk, 3BP2, fps/fes, GRB-2, HCP, SHC, Syk,
J. VIROL.
and Vav. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:2777–2785.
30. Soulier, J., L. Grollet, E. Oksenhendler, P. Cacoub, D. Cazals-Hatem, P.
Babinet, M. F. d’Agay, J. P. Clauvel, M. Raphael, and L. Degos. 1995.
Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus-like DNA sequences in multicentric Castleman’s disease. Blood 86:1276–1280.
31. Verweij, C. L., C. Guidos, and G. R. Crabtree. 1990. Cell type specificity and
activation requirements for NFAT-1 (nuclear factor of activated T-cells)
transcriptional activity determined by a new method using transgenic mice to
assay transcriptional activity of an individual nuclear factor. J. Biol. Chem.
265:15788–15795.
32. Wange, R. L., and L. E. Samelson. 1996. Complex complexes: signaling at the
TCR. Immunity 5:197–205.
33. Weiss, A., and D. R. Littman. 1994. Signal transduction by lymphocyte
antigen receptors. Cell 76:263–274.